Conlang Mailing List – October 2008, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• A verb that requires an adverb?
• can a language be inflecting polysynthetic? (4 messages)
• Gender of rivers - and other waters. (18 messages)
• genitive - posessive - relative ...
• Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil) (4 messages)
• Hooked o's and stuff. (9 messages)
• Idiom Neutral
• iermânêh: short sample text (3 messages)
• Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation (3 messages)
• My new two-layout, two-scripts keyboard
• Newest natlang? (7 messages)
• Old European-contact conlang (6 messages)
• phonology, grammar and lexicon (9 messages)
• Posts per day (was Re: quadrivalent verb)
• Subtitling (5 messages)
• TECH: Fonts on the Web?
• TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (12 messages)
• W. Hellenistic ATL (was: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] ...)) (6 messages)
• What case is the inverse of the dative? (10 messages)
• [relay] Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil)

1. A verb that requires an adverb?
   • Re: A verb that requires an adverb? (37 lines)
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:39:47 +0200

2. can a language be inflecting polysynthetic?
   • can a language be inflecting polysynthetic? (22 lines)
     Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:27:21 -0400
   • Re: can a language be inflecting polysynthetic? (62 lines)
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 17:04:39 +0100
   • Re: can a language be inflecting polysynthetic? (120 lines)
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 13:26:10 -0700
   • Re: can a language be inflecting polysynthetic? (42 lines)
     Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 17:42:55 -0400

3. Gender of rivers - and other waters.
   • Gender of rivers - and other waters. (59 lines)
     Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 16:48:14 +0200
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (67 lines)
     Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:05:53 -0500
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (75 lines)
     Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:10:14 -0500
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (44 lines)
     Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 08:31:48 -0700
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (45 lines)
     Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:48:23 +0200
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (54 lines)
     Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:31:31 -0000
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (53 lines)
     Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 19:55:36 +0200
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (48 lines)
     Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 22:06:55 +0200
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (55 lines)
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 13:18:01 +0100
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (67 lines)
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 16:04:52 +0200
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (48 lines)
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 14:35:08 -0000
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (74 lines)
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 15:52:42 +0100
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (46 lines)
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 15:42:11 -0000
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (52 lines)
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 19:12:00 +0100
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (57 lines)
     Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 00:12:42 +0200
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (49 lines)
     Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 22:12:49 -0700
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (53 lines)
     Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 12:07:56 +0200
   • Re: Gender of rivers - and other waters. (45 lines)
     Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 12:58:57 +0200

4. genitive - posessive - relative ...
   • genitive - posessive - relative ... (56 lines)
     Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:51:59 +0000

5. Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil)
   • Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil) (57 lines)
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 21:36:07 +0200
   • Re: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil) (96 lines)
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 22:05:54 +0200
   • Re: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil) (97 lines)
     Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 08:08:11 +0200
   • Re: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil) (41 lines)
     Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 20:46:12 +0200

6. Hooked o's and stuff.
   • Hooked o's and stuff. (42 lines)
     Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 12:13:27 +0200
   • Re: Hooked o's and stuff. (48 lines)
     Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 07:43:51 -0400
   • Re: Hooked o's and stuff. (57 lines)
     Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 14:33:54 +0200
   • Re: Hooked o's and stuff. (52 lines)
     Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 08:52:01 -0400
   • Re: Hooked o's and stuff. (52 lines)
     Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 15:01:39 +0200
   • Re: Hooked o's and stuff. (41 lines)
     Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 09:09:18 -0400
   • Re: Hooked o's and stuff. (59 lines)
     Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 15:27:57 +0200
   • Re: Hooked o's and stuff. (58 lines)
     Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 17:33:04 -0400
   • Re: Hooked o's and stuff. (64 lines)
     Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 01:45:45 +0200

7. Idiom Neutral
   • Idiom Neutral (49 lines)
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:37:03 +0200

8. iermânêh: short sample text
   • iermânêh: short sample text (38 lines)
     Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:13:25 +0100
   • Re: iermânêh: short sample text (52 lines)
     Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:53:27 -0600
   • Re: iermânêh: short sample text (73 lines)
     Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 08:02:23 +0000

9. Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation
   • Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation (235 lines)
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:00:48 +0200
   • Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation (70 lines)
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:03:17 -0400
   • Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation (133 lines)
     Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 22:43:53 -0400

10. My new two-layout, two-scripts keyboard
    • My new two-layout, two-scripts keyboard (48 lines)
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 16:05:50 +0200

11. Newest natlang?
    • Re: Newest natlang? (52 lines)
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:57:37 +0200
    • Re: Newest natlang? (43 lines)
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:00:52 -0000
    • Re: Newest natlang? (53 lines)
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:34:33 +0100
    • Re: Newest natlang? (64 lines)
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:03:18 -0000
    • Re: Newest natlang? (39 lines)
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 21:12:40 +0200
    • Re: Newest natlang? (51 lines)
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:36:50 -0400
    • Re: Newest natlang? (57 lines)
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:11:11 -0000

12. Old European-contact conlang
    • Old European-contact conlang (55 lines)
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:47:57 +0200
    • Re: Old European-contact conlang (74 lines)
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:12:24 +0200
    • Re: Old European-contact conlang (83 lines)
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:54:30 -0700
    • Re: Old European-contact conlang (95 lines)
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:58:36 +0200
    • Re: Old European-contact conlang (63 lines)
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:11:59 -0400
    • Re: Old European-contact conlang (85 lines)
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:32:10 +0200

13. phonology, grammar and lexicon
    • phonology, grammar and lexicon (23 lines)
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 14:45:18 -0400
    • Re: phonology, grammar and lexicon (60 lines)
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:12:48 -0700
    • Re: phonology, grammar and lexicon (43 lines)
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:54:16 -0700
    • Re: phonology, grammar and lexicon (89 lines)
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:39:31 -0400
    • Re: phonology, grammar and lexicon (73 lines)
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 00:00:00 -0400
    • Re: phonology, grammar and lexicon (41 lines)
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:41:27 -0700
    • Re: phonology, grammar and lexicon (56 lines)
      Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 17:31:15 -0400
    • Re: phonology, grammar and lexicon (53 lines)
      Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 22:11:54 +0200
    • Re: phonology, grammar and lexicon (58 lines)
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 00:20:43 +0100

14. Posts per day (was Re: quadrivalent verb)
    • Posts per day (was Re: quadrivalent verb) (30 lines)
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:17:01 -0400

15. Subtitling
    • Re: Subtitling (48 lines)
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:19:37 +0200
    • Re: Subtitling (67 lines)
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:51:54 -0400
    • Re: Subtitling (41 lines)
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:28:53 +0200
    • Re: Subtitling (53 lines)
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:04:11 -0400
    • Re: Subtitling (42 lines)
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:30:03 -0400

16. TECH: Fonts on the Web?
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (75 lines)
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:19:46 +0200

17. TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation)
    • TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (74 lines)
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:05:11 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (37 lines)
      Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 23:19:52 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (46 lines)
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 00:15:19 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (58 lines)
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 00:09:08 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (56 lines)
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:53:30 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (41 lines)
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:54:52 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (34 lines)
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:39:03 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (51 lines)
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 09:49:21 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (52 lines)
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:36:11 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (55 lines)
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:09:15 -0500
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (58 lines)
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 08:38:45 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Fonts on the Web? (was Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation) (48 lines)
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 08:41:58 -0400

18. W. Hellenistic ATL (was: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] ...))
    • W. Hellenistic ATL (was: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] ...)) (31 lines)
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:06:14 -0400
    • Re: W. Hellenistic ATL (was: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] ...)) (23 lines)
      Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:10:40 -0400
    • Re: W. Hellenistic ATL (was: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] ...)) (53 lines)
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:46:38 +0200
    • Re: W. Hellenistic ATL (was: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] ...)) (55 lines)
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:47:58 +0200
    • Re: W. Hellenistic ATL (was: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] ...)) (41 lines)
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:01:48 +0200
    • Re: W. Hellenistic ATL (was: Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: [relay] ...)) (44 lines)
      Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:32:07 -0400

19. What case is the inverse of the dative?
    • What case is the inverse of the dative? (44 lines)
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 10:21:02 -0700
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (40 lines)
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 20:33:58 +0200
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (56 lines)
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 19:58:40 +0100
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (44 lines)
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 20:01:00 -0400
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (64 lines)
      Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 21:58:11 -0700
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (62 lines)
      Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 11:58:16 +0200
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (55 lines)
      Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 11:49:09 -0000
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (79 lines)
      Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 10:12:28 -0400
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (53 lines)
      Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 18:59:04 +0200
    • Re: What case is the inverse of the dative? (51 lines)
      Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 12:15:21 -0500

20. [relay] Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil)
    • Re: [relay] Hellenic languages in the WHAT (was Re: Another relay soon, with start-text in Ithkuil) (59 lines)
      Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 09:51:57 +0100