Conlang Mailing List – April 2009, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (18 messages)
• adposition (2 messages)
• adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (53 messages)
• and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents
• bye (3 messages)
• CONL: Urianian verbs. (was: Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel))
• CONL: Urianian verbs. (was: Re: adposition) (2 messages)
• Conlang units of measure (12 messages)
• Conlang units of measure - correction
• Deriving nouns from verbs (34 messages)
• Grammatical equivocation wordplay (3 messages)
• Hyperdictionary / Kura 2.0 project - call for participants
• iti Basata release 0.0 (3 messages)
• Khangaþyagon dictionary quasi-complete (4 messages)
• Money (18 messages)
• New listserv: lists.conlang.org
• Null aspect (11 messages)
• Origin of punctuation (was: Re: Money)
• OT idioms (was: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel))
• OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (30 messages)
• OT: multilingual dictionary linked here recently (4 messages)
• Punctuation (was Money) (3 messages)
• stress shift (was OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents)
• Synaesthesia in conlanging (WAS: OT: What is your qualia of consciousness / thought?)
• TECH: DSL (Damn Small Linux)
• TECH: Listserv software comparison
• TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (21 messages)
• TECH: web interface @ Brown
• TECH: web interface @ Brown (Was: bye) (2 messages)
• TECH: Yahoo mail help (was: The rhotic as a vowel)
• The rhotic as a vowel (28 messages)
• Unambiguous phonetic coding superset (3 messages)
• Untranslatable words (8 messages)
• USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (25 messages)
• vowels & vocoids (3 messages)
• vowels & vocoids (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (11 messages)
• word classes (10 messages)
• YAEPT: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates

1. /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates
   • /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (32 lines)
     From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (60 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (51 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (38 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (35 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (54 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (46 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (33 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (30 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (72 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (36 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (56 lines)
     From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (57 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (38 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (83 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (49 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (48 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (57 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

2. adposition
   • Re: adposition (84 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (49 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

3. adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel)
   • adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (66 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (39 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (59 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (47 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (140 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (42 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (45 lines)
     From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (43 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (69 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (37 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (59 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (57 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (101 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (103 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (39 lines)
     From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (134 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (56 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (103 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (94 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (80 lines)
     From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (54 lines)
     From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (63 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (110 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (58 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (56 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (100 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (51 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (106 lines)
     From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (94 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (75 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (216 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (45 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (70 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (37 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (62 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (74 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (41 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (109 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (52 lines)
     From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (35 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (52 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (52 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (79 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (46 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (39 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (58 lines)
     From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (32 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (58 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (58 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (40 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (46 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (47 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (63 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

4. and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents
   • Re: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (138 lines)
     From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>

5. bye
   • Re: bye (58 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: bye (43 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: bye (57 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

6. CONL: Urianian verbs. (was: Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel))
   • CONL: Urianian verbs. (was: Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel)) (66 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>

7. CONL: Urianian verbs. (was: Re: adposition)
   • Re: CONL: Urianian verbs. (was: Re: adposition) (45 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CONL: Urianian verbs. (was: Re: adposition) (83 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>

8. Conlang units of measure
   • Conlang units of measure (38 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang units of measure (132 lines)
     From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang units of measure (64 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang units of measure (32 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang units of measure (58 lines)
     From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang units of measure (70 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang units of measure (47 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang units of measure (80 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang units of measure (42 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang units of measure (35 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang units of measure (71 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang units of measure (59 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>

9. Conlang units of measure - correction
   • Re: Conlang units of measure - correction (28 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

10. Deriving nouns from verbs
    • Deriving nouns from verbs (30 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (48 lines)
      From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (40 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (73 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (117 lines)
      From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (116 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (54 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (56 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (107 lines)
      From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (38 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (118 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (105 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (46 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (44 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (52 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (65 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (56 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (71 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (53 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (89 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (61 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (71 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (47 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (47 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (67 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (57 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (65 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (85 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (39 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (57 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving nouns from verbs (36 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

11. Grammatical equivocation wordplay
    • Grammatical equivocation wordplay (35 lines)
      From: Nokta Kanto <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammatical equivocation wordplay (38 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammatical equivocation wordplay (64 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>

12. Hyperdictionary / Kura 2.0 project - call for participants
    • Hyperdictionary / Kura 2.0 project - call for participants (78 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

13. iti Basata release 0.0
    • iti Basata release 0.0 (38 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: iti Basata release 0.0 (24 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: iti Basata release 0.0 (29 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

14. Khangaþyagon dictionary quasi-complete
    • Khangaþyagon dictionary quasi-complete (38 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Khangaþyagon dictionary quasi-complete (38 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Khangaþyagon dictionary quasi-complete (42 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Khangaþyagon dictionary quasi-complete (35 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

15. Money
    • Re: Money (52 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Money (111 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Money (72 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Money (37 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Money (38 lines)
      From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Money (45 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Money (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Money (77 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Money (32 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Money (40 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Money (64 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Money (33 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Money (60 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Money (71 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Money (41 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Money (31 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Money (31 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Money (38 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

16. New listserv: lists.conlang.org
    • New listserv: lists.conlang.org (33 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

17. Null aspect
    • Null aspect (43 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (38 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (95 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (186 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (50 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (240 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (30 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (45 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (128 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (221 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>

18. Origin of punctuation (was: Re: Money)
    • Origin of punctuation (was: Re: Money) (126 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

19. OT idioms (was: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel))
    • OT idioms (was: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel)) (76 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

20. OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents
    • OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (44 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (33 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (68 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (43 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (34 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (79 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (47 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (35 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (33 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (37 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (51 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (32 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (75 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (64 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (61 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (46 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (51 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (63 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (32 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (95 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (46 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (109 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (69 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (95 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (65 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (57 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (95 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

21. OT: multilingual dictionary linked here recently
    • OT: multilingual dictionary linked here recently (30 lines)
      From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: multilingual dictionary linked here recently (26 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: multilingual dictionary linked here recently (33 lines)
      From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: multilingual dictionary linked here recently (36 lines)
      From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>

22. Punctuation (was Money)
    • Re: Punctuation (was Money) (68 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Punctuation (was Money) (33 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Punctuation (was Money) (38 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>

23. stress shift (was OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents)
    • stress shift (was OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents) (125 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

24. Synaesthesia in conlanging (WAS: OT: What is your qualia of consciousness / thought?)
    • Re: Synaesthesia in conlanging (WAS: OT: What is your qualia of consciousness / thought?) (59 lines)
      From: Andrii Zvorygin <[log in to unmask]>

25. TECH: DSL (Damn Small Linux)
    • TECH: DSL (Damn Small Linux) (25 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

26. TECH: Listserv software comparison
    • Re: TECH: Listserv software comparison (37 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

27. TECH: Regular expression for syllable division?
    • TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (52 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (75 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (82 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (48 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (75 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (55 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (376 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (392 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (41 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (43 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (37 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (83 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (44 lines)
      From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (59 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (69 lines)
      From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (39 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (45 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (40 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (88 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Regular expression for syllable division? (86 lines)
      From: Adrian <[log in to unmask]>

28. TECH: web interface @ Brown
    • Re: TECH: web interface @ Brown (50 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

29. TECH: web interface @ Brown (Was: bye)
    • TECH: web interface @ Brown (Was: bye) (53 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: web interface @ Brown (Was: bye) (40 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>

30. TECH: Yahoo mail help (was: The rhotic as a vowel)
    • TECH: Yahoo mail help (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (36 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

31. The rhotic as a vowel
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (54 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (40 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (98 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (99 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (45 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (66 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (57 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (41 lines)
      From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (44 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (111 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (33 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (64 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (32 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (66 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (61 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (52 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (59 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (44 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (48 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (38 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (71 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (34 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (79 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (91 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (51 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (151 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The rhotic as a vowel (32 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

32. Unambiguous phonetic coding superset
    • Unambiguous phonetic coding superset (33 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unambiguous phonetic coding superset (55 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Unambiguous phonetic coding superset (46 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

33. Untranslatable words
    • Untranslatable words (40 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Untranslatable words (54 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Untranslatable words (59 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Untranslatable words (50 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Untranslatable words (37 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Untranslatable words (38 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Untranslatable words (48 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Untranslatable words (45 lines)
      From: Damien Perrotin <[log in to unmask]>

34. USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse
    • USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (39 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (54 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (26 lines)
      From: Alex DelPriore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (21 lines)
      From: Alex DelPriore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (38 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (68 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (80 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (106 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (58 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (36 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (71 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (39 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (49 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (109 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (79 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (77 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (133 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (36 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (33 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (39 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (62 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (82 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Japanese question - parallelism and politesse (112 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

35. vowels & vocoids
    • Re: vowels & vocoids (41 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowels & vocoids (143 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowels & vocoids (95 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

36. vowels & vocoids (was: The rhotic as a vowel)
    • vowels & vocoids (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (223 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowels & vocoids (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (141 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowels & vocoids (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (112 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowels & vocoids (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (90 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowels & vocoids (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (189 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowels & vocoids (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (94 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowels & vocoids (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (268 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowels & vocoids (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (111 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowels & vocoids (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (49 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowels & vocoids (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (47 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vowels & vocoids (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (71 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

37. word classes
    • word classes (35 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: word classes (40 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: word classes (26 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: word classes (27 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: word classes (28 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: word classes (56 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: word classes (54 lines)
      From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: word classes (64 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: word classes (78 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: word classes (57 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

38. YAEPT: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates
    • YAEPT: /dD)/ and /tT)/ affricates (62 lines)
      From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>