Conlang
Mailing List December 2008, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"A Million Words and Counting" - New Book
(9 messages)
-o-poulos (was: WHATL calendar for next year (2013))
(5 messages)
A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang
(4 messages)
Anyone got unsubscribed unvoluntarily lately?
(2 messages)
Available now: free, permanent, conlang hosting
(3 messages)
CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D.
Conlang letters
(10 messages)
Conlangs as secret communication styles
(6 messages)
constructed sign language
(3 messages)
Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD)
(5 messages)
Creative ways to form relative clauses?
(15 messages)
Cyrillic vs. Latin representation
(2 messages)
Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(23 messages)
juvenalia
(2 messages)
juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
(14 messages)
Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(14 messages)
META: Unicode rules / test
(12 messages)
Mysterious unsubscribe messages
(2 messages)
New address
new conlanging wiki
(23 messages)
new Mac font (Re: A Font for Pictographs)
(3 messages)
Poll
(2 messages)
Sample Sentences (Was: Re: A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang)
(2 messages)
TECH: MIME Digests
Tepa online (again)
(3 messages)
Test please ignore
testing
(3 messages)
Tnary and Tinauros
Translation exercise idea
Unnatural auxlangs (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(2 messages)
WHATL calendar for next year (2013)
(10 messages)
"A Million Words and Counting" - New Book
"A Million Words and Counting" - New Book
(45 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book
(54 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book
(54 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book
(68 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book
(86 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book
(101 lines)
From:
John Osborne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book
(36 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book
(57 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book
(38 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
-o-poulos (was: WHATL calendar for next year (2013))
-o-poulos (was: WHATL calendar for next year (2013))
(59 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: -o-poulos (was: WHATL calendar for next year (2013))
(49 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: -o-poulos (was: WHATL calendar for next year (2013))
(54 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: -o-poulos (was: WHATL calendar for next year (2013))
(54 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: -o-poulos (was: WHATL calendar for next year (2013))
(64 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang
A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang
(42 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang
(59 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang
(35 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang
(51 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Anyone got unsubscribed unvoluntarily lately?
Anyone got unsubscribed unvoluntarily lately?
(38 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone got unsubscribed unvoluntarily lately?
(55 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Available now: free, permanent, conlang hosting
Available now: free, permanent, conlang hosting
(96 lines)
From:
Language Creation Society <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Available now: free, permanent, conlang hosting
(32 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Available now: free, permanent, conlang hosting
(32 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D.
Re: CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D.
(32 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang letters
Conlang letters
(31 lines)
From:
Erbrice <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang letters
(41 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang letters
(54 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang letters
(40 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang letters
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang letters
(53 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang letters
(39 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang letters
(23 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang letters
(35 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang letters
(29 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlangs as secret communication styles
Conlangs as secret communication styles
(52 lines)
From:
Chris Peters <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs as secret communication styles
(38 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs as secret communication styles
(39 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs as secret communication styles
(44 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs as secret communication styles
(44 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs as secret communication styles
(46 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
constructed sign language
constructed sign language
(24 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: constructed sign language
(28 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: constructed sign language
(55 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD)
Re: Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD)
(47 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD)
(66 lines)
From:
Lars Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD)
(79 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD)
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD)
(48 lines)
From:
Lars Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Creative ways to form relative clauses?
Creative ways to form relative clauses?
(39 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses?
(67 lines)
From:
M. Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses?
(73 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses?
(54 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses?
(50 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses?
(47 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses?
(38 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses?
(53 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses?
(68 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses?
(32 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses?
(60 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses?
(116 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses?
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses?
(47 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses?
(70 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cyrillic vs. Latin representation
Re: Cyrillic vs. Latin representation
(50 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cyrillic vs. Latin representation
(54 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(42 lines)
From:
Ina van der Vegt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(173 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(47 lines)
From:
Lars Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(194 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(322 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(65 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(61 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(103 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(49 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(82 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(66 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(82 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(71 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(60 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(37 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(48 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(39 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(53 lines)
From:
Chris Peters <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(78 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(44 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(89 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
(113 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
juvenalia
Re: juvenalia
(74 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: juvenalia
(59 lines)
From:
deini nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
(168 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
(169 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
(54 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
(64 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
(63 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
(45 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
(50 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
(223 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
(46 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
(43 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
(42 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
(44 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
(83 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(74 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(79 lines)
From:
deini nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(55 lines)
From:
deini nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(66 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(36 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(45 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(52 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(81 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(39 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(44 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
META: Unicode rules / test
META: Unicode rules / test
(34 lines)
From:
maikxlx <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Unicode rules / test
(58 lines)
From:
Rebecca Bettencourt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Unicode rules / test
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Unicode rules / test
(37 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Unicode rules / test
(51 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Unicode rules / test
(55 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Unicode rules / test
(84 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Unicode rules / test
(58 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Unicode rules / test
(49 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Unicode rules / test
(46 lines)
From:
maikxlx <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Unicode rules / test
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Unicode rules / test
(49 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mysterious unsubscribe messages
Mysterious unsubscribe messages
(29 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mysterious unsubscribe messages
(47 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
New address
Re: New address
(30 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
new conlanging wiki
new conlanging wiki
(23 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(42 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(36 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(50 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(44 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(43 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(56 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(49 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(68 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(56 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(61 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(58 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(38 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(46 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(41 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(40 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(59 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(60 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(48 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(66 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new conlanging wiki
(39 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
new Mac font (Re: A Font for Pictographs)
Re: new Mac font (Re: A Font for Pictographs)
(36 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Mac font (Re: A Font for Pictographs)
(42 lines)
From:
Rebecca Bettencourt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new Mac font (Re: A Font for Pictographs)
(42 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poll
Re: Poll
(52 lines)
From:
Falcata Lusa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poll
(43 lines)
From:
Israel Noletto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sample Sentences (Was: Re: A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang)
Sample Sentences (Was: Re: A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang)
(37 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sample Sentences (Was: Re: A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang)
(44 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: MIME Digests
TECH: MIME Digests
(52 lines)
From:
Lars Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tepa online (again)
Tepa online (again)
(40 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tepa online (again)
(52 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tepa online (again)
(28 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Test please ignore
Test please ignore
(21 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
testing
testing
(32 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: testing
(39 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: testing
(49 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tnary and Tinauros
Tnary and Tinauros
(59 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation exercise idea
Re: Translation exercise idea
(74 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Unnatural auxlangs (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
Unnatural auxlangs (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(85 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unnatural auxlangs (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
(27 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
WHATL calendar for next year (2013)
Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013)
(79 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013)
(69 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013)
(133 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013)
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013)
(43 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013)
(38 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013)
(71 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013)
(40 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013)
(53 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013)
(67 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU