Conlang Mailing List – December 2008, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• 3rd Language Creation Conference dates & LCS membership now open
• Concalendars (< Holiday greetings) (7 messages)
• Conlang letters (7 messages)
• Conlangs as secret communication styles (7 messages)
• Creative ways to form relative clauses? (9 messages)
• Fragmentz font (Att. Gary) (2 messages)
• Gripping phonology (long) (13 messages)
• Holiday greetings (2 messages)
• Kinship system (5 messages)
• Omniglossa
• Survival of minority languages (was Re: World English (was: ...))
• TECH: JavaScript help (7 messages)
• TECH: pdf to html conversion (6 messages)
• Tones to make up for lack of phonemes (12 messages)
• World English
• World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (22 messages)

1. 3rd Language Creation Conference dates & LCS membership now open
   • 3rd Language Creation Conference dates & LCS membership now open (181 lines)
     From: Language Creation Society <[log in to unmask]>

2. Concalendars (< Holiday greetings)
   • Concalendars (< Holiday greetings) (53 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Concalendars (< Holiday greetings) (37 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Concalendars (< Holiday greetings) (41 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Concalendars (< Holiday greetings) (61 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Concalendars (< Holiday greetings) (57 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Concalendars (< Holiday greetings) (28 lines)
     From: Ollock Ackeop <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Concalendars (< Holiday greetings) (59 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

3. Conlang letters
   • Re: Conlang letters (50 lines)
     From: Erbrice <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang letters (39 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang letters (56 lines)
     From: Erbrice <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang letters (67 lines)
     From: Ina van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang letters (36 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang letters (28 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang letters (56 lines)
     From: Erbrice <[log in to unmask]>

4. Conlangs as secret communication styles
   • Re: Conlangs as secret communication styles (69 lines)
     From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as secret communication styles (43 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as secret communication styles (41 lines)
     From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as secret communication styles (70 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as secret communication styles (58 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as secret communication styles (62 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as secret communication styles (36 lines)
     From: Christopher Wright <[log in to unmask]>

5. Creative ways to form relative clauses?
   • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (51 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (48 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (57 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (62 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (56 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (114 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (77 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (66 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (48 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

6. Fragmentz font (Att. Gary)
   • Fragmentz font (Att. Gary) (56 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Fragmentz font (Att. Gary) (47 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

7. Gripping phonology (long)
   • Gripping phonology (long) (170 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gripping phonology (long) (31 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gripping phonology (long) (33 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gripping phonology (long) (34 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gripping phonology (long) (37 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gripping phonology (long) (33 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gripping phonology (long) (37 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gripping phonology (long) (30 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gripping phonology (long) (36 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gripping phonology (long) (51 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gripping phonology (long) (28 lines)
     From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gripping phonology (long) (56 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gripping phonology (long) (40 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

8. Holiday greetings
   • Holiday greetings (32 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Holiday greetings (39 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

9. Kinship system
   • Kinship system (92 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Kinship system (94 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Kinship system (115 lines)
     From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Kinship system (47 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Kinship system (61 lines)
     From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>

10. Omniglossa
    • Omniglossa (43 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

11. Survival of minority languages (was Re: World English (was: ...))
    • Survival of minority languages (was Re: World English (was: ...)) (75 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

12. TECH: JavaScript help
    • TECH: JavaScript help (59 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: JavaScript help (59 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: JavaScript help (64 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: JavaScript help (44 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: JavaScript help (60 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: JavaScript help (58 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: JavaScript help (99 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

13. TECH: pdf to html conversion
    • TECH: pdf to html conversion (29 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: pdf to html conversion (52 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: pdf to html conversion (57 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: pdf to html conversion (34 lines)
      From: Chris Wright <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: pdf to html conversion (36 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: pdf to html conversion (29 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

14. Tones to make up for lack of phonemes
    • Tones to make up for lack of phonemes (24 lines)
      From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tones to make up for lack of phonemes (55 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tones to make up for lack of phonemes (57 lines)
      From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tones to make up for lack of phonemes (66 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tones to make up for lack of phonemes (52 lines)
      From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tones to make up for lack of phonemes (40 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tones to make up for lack of phonemes (47 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tones to make up for lack of phonemes (51 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tones to make up for lack of phonemes (63 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tones to make up for lack of phonemes (34 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tones to make up for lack of phonemes (37 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tones to make up for lack of phonemes (41 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>

15. World English
    • Re: World English (52 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>

16. World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
    • World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (59 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (37 lines)
      From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (99 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (35 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (70 lines)
      From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (35 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (73 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (49 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (33 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (46 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (37 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (139 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (59 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (193 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (278 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (43 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (48 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (42 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (30 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (44 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (58 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: World English (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (247 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>