Conlang
Mailing List – February 2009, week 2
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Con Lang Software
(3 messages)
Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(24 messages)
Feminization of plurals?
(25 messages)
Input on press resources page
(9 messages)
LCC live video streaming test - live right now
(2 messages)
Looking for a paper on partial reduplication
New LCS podcast/blog; contributors wanted
OT: Number bases
(12 messages)
OT: Number bases (WAS: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?))
(6 messages)
podrÃa haberlo hecho
podría haberlo hecho
(2 messages)
Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(26 messages)
YAEPT (< French)
Yahoo groups? (Was: podrÃa haberlo hecho)
YASGT: Adjectival agreement
(2 messages)
YASGT: Adjectival agreement (was: Feminization of plurals?)
(2 messages)
[lojban] Re: New LCS podcast/blog; contributors wanted
(2 messages)
Con Lang Software
Con Lang Software
(50 lines)
From:
Andrii Zvorygin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con Lang Software
(58 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con Lang Software
(35 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(50 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(57 lines)
From:
Ina van der Vegt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(46 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(45 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(38 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(71 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(35 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(33 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(63 lines)
From:
John Osborne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(80 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(106 lines)
From:
John Osborne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(125 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(53 lines)
From:
Michael Potter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(50 lines)
From:
Arnt Richard Johansen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(71 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(50 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(44 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(46 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(36 lines)
From:
Garth W. Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(49 lines)
From:
Garth W. Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?)
(55 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Feminization of plurals?
Feminization of plurals?
(42 lines)
From:
Adnan Majid <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(65 lines)
From:
Steven A. Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(45 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(50 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(110 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(78 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(67 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(78 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(146 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(68 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(148 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(37 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(50 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(42 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(46 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(79 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(108 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(60 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Feminization of plurals?
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Input on press resources page
Input on press resources page
(38 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Input on press resources page
(48 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Input on press resources page
(43 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Input on press resources page
(32 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Input on press resources page
(35 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Input on press resources page
(46 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Input on press resources page
(58 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Input on press resources page
(53 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Input on press resources page
(40 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
LCC live video streaming test - live right now
LCC live video streaming test - live right now
(33 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LCC live video streaming test - live right now
(33 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Looking for a paper on partial reduplication
Looking for a paper on partial reduplication
(31 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
New LCS podcast/blog; contributors wanted
New LCS podcast/blog; contributors wanted
(71 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Number bases
Re: OT: Number bases
(56 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Number bases
(45 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Number bases
(66 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Number bases
(51 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Number bases
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Number bases
(59 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Number bases
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Number bases
(70 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Number bases
(79 lines)
From:
Chris Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Number bases
(75 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Number bases
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Number bases
(56 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Number bases (WAS: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?))
OT: Number bases (WAS: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?))
(65 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Number bases (WAS: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?))
(91 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Number bases (WAS: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?))
(42 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Number bases (WAS: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?))
(42 lines)
From:
Rebecca Bettencourt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Number bases (WAS: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?))
(34 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Number bases (WAS: Constructed Computer Architectures (Concomps?))
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
podrÃa haberlo hecho
Re: podrÃa haberlo hecho
(58 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
podría haberlo hecho
podría haberlo hecho
(48 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: podría haberlo hecho
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(239 lines)
From:
Parker Glynn-Adey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(76 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(44 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(237 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(56 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(41 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(58 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(44 lines)
From:
Parker Glynn-Adey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(81 lines)
From:
Parker Glynn-Adey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(37 lines)
From:
Parker Glynn-Adey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(57 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(49 lines)
From:
Parker Glynn-Adey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(52 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(34 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(49 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(37 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(72 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(85 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(43 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(46 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(92 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(57 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(37 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some thoughts on mutli-modal (signing / speech) languages and communication.
(41 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEPT (< French)
Re: YAEPT (< French)
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yahoo groups? (Was: podrÃa haberlo hecho)
Yahoo groups? (Was: podrÃa haberlo hecho)
(34 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
YASGT: Adjectival agreement
Re: YASGT: Adjectival agreement
(97 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YASGT: Adjectival agreement
(108 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
YASGT: Adjectival agreement (was: Feminization of plurals?)
Re: YASGT: Adjectival agreement (was: Feminization of plurals?)
(117 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YASGT: Adjectival agreement (was: Feminization of plurals?)
(114 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
[lojban] Re: New LCS podcast/blog; contributors wanted
Re: [lojban] Re: New LCS podcast/blog; contributors wanted
(38 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [lojban] Re: New LCS podcast/blog; contributors wanted
(55 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – February 2009, week 2
Conlang Mailing List – February 2009, week 2
