Conlang Mailing List – October 2008, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• (YA?)English Orthography Question (8 messages)
• Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (21 messages)
• Conlang Subtitles? (6 messages)
• Different Words with Large Common Substrings (3 messages)
• Flesh Eating Names (14 messages)
• Idiom Neutral
• Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation (2 messages)
• Neanderthal and PIE (33 messages)
• Old European-contact conlang (5 messages)
• Prepositions as argument keywords (WAS: Re: Collaborative conlang)
• quadrivalent verb
• Some questions on phonology (7 messages)
• Terkunan texts + IPA (after sound shift)
• Terkunan: revision: /a i u/ in unstressed syllables (2 messages)
• Tirelat page updated
• USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (17 messages)
• Vacation
• Will begin to create a conlang, anyone interested to join? (4 messages)

1. (YA?)English Orthography Question
   • (YA?)English Orthography Question (43 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:53:49 -0400
   • Re: (YA?)English Orthography Question (64 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:39:40 +0200
   • Re: (YA?)English Orthography Question (40 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:36:31 -0400
   • Re: (YA?)English Orthography Question (35 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:42:24 -0400
   • Re: (YA?)English Orthography Question (36 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:45:30 -0000
   • Re: (YA?)English Orthography Question (48 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:56:49 -0000
   • Re: (YA?)English Orthography Question (42 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:52:19 -0700
   • Re: (YA?)English Orthography Question (53 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:17:48 -0400

2. Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm?
   • Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (42 lines)
     Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 00:07:39 -0700
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (127 lines)
     Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 01:04:31 -0700
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (58 lines)
     Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:56:51 -0400
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (71 lines)
     Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:27:12 -0400
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (91 lines)
     Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 10:38:01 -0700
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (96 lines)
     Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:02:53 -0700
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (48 lines)
     Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 21:17:55 +0200
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (33 lines)
     Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:14:04 -0500
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (108 lines)
     Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:20:56 -0700
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (33 lines)
     Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:40:34 -0700
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (53 lines)
     Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 02:47:45 -0400
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (55 lines)
     Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:53:19 -0700
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (30 lines)
     Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:27:13 -0400
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (58 lines)
     Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:40:14 -0400
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (44 lines)
     Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:44:56 -0400
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (34 lines)
     Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:22:50 -0400
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (43 lines)
     Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:14:36 -0400
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (63 lines)
     Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:52:57 -0700
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (35 lines)
     Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:54:00 -0400
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (36 lines)
     Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:54:35 -0700
   • Re: Collaborative conlang - Third time's the charm? (39 lines)
     Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:22:36 -0400

3. Conlang Subtitles?
   • Conlang Subtitles? (34 lines)
     Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 02:59:55 +0200
   • Re: Conlang Subtitles? (57 lines)
     Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 19:23:50 -0700
   • Re: Conlang Subtitles? (39 lines)
     Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 19:46:47 -0700
   • Re: Conlang Subtitles? (50 lines)
     Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 04:53:27 +0200
   • Re: Conlang Subtitles? (41 lines)
     Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 23:41:47 -0400
   • Re: Conlang Subtitles? (44 lines)
     Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:36:00 -0400

4. Different Words with Large Common Substrings
   • Different Words with Large Common Substrings (100 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:40:49 -0400
   • Re: Different Words with Large Common Substrings (64 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:51:11 -0400
   • Re: Different Words with Large Common Substrings (80 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:07:39 -0700

5. Flesh Eating Names
   • Flesh Eating Names (51 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:53:47 -0700
   • Re: Flesh Eating Names (127 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:11:40 -0400
   • Re: Flesh Eating Names (57 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:23:40 -0400
   • Re: Flesh Eating Names (48 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:19:50 -0000
   • Re: Flesh Eating Names (38 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:37:40 -0400
   • Re: Flesh Eating Names (30 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:42:35 -0400
   • Re: Flesh Eating Names (38 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:01:30 -0400
   • Re: Flesh Eating Names (51 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:32:01 +0100
   • Re: Flesh Eating Names (55 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:04:12 -0400
   • Re: Flesh Eating Names (55 lines)
     Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:02:34 +0100
   • Re: Flesh Eating Names (73 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:35:26 -0600
   • Re: Flesh Eating Names (34 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:51:41 -0400
   • Re: Flesh Eating Names (37 lines)
     Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:56:27 -0400
   • Re: Flesh Eating Names (37 lines)
     Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:48:52 +0100

6. Idiom Neutral
   • Idiom Neutral (48 lines)
     Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:39:13 -0600

7. Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation
   • Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation (53 lines)
     Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:11:07 -0400
   • Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation (41 lines)
     Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:28:18 -0400

8. Neanderthal and PIE
   • Neanderthal and PIE (35 lines)
     Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:18:53 +0100
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (53 lines)
     Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:45:35 -0400
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (57 lines)
     Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:14:09 +0200
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (44 lines)
     Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:53:41 -0700
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (51 lines)
     Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:22:45 -0400
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (49 lines)
     Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 12:02:32 -0700
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (67 lines)
     Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:20:14 +0200
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (37 lines)
     Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:17:41 -0400
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (57 lines)
     Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:49:37 -0400
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (50 lines)
     Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:03:22 +0100
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (47 lines)
     Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:54:49 -0400
   • Neanderthal and PIE (79 lines)
     Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:05:33 +0100
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (44 lines)
     Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:19:08 +0100
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (82 lines)
     Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:50:00 +0100
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (52 lines)
     Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:06:25 -0500
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (46 lines)
     Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:59:57 -0400
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (50 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:49:38 +0200
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (44 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:21:32 -0400
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (42 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:49:46 -0400
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (63 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:12:47 +0200
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (43 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:38:20 -0700
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (47 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:45:39 -0700
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (115 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:29:15 +0200
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (56 lines)
     Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:29:44 -0400
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (71 lines)
     Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:06:36 -0500
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (35 lines)
     Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:47:03 -0400
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (55 lines)
     Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:50:17 -0400
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (44 lines)
     Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:07:14 +0200
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (105 lines)
     Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:54:33 +0200
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (35 lines)
     Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:59:05 -0700
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (37 lines)
     Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:15:55 -0400
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (43 lines)
     Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:28:12 -0700
   • Re: Neanderthal and PIE (49 lines)
     Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:32:16 -0400

9. Old European-contact conlang
   • Re: Old European-contact conlang (53 lines)
     Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 08:39:28 +0200
   • Re: Old European-contact conlang (106 lines)
     Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 21:44:22 +0200
   • Re: Old European-contact conlang (43 lines)
     Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:38:22 +0200
   • Re: Old European-contact conlang (81 lines)
     Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:13:29 +0200
   • Re: Old European-contact conlang (36 lines)
     Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:37:33 -0400

10. Prepositions as argument keywords (WAS: Re: Collaborative conlang)
    • Prepositions as argument keywords (WAS: Re: Collaborative conlang) (85 lines)
      Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:43:20 -0700

11. quadrivalent verb
    • Re: quadrivalent verb (34 lines)
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:23:34 -0400

12. Some questions on phonology
    • Some questions on phonology (90 lines)
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:49:43 +0100
    • Re: Some questions on phonology (116 lines)
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:08:07 +0100
    • Re: Some questions on phonology (143 lines)
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:29:52 -0400
    • Re: Some questions on phonology (98 lines)
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:50:50 -0400
    • Re: Some questions on phonology (47 lines)
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:28:11 +0200
    • Re: Some questions on phonology (45 lines)
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:50:31 -0400
    • Re: Some questions on phonology (60 lines)
      Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:21:12 +0200

13. Terkunan texts + IPA (after sound shift)
    • Terkunan texts + IPA (after sound shift) (33 lines)
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:20:44 +0200

14. Terkunan: revision: /a i u/ in unstressed syllables
    • Terkunan: revision: /a i u/ in unstressed syllables (321 lines)
      Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:41:59 +0200
    • Re: Terkunan: revision: /a i u/ in unstressed syllables (82 lines)
      Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:04:50 +0200

15. Tirelat page updated
    • Tirelat page updated (29 lines)
      Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:22:32 -0400

16. USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted"
    • USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (24 lines)
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:51:28 -0400
    • Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (51 lines)
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:00:08 -0700
    • Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (55 lines)
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:24:34 +0200
    • Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (40 lines)
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:29:22 -0400
    • Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (56 lines)
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:37:48 -0000
    • Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (40 lines)
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:17:39 -0700
    • Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (65 lines)
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:27:26 +0100
    • Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (33 lines)
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:40:32 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (69 lines)
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:44:25 +0100
    • Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (59 lines)
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:18:57 +0100
    • Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (61 lines)
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:29:46 -0400
    • Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (65 lines)
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:38:17 +0100
    • Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (46 lines)
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:50:42 -0400
    • Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (35 lines)
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:54:22 -0400
    • Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (39 lines)
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:31:30 -0600
    • Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (57 lines)
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:40:14 +0100
    • Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "Molten" vs. "Melted" (34 lines)
      Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:37:39 -0400

17. Vacation
    • Vacation (34 lines)
      Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:21:00 +0200

18. Will begin to create a conlang, anyone interested to join?
    • Will begin to create a conlang, anyone interested to join? (26 lines)
      Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:07:07 -0400
    • Re: Will begin to create a conlang, anyone interested to join? (40 lines)
      Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:54:32 -0400
    • Re: Will begin to create a conlang, anyone interested to join? (47 lines)
      Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:17:41 -0400
    • Re: Will begin to create a conlang, anyone interested to join? (45 lines)
      Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:20:32 -0400