Conlang Mailing List – March 2009, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• 18 base concepts (18 messages)
• 2 base axiom concepts (was 18 base concepts) (7 messages)
• A question of phone (was: tone) (4 messages)
• A question of tone (2 messages)
• Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (9 messages)
• Bsrag
• Derivation from particles (4 messages)
• K'tle web pages
• Kijeb verb inflection (3 messages)
• LCC3 Simulcast this weekend & Friday info
• Oligosynthesis in fantasy (3 messages)
• OT: "Google books" question (10 messages)
• OT: Acrobat (dumb question dept.) (5 messages)
• OT: LCC3 Live streaming test RIGHT NOW
• perlative question (4 messages)
• strange number derivations (2 messages)
• YAAuPT: Pronunciation of <eay> digraph (3 messages)
• YAFPT: p'tit (was YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph)
• YAxPT: inital /ts/ (was YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph) (6 messages)
• YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (212 messages)
• YAxPT: Pronunciation of initial clusters (3 messages)

1. 18 base concepts
   • 18 base concepts (148 lines)
     From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:27:19 -0400
   • Re: 18 base concepts (58 lines)
     From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:37:23 -0400
   • Re: 18 base concepts (70 lines)
     From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:44:27 -0400
   • Re: 18 base concepts (63 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:27:22 +0100
   • Re: 18 base concepts (75 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:38:02 +0000
   • Re: 18 base concepts (84 lines)
     From: Erbrice <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:38:43 +0100
   • Re: 18 base concepts (95 lines)
     From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:03:24 -0400
   • Re: 18 base concepts (79 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:34:57 +0100
   • Re: 18 base concepts (103 lines)
     From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:37:06 -0400
   • Re: 18 base concepts (44 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:51:31 +0100
   • Re: 18 base concepts (37 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:54:06 -0700
   • Re: 18 base concepts (125 lines)
     From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:22:42 -0400
   • Re: 18 base concepts (48 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:52:11 -0700
   • Re: 18 base concepts (69 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:08:01 -0700
   • Re: 18 base concepts (127 lines)
     From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:34:51 -0400
   • Re: 18 base concepts (146 lines)
     From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:48:36 -0400
   • Re: 18 base concepts (75 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:26:09 +0100
   • Re: 18 base concepts (34 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:11:13 -0400

2. 2 base axiom concepts (was 18 base concepts)
   • 2 base axiom concepts (was 18 base concepts) (73 lines)
     From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:40:31 -0400
   • Re: 2 base axiom concepts (was 18 base concepts) (81 lines)
     From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:55:58 -0400
   • Re: 2 base axiom concepts (was 18 base concepts) (41 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:16:06 -0700
   • Re: 2 base axiom concepts (was 18 base concepts) (110 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:28:16 +0000
   • Re: 2 base axiom concepts (was 18 base concepts) (141 lines)
     From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:57:05 -0400
   • Re: 2 base axiom concepts (was 18 base concepts) (169 lines)
     From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:10:02 -0400
   • Re: 2 base axiom concepts (was 18 base concepts) (200 lines)
     From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:27:30 -0400

3. A question of phone (was: tone)
   • Re: A question of phone (was: tone) (43 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 01:41:10 -0500
   • Re: A question of phone (was: tone) (44 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:53:48 -0700
   • Re: A question of phone (was: tone) (55 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 06:08:46 -0400
   • Re: A question of phone (was: tone) (35 lines)
     From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:20:29 +0100

4. A question of tone
   • Re: A question of tone (48 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:25:21 +0100
   • Re: A question of tone (56 lines)
     From: Julia "Schnecki" Simon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:16:42 +0100

5. Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (72 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:45:07 +0100
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (166 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:09:54 +0100
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (87 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:28:14 -0400
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (83 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:59:09 +0100
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (46 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:13:30 -0400
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (48 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:17:32 +0100
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (65 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:56:21 -0400
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (73 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:21:14 +0100
   • Re: Benct-X-SAMPA keymap for vim (52 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:05:42 -0400

6. Bsrag
   • Bsrag (30 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:01:57 -0500

7. Derivation from particles
   • Re: Derivation from particles (40 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:42:23 +0100
   • Re: Derivation from particles (37 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:56:59 -0400
   • Re: Derivation from particles (46 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:16:18 -0700
   • Re: Derivation from particles (39 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:49:26 +0000

8. K'tle web pages
   • K'tle web pages (26 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:00:45 -0400

9. Kijeb verb inflection
   • Kijeb verb inflection (266 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:03:15 +0100
   • Re: Kijeb verb inflection (25 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:18:11 -0400
   • Re: Kijeb verb inflection (87 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:23:27 -0700

10. LCC3 Simulcast this weekend & Friday info
    • LCC3 Simulcast this weekend & Friday info (36 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:18:19 -0700

11. Oligosynthesis in fantasy
    • Oligosynthesis in fantasy (39 lines)
      From: Ina van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:48:20 +0100
    • Re: Oligosynthesis in fantasy (57 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:32:45 +0000
    • Re: Oligosynthesis in fantasy (72 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:24:51 +0000

12. OT: "Google books" question
    • OT: "Google books" question (25 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:16:55 -0700
    • Re: OT: "Google books" question (33 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:28:38 -0400
    • Re: OT: "Google books" question (73 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:08:27 +0100
    • Re: OT: "Google books" question (31 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:29:54 -0700
    • Re: OT: "Google books" question (57 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:43:35 +0100
    • Re: OT: "Google books" question (41 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:05:15 -0700
    • Re: OT: "Google books" question (91 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:24:38 -0700
    • Re: OT: "Google books" question (48 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:32:26 -0700
    • Re: OT: "Google books" question (33 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:52:12 -0400
    • Re: OT: "Google books" question (63 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:05:50 -0700

13. OT: Acrobat (dumb question dept.)
    • Re: OT: Acrobat (dumb question dept.) (29 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:44:36 -0700
    • Re: OT: Acrobat (dumb question dept.) (40 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:00:39 -0700
    • Re: OT: Acrobat (dumb question dept.) (37 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:18:44 -0700
    • Re: OT: Acrobat (dumb question dept.) (36 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:05:18 +0100
    • Re: OT: Acrobat (dumb question dept.) (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 07:39:53 -0400

14. OT: LCC3 Live streaming test RIGHT NOW
    • OT: LCC3 Live streaming test RIGHT NOW (36 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:46:45 -0700

15. perlative question
    • Re: perlative question (47 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:02:19 -0500
    • Re: perlative question (51 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 02:05:36 -0400
    • Re: perlative question (38 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:30:46 -0700
    • Re: perlative question (48 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:16:01 -0400

16. strange number derivations
    • Re: strange number derivations (66 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:14:17 -0500
    • Re: strange number derivations (69 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 01:50:34 -0400

17. YAAuPT: Pronunciation of <eay> digraph
    • Re: YAAuPT: Pronunciation of <eay> digraph (113 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:29:26 +0100
    • Re: YAAuPT: Pronunciation of <eay> digraph (49 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:44:25 +0100
    • Re: YAAuPT: Pronunciation of <eay> digraph (53 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:46:31 +0000

18. YAFPT: p'tit (was YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph)
    • YAFPT: p'tit (was YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph) (61 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:13:34 +0000

19. YAxPT: inital /ts/ (was YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph)
    • YAxPT: inital /ts/ (was YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph) (72 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:37:18 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: inital /ts/ (was YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph) (83 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 06:50:46 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: inital /ts/ (was YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph) (61 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 07:28:01 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: inital /ts/ (was YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph) (39 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 07:02:19 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: inital /ts/ (was YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph) (61 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:37:01 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: inital /ts/ (was YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph) (41 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 07:43:57 -0700

20. YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph
    • YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (43 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:47:33 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (33 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:54:55 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (39 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:05:29 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (70 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:06:35 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (46 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:19:57 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (55 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:15:48 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (60 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:42:59 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (33 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 20:37:26 -0500
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (46 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:38:33 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (74 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:36:55 +1200
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (48 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:38:40 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (46 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:08:01 -0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (111 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:47:29 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (63 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:33:55 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (61 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:28:59 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (34 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:39:10 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (78 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:48:46 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (41 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:10:38 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (60 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:20:04 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (38 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:20:43 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (56 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:21:46 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:35:52 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (101 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:58:09 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (58 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:05:07 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (39 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:07:13 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (39 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:08:57 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (40 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:05:44 -0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (34 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:20:15 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (57 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:40:04 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:49:15 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (47 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:54:46 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (39 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:59:21 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (34 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:59:47 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (47 lines)
      From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:50:21 -0300
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (67 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:35:09 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (39 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:08:19 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:35:55 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (41 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:53:17 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (46 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:55:40 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (44 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:21:12 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (36 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:22:14 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (59 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:20:13 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (45 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:18:21 -0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (35 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:52:25 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (37 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:42:37 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (46 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:25:27 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (51 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:37:06 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (59 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:43:23 +1200
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (93 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:31:05 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (106 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 06:40:40 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (58 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:34:56 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (48 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:45:00 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (70 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:55:45 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (102 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:57:38 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (56 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:02:54 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (41 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:07:23 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (60 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:28:33 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (94 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:29:10 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (50 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:31:05 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (66 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:37:50 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (58 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:48:29 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (89 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:22:31 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (113 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:40:34 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (49 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:41:03 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (45 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:35:55 -0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (56 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:14:46 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (78 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:19:40 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (34 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:26:47 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (51 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:11:48 -0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (71 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:18:37 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (43 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:25:59 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (104 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:04:22 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (41 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:52:32 -0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (46 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:51:28 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (117 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:34:25 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (46 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:42:10 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (60 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:58:38 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (128 lines)
      From: Adnan Majid <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:23:34 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (118 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:38:17 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (84 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:45:06 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (52 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:51:16 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (74 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:00:41 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (63 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:42:19 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (68 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:14:31 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (98 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:15:01 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (44 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:47:59 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (45 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:10:05 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (53 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:14:05 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (53 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:48:40 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (155 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:55:42 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (77 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:57:37 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (50 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:59:11 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (45 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:02:00 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (69 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:08:26 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (38 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:09:50 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (97 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:12:03 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (81 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:31:38 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (46 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:50:53 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (56 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:58:58 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (36 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:04:54 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (71 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:57:44 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (35 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:20:41 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (61 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:03:57 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (38 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:48:46 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (49 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 06:58:28 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (61 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:24:40 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (236 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:33:00 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (65 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:37:43 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (53 lines)
      From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:42:13 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (54 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:50:55 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (34 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:52:59 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (43 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:31:19 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (180 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:25:18 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (57 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:28:25 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (73 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:40:21 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (86 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:44:02 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (65 lines)
      From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:40:06 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (78 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:49:08 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (32 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:00:49 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (44 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:03:37 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (34 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:25:23 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (135 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:25:31 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (58 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:25:32 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (32 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:39:14 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (47 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:16:50 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (62 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:23:32 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (48 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:31:57 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (165 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:28:25 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (64 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:03:28 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (237 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:36:59 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (58 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:51:15 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (64 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:06:01 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (48 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:39:41 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (32 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:43:49 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (33 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:12:12 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (49 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:29:36 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (46 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:25:33 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (39 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:48:56 -0500
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (53 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:34:09 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (81 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:46:19 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (49 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:52:30 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (62 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:54:52 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (48 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:57:47 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (49 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:58:10 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (39 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:00:34 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (59 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:02:27 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (54 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:03:41 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (72 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:12:45 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (74 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:18:47 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (52 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:31:41 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (72 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:48:38 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (49 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:51:29 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (45 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:54:21 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (54 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:57:36 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (49 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:01:18 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (37 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:06:26 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (44 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:14:35 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (56 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:15:16 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (71 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:26:05 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (74 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:18:30 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (36 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:19:38 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:35:31 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (51 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:43:02 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (39 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:46:08 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (44 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:08:32 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (115 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:22:46 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:22:53 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (65 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:36:38 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (31 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:46:09 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (44 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:47:36 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (122 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:59:14 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (42 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:01:41 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (75 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:12:23 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (59 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:20:07 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (44 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:18:52 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (130 lines)
      From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:20:21 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (53 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:30:29 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (57 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:32:05 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (39 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:03:51 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (47 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:08:57 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (57 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:12:03 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (83 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:22:49 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (37 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:26:09 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (42 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:37:43 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (85 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:39:12 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (53 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:41:18 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (42 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:59:37 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (66 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:02:57 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (115 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:04:35 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (36 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:07:11 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (54 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:07:50 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (35 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:50:37 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (44 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:16:52 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:19:28 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (160 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:20:26 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (32 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:23:47 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (66 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:48:55 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (108 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:56:05 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (82 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:12:37 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (42 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:31:55 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (40 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:39:17 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (32 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:41:09 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (55 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:53:50 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (49 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:58:56 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (47 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:02:44 -0700
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (44 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:59:45 -0600
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (31 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:18:30 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (40 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:40:23 +0000
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (61 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:34:53 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (246 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:02:48 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (64 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:46:20 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (70 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:10:47 +0100

21. YAxPT: Pronunciation of initial clusters
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of initial clusters (36 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:13:41 -0400
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of initial clusters (60 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:44:58 +0100
    • Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of initial clusters (45 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:53:17 -0400