Conlang Mailing List – February 2009, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "to cause" in Ancient Greek (3 messages)
• 3rd Language Creation Conference update & preview
• a bad essay (5 messages)
• about M.A.Foster's Layaklan (formerly Singlespeech)
• Alphabets with logographic symbols (3 messages)
• Ass metonymy (WAS: a bad essay) (14 messages)
• Don & doff (was: Natural Order of Events (2 messages)
• Don & doff (was: Natural Order of Events)
• Encyclopedia of Fictional and Fantastic Languages (4 messages)
• English (Was: Portuguese (Was: French))
• French (19 messages)
• Fwd: YAEPT (was Re: French)
• In the Land of Invented Languages (was: Encyclopedia of Fictional and Fantastic Languages)
• Portuguese (Was: French) (9 messages)
• Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (12 messages)
• TECH: Video simulcasting & conferencing
• The radness of serial verbs (was: Re: "To slurp" in latin)
• Use of Conlang to test Language Universals (4 messages)
• YAEPT (< French) (2 messages)
• YAEPT (was Re: French) (11 messages)
• YAPTPT (was Re: French) (3 messages)

1. "to cause" in Ancient Greek
   • "to cause" in Ancient Greek (26 lines)
     From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "to cause" in Ancient Greek (34 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "to cause" in Ancient Greek (59 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

2. 3rd Language Creation Conference update & preview
   • 3rd Language Creation Conference update & preview (129 lines)
     From: Language Creation Society <[log in to unmask]>

3. a bad essay
   • a bad essay (65 lines)
     From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: a bad essay (85 lines)
     From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: a bad essay (115 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: a bad essay (81 lines)
     From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: a bad essay (33 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

4. about M.A.Foster's Layaklan (formerly Singlespeech)
   • about M.A.Foster's Layaklan (formerly Singlespeech) (41 lines)
     From: Elane Imgoven <[log in to unmask]>

5. Alphabets with logographic symbols
   • Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (42 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (56 lines)
     From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Alphabets with logographic symbols (52 lines)
     From: Brandon Green <[log in to unmask]>

6. Ass metonymy (WAS: a bad essay)
   • Ass metonymy (WAS: a bad essay) (42 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ass metonymy (WAS: a bad essay) (33 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ass metonymy (WAS: a bad essay) (68 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ass metonymy (WAS: a bad essay) (56 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ass metonymy (WAS: a bad essay) (49 lines)
     From: Chris Wright <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ass metonymy (WAS: a bad essay) (35 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ass metonymy (WAS: a bad essay) (43 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ass metonymy (WAS: a bad essay) (40 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ass metonymy (WAS: a bad essay) (41 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ass metonymy (WAS: a bad essay) (32 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ass metonymy (WAS: a bad essay) (39 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ass metonymy (WAS: a bad essay) (63 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ass metonymy (WAS: a bad essay) (81 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ass metonymy (WAS: a bad essay) (42 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>

7. Don & doff (was: Natural Order of Events
   • Re: Don & doff (was: Natural Order of Events (32 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Don & doff (was: Natural Order of Events (36 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

8. Don & doff (was: Natural Order of Events)
   • Re: Don & doff (was: Natural Order of Events) (20 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>

9. Encyclopedia of Fictional and Fantastic Languages
   • Encyclopedia of Fictional and Fantastic Languages (28 lines)
     From: Israel Noletto <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Encyclopedia of Fictional and Fantastic Languages (53 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Encyclopedia of Fictional and Fantastic Languages (56 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Encyclopedia of Fictional and Fantastic Languages (78 lines)
     From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>

10. English (Was: Portuguese (Was: French))
    • English (Was: Portuguese (Was: French)) (38 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>

11. French
    • Re: French (77 lines)
      From: Falcata Lusa <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French (51 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French (69 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French (75 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: French (55 lines)
      From: faberic banouette <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French (39 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French (61 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French (72 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French (85 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French (40 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French (37 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French (47 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French (60 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French (45 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French (35 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French (47 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French (34 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: French (46 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

12. Fwd: YAEPT (was Re: French)
    • Fwd: YAEPT (was Re: French) (41 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>

13. In the Land of Invented Languages (was: Encyclopedia of Fictional and Fantastic Languages)
    • In the Land of Invented Languages (was: Encyclopedia of Fictional and Fantastic Languages) (31 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

14. Portuguese (Was: French)
    • Portuguese (Was: French) (40 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Portuguese (Was: French) (69 lines)
      From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Portuguese (Was: French) (40 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Portuguese (Was: French) (46 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Portuguese (Was: French) (42 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Portuguese (Was: French) (51 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Portuguese (Was: French) (36 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Portuguese (Was: French) (45 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Portuguese (Was: French) (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

15. Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender?
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (40 lines)
      From: Ina van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (62 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (46 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (52 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (39 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (91 lines)
      From: Fredrik Ekman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (43 lines)
      From: Ollock Ackeop <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (38 lines)
      From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (61 lines)
      From: Ollock Ackeop <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (54 lines)
      From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (43 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic Content of Grammatical Gender? (106 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>

16. TECH: Video simulcasting & conferencing
    • TECH: Video simulcasting & conferencing (134 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

17. The radness of serial verbs (was: Re: "To slurp" in latin)
    • The radness of serial verbs (was: Re: "To slurp" in latin) (119 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>

18. Use of Conlang to test Language Universals
    • Use of Conlang to test Language Universals (93 lines)
      From: John H. Chalmers <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Use of Conlang to test Language Universals (47 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Use of Conlang to test Language Universals (98 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Use of Conlang to test Language Universals (41 lines)
      From: Ronald Craig <[log in to unmask]>

19. YAEPT (< French)
    • YAEPT (< French) (41 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT (< French) (42 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>

20. YAEPT (was Re: French)
    • YAEPT (was Re: French) (56 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: YAEPT (was Re: French) (52 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT (was Re: French) (40 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT (was Re: French) (57 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT (was Re: French) (62 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT (was Re: French) (36 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT (was Re: French) (36 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT (was Re: French) (45 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT (was Re: French) (48 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT (was Re: French) (32 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT (was Re: French) (35 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

21. YAPTPT (was Re: French)
    • YAPTPT (was Re: French) (45 lines)
      From: Falcata Lusa <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAPTPT (was Re: French) (24 lines)
      From: Chris Wright <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAPTPT (was Re: French) (35 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>