Conlang Mailing List – December 2008, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book (9 messages)
• -o-poulos (was: WHATL calendar for next year (2013)) (5 messages)
• A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang (4 messages)
• Anyone got unsubscribed unvoluntarily lately? (2 messages)
• Available now: free, permanent, conlang hosting (3 messages)
• CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D.
• Conlang letters (10 messages)
• Conlangs as secret communication styles (6 messages)
• constructed sign language (3 messages)
• Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD) (5 messages)
• Creative ways to form relative clauses? (15 messages)
• Cyrillic vs. Latin representation (2 messages)
• Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (23 messages)
• juvenalia (2 messages)
• juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (14 messages)
• Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (14 messages)
• META: Unicode rules / test (12 messages)
• Mysterious unsubscribe messages (2 messages)
• New address
• new conlanging wiki (23 messages)
• new Mac font (Re: A Font for Pictographs) (3 messages)
• Poll (2 messages)
• Sample Sentences (Was: Re: A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang) (2 messages)
• TECH: MIME Digests
• Tepa online (again) (3 messages)
• Test please ignore
• testing (3 messages)
• Tnary and Tinauros
• Translation exercise idea
• Unnatural auxlangs (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (2 messages)
• WHATL calendar for next year (2013) (10 messages)

1. "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book
   • "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book (45 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:17:23 -0800
   • Re: "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book (54 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:55:03 -0500
   • Re: "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book (54 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:01:13 -0500
   • Re: "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book (68 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:30:18 -0800
   • Re: "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book (86 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:19:31 -0800
   • Re: "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book (101 lines)
     From: John Osborne <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:49:24 -0600
   • Re: "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book (36 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:05:14 -0500
   • Re: "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book (57 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:50:59 -0600
   • Re: "A Million Words and Counting" - New Book (38 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:17:29 -0500

2. -o-poulos (was: WHATL calendar for next year (2013))
   • -o-poulos (was: WHATL calendar for next year (2013)) (59 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:49:39 +0000
   • Re: -o-poulos (was: WHATL calendar for next year (2013)) (49 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:59:52 +0100
   • Re: -o-poulos (was: WHATL calendar for next year (2013)) (54 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:10:14 +0100
   • Re: -o-poulos (was: WHATL calendar for next year (2013)) (54 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:11:11 +0100
   • Re: -o-poulos (was: WHATL calendar for next year (2013)) (64 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:35:11 +0000

3. A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang
   • A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang (42 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:55:11 -0800
   • Re: A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang (59 lines)
     From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:44:28 +0000
   • Re: A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang (35 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:10:18 -0800
   • Re: A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang (51 lines)
     From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:50:54 +0000

4. Anyone got unsubscribed unvoluntarily lately?
   • Anyone got unsubscribed unvoluntarily lately? (38 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:37:18 +0100
   • Re: Anyone got unsubscribed unvoluntarily lately? (55 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:14:15 -0800

5. Available now: free, permanent, conlang hosting
   • Available now: free, permanent, conlang hosting (96 lines)
     From: Language Creation Society <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:30:53 -0800
   • Re: Available now: free, permanent, conlang hosting (32 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:31:29 +0100
   • Re: Available now: free, permanent, conlang hosting (32 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:00:57 -0800

6. CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D.
   • Re: CHAT: Doug Ball, Ph.D. (32 lines)
     From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:50:53 -0800

7. Conlang letters
   • Conlang letters (31 lines)
     From: Erbrice <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:52:52 +0100
   • Re: Conlang letters (41 lines)
     From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:24:20 -0600
   • Re: Conlang letters (54 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:42:55 +0100
   • Re: Conlang letters (40 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 13:43:57 -0500
   • Re: Conlang letters (43 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:55:19 +0100
   • Re: Conlang letters (53 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:11:53 -0500
   • Re: Conlang letters (39 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:15:25 -0500
   • Re: Conlang letters (23 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:24:14 -0500
   • Re: Conlang letters (35 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:38:53 -0800
   • Re: Conlang letters (29 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:18:41 -0800

8. Conlangs as secret communication styles
   • Conlangs as secret communication styles (52 lines)
     From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:38:51 -0600
   • Re: Conlangs as secret communication styles (38 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 13:12:41 -0800
   • Re: Conlangs as secret communication styles (39 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:31:24 -0500
   • Re: Conlangs as secret communication styles (44 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:59:24 -0500
   • Re: Conlangs as secret communication styles (44 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:04:46 -0500
   • Re: Conlangs as secret communication styles (46 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:16:41 -0800

9. constructed sign language
   • constructed sign language (24 lines)
     From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:44:30 -0500
   • Re: constructed sign language (28 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:25:33 -0800
   • Re: constructed sign language (55 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:39:41 -0800

10. Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD)
    • Re: Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD) (47 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:51:15 +0100
    • Re: Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD) (66 lines)
      From: Lars Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:53:08 +0100
    • Re: Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD) (79 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:15:04 -0500
    • Re: Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD) (39 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:14:58 +0100
    • Re: Corrupt messages (was CHAT: Doug Ball, PhD) (48 lines)
      From: Lars Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:05:07 +0100

11. Creative ways to form relative clauses?
    • Creative ways to form relative clauses? (39 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:39:03 -0500
    • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (67 lines)
      From: M. Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:28:59 +0100
    • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (73 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:02:41 -0500
    • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (54 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:22:20 -0000
    • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (50 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:45:42 -0500
    • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (47 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:55:35 -0600
    • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (38 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:55:26 -0500
    • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (53 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:09:12 -0000
    • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (68 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:19:41 -0700
    • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (32 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:30:05 -0800
    • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (60 lines)
      From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:53:28 -0200
    • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (116 lines)
      From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:08:13 -0700
    • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (52 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:30:20 -0800
    • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (47 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:06:27 -0800
    • Re: Creative ways to form relative clauses? (70 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:58:57 +0000

12. Cyrillic vs. Latin representation
    • Re: Cyrillic vs. Latin representation (50 lines)
      From: deinx nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 02:53:04 -0500
    • Re: Cyrillic vs. Latin representation (54 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:05:30 +0100

13. Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (42 lines)
      From: Ina van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:57:58 +0100
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (173 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:08:09 +0000
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (47 lines)
      From: Lars Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:33:50 +0100
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (194 lines)
      From: deinx nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:01:41 -0500
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (322 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:31:32 +0100
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (65 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:28:24 -0800
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (61 lines)
      From: deinx nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:00:37 -0500
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (103 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:12:28 -0500
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (49 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:31:32 +0100
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (82 lines)
      From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:46:48 +0100
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (66 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:31:13 +0000
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (82 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:51:31 -0500
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (71 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:24:06 -0500
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (60 lines)
      From: deinx nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:43:16 -0500
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (37 lines)
      From: deinx nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:46:02 -0500
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (48 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:10:44 +0000
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (39 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:36:23 -0800
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (53 lines)
      From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:11:54 -0600
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (37 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:55:05 +0100
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (78 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:01:40 +0100
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (44 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:48:59 +0100
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (89 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:03:10 +0100
    • Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll) (113 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:35:08 -0500

14. juvenalia
    • Re: juvenalia (74 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:22:37 +0100
    • Re: juvenalia (59 lines)
      From: deini nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:16:42 -0500

15. juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs)
    • juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (168 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:36:12 +0000
    • Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (169 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:34:39 +0100
    • Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (54 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:33:32 -0800
    • Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (64 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:20:39 +0000
    • Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (38 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:28:42 -0500
    • Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (63 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:27:36 -0500
    • Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (45 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:50:58 +0100
    • Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (50 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:33:25 -0800
    • Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (223 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:44:31 +0100
    • Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (46 lines)
      From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:55:22 -0000
    • Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (43 lines)
      From: deinx nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:24:58 -0500
    • Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (42 lines)
      From: deinx nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:27:53 -0500
    • Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (44 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:27:44 -0500
    • Re: juvenalia (was: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs) (83 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:29:38 +0100

16. Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
    • Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (74 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:28:26 +0100
    • Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:36:24 -0500
    • Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (46 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:18:53 -0500
    • Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (79 lines)
      From: deini nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:59:11 -0500
    • Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (55 lines)
      From: deini nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:04:55 -0500
    • Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (60 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:35:47 -0500
    • Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (66 lines)
      From: deinx nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:08:12 -0500
    • Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (36 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:03:10 -0500
    • Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (45 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:52:46 +0000
    • Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:59:06 -0500
    • Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (52 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:10:41 +0100
    • Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (81 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:41:57 +0100
    • Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (39 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:57:44 -0800
    • Re: Klingon (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (44 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:27:22 -0500

17. META: Unicode rules / test
    • META: Unicode rules / test (34 lines)
      From: maikxlx <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:33:36 -0500
    • Re: META: Unicode rules / test (58 lines)
      From: Rebecca Bettencourt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:33:53 -0800
    • Re: META: Unicode rules / test (36 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:35:28 -0500
    • Re: META: Unicode rules / test (37 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:33:15 +0100
    • Re: META: Unicode rules / test (51 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:38:41 +0100
    • Re: META: Unicode rules / test (55 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:30:13 -0500
    • Re: META: Unicode rules / test (84 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:45:32 -0500
    • Re: META: Unicode rules / test (58 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:58:51 +0100
    • Re: META: Unicode rules / test (49 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:26:06 -0000
    • Re: META: Unicode rules / test (46 lines)
      From: maikxlx <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:35:19 -0500
    • Re: META: Unicode rules / test (39 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:43:57 -0500
    • Re: META: Unicode rules / test (49 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:20:47 +0100

18. Mysterious unsubscribe messages
    • Mysterious unsubscribe messages (29 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:23:09 -0500
    • Re: Mysterious unsubscribe messages (47 lines)
      From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:39:13 -0700

19. New address
    • Re: New address (30 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:23:26 -0800

20. new conlanging wiki
    • new conlanging wiki (23 lines)
      From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:31:27 -0500
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (42 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:06:56 -0800
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (36 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:20:31 -0800
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (50 lines)
      From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:31:31 -0600
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (44 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:33:52 -0800
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (43 lines)
      From: deinx nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:31:59 -0500
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (56 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:02:34 -0800
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (49 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:31:10 -0800
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (68 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:48:00 -0800
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (56 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:27:49 -0800
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (61 lines)
      From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:53:22 -0600
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (58 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:59:27 +0100
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (38 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:43:45 -0800
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (46 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:47:30 -0800
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (41 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:00:35 -0500
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (36 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:34:26 -0800
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (40 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:48:23 -0500
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (59 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:50:44 -0600
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (35 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 02:06:08 -0500
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (60 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:55:41 -0500
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (48 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:39:08 +0100
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (66 lines)
      From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:05:49 -0600
    • Re: new conlanging wiki (39 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:18:25 +0100

21. new Mac font (Re: A Font for Pictographs)
    • Re: new Mac font (Re: A Font for Pictographs) (36 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:00:04 -0800
    • Re: new Mac font (Re: A Font for Pictographs) (42 lines)
      From: Rebecca Bettencourt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:13:53 -0800
    • Re: new Mac font (Re: A Font for Pictographs) (42 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:28:26 -0800

22. Poll
    • Re: Poll (52 lines)
      From: Falcata Lusa <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:47:39 +0000
    • Poll (43 lines)
      From: Israel Noletto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:19:46 -0500

23. Sample Sentences (Was: Re: A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang)
    • Sample Sentences (Was: Re: A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang) (37 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:12:43 -0800
    • Re: Sample Sentences (Was: Re: A Grammar for a Pictographic conlang) (44 lines)
      From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:20:05 +0000

24. TECH: MIME Digests
    • TECH: MIME Digests (52 lines)
      From: Lars Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:46:05 +0100

25. Tepa online (again)
    • Tepa online (again) (40 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:20:53 -0700
    • Re: Tepa online (again) (52 lines)
      From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:25:26 -0600
    • Re: Tepa online (again) (28 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:29:44 -0500

26. Test please ignore
    • Test please ignore (21 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:15:29 +0100

27. testing
    • testing (32 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:06:51 -0800
    • Re: testing (39 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:00:31 -0500
    • Re: testing (49 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:51:16 +0100

28. Tnary and Tinauros
    • Tnary and Tinauros (59 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:18:42 +0100

29. Translation exercise idea
    • Re: Translation exercise idea (74 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:07:52 -0500

30. Unnatural auxlangs (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll))
    • Unnatural auxlangs (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (85 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:55:07 +0100
    • Re: Unnatural auxlangs (was Re: Fictional auxlangs as artlangs (was Re: Poll)) (27 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:09:38 -0500

31. WHATL calendar for next year (2013)
    • Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013) (79 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:35:23 +0000
    • Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013) (69 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:27:00 +0100
    • Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013) (133 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:09:04 +0000
    • Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013) (43 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:28:51 +0100
    • Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013) (43 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:39:32 -0000
    • Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013) (38 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:45:24 +0100
    • Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013) (71 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:03:10 +0000
    • Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013) (40 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:03:50 +0100
    • Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013) (53 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:07:22 +0100
    • Re: WHATL calendar for next year (2013) (67 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:17:47 +0000