Conlang Mailing List – June 2009, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• <Q> (<: Qakwan) (9 messages)
• Ascriptors vs evidentials and skepticism vs sheephood (2 messages)
• CONL: Urianian verbs. (3 messages)
• crossed bilingual conversation (3 messages)
• Fundamental syntactic features (10 messages)
• Gothic oddities (was: Qakwan)
• Hildegard of Bingen's Private Language
• Lang of the Lost? (8 messages)
• Lingua Ignota (14 messages)
• Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (30 messages)
• META: Missing messages (11 messages)
• Noam Chomsky (8 messages)
• Nominal Aspect for Location Nouns (5 messages)
• OT: Anyone know if this is normal? (6 messages)
• Patent application for "Digital universal language" (5 messages)
• Phaistos Disk (8 messages)
• Phaistos Disk (was: XKCD - Voynich manuscript) (4 messages)
• Q and other orthografical oddities (< Qakwan) (5 messages)
• Qakwan (25 messages)
• Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (9 messages)
• Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (9 messages)
• TECH: Linewrapping (35 messages)
• The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea) (2 messages)
• Vowel length in Urianian. (4 messages)
• Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (31 messages)
• XKCD - Voynich manuscript (26 messages)
• Yengtilah or Yengdilah (2 messages)

1. <Q> (<: Qakwan)
   • <Q> (<: Qakwan) (66 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: <Q> (<: Qakwan) (66 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: <Q> (<: Qakwan) (58 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: <Q> (<: Qakwan) (48 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: <Q> (<: Qakwan) (61 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: <Q> (<: Qakwan) (50 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: <Q> (<: Qakwan) (92 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: <Q> (<: Qakwan) (61 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: <Q> (<: Qakwan) (55 lines)
     From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>

2. Ascriptors vs evidentials and skepticism vs sheephood
   • Ascriptors vs evidentials and skepticism vs sheephood (95 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ascriptors vs evidentials and skepticism vs sheephood (133 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

3. CONL: Urianian verbs.
   • Re: CONL: Urianian verbs. (78 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CONL: Urianian verbs. (69 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CONL: Urianian verbs. (46 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

4. crossed bilingual conversation
   • Re: crossed bilingual conversation (28 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: crossed bilingual conversation (55 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: crossed bilingual conversation (30 lines)
     From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>

5. Fundamental syntactic features
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (108 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (127 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (51 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (76 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (47 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (70 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (48 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (78 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (46 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (58 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

6. Gothic oddities (was: Qakwan)
   • Gothic oddities (was: Qakwan) (96 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

7. Hildegard of Bingen's Private Language
   • Hildegard of Bingen's Private Language (50 lines)
     From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>

8. Lang of the Lost?
   • Re: Lang of the Lost? (43 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lang of the Lost? (37 lines)
     From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lang of the Lost? (45 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lang of the Lost? (34 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lang of the Lost? (31 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lang of the Lost? (47 lines)
     From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lang of the Lost? (41 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lang of the Lost? (40 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

9. Lingua Ignota
   • Lingua Ignota (35 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (49 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (60 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (37 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (87 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (65 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (53 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (115 lines)
     From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (32 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (40 lines)
     From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (75 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (92 lines)
     From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (59 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (90 lines)
     From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>

10. Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects?
    • Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (31 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (58 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (59 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (40 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (44 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (68 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (56 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (75 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (52 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (59 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (36 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (44 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (59 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (46 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (88 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (45 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (48 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (55 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (60 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (36 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (235 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (53 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (43 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (47 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (39 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (52 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (62 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (45 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (63 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (43 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

11. META: Missing messages
    • META: Missing messages (27 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: Missing messages (39 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: Missing messages (33 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: Missing messages (31 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: Missing messages (27 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: Missing messages (34 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: Missing messages (27 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: Missing messages (36 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: Missing messages (38 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: Missing messages (45 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: META: Missing messages (47 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

12. Noam Chomsky
    • Noam Chomsky (22 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Noam Chomsky (38 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Noam Chomsky (46 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Noam Chomsky (60 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Noam Chomsky (32 lines)
      From: Ronald Craig <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Noam Chomsky (27 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Noam Chomsky (53 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Noam Chomsky (32 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

13. Nominal Aspect for Location Nouns
    • Re: Nominal Aspect for Location Nouns (59 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nominal Aspect for Location Nouns (58 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nominal Aspect for Location Nouns (58 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nominal Aspect for Location Nouns (60 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nominal Aspect for Location Nouns (47 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>

14. OT: Anyone know if this is normal?
    • OT: Anyone know if this is normal? (27 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Anyone know if this is normal? (38 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Anyone know if this is normal? (32 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Anyone know if this is normal? (39 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Anyone know if this is normal? (34 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Anyone know if this is normal? (68 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>

15. Patent application for "Digital universal language"
    • Patent application for "Digital universal language" (32 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Patent application for "Digital universal language" (36 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Patent application for "Digital universal language" (35 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Patent application for "Digital universal language" (61 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Patent application for "Digital universal language" (45 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

16. Phaistos Disk
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (90 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (35 lines)
      From: RoseRose <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (71 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (77 lines)
      From: RoseRose <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (85 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (81 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (129 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (62 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>

17. Phaistos Disk (was: XKCD - Voynich manuscript)
    • Phaistos Disk (was: XKCD - Voynich manuscript) (74 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (was: XKCD - Voynich manuscript) (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (was: XKCD - Voynich manuscript) (59 lines)
      From: RoseRose <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (was: XKCD - Voynich manuscript) (71 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

18. Q and other orthografical oddities (< Qakwan)
    • Q and other orthografical oddities (< Qakwan) (74 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Q and other orthografical oddities (< Qakwan) (51 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Q and other orthografical oddities (< Qakwan) (54 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Q and other orthografical oddities (< Qakwan) (51 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Q and other orthografical oddities (< Qakwan) (66 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>

19. Qakwan
    • Re: Qakwan (47 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (64 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (54 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (43 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Qakwan (70 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (74 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (81 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (41 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (70 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (32 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (60 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (65 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (75 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (48 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (47 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (42 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (61 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (88 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (54 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (54 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (101 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (126 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (62 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (54 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Qakwan (65 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

20. Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book
    • Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (49 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (69 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (25 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (57 lines)
      From: RoseRose <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (32 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (40 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (59 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (32 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (38 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>

21. Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages'
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (37 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (34 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (43 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (54 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (38 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (50 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (202 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (55 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (44 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

22. TECH: Linewrapping
    • TECH: Linewrapping (43 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (69 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (37 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (78 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (60 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (47 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (44 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (51 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (44 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (50 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (63 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (31 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (33 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (35 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (33 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (110 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (37 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (39 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (55 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (48 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (44 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (28 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (63 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (50 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (55 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (47 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (67 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (60 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (90 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (75 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (59 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (42 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (30 lines)
      From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (58 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

23. The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
    • Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea) (53 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea) (52 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>

24. Vowel length in Urianian.
    • Vowel length in Urianian. (45 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vowel length in Urianian. (47 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vowel length in Urianian. (54 lines)
      From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vowel length in Urianian. (87 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>

25. Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili?
    • Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (39 lines)
      From: The Benevolent Dictator <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (90 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (43 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (63 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (46 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (53 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (85 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (92 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (58 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (37 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (41 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (60 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (65 lines)
      From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (25 lines)
      From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (41 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (52 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (40 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (64 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (77 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (75 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (51 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (31 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (63 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (36 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (46 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (58 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (35 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (73 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (119 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (58 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (155 lines)
      From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>

26. XKCD - Voynich manuscript
    • XKCD - Voynich manuscript (30 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (39 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (41 lines)
      From: RoseRose <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (54 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (54 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (56 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (68 lines)
      From: RoseRose <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (43 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (47 lines)
      From: RoseRose <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (43 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (47 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (39 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (59 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (63 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (53 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (50 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (45 lines)
      From: RoseRose <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (49 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (35 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (50 lines)
      From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (35 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (58 lines)
      From: RoseRose <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (77 lines)
      From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (55 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

27. Yengtilah or Yengdilah
    • Yengtilah or Yengdilah (38 lines)
      From: Martin Di Maggio <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Yengtilah or Yengdilah (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>