Conlang Mailing List – October 2008, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• A verb that requires an adverb?
• can a language be inflecting polysynthetic? (4 messages)
• Gender of rivers - and other waters. (18 messages)
• genitive - posessive - relative ...
• Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil) (4 messages)
• Hooked o's and stuff. (9 messages)
• Idiom Neutral
• iermânêh: short sample text (3 messages)
• Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation (3 messages)
• My new two-layout, two-scripts keyboard
• Newest natlang? (7 messages)
• Old European-contact conlang (6 messages)
• phonology, grammar and lexicon (9 messages)
• Posts per day (was Re: quadrivalent verb)
• Subtitling (5 messages)
• TECH: Fonts on the Web?
• TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (12 messages)
• W. Hellenistic ATL (was: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] ...)) (6 messages)
• What case is the inverse of the dative? (10 messages)
• [relay] Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil)

1. A verb that requires an adverb?
   • Re: A verb that requires an adverb? (37 lines)
     From: Lars Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>

2. can a language be inflecting polysynthetic?
   • can a language be inflecting polysynthetic? (22 lines)
     From: Jack Hall <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: can a language be inflecting polysynthetic? (62 lines)
     From: Christopher Bates <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: can a language be inflecting polysynthetic? (120 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: can a language be inflecting polysynthetic? (42 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

3. Gender of rivers - and other waters.
   • Gender of rivers - and other waters. (59 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (67 lines)
     From: James W. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (75 lines)
     From: James W. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (44 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (45 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (54 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (53 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (48 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (55 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (67 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (48 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (74 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (46 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (52 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (57 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (49 lines)
     From: Gregory Gadow <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (53 lines)
     From: Ina van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (45 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

4. genitive - posessive - relative ...
   • genitive - posessive - relative ... (56 lines)
     From: David Fernandez-Nieto <[log in to unmask]>

5. Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil)
   • Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil) (57 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil) (96 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil) (97 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil) (41 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

6. Hooked o's and stuff.
   • Hooked o's and stuff. (42 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Hooked o's and stuff. (48 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Hooked o's and stuff. (57 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Hooked o's and stuff. (52 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Hooked o's and stuff. (52 lines)
     From: Ina van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Hooked o's and stuff. (41 lines)
     From: deinx nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Hooked o's and stuff. (59 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Hooked o's and stuff. (58 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Hooked o's and stuff. (64 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>

7. Idiom Neutral
   • Idiom Neutral (49 lines)
     From: Doro Winkelhofer <[log in to unmask]>

8. iermânêh: short sample text
   • iermânêh: short sample text (38 lines)
     From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: iermânêh: short sample text (52 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: iermânêh: short sample text (73 lines)
     From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>

9. Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation
   • Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation (235 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation (70 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation (133 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

10. My new two-layout, two-scripts keyboard
    • My new two-layout, two-scripts keyboard (48 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

11. Newest natlang?
    • Re: Newest natlang? (52 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newest natlang? (43 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newest natlang? (53 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newest natlang? (64 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newest natlang? (39 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newest natlang? (51 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Newest natlang? (57 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

12. Old European-contact conlang
    • Old European-contact conlang (55 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Old European-contact conlang (74 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Old European-contact conlang (83 lines)
      From: Carl Banks <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Old European-contact conlang (95 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Old European-contact conlang (63 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Old European-contact conlang (85 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

13. phonology, grammar and lexicon
    • phonology, grammar and lexicon (23 lines)
      From: Jack Hall <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, grammar and lexicon (60 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, grammar and lexicon (43 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, grammar and lexicon (89 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, grammar and lexicon (73 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, grammar and lexicon (41 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, grammar and lexicon (56 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, grammar and lexicon (53 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, grammar and lexicon (58 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>

14. Posts per day (was Re: quadrivalent verb)
    • Posts per day (was Re: quadrivalent verb) (30 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

15. Subtitling
    • Re: Subtitling (48 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subtitling (67 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subtitling (41 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subtitling (53 lines)
      From: deinx nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subtitling (42 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>

16. TECH: Fonts on the Web?
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (75 lines)
      From: Przemys³aw Ziobrowski <[log in to unmask]>

17. TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation)
    • TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (74 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (46 lines)
      From: deinx nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (58 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (56 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (41 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (34 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (51 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (52 lines)
      From: deinx nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (55 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (58 lines)
      From: deinx nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (48 lines)
      From: deinx nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>

18. W. Hellenistic ATL (was: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] ...))
    • W. Hellenistic ATL (was: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] ...)) (31 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: W. Hellenistic ATL (was: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] ...)) (23 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: W. Hellenistic ATL (was: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] ...)) (53 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: W. Hellenistic ATL (was: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] ...)) (55 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: W. Hellenistic ATL (was: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] ...)) (41 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: W. Hellenistic ATL (was: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] ...)) (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

19. What case is the inverse of the dative?
    • What case is the inverse of the dative? (44 lines)
      From: Gregory Gadow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (40 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (56 lines)
      From: Christopher Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (64 lines)
      From: Gregory Gadow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (62 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (55 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (79 lines)
      From: Kenneth Asad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (53 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (51 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

20. [relay] Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil)
    • Re: [relay] Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil) (59 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>