Conlang
Mailing List December 2008, week 2
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
¡u?op ?p?sdn ?? ? ?? u?? oo ? no?
A Font for Pictographs
(23 messages)
Azurian update.
CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D.
(10 messages)
CONLANG Digest - 11 Dec 2008 to 12 Dec 2008 (#2008-342)---wash/warsh etc.
(2 messages)
CONLANG Digest - 12 Dec 2008 to 13 Dec 2008 (#2008-343)- Wash and Survey
Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD)
(7 messages)
Cyrillic vs. Latin representation
F: Poll
Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(8 messages)
i'm reforming one of my conlangs
(13 messages)
Mac (Re: A Font for Pictographs)
(3 messages)
Mac keyboard layouts (was Re: A Font for Pictographs)
OT typewriter woes
OT typewriter woes (was: ¡u ?op ?p?s dn ?? ? ?? u?? oo? no?)
(3 messages)
OT typewriter woes (was: ¡u ?op ?p?sdn ?? ? ?? u?? oo? no?)
(2 messages)
PA dialect (was: Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs)
(15 messages)
PIKTO (was: A Font for Pictographs)
(4 messages)
Poll
(16 messages)
poll
Poll
(13 messages)
syllable-word nonalignment
(5 messages)
TECH: Font Embedding
(3 messages)
THEORY: Aspect terminology (long)
(5 messages)
THEORY: Stative verbs and punctuality
(2 messages)
Typewriter woes
(4 messages)
WHATL calendar for next year (2013)
(2 messages)
Word orders in comparative constructions
(16 messages)
¡u?op ?p?sdn ?? ? ?? u?? oo ? no?
Re: ¡u?op ?p?sdn ?? ? ?? u?? oo ? no?
(68 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Font for Pictographs
A Font for Pictographs
(34 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(52 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(41 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(59 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(70 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(68 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(29 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(29 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(39 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(54 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(156 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(59 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(88 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(58 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(131 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(39 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(200 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(77 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(63 lines)
From:
Rebecca Bettencourt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(55 lines)
From:
Rebecca Bettencourt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(47 lines)
From:
Rebecca Bettencourt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(29 lines)
From:
Ina van der Vegt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Font for Pictographs
(37 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Azurian update.
Azurian update.
(47 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D.
CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D.
(64 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D.
(41 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D.
(44 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D.
(73 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D.
(30 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D.
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D.
(38 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D.
(50 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D.
(51 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D.
(46 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 11 Dec 2008 to 12 Dec 2008 (#2008-342)---wash/warsh etc.
Re: CONLANG Digest - 11 Dec 2008 to 12 Dec 2008 (#2008-342)---wash/warsh etc.
(51 lines)
From:
John H. Chalmers <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 11 Dec 2008 to 12 Dec 2008 (#2008-342)---wash/warsh etc.
(48 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 12 Dec 2008 to 13 Dec 2008 (#2008-343)- Wash and Survey
Re: CONLANG Digest - 12 Dec 2008 to 13 Dec 2008 (#2008-343)- Wash and Survey
(86 lines)
From:
John H. Chalmers <
[log in to unmask]
>
Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD)
Re: Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD)
(45 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD)
(66 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD)
(64 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD)
(43 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD)
(45 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD)
(65 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD)
(41 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cyrillic vs. Latin representation
Cyrillic vs. Latin representation
(38 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
F: Poll
F: Poll
(63 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(47 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(71 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(56 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(160 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(39 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(138 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(189 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
i'm reforming one of my conlangs
i'm reforming one of my conlangs
(23 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs
(43 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs
(52 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs
(48 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs
(66 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs
(40 lines)
From:
M.S. Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs
(63 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs
(62 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs
(53 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs
(61 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs
(41 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs
(71 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs
(89 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mac (Re: A Font for Pictographs)
Mac (Re: A Font for Pictographs)
(38 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mac (Re: A Font for Pictographs)
(54 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mac (Re: A Font for Pictographs)
(38 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mac keyboard layouts (was Re: A Font for Pictographs)
Mac keyboard layouts (was Re: A Font for Pictographs)
(74 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT typewriter woes
Re: OT typewriter woes
(50 lines)
From:
Christopher Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT typewriter woes (was: ¡u ?op ?p?s dn ?? ? ?? u?? oo? no?)
Re: OT typewriter woes (was: ¡u ?op ?p?s dn ?? ? ?? u?? oo? no?)
(54 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT typewriter woes (was: ¡u ?op ?p?s dn ?? ? ?? u?? oo? no?)
(67 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT typewriter woes (was: ¡u ?op ?p?s dn ?? ? ?? u?? oo? no?)
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT typewriter woes (was: ¡u ?op ?p?sdn ?? ? ?? u?? oo? no?)
Re: OT typewriter woes (was: ¡u ?op ?p?sdn ?? ? ?? u?? oo? no?)
(36 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT typewriter woes (was: ¡u ?op ?p?sdn ?? ? ?? u?? oo? no?)
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
PA dialect (was: Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs)
PA dialect (was: Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs)
(70 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PA dialect (was: Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs)
(40 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PA dialect (was: Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs)
(42 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PA dialect (was: Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs)
(53 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PA dialect (was: Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs)
(72 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PA dialect (was: Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs)
(35 lines)
From:
Lars Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PA dialect (was: Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs)
(116 lines)
From:
Carl Banks <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PA dialect (was: Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs)
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PA dialect (was: Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs)
(70 lines)
From:
Carl Banks <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PA dialect (was: Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs)
(77 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PA dialect (was: Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs)
(51 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PA dialect (was: Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs)
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PA dialect (was: Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs)
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PA dialect (was: Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs)
(146 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PA dialect (was: Re: i'm reforming one of my conlangs)
(83 lines)
From:
Carl Banks <
[log in to unmask]
>
PIKTO (was: A Font for Pictographs)
PIKTO (was: A Font for Pictographs)
(31 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PIKTO (was: A Font for Pictographs)
(51 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PIKTO (was: A Font for Pictographs)
(69 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PIKTO (was: A Font for Pictographs)
(42 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poll
Poll
(45 lines)
From:
Israel Noletto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(73 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(56 lines)
From:
Carl Banks <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(38 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(75 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(88 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(56 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(45 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(78 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(51 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(39 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(70 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(74 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(43 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(60 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(66 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
poll
poll
(62 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poll
Re: Poll
(56 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(68 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(68 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(50 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(71 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(91 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(60 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(61 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(76 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(33 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(52 lines)
From:
eldin_raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(76 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll
(72 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
syllable-word nonalignment
syllable-word nonalignment
(42 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable-word nonalignment
(55 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable-word nonalignment
(59 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable-word nonalignment
(81 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syllable-word nonalignment
(79 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Font Embedding
Re: TECH: Font Embedding
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Font Embedding
(42 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Font Embedding
(51 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Aspect terminology (long)
THEORY: Aspect terminology (long)
(68 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Aspect terminology (long)
(81 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Aspect terminology (long)
(40 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Aspect terminology (long)
(148 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Aspect terminology (long)
(184 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Stative verbs and punctuality
THEORY: Stative verbs and punctuality
(56 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Stative verbs and punctuality
(76 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Typewriter woes
Re: Typewriter woes
(184 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typewriter woes
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typewriter woes
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typewriter woes
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
WHATL calendar for next year (2013)
WHATL calendar for next year (2013)
(52 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013)
(57 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Word orders in comparative constructions
Word orders in comparative constructions
(127 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word orders in comparative constructions
(70 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word orders in comparative constructions
(100 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word orders in comparative constructions
(70 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word orders in comparative constructions
(56 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word orders in comparative constructions
(61 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word orders in comparative constructions
(118 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word orders in comparative constructions
(69 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word orders in comparative constructions
(57 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word orders in comparative constructions
(55 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word orders in comparative constructions
(68 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word orders in comparative constructions
(43 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word orders in comparative constructions
(30 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word orders in comparative constructions
(30 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word orders in comparative constructions
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word orders in comparative constructions
(99 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU