Conlang
Mailing List – February 2009, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"Get" passive
(14 messages)
a K'tle sentence (long)
(3 messages)
Artlanging is now mainstream
(4 messages)
Chinese whispers game
(53 messages)
Chinese whispers game - A Question
(2 messages)
del.icio.us
(10 messages)
Diacritics and Vowel Inventories (WAS: Chinese whispers game)
(2 messages)
Evidentiality drift (WAS: Pronouns & sexuality)
(3 messages)
Gweydr and English Lax Vowels
(3 messages)
Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
(16 messages)
IPA/XSAMPA was Re: [CONLANG] Chinese whispers game
Khangaþyagon Dictionary
Languages written in the Roman alphabet (Was: Re: Chinese whispers game)
(2 messages)
Manuscripts & Manuscript Abbreviations in Conlang
Manuscripts & Manuscript Abbreviations in Conlangs
(4 messages)
META: "Chinese whispers"
(11 messages)
Nalang precedents?
Natlang precedents?
Origins of [i\]
(8 messages)
OT: Finns.
(13 messages)
OT: Re: Artlanging is now mainstream
(5 messages)
pair conlanging, dyadic language
(3 messages)
Pronouns & sexual
(6 messages)
Pronouns & sexuali
(9 messages)
Pronouns & sexualit
(16 messages)
Pronouns & sexuality
(15 messages)
Pronouns and Social Status
(2 messages)
quechua translation help
(3 messages)
reverse chinese whispers
Small Derivational Idea
(31 messages)
TECH: Subject-chomping (WAS: Pronouns & sexual^H^H^
TECH: Subject-chomping (WAS: Pronouns & sexual^H^H^H
(4 messages)
TECH: Subject-chomping (WAS: Pronouns & sexual^H^H^H)
(2 messages)
Terminology Question-Verb that (inflects?) for emotional attachment
(2 messages)
yet another conscript -- this one is for Layaklan
[CLEAR] RE: META: "Chinese whispers"
"Get" passive
"Get" passive
(43 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Get" passive
(70 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Get" passive
(82 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Get" passive
(36 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Get" passive
(91 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Get" passive
(105 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Get" passive
(63 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Get" passive
(85 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Get" passive
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Get" passive
(75 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Get" passive
(56 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Get" passive
(74 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Get" passive
(41 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Get" passive
(45 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
a K'tle sentence (long)
a K'tle sentence (long)
(153 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a K'tle sentence (long)
(59 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a K'tle sentence (long)
(53 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Artlanging is now mainstream
Re: Artlanging is now mainstream
(43 lines)
From:
Andrii Zvorygin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Artlanging is now mainstream
(38 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Artlanging is now mainstream
(67 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Artlanging is now mainstream
(41 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chinese whispers game
Chinese whispers game
(56 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(35 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(48 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(63 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(45 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(54 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(67 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(47 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(43 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(36 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(47 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(51 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(37 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(49 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(36 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(58 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(44 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(88 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(28 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(104 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(85 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(96 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(94 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(44 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(73 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(94 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(105 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(127 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(115 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(98 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(113 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(119 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(130 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(147 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(35 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(32 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(32 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(147 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(37 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(47 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(50 lines)
From:
Chris Peters <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(61 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(33 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(50 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(33 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(42 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game
(42 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chinese whispers game - A Question
Re: Chinese whispers game - A Question
(41 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chinese whispers game - A Question
(46 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
(30 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: del.icio.us
(46 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: del.icio.us
(30 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: del.icio.us
(26 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: del.icio.us
(36 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: del.icio.us
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: del.icio.us
(49 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: del.icio.us
(66 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: del.icio.us
(53 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: del.icio.us
(40 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Diacritics and Vowel Inventories (WAS: Chinese whispers game)
Diacritics and Vowel Inventories (WAS: Chinese whispers game)
(53 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Diacritics and Vowel Inventories (WAS: Chinese whispers game)
(47 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Evidentiality drift (WAS: Pronouns & sexuality)
Evidentiality drift (WAS: Pronouns & sexuality)
(42 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidentiality drift (WAS: Pronouns & sexuality)
(65 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evidentiality drift (WAS: Pronouns & sexuality)
(74 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gweydr and English Lax Vowels
Gweydr and English Lax Vowels
(122 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gweydr and English Lax Vowels
(43 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gweydr and English Lax Vowels
(40 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
(45 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
(48 lines)
From:
Ina van der Vegt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
(51 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
(47 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
(49 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
(47 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
(41 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
(62 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
(56 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
(54 lines)
From:
Adnan Majid <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
(64 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
(40 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
(52 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inversion for subjunctive (was "Get" passive)
(41 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
IPA/XSAMPA was Re: [CONLANG] Chinese whispers game
IPA/XSAMPA was Re: [CONLANG] Chinese whispers game
(48 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Khangaþyagon Dictionary
Khangaþyagon Dictionary
(43 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Languages written in the Roman alphabet (Was: Re: Chinese whispers game)
Languages written in the Roman alphabet (Was: Re: Chinese whispers game)
(42 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages written in the Roman alphabet (Was: Re: Chinese whispers game)
(43 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Manuscripts & Manuscript Abbreviations in Conlang
Re: Manuscripts & Manuscript Abbreviations in Conlang
(43 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Manuscripts & Manuscript Abbreviations in Conlangs
Re: Manuscripts & Manuscript Abbreviations in Conlangs
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Manuscripts & Manuscript Abbreviations in Conlangs
(35 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Manuscripts & Manuscript Abbreviations in Conlangs
(34 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Manuscripts & Manuscript Abbreviations in Conlangs
(102 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
META: "Chinese whispers"
META: "Chinese whispers"
(33 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: "Chinese whispers"
(62 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: "Chinese whispers"
(67 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: "Chinese whispers"
(44 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: "Chinese whispers"
(46 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: "Chinese whispers"
(34 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: "Chinese whispers"
(54 lines)
From:
Ina van der Vegt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: "Chinese whispers"
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: "Chinese whispers"
(76 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: "Chinese whispers"
(31 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: "Chinese whispers"
(117 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nalang precedents?
Nalang precedents?
(29 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Natlang precedents?
Re: Natlang precedents?
(32 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Origins of [i\]
Origins of [i\]
(31 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origins of [i\]
(60 lines)
From:
Steven A. Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origins of [i\]
(41 lines)
From:
Steven A. Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origins of [i\]
(41 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origins of [i\]
(79 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origins of [i\]
(50 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origins of [i\]
(65 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origins of [i\]
(44 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Finns.
OT: Finns.
(46 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Finns.
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Finns.
(68 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Finns.
(77 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Finns.
(81 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Finns.
(83 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Finns.
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Finns.
(45 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Finns.
(81 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Finns.
(55 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Finns.
(56 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Finns.
(54 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Finns.
(69 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Artlanging is now mainstream
Re: OT: Re: Artlanging is now mainstream
(108 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Artlanging is now mainstream
(66 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Artlanging is now mainstream
(86 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Artlanging is now mainstream
(42 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Artlanging is now mainstream
(65 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
pair conlanging, dyadic language
pair conlanging, dyadic language
(56 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pair conlanging, dyadic language
(42 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pair conlanging, dyadic language
(45 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pronouns & sexual
Re: Pronouns & sexual
(76 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexual
(40 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexual
(61 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexual
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexual
(43 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexual
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pronouns & sexuali
Re: Pronouns & sexuali
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuali
(48 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuali
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuali
(131 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuali
(56 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuali
(152 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuali
(67 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuali
(92 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuali
(50 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pronouns & sexualit
Re: Pronouns & sexualit
(65 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexualit
(53 lines)
From:
Chris Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexualit
(45 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexualit
(58 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexualit
(45 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexualit
(56 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexualit
(32 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexualit
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexualit
(57 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexualit
(37 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexualit
(55 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexualit
(40 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexualit
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexualit
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexualit
(46 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexualit
(32 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pronouns & sexuality
Pronouns & sexuality
(24 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuality
(44 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuality
(46 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuality
(70 lines)
From:
Scott Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuality
(26 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuality
(35 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuality
(39 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuality
(44 lines)
From:
Ina van der Vegt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuality
(45 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuality
(34 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuality
(39 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuality
(67 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuality
(108 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuality
(60 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns & sexuality
(58 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pronouns and Social Status
Pronouns and Social Status
(41 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns and Social Status
(46 lines)
From:
Chris Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
quechua translation help
quechua translation help
(26 lines)
From:
Campbell Nilsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quechua translation help
(34 lines)
From:
Campbell Nilsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quechua translation help
(43 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
reverse chinese whispers
reverse chinese whispers
(29 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Small Derivational Idea
Small Derivational Idea
(74 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(103 lines)
From:
Steven A. Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(39 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(54 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(74 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(67 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(42 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(45 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(37 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(108 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(47 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(91 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(50 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(143 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(136 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(191 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(144 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(80 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(211 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(71 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(111 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(58 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(31 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(43 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(59 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(36 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(35 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(33 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(305 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Subject-chomping (WAS: Pronouns & sexual^H^H^
Re: TECH: Subject-chomping (WAS: Pronouns & sexual^H^H^
(56 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Subject-chomping (WAS: Pronouns & sexual^H^H^H
Re: TECH: Subject-chomping (WAS: Pronouns & sexual^H^H^H
(30 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Subject-chomping (WAS: Pronouns & sexual^H^H^H
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Subject-chomping (WAS: Pronouns & sexual^H^H^H
(43 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Subject-chomping (WAS: Pronouns & sexual^H^H^H
(48 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Subject-chomping (WAS: Pronouns & sexual^H^H^H)
TECH: Subject-chomping (WAS: Pronouns & sexual^H^H^H)
(28 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Subject-chomping (WAS: Pronouns & sexual^H^H^H)
(41 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Terminology Question-Verb that (inflects?) for emotional attachment
Terminology Question-Verb that (inflects?) for emotional attachment
(56 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology Question-Verb that (inflects?) for emotional attachment
(43 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
yet another conscript -- this one is for Layaklan
yet another conscript -- this one is for Layaklan
(58 lines)
From:
Elane Deren sa-Imgoven <
[log in to unmask]
>
[CLEAR] RE: META: "Chinese whispers"
[CLEAR] RE: META: "Chinese whispers"
(61 lines)
From:
Alistair J R Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – February 2009, week 4
Conlang Mailing List – February 2009, week 4
