Conlang
Mailing List May 2009, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"Conlanging: the not-so-secret vice", by Diana Slattery
A method of generating "flavored" words
(2 messages)
artlang advocacy/evangelism
(13 messages)
computer generation of wordforms
(5 messages)
Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(17 messages)
Date and time on Cindu
(7 messages)
English - the world's IAL?
Fundamental syntactic features
(15 messages)
how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea
(7 messages)
Search for 'purity' in language revival
(4 messages)
Search for 'purity' in language revival (was: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages'
(5 messages)
The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(20 messages)
TV/Movie conlangs (WAS: artlang advocacy/evangelism)
(9 messages)
YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(23 messages)
"Conlanging: the not-so-secret vice", by Diana Slattery
Re: "Conlanging: the not-so-secret vice", by Diana Slattery
(29 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
A method of generating "flavored" words
Re: A method of generating "flavored" words
(42 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A method of generating "flavored" words
(61 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
artlang advocacy/evangelism
Re: artlang advocacy/evangelism
(90 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang advocacy/evangelism
(626 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang advocacy/evangelism
(191 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang advocacy/evangelism
(92 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang advocacy/evangelism
(41 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang advocacy/evangelism
(174 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang advocacy/evangelism
(160 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang advocacy/evangelism
(67 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang advocacy/evangelism
(171 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang advocacy/evangelism
(198 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang advocacy/evangelism
(86 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang advocacy/evangelism
(46 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: artlang advocacy/evangelism
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
computer generation of wordforms
computer generation of wordforms
(48 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: computer generation of wordforms
(45 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: computer generation of wordforms
(35 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: computer generation of wordforms
(59 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: computer generation of wordforms
(38 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(59 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(43 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(63 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(27 lines)
From:
Harry Aspinwall <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(35 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(39 lines)
From:
Harry Aspinwall <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(35 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(79 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(40 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(69 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(39 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(87 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(84 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(67 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(61 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(58 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang referral service for movies/games/books
(52 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Date and time on Cindu
Date and time on Cindu
(26 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Date and time on Cindu
(43 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Date and time on Cindu
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Date and time on Cindu
(47 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Date and time on Cindu
(51 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Date and time on Cindu
(57 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Date and time on Cindu
(41 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
English - the world's IAL?
English - the world's IAL?
(28 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fundamental syntactic features
Fundamental syntactic features
(121 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fundamental syntactic features
(31 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fundamental syntactic features
(42 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fundamental syntactic features
(44 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fundamental syntactic features
(38 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fundamental syntactic features
(61 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fundamental syntactic features
(42 lines)
From:
Ronald Craig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fundamental syntactic features
(42 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fundamental syntactic features
(40 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fundamental syntactic features
(47 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fundamental syntactic features
(53 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fundamental syntactic features
(36 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fundamental syntactic features
(57 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fundamental syntactic features
(43 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fundamental syntactic features
(70 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea
Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea
(75 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea
(60 lines)
From:
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea
(62 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea
(396 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea
(245 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea
(45 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea
(94 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Search for 'purity' in language revival
Re: Search for 'purity' in language revival
(51 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Search for 'purity' in language revival
(57 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Search for 'purity' in language revival
(47 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Search for 'purity' in language revival
(62 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Search for 'purity' in language revival (was: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
Re: Search for 'purity' in language revival (was: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(40 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages'
Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages'
(30 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages'
(38 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages'
(33 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages'
(40 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages'
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(172 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(103 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(263 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(124 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(40 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(50 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(35 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(39 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(188 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(41 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(83 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(77 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(38 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(66 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(106 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(43 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(38 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
(46 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
TV/Movie conlangs (WAS: artlang advocacy/evangelism)
Re: TV/Movie conlangs (WAS: artlang advocacy/evangelism)
(43 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TV/Movie conlangs (WAS: artlang advocacy/evangelism)
(43 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TV/Movie conlangs (WAS: artlang advocacy/evangelism)
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TV/Movie conlangs (WAS: artlang advocacy/evangelism)
(49 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TV/Movie conlangs (WAS: artlang advocacy/evangelism)
(47 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TV/Movie conlangs (WAS: artlang advocacy/evangelism)
(40 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TV/Movie conlangs (WAS: artlang advocacy/evangelism)
(47 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TV/Movie conlangs (WAS: artlang advocacy/evangelism)
(40 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TV/Movie conlangs (WAS: artlang advocacy/evangelism)
(99 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(42 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(27 lines)
From:
Harry Aspinwall <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(36 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(40 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(74 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(66 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(56 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(49 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(35 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(56 lines)
From:
Andrew Jarrette <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(50 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(58 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(47 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(45 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(48 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(36 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAELT: wardrobe/garderobe, closet/"water closet"
(53 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU