Conlang Mailing List – March 2009, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction) (12 messages)
• commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes) (2 messages)
• Conlang text anthology? (5 messages)
• does conlanging change your sense of reality? (29 messages)
• Formal vs. natural languages (was Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.) (10 messages)
• LCC3 and K'tlê
• Linguistic terms (was: Formal vs. natural languages) (2 messages)
• Oligosynthetic languages in nature. (5 messages)
• OT Fuishiki Okamoto (was: Oligosynthetic languages in nature)
• OT: Ra (was Re: Formal vs. natural languages (was Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.))
• Question about Central Mountain Languages (2 messages)
• Scanner help/suggestions (was: LCC3 an d K'tl ê)
• Scanner help/suggestions (was: LCC3 and K't l ê)
• Scanner help/suggestions (was: LCC3 and K'tl ê)
• TECH: archives.conlang.info frozen
• TECH: Listserv software comparison (2 messages)
• The Kayasahtan Characters (6 messages)
• The Oligosynthesis Project
• The Relay Museum (beta) needs volunteers!
• Why Did Boustrophedon Disappear? (5 messages)
• Why did Boustrophedon Disappear?
• YAEPT (we can't have enough)

1. 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)
   • Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction) (36 lines)
     Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:48:04 -0000
   • Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction) (54 lines)
     Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:43:31 -0400
   • Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction) (34 lines)
     Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:30:23 -0500
   • Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction) (48 lines)
     Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:40:13 +0200
   • Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction) (56 lines)
     Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:51:52 -0400
   • Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction) (53 lines)
     Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:24:31 -0700
   • Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction) (35 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:45:42 +0200
   • Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction) (38 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:24:21 -0400
   • Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction) (46 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:02:29 +0200
   • Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction) (44 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:13:58 +0200
   • Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction) (46 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:39:02 -0500
   • Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction) (56 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:03:03 -0400

2. commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)
   • Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes) (54 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:58:58 -0500
   • Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes) (77 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:52:16 -0700

3. Conlang text anthology?
   • Re: Conlang text anthology? (30 lines)
     Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:56:09 -0700
   • Re: Conlang text anthology? (45 lines)
     Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:26:27 +0200
   • Re: Conlang text anthology? (46 lines)
     Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:53:37 -0400
   • Re: Conlang text anthology? (59 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:18:14 -0500
   • Re: Conlang text anthology? (46 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:21:43 -0700

4. does conlanging change your sense of reality?
   • does conlanging change your sense of reality? (29 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:57:52 -0400
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (57 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:14:23 +0100
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (41 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:32:46 +0200
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (57 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:37:47 -0700
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (93 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:30:44 -0400
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (48 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:28:36 +0200
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (53 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:45:45 +0100
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (118 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:39:31 +0200
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (52 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:30:39 +0100
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (49 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:15:46 -0700
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (45 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:52:38 -0400
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (81 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:31:54 +0100
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (38 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:14:15 -0400
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (60 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:37:26 -0400
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (56 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:00:44 +0200
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (63 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:12:27 -0500
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (44 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:16:06 -0500
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (51 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:26:42 +0200
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (37 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:39:50 -0700
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (39 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:02:35 -0700
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (96 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:11:49 +0200
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (55 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:40:05 -0400
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (59 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:20:51 +0200
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (62 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:32:49 -0400
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (41 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:40:23 -0400
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (35 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:42:47 -0700
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (34 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:31:19 -0700
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (51 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:26:37 -0400
   • Re: does conlanging change your sense of reality? (42 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:31:41 -0700

5. Formal vs. natural languages (was Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.)
   • Formal vs. natural languages (was Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.) (120 lines)
     Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:25:19 +0200
   • Re: Formal vs. natural languages (was Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.) (120 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:13:43 +0100
   • Re: Formal vs. natural languages (was Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.) (106 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:24:59 +0200
   • Re: Formal vs. natural languages (was Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.) (59 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:53:09 -0600
   • Re: Formal vs. natural languages (was Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.) (44 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:16:08 +0100
   • Re: Formal vs. natural languages (was Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.) (91 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:57:24 +0100
   • Re: Formal vs. natural languages (was Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.) (34 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:51:37 -0700
   • Re: Formal vs. natural languages (was Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.) (51 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:41:24 -0600
   • Re: Formal vs. natural languages (was Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.) (130 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:26:58 -0400
   • Re: Formal vs. natural languages (was Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.) (181 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:49:47 +0100

6. LCC3 and K'tlê
   • Re: LCC3 and K'tlê (40 lines)
     Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 01:36:32 -0400

7. Linguistic terms (was: Formal vs. natural languages)
   • Linguistic terms (was: Formal vs. natural languages) (94 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:47:46 +0100
   • Re: Linguistic terms (was: Formal vs. natural languages) (50 lines)
     Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:19:28 -0700

8. Oligosynthetic languages in nature.
   • Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature. (113 lines)
     Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:18:29 +0100
   • Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature. (47 lines)
     Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:24:09 +0100
   • Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature. (58 lines)
     Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:12:34 +0100
   • Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature. (43 lines)
     Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:57:24 -0700
   • Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature. (34 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:24:31 +0900

9. OT Fuishiki Okamoto (was: Oligosynthetic languages in nature)
   • OT Fuishiki Okamoto (was: Oligosynthetic languages in nature) (61 lines)
     Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:22:22 +0100

10. OT: Ra (was Re: Formal vs. natural languages (was Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.))
    • OT: Ra (was Re: Formal vs. natural languages (was Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.)) (64 lines)
      Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:30:54 -0500

11. Question about Central Mountain Languages
    • Re: Question about Central Mountain Languages (61 lines)
      Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:29:32 -0500
    • Re: Question about Central Mountain Languages (38 lines)
      Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:24:44 -0700

12. Scanner help/suggestions (was: LCC3 an d K'tl ê)
    • Re: Scanner help/suggestions (was: LCC3 an d K'tl ê) (30 lines)
      Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:54:50 -0700

13. Scanner help/suggestions (was: LCC3 and K't l ê)
    • Re: Scanner help/suggestions (was: LCC3 and K't l ê) (69 lines)
      Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:28:36 -0500

14. Scanner help/suggestions (was: LCC3 and K'tl ê)
    • Re: Scanner help/suggestions (was: LCC3 and K'tl ê) (45 lines)
      Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:06:26 -0700

15. TECH: archives.conlang.info frozen
    • TECH: archives.conlang.info frozen (37 lines)
      Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:51:41 +0200

16. TECH: Listserv software comparison
    • Re: TECH: Listserv software comparison (53 lines)
      Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:09:02 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Listserv software comparison (55 lines)
      Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:27:25 -0400

17. The Kayasahtan Characters
    • Re: The Kayasahtan Characters (52 lines)
      Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:45:00 -0500
    • Re: The Kayasahtan Characters (77 lines)
      Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:09:23 +0200
    • Re: The Kayasahtan Characters (43 lines)
      Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:27:30 -0700
    • Re: The Kayasahtan Characters (40 lines)
      Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:50:48 +0200
    • Re: The Kayasahtan Characters (47 lines)
      Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:09:25 -0700
    • Re: The Kayasahtan Characters (58 lines)
      Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:31:42 +0200

18. The Oligosynthesis Project
    • The Oligosynthesis Project (37 lines)
      Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:50:31 +0100

19. The Relay Museum (beta) needs volunteers!
    • Re: The Relay Museum (beta) needs volunteers! (52 lines)
      Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:24:05 +0200

20. Why Did Boustrophedon Disappear?
    • Re: Why Did Boustrophedon Disappear? (41 lines)
      Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:09:21 +0100
    • Re: Why Did Boustrophedon Disappear? (42 lines)
      Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:12:58 -0700
    • Re: Why Did Boustrophedon Disappear? (38 lines)
      Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 06:38:27 +0200
    • Re: Why Did Boustrophedon Disappear? (142 lines)
      Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:15:07 +0100
    • Re: Why Did Boustrophedon Disappear? (65 lines)
      Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:08:32 +0200

21. Why did Boustrophedon Disappear?
    • Re: Why did Boustrophedon Disappear? (42 lines)
      Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:47:37 +0100

22. YAEPT (we can't have enough)
    • YAEPT (we can't have enough) (43 lines)
      Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:39:23 +0200