Conlang Mailing List -- January 2009, week 5

Conlang Mailing List – January 2009, week 5

Sort by

Author | Date | Topic
Chronologically | Most recent first

Options

Show author | Hide author

Navigation

Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives

Re: Basic Font for Asha'ille Script (64 lines)
From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Basic Font for Asha'ille Script (52 lines)
From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "To slurp" in latin, is there such a thing? (55 lines)
From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Cafe-Press (51 lines)
From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "To slurp" in latin, is there such a thing? (40 lines)
From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Re: (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (was French) (281 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Cafe-Press (63 lines)
From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Don & doff (was: Natural Order of Events) (60 lines)
From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
2nd Language Creation Conference videos now part of LCS Podcast (75 lines)
From: Language Creation Society <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (54 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (119 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Natural Order of Events (49 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Natural Order of Events (75 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Natural Order of Events (50 lines)
From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Cafe-Press (45 lines)
From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (50 lines)
From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Cafe-Press (51 lines)
From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "To slurp" in latin, is there such a thing? (40 lines)
From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (40 lines)
From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (38 lines)
From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (59 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (69 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Don & doff (was: Natural Order of Events) (76 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: "To slurp" in latin, is there such a thing? (38 lines)
From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Re: (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (39 lines)
From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Cafe-Press (38 lines)
From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
Re: (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (48 lines)
From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (61 lines)
From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (43 lines)
From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (55 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (47 lines)
From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (47 lines)
From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Re: (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (was French) (51 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (49 lines)
From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
collaborators sought to give birth to living artlang (122 lines)
From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (48 lines)
From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Communication methods for people with extremely limited articulation (145 lines)
From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Communication methods for people with extremely limited articulation (35 lines)
From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
Alphabets with logographic symbols (34 lines)
From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (33 lines)
From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (45 lines)
From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (34 lines)
From: Chris Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (48 lines)
From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (109 lines)
From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Communication methods for people with extremely limited articulation (148 lines)
From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
OT: "Save the words" (27 lines)
From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
Merechi birthdays (42 lines)
From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (58 lines)
From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (130 lines)
From: Brandon Green <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (103 lines)
From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (34 lines)
From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (94 lines)
From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (62 lines)
From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (41 lines)
From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (42 lines)
From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (54 lines)
From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>

Back to the main CONLANG page

LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU