Conlang Mailing List – March 2009, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "Get" passive (2 messages)
• "succession" (2 messages)
• Aspect (7 messages)
• Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (12 messages)
• Book Recommendations (11 messages)
• Chinese whispers game (7 messages)
• Complementary Infinitives (12 messages)
• CONLANG Digest - 27 Feb 2009 to 28 Feb 2009 (#2009-60)--re GET passive
• Conlang Document Translation (7 messages)
• Constructium
• cyphers of English (was "re: Interesting constraints") (4 messages)
• Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (18 messages)
• Diacritics and Vowel Inventories (WAS: Chinese whispers game) (4 messages)
• Friend (Was: Re: Interesting constraints)
• Gweydr and English Lax Vowels (6 messages)
• Huge phoneme inventories (was Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet) (5 messages)
• I need help creating my conlang (20 messages)
• IB: Modern Tocharian Cyrillics -- opinions wanted!
• Interesting constraints (51 messages)
• IPA speech synthesizer (2 messages)
• IPA XSAMPA conversion tools
• Languages written in the Roman alphabet (Was: Re: Chinese whispers game) (7 messages)
• LCC4 (2 messages)
• META: "Chinese whispers" (21 messages)
• More Chinese Whispers (18 messages)
• New Site Style (6 messages)
• OT but useful YourFonts
• Participles (18 messages)
• Phoneme Builder Alphabet (28 messages)
• Piashi update (7 messages)
• Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constra in ts)
• Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constra in ts)
• Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constrain ts)
• Pirahã (was Re: Interesting con stra in ts)
• Pirahã (was Re: Interes ting constrain ts)
• Pirahã (was Re: Interes ting constraints) (3 messages)
• Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constrain ts)
• Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constraints) (4 messages)
• reverse chinese whispers (8 messages)
• Six levels of tone (was Re: [CONLANG] Phoneme Builder Alphabet)
• Small Derivational Idea (4 messages)
• TECH: Mac fonts (was Re: IB: Modern Tocharian Cyrillics -- opinions wanted!) (7 messages)
• TECH: typing in IPA on Linux (was Re: Interesting constraints) (11 messages)
• THEORY: How would this language influence the other? (7 messages)
• Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (37 messages)
• [Fwd: [Demos] Deletion of group. Archive now!]
• [getting really really OT] Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (7 messages)

1. "Get" passive
   • Re: "Get" passive (37 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Get" passive (50 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>

2. "succession"
   • "succession" (29 lines)
     From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "succession" (31 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

3. Aspect
   • Aspect (30 lines)
     From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect (63 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect (64 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect (69 lines)
     From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect (91 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect (93 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect (57 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>

4. Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim
   • Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (366 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (30 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (32 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (34 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (40 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (37 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (49 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (65 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (64 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (71 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (47 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (38 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

5. Book Recommendations
   • Book Recommendations (23 lines)
     From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Book Recommendations (38 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Book Recommendations (46 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Book Recommendations (66 lines)
     From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Book Recommendations (28 lines)
     From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Book Recommendations (48 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Book Recommendations (49 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Book Recommendations (45 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Book Recommendations (52 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Book Recommendations (30 lines)
     From: Chris Wright <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Book Recommendations (36 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

6. Chinese whispers game
   • Re: Chinese whispers game (56 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chinese whispers game (35 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chinese whispers game (41 lines)
     From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chinese whispers game (38 lines)
     From: Ina van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chinese whispers game (35 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chinese whispers game (40 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chinese whispers game (40 lines)
     From: Ina van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>

7. Complementary Infinitives
   • Complementary Infinitives (40 lines)
     From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Complementary Infinitives (53 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Complementary Infinitives (65 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Complementary Infinitives (60 lines)
     From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Complementary Infinitives (75 lines)
     From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Complementary Infinitives (84 lines)
     From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Complementary Infinitives (30 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Complementary Infinitives (39 lines)
     From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Complementary Infinitives (58 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Complementary Infinitives (43 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Complementary Infinitives (66 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Complementary Infinitives (48 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

8. CONLANG Digest - 27 Feb 2009 to 28 Feb 2009 (#2009-60)--re GET passive
   • Re: CONLANG Digest - 27 Feb 2009 to 28 Feb 2009 (#2009-60)--re GET passive (36 lines)
     From: John H. Chalmers <[log in to unmask]>

9. Conlang Document Translation
   • Conlang Document Translation (87 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Document Translation (29 lines)
     From: Israel Noletto <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Document Translation (48 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Document Translation (37 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Document Translation (37 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Document Translation (54 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Document Translation (44 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

10. Constructium
    • Constructium (66 lines)
      From: Rebecca Bettencourt <[log in to unmask]>

11. cyphers of English (was "re: Interesting constraints")
    • cyphers of English (was "re: Interesting constraints") (68 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: cyphers of English (was "re: Interesting constraints") (85 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: cyphers of English (was "re: Interesting constraints") (39 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: cyphers of English (was "re: Interesting constraints") (101 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

12. Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German!
    • Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (78 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (52 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (55 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (46 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (89 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (64 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (66 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (63 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (44 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (64 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (34 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (44 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (57 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (41 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (44 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (34 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (40 lines)
      From: Ina van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Der Sprachbaukasten: Jetzt auf Deutsch! - The Language Construction Kit: Now in German! (35 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>

13. Diacritics and Vowel Inventories (WAS: Chinese whispers game)
    • Re: Diacritics and Vowel Inventories (WAS: Chinese whispers game) (72 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Diacritics and Vowel Inventories (WAS: Chinese whispers game) (42 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Diacritics and Vowel Inventories (WAS: Chinese whispers game) (55 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Diacritics and Vowel Inventories (WAS: Chinese whispers game) (36 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

14. Friend (Was: Re: Interesting constraints)
    • Friend (Was: Re: Interesting constraints) (40 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>

15. Gweydr and English Lax Vowels
    • Re: Gweydr and English Lax Vowels (38 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gweydr and English Lax Vowels (44 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gweydr and English Lax Vowels (39 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gweydr and English Lax Vowels (54 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gweydr and English Lax Vowels (47 lines)
      From: Chris Wright <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gweydr and English Lax Vowels (40 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>

16. Huge phoneme inventories (was Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet)
    • Huge phoneme inventories (was Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet) (55 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Huge phoneme inventories (was Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet) (45 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Huge phoneme inventories (was Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet) (61 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Huge phoneme inventories (was Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet) (62 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Huge phoneme inventories (was Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet) (38 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

17. I need help creating my conlang
    • I need help creating my conlang (36 lines)
      From: Bruno Barcelos <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (56 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (34 lines)
      From: Bruno Barcelos <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (34 lines)
      From: Chris Wright <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (52 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (36 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (67 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (36 lines)
      From: Bruno Barcelos <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (37 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (55 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (34 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (55 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (44 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (31 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (91 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (52 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (61 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (69 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (42 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I need help creating my conlang (49 lines)
      From: Israel Noletto <[log in to unmask]>

18. IB: Modern Tocharian Cyrillics -- opinions wanted!
    • IB: Modern Tocharian Cyrillics -- opinions wanted! (194 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

19. Interesting constraints
    • Interesting constraints (31 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (42 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (38 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (70 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (65 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (88 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (39 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (42 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (51 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (49 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (41 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (40 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (44 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (50 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (58 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (51 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (34 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (41 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (62 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (41 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (36 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (79 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (59 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (45 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (54 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (62 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (138 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (84 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (51 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (78 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (46 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (53 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (48 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (67 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (51 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (104 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (68 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (74 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (37 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (41 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (56 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (94 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (45 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (43 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (54 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (90 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (54 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (36 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (47 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (72 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interesting constraints (34 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

20. IPA speech synthesizer
    • Re: IPA speech synthesizer (46 lines)
      From: John Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA speech synthesizer (43 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

21. IPA XSAMPA conversion tools
    • IPA XSAMPA conversion tools (32 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>

22. Languages written in the Roman alphabet (Was: Re: Chinese whispers game)
    • Re: Languages written in the Roman alphabet (Was: Re: Chinese whispers game) (39 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Languages written in the Roman alphabet (Was: Re: Chinese whispers game) (90 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Languages written in the Roman alphabet (Was: Re: Chinese whispers game) (88 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Languages written in the Roman alphabet (Was: Re: Chinese whispers game) (47 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Languages written in the Roman alphabet (Was: Re: Chinese whispers game) (92 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Languages written in the Roman alphabet (Was: Re: Chinese whispers game) (72 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Languages written in the Roman alphabet (Was: Re: Chinese whispers game) (46 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

23. LCC4
    • LCC4 (48 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC4 (58 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

24. META: "Chinese whispers"
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (40 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (61 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (37 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (37 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (40 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (30 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (32 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (56 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (67 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (37 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (57 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (50 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (38 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (41 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (39 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (38 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (51 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (53 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

25. More Chinese Whispers
    • More Chinese Whispers (61 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Chinese Whispers (65 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Chinese Whispers (74 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Chinese Whispers (58 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Chinese Whispers (69 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Chinese Whispers (69 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Chinese Whispers (57 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Chinese Whispers (85 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Chinese Whispers (96 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Chinese Whispers (87 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Chinese Whispers (90 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Chinese Whispers (106 lines)
      From: Chris Wright <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Chinese Whispers (57 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Chinese Whispers (42 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Chinese Whispers (92 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Chinese Whispers (110 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Chinese Whispers (105 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Chinese Whispers (125 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>

26. New Site Style
    • New Site Style (60 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Site Style (65 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Site Style (75 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Site Style (102 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Site Style (34 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Site Style (61 lines)
      From: Veoler <[log in to unmask]>

27. OT but useful YourFonts
    • OT but useful YourFonts (52 lines)
      From: Paul Schleitwiler, FCM <[log in to unmask]>

28. Participles
    • Participles (35 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles (29 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles (48 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles (67 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles (44 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles (76 lines)
      From: Scott Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles (55 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles (110 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles (53 lines)
      From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles (76 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles (112 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles (54 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles (85 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles (99 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles (63 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles (111 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles (36 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles (132 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

29. Phoneme Builder Alphabet
    • Phoneme Builder Alphabet (109 lines)
      From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (32 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (126 lines)
      From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (44 lines)
      From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (35 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (53 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (51 lines)
      From: Chris Wright <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (70 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (67 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (39 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (204 lines)
      From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (33 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (37 lines)
      From: Przemyslaw Ziobrowski <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (79 lines)
      From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (61 lines)
      From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (66 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (26 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (42 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (34 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (43 lines)
      From: Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (48 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (45 lines)
      From: Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (49 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (52 lines)
      From: Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (37 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (49 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (38 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phoneme Builder Alphabet (57 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

30. Piashi update
    • Piashi update (55 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Piashi update (40 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Piashi update (50 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Piashi update (87 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Piashi update (65 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Piashi update (97 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Piashi update (109 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

31. Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constra in ts)
    • Re: Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constra in ts) (48 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

32. Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constra in ts)
    • Re: Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constra in ts) (74 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

33. Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constrain ts)
    • Re: Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constrain ts) (77 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

34. Pirahã (was Re: Interesting con stra in ts)
    • Re: Pirahã (was Re: Interesting con stra in ts) (68 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

35. Pirahã (was Re: Interes ting constrain ts)
    • Re: Pirahã (was Re: Interes ting constrain ts) (74 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

36. Pirahã (was Re: Interes ting constraints)
    • Re: Pirahã (was Re: Interes ting constraints) (46 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pirahã (was Re: Interes ting constraints) (55 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pirahã (was Re: Interes ting constraints) (39 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>

37. Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constrain ts)
    • Re: Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constrain ts) (78 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

38. Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constraints)
    • Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constraints) (69 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constraints) (37 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constraints) (65 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pirahã (was Re: Interesting constraints) (56 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

39. reverse chinese whispers
    • Re: reverse chinese whispers (32 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: reverse chinese whispers (30 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: reverse chinese whispers (38 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: reverse chinese whispers (53 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: reverse chinese whispers (36 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: reverse chinese whispers (40 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: reverse chinese whispers (28 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: reverse chinese whispers (34 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

40. Six levels of tone (was Re: [CONLANG] Phoneme Builder Alphabet)
    • Six levels of tone (was Re: [CONLANG] Phoneme Builder Alphabet) (45 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

41. Small Derivational Idea
    • Re: Small Derivational Idea (121 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Small Derivational Idea (161 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Small Derivational Idea (189 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Small Derivational Idea (169 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

42. TECH: Mac fonts (was Re: IB: Modern Tocharian Cyrillics -- opinions wanted!)
    • TECH: Mac fonts (was Re: IB: Modern Tocharian Cyrillics -- opinions wanted!) (57 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Mac fonts (was Re: IB: Modern Tocharian Cyrillics -- opinions wanted!) (38 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Mac fonts (was Re: IB: Modern Tocharian Cyrillics -- opinions wanted!) (62 lines)
      From: Ina van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Mac fonts (was Re: IB: Modern Tocharian Cyrillics -- opinions wanted!) (36 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Mac fonts (was Re: IB: Modern Tocharian Cyrillics -- opinions wanted!) (65 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Mac fonts (was Re: IB: Modern Tocharian Cyrillics -- opinions wanted!) (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Mac fonts (was Re: IB: Modern Tocharian Cyrillics -- opinions wanted!) (49 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

43. TECH: typing in IPA on Linux (was Re: Interesting constraints)
    • TECH: typing in IPA on Linux (was Re: Interesting constraints) (38 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: typing in IPA on Linux (was Re: Interesting constraints) (29 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: typing in IPA on Linux (was Re: Interesting constraints) (32 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: typing in IPA on Linux (was Re: Interesting constraints) (40 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: typing in IPA on Linux (was Re: Interesting constraints) (29 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: typing in IPA on Linux (was Re: Interesting constraints) (45 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: typing in IPA on Linux (was Re: Interesting constraints) (33 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: typing in IPA on Linux (was Re: Interesting constraints) (47 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: typing in IPA on Linux (was Re: Interesting constraints) (53 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: typing in IPA on Linux (was Re: Interesting constraints) (41 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: typing in IPA on Linux (was Re: Interesting constraints) (53 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>

44. THEORY: How would this language influence the other?
    • THEORY: How would this language influence the other? (65 lines)
      From: Eamon Bohan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: How would this language influence the other? (60 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: How would this language influence the other? (97 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: How would this language influence the other? (36 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: How would this language influence the other? (115 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: How would this language influence the other? (75 lines)
      From: Eamon Bohan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: How would this language influence the other? (64 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

45. Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs
    • Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (35 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (97 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (96 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (112 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (40 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (57 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (58 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (55 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (55 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (58 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (55 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (97 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (55 lines)
      From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (31 lines)
      From: Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (104 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (121 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (34 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (59 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (59 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (39 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (46 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (32 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (49 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (51 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (40 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (47 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (62 lines)
      From: Adnan Majid <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (42 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (45 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (48 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (56 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (28 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (50 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (68 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (77 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (32 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs (43 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

46. [Fwd: [Demos] Deletion of group. Archive now!]
    • [Fwd: [Demos] Deletion of group. Archive now!] (46 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

47. [getting really really OT] Re: META: "Chinese whispers"
    • [getting really really OT] Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (50 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [getting really really OT] Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (36 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [getting really really OT] Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (46 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [getting really really OT] Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (54 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [getting really really OT] Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (36 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [getting really really OT] Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (39 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [getting really really OT] Re: META: "Chinese whispers" (55 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>