Conlang Mailing List – January 2009, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "To slurp" in latin, is there such a thing? (4 messages)
• (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (3 messages)
• (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (was French) (2 messages)
• 2nd Language Creation Conference videos now part of LCS Podcast
• Alphabets with logographic symbols (8 messages)
• Basic Font for Asha'ille Script (2 messages)
• Cafe-Press (5 messages)
• collaborators sought to give birth to living artlang
• Communication methods for people with extremely limited articulation (3 messages)
• Don & doff (was: Natural Order of Events) (2 messages)
• Merechi birthdays
• Natural Order of Events (3 messages)
• OT: "Save the words"
• Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (7 messages)
• Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (13 messages)

1. "To slurp" in latin, is there such a thing?
   • Re: "To slurp" in latin, is there such a thing? (55 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "To slurp" in latin, is there such a thing? (40 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "To slurp" in latin, is there such a thing? (40 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "To slurp" in latin, is there such a thing? (38 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

2. (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese
   • Re: (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (50 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (39 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (48 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

3. (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (was French)
   • Re: (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (was French) (281 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (was French) (51 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>

4. 2nd Language Creation Conference videos now part of LCS Podcast
   • 2nd Language Creation Conference videos now part of LCS Podcast (75 lines)
     From: Language Creation Society <[log in to unmask]>

5. Alphabets with logographic symbols
   • Alphabets with logographic symbols (34 lines)
     From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (33 lines)
     From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (45 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (34 lines)
     From: Chris Wright <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (48 lines)
     From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (109 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (34 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (94 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

6. Basic Font for Asha'ille Script
   • Re: Basic Font for Asha'ille Script (64 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Basic Font for Asha'ille Script (52 lines)
     From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>

7. Cafe-Press
   • Re: Cafe-Press (51 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cafe-Press (63 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cafe-Press (45 lines)
     From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cafe-Press (51 lines)
     From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cafe-Press (38 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

8. collaborators sought to give birth to living artlang
   • collaborators sought to give birth to living artlang (122 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>

9. Communication methods for people with extremely limited articulation
   • Re: Communication methods for people with extremely limited articulation (145 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Communication methods for people with extremely limited articulation (35 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Communication methods for people with extremely limited articulation (148 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

10. Don & doff (was: Natural Order of Events)
    • Don & doff (was: Natural Order of Events) (60 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Don & doff (was: Natural Order of Events) (76 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

11. Merechi birthdays
    • Merechi birthdays (42 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>

12. Natural Order of Events
    • Re: Natural Order of Events (49 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natural Order of Events (75 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natural Order of Events (50 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>

13. OT: "Save the words"
    • OT: "Save the words" (27 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

14. Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender?
    • Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (58 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (130 lines)
      From: Brandon Green <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (103 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (62 lines)
      From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (41 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (42 lines)
      From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (54 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>

15. Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events)
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (54 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (119 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (40 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (38 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (59 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (69 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (61 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (43 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (55 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (47 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (47 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (49 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (48 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>