Conlang Mailing List – January 2009, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "To slurp" in latin, is there such a thing? (4 messages)
• (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (3 messages)
• (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (was French) (2 messages)
• 2nd Language Creation Conference videos now part of LCS Podcast
• Alphabets with logographic symbols (8 messages)
• Basic Font for Asha'ille Script (2 messages)
• Cafe-Press (5 messages)
• collaborators sought to give birth to living artlang
• Communication methods for people with extremely limited articulation (3 messages)
• Don & doff (was: Natural Order of Events) (2 messages)
• Merechi birthdays
• Natural Order of Events (3 messages)
• OT: "Save the words"
• Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (7 messages)
• Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (13 messages)

1. "To slurp" in latin, is there such a thing?
   • Re: "To slurp" in latin, is there such a thing? (55 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:47:48 -0500
   • Re: "To slurp" in latin, is there such a thing? (40 lines)
     Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:27:40 -0800
   • Re: "To slurp" in latin, is there such a thing? (40 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:49:49 +0100
   • Re: "To slurp" in latin, is there such a thing? (38 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:40:15 +0100

2. (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese
   • Re: (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (50 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:45:55 +0100
   • Re: (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (39 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:05:47 +0100
   • Re: (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (48 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:46:36 +0100

3. (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (was French)
   • Re: (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (was French) (281 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:15:02 +0100
   • Re: (Brazilian Portuguese and Rhodrese (was French) (51 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:32:48 -0800

4. 2nd Language Creation Conference videos now part of LCS Podcast
   • 2nd Language Creation Conference videos now part of LCS Podcast (75 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:19:50 -0800

5. Alphabets with logographic symbols
   • Alphabets with logographic symbols (34 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:05:28 -0800
   • Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (33 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:16:25 -0800
   • Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (45 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:30:08 +0000
   • Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (34 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:32:09 -0500
   • Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (48 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:45:37 -0800
   • Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (109 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:56:16 -0800
   • Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (34 lines)
     Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:07:52 +0100
   • Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (94 lines)
     Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:39:14 +0100

6. Basic Font for Asha'ille Script
   • Re: Basic Font for Asha'ille Script (64 lines)
     Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:59:59 -0800
   • Re: Basic Font for Asha'ille Script (52 lines)
     Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:09:09 -0800

7. Cafe-Press
   • Re: Cafe-Press (51 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:05:05 +0100
   • Re: Cafe-Press (63 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:40:59 +0000
   • Re: Cafe-Press (45 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:37:31 -0800
   • Re: Cafe-Press (51 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:46:15 -0800
   • Re: Cafe-Press (38 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:07:44 +0100

8. collaborators sought to give birth to living artlang
   • collaborators sought to give birth to living artlang (122 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:52:16 -0500

9. Communication methods for people with extremely limited articulation
   • Re: Communication methods for people with extremely limited articulation (145 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:59:44 +0100
   • Re: Communication methods for people with extremely limited articulation (35 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:00:37 -0500
   • Re: Communication methods for people with extremely limited articulation (148 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:02:18 -0800

10. Don & doff (was: Natural Order of Events)
    • Don & doff (was: Natural Order of Events) (60 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:12:10 +0000
    • Re: Don & doff (was: Natural Order of Events) (76 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:37:22 -0500

11. Merechi birthdays
    • Merechi birthdays (42 lines)
      Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:47:03 -0500

12. Natural Order of Events
    • Re: Natural Order of Events (49 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:23:40 +0100
    • Re: Natural Order of Events (75 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:32:08 +0100
    • Re: Natural Order of Events (50 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:12:42 +0100

13. OT: "Save the words"
    • OT: "Save the words" (27 lines)
      Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:23:10 -0800

14. Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender?
    • Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (58 lines)
      Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:33:21 -0500
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (130 lines)
      Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:53:54 -0800
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (103 lines)
      Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:37:58 +1300
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (62 lines)
      Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:15:55 +0000
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (41 lines)
      Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:33:15 -0000
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (42 lines)
      Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:13:52 -0600
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (54 lines)
      Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:09:37 +0100

15. Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events)
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (54 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:04:39 +0100
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (119 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:21:27 +0100
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (40 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:57:03 -0800
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (38 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:09:22 -0800
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (59 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:19:18 +0100
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (69 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:29:19 +0100
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (61 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:30:23 -0500
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (43 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:04:21 +0100
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (55 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:07:22 -0500
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (47 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:15:48 +0100
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (47 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:24:17 -0500
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (49 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:49:18 -0500
    • Re: Verb specificity (Was: Re: Natural Order of Events) (48 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:50:22 -0600