Conlang
Mailing List – March 2009, week 2
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
-(h)ue
(2 messages)
A question of phone
(2 messages)
A question of phone (was: tone)
(20 messages)
A question of tone
(56 messages)
Book Recommendations
Classical Latin in 4th/5th century North Africa
Cleaned-up version of the Conlang Flag
Constructium
(3 messages)
Converb, gerund, masdar, verbnoun, content-word
(9 messages)
Derivation from particles
(27 messages)
Hopefully, not another YAEPT (was: A question of tone)
(2 messages)
Interesting constraints
(8 messages)
IPA XSAMPA conversion tools
Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(27 messages)
music composition programs
Non-finite verb-forms and verbals (was: Converb, gerund, masdar, verbnoun, content-word)
Original "Your Language Here" Conlang t-shirt?
OT: Acrobat (dumb question dept.)
(6 messages)
OT: music composition programs
(12 messages)
perlative question
(3 messages)
Piashi update
(20 messages)
Pirahã (was Re: Interes ting constraints)
Prepositions and Tense/Aspect
(3 messages)
Small Derivational Idea
(7 messages)
sound change: /l/ and /n/
(15 messages)
strange number derivations
(9 messages)
TECH (minor IE annoyance)
(4 messages)
USAGE: YAEUT: "begun V-ing" vs "begun to V"
(5 messages)
Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs
(2 messages)
-(h)ue
-(h)ue
(32 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: -(h)ue
(41 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
A question of phone
Re: A question of phone
(56 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone
(45 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
A question of phone (was: tone)
A question of phone (was: tone)
(34 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(61 lines)
From:
Steven A. Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(49 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(33 lines)
From:
Israel Noletto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(33 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(43 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(70 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(33 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(46 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(61 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(48 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(31 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(68 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(55 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(36 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(83 lines)
From:
Oren <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(50 lines)
From:
Oren <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(33 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of phone (was: tone)
(55 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
A question of tone
A question of tone
(46 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(46 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(60 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(63 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(119 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(162 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(69 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: A question of tone
(50 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: A question of tone
(66 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(40 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(41 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(40 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(75 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(38 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(113 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(42 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(40 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(58 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(44 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(127 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(48 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(44 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(53 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(53 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(32 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(40 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(48 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(106 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(61 lines)
From:
T. A. McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(62 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(59 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(59 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(88 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(52 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(48 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(44 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(58 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(97 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(73 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(42 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(72 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(70 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(92 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(37 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(79 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(90 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(56 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(50 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question of tone
(51 lines)
From:
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Book Recommendations
Re: Book Recommendations
(37 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Classical Latin in 4th/5th century North Africa
Classical Latin in 4th/5th century North Africa
(36 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cleaned-up version of the Conlang Flag
Cleaned-up version of the Conlang Flag
(48 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Constructium
Re: Constructium
(30 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructium
(46 lines)
From:
Rebecca Bettencourt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Constructium
(49 lines)
From:
Rebecca Bettencourt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Converb, gerund, masdar, verbnoun, content-word
Converb, gerund, masdar, verbnoun, content-word
(78 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Converb, gerund, masdar, verbnoun, content-word
(86 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Converb, gerund, masdar, verbnoun, content-word
(70 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Converb, gerund, masdar, verbnoun, content-word
(61 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Converb, gerund, masdar, verbnoun, content-word
(84 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Converb, gerund, masdar, verbnoun, content-word
(76 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Converb, gerund, masdar, verbnoun, content-word
(47 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Converb, gerund, masdar, verbnoun, content-word
(76 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Converb, gerund, masdar, verbnoun, content-word
(67 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Derivation from particles
Derivation from particles
(66 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(44 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(49 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(48 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(46 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(57 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(49 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(112 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(80 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(114 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(40 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(54 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(35 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(63 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(34 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(37 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(35 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(99 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(125 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(113 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(40 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(42 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(40 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(39 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation from particles
(44 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hopefully, not another YAEPT (was: A question of tone)
Hopefully, not another YAEPT (was: A question of tone)
(103 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hopefully, not another YAEPT (was: A question of tone)
(42 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Interesting constraints
Re: Interesting constraints
(22 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting constraints
(38 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting constraints
(57 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting constraints
(45 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting constraints
(41 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting constraints
(133 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting constraints
(73 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting constraints
(52 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
IPA XSAMPA conversion tools
Re: IPA XSAMPA conversion tools
(40 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(52 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(66 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(38 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(50 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(49 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(59 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(36 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(40 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(62 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(60 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(65 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(41 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(43 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(57 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(35 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(50 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(108 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(110 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(41 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Letter for the voiced postalveolar affricate
(46 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
music composition programs
Re: music composition programs
(49 lines)
From:
Kurt M. Weber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Non-finite verb-forms and verbals (was: Converb, gerund, masdar, verbnoun, content-word)
Non-finite verb-forms and verbals (was: Converb, gerund, masdar, verbnoun, content-word)
(228 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Original "Your Language Here" Conlang t-shirt?
Original "Your Language Here" Conlang t-shirt?
(38 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Acrobat (dumb question dept.)
OT: Acrobat (dumb question dept.)
(27 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Acrobat (dumb question dept.)
(52 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Acrobat (dumb question dept.)
(51 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Acrobat (dumb question dept.)
(68 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Acrobat (dumb question dept.)
(31 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Acrobat (dumb question dept.)
(73 lines)
From:
Paul Schleitwiler, FCM <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: music composition programs
OT: music composition programs
(25 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: music composition programs
(34 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: music composition programs
(34 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: music composition programs
(40 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: music composition programs
(44 lines)
From:
Kurt M. Weber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: music composition programs
(58 lines)
From:
Kurt M. Weber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: music composition programs
(43 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: music composition programs
(70 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: music composition programs
(58 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: music composition programs
(46 lines)
From:
Kurt M. Weber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: music composition programs
(66 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: music composition programs
(28 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
perlative question
perlative question
(33 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: perlative question
(46 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: perlative question
(79 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Piashi update
Re: Piashi update
(70 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(52 lines)
From:
Chris Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(31 lines)
From:
Chris Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(40 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(39 lines)
From:
Chris Wright <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(35 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(86 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(103 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(51 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(47 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(58 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(63 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(135 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(88 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(107 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(39 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(65 lines)
From:
Ina van der Vegt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(85 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piashi update
(82 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pirahã (was Re: Interes ting constraints)
Re: Pirahã (was Re: Interes ting constraints)
(39 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Prepositions and Tense/Aspect
Prepositions and Tense/Aspect
(28 lines)
From:
Linvi Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Prepositions and Tense/Aspect
(44 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Prepositions and Tense/Aspect
(38 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Small Derivational Idea
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(191 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(142 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(135 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(107 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(56 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(45 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Small Derivational Idea
(130 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
sound change: /l/ and /n/
sound change: /l/ and /n/
(45 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sound change: /l/ and /n/
(49 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sound change: /l/ and /n/
(76 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sound change: /l/ and /n/
(104 lines)
From:
Adnan Majid <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sound change: /l/ and /n/
(122 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sound change: /l/ and /n/
(69 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sound change: /l/ and /n/
(96 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sound change: /l/ and /n/
(65 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sound change: /l/ and /n/
(49 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sound change: /l/ and /n/
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sound change: /l/ and /n/
(54 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sound change: /l/ and /n/
(47 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sound change: /l/ and /n/
(37 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sound change: /l/ and /n/
(42 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sound change: /l/ and /n/
(46 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
strange number derivations
strange number derivations
(64 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: strange number derivations
(38 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: strange number derivations
(88 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: strange number derivations
(56 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: strange number derivations
(54 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: strange number derivations
(64 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: strange number derivations
(74 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: strange number derivations
(74 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: strange number derivations
(46 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH (minor IE annoyance)
TECH (minor IE annoyance)
(27 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (minor IE annoyance)
(67 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (minor IE annoyance)
(84 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH (minor IE annoyance)
(80 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: YAEUT: "begun V-ing" vs "begun to V"
USAGE: YAEUT: "begun V-ing" vs "begun to V"
(27 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "begun V-ing" vs "begun to V"
(51 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "begun V-ing" vs "begun to V"
(64 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "begun V-ing" vs "begun to V"
(42 lines)
From:
Paul Kershaw <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: YAEUT: "begun V-ing" vs "begun to V"
(103 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs
Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs
(52 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vorlin - building prepositions from verbs
(54 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – March 2009, week 2
Conlang Mailing List – March 2009, week 2
