Conlang Mailing List – April 2009, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• 'õSet'akh
• adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (4 messages)
• ai Basata Syntax ideas (kinda long) (2 messages)
• Basic Font for Asha'ille Script (2 messages)
• Characters (36 messages)
• Graphical Language (4 messages)
• Greek miscellanea (6 messages)
• Greek miscellanea (was: Null aspect) (11 messages)
• Greek verbs (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] Null aspect) (3 messages)
• Impersonal passives question (4 messages)
• Indus Valley Script
• Information about 'o~Set'akh (was Rejistanian)
• Information about Rejistanian (2 messages)
• naturalness in a PIE conlang allophony (7 messages)
• Null aspect (13 messages)
• OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (11 messages)
• OT: Intarwebz (was: Re: Characters) (4 messages)
• personal pronominal suffixes and case suffixes (4 messages)
• The copula (4 messages)
• USAGE: two Setswana questions (15 messages)
• Yes, Conlangs can help endangered natlangs (3 messages)

1. 'õSet'akh
   • 'õSet'akh (43 lines)
     From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>

2. adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel)
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (238 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (48 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (304 lines)
     From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adposition (was: The rhotic as a vowel) (74 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>

3. ai Basata Syntax ideas (kinda long)
   • ai Basata Syntax ideas (kinda long) (125 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ai Basata Syntax ideas (kinda long) (46 lines)
     From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>

4. Basic Font for Asha'ille Script
   • Re: Basic Font for Asha'ille Script (46 lines)
     From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Basic Font for Asha'ille Script (56 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

5. Characters
   • Characters (27 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (58 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (72 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (37 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (55 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (77 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (64 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (85 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (98 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (40 lines)
     From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (61 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (41 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (104 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (41 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (67 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (32 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (32 lines)
     From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (33 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (33 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (35 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (49 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (50 lines)
     From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (60 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (75 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (41 lines)
     From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (40 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (48 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (46 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (39 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (48 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (53 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (35 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (36 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (65 lines)
     From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (31 lines)
     From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Characters (35 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

6. Graphical Language
   • Graphical Language (38 lines)
     From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graphical Language (47 lines)
     From: RoseRose <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graphical Language (65 lines)
     From: John Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graphical Language (53 lines)
     From: Walter Mulder <[log in to unmask]>

7. Greek miscellanea
   • Re: Greek miscellanea (236 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Greek miscellanea (208 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Greek miscellanea (223 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Greek miscellanea (48 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Greek miscellanea (82 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Greek miscellanea (99 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

8. Greek miscellanea (was: Null aspect)
   • Greek miscellanea (was: Null aspect) (186 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Greek miscellanea (was: Null aspect) (132 lines)
     From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Greek miscellanea (was: Null aspect) (289 lines)
     From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Greek miscellanea (was: Null aspect) (62 lines)
     From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Greek miscellanea (was: Null aspect) (66 lines)
     From: Damien Perrotin <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Greek miscellanea (was: Null aspect) (65 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Greek miscellanea (was: Null aspect) (148 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Greek miscellanea (was: Null aspect) (47 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Greek miscellanea (was: Null aspect) (125 lines)
     From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Greek miscellanea (was: Null aspect) (43 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Greek miscellanea (was: Null aspect) (59 lines)
     From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>

9. Greek verbs (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] Null aspect)
   • Greek verbs (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] Null aspect) (48 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Greek verbs (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] Null aspect) (81 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Greek verbs (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] Null aspect) (66 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

10. Impersonal passives question
    • Impersonal passives question (25 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Impersonal passives question (61 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Impersonal passives question (62 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Impersonal passives question (81 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

11. Indus Valley Script
    • Indus Valley Script (32 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

12. Information about 'o~Set'akh (was Rejistanian)
    • Re: Information about 'o~Set'akh (was Rejistanian) (32 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

13. Information about Rejistanian
    • Information about Rejistanian (44 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Information about Rejistanian (66 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>

14. naturalness in a PIE conlang allophony
    • naturalness in a PIE conlang allophony (67 lines)
      From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: naturalness in a PIE conlang allophony (95 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: naturalness in a PIE conlang allophony (76 lines)
      From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: naturalness in a PIE conlang allophony (55 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: naturalness in a PIE conlang allophony (35 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: naturalness in a PIE conlang allophony (87 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: naturalness in a PIE conlang allophony (39 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

15. Null aspect
    • Re: Null aspect (312 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (229 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (55 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (169 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (168 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (50 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (128 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (62 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (58 lines)
      From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (68 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (87 lines)
      From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (39 lines)
      From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Null aspect (51 lines)
      From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>

16. OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (93 lines)
      From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (60 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (38 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (83 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (28 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (35 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (72 lines)
      From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (90 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (71 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: and YAEPT (I guess): Movie-actors' Accents (42 lines)
      From: Paul Kershaw <[log in to unmask]>

17. OT: Intarwebz (was: Re: Characters)
    • OT: Intarwebz (was: Re: Characters) (57 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Intarwebz (was: Re: Characters) (50 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Intarwebz (was: Re: Characters) (72 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Intarwebz (was: Re: Characters) (69 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

18. personal pronominal suffixes and case suffixes
    • personal pronominal suffixes and case suffixes (48 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: personal pronominal suffixes and case suffixes (80 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: personal pronominal suffixes and case suffixes (94 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: personal pronominal suffixes and case suffixes (64 lines)
      From: Tim Smith <[log in to unmask]>

19. The copula
    • The copula (29 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The copula (27 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The copula (59 lines)
      From: Scott Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The copula (54 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

20. USAGE: two Setswana questions
    • USAGE: two Setswana questions (33 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: two Setswana questions (55 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: two Setswana questions (54 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: two Setswana questions (39 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: two Setswana questions (45 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: two Setswana questions (75 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: two Setswana questions (83 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: two Setswana questions (57 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: two Setswana questions (37 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: two Setswana questions (62 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: two Setswana questions (47 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: two Setswana questions (59 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: two Setswana questions (39 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: two Setswana questions (108 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: two Setswana questions (118 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

21. Yes, Conlangs can help endangered natlangs
    • Yes, Conlangs can help endangered natlangs (190 lines)
      From: Zeinelabidin Elhassi <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Yes, Conlangs can help endangered natlangs (25 lines)
      From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Yes, Conlangs can help endangered natlangs (37 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>