Conlang
Mailing List November 2008, week 2
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents
| Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
"Theory informs practice" - OK?
"Theory informs practice" - OK?
(86 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Theory informs practice" - OK?
(44 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Theory informs practice" - OK?
(129 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Theory informs practice" - OK?
(98 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Theory informs practice" - OK?
(116 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Theory informs practice" - OK?
(106 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Theory informs practice" - OK?
(152 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Theory informs practice" - OK?
(97 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Theory informs practice" - OK?
(46 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Theory informs practice" - OK?
(34 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Theory informs practice" - OK?
(61 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Theory informs practice" - OK?
(69 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Theory informs practice" - OK?
(33 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Theory informs practice" - OK?
(42 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Theory informs practice" - OK?
(49 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Theory informs practice" - OK?
(65 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
case
case
(30 lines)
From:
Campbell Nilsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: case
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: case
(68 lines)
From:
Campbell Nilsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: case
(45 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: case
(43 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: case
(26 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: case
(39 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: case
(61 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: case
(70 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: case
(89 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: case
(118 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: case
(146 lines)
From:
Campbell Nilsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: case
(162 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: case
(73 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: case
(57 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Cool Mac Unicode
CHAT: Cool Mac Unicode
(33 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Cool Mac Unicode
(36 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Cool Mac Unicode
(41 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Introduction
CHAT: Introduction
(61 lines)
From:
David Vercauteren <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Introduction
(35 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Danish VOT
Danish VOT
(65 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Danish VOT
(76 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Danish VOT
(72 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Danish VOT
(80 lines)
From:
Lars Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Danish VOT
(63 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Danish VOT
(77 lines)
From:
Lars Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Danish VOT
(82 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Danish VOT
(61 lines)
From:
Lars Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(42 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(56 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(62 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(93 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(111 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(54 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(67 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(39 lines)
From:
Sam Pointon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(65 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(58 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(63 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(73 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(41 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(47 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(55 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(59 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(27 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(32 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(80 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(82 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(125 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(38 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Describing the Welsh LL to non-linguists
(40 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
how can I tell a postposition from a case marker???
how can I tell a postposition from a case marker???
(42 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Languages without verbs
Languages without verbs
(50 lines)
From:
Fredrik Ekman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(26 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(51 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(51 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(83 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(64 lines)
From:
Fredrik Ekman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(50 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(53 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(69 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(41 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(49 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(49 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(52 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(40 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(36 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(97 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(45 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(43 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without verbs
(66 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Obama
Obama
(34 lines)
From:
Arne Duering <
[log in to unmask]
>
Old Silthan
Old Silthan
(65 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Identify unknown music
OT: Identify unknown music
(29 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Identify unknown music
(51 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Identify unknown music
(37 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Identify unknown music
(31 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Identify unknown music
(35 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Identify unknown music
(42 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Romance & Latin prepositions (was: Set of basic adpositions)
Romance & Latin prepositions (was: Set of basic adpositions)
(105 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Set of basic adpositions
Set of basic adpositions
(44 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Set of basic adpositions
(70 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Set of basic adpositions
(68 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Set of basic adpositions
(49 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Set of basic adpositions
(85 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Set of basic adpositions
(111 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Set of basic adpositions
(69 lines)
From:
Carl Banks <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Set of basic adpositions
(61 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Set of basic adpositions
(64 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Set of basic adpositions
(116 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Set of basic adpositions
(53 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Set of basic adpositions
(65 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Set of basic adpositions
(59 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Set of basic adpositions
(69 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Set of basic adpositions
(82 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Set of basic adpositions
(108 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Set of basic adpositions
(56 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH (was Cool Mac Unicode)
Re: TECH (was Cool Mac Unicode)
(54 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Re: CHAT: Cool Mac Unicode
TECH: Re: CHAT: Cool Mac Unicode
(65 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Re: CHAT: Cool Mac Unicode
(34 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Implied prepositions in English
USAGE: Implied prepositions in English
(58 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Implied prepositions in English
(48 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Implied prepositions in English
(45 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Implied prepositions in English
(46 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
VCV syllables? (was: Different Words with Large Common Substrings)
Re: VCV syllables? (was: Different Words with Large Common Substrings)
(41 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: VCV syllables? (was: Different Words with Large Common Substrings)
(33 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: VCV syllables? (was: Different Words with Large Common Substrings)
(59 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: VCV syllables? (was: Different Words with Large Common Substrings)
(44 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vowel length near-minimal pairs in Tirelat
Re: Vowel length near-minimal pairs in Tirelat
(50 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel length near-minimal pairs in Tirelat
(60 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU