Conlang Mailing List – June 2009, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• <Q> (<: Qakwan) (9 messages)
• Ascriptors vs evidentials and skepticism vs sheephood (2 messages)
• CONL: Urianian verbs. (3 messages)
• crossed bilingual conversation (3 messages)
• Fundamental syntactic features (10 messages)
• Gothic oddities (was: Qakwan)
• Hildegard of Bingen's Private Language
• Lang of the Lost? (8 messages)
• Lingua Ignota (14 messages)
• Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (30 messages)
• META: Missing messages (11 messages)
• Noam Chomsky (8 messages)
• Nominal Aspect for Location Nouns (5 messages)
• OT: Anyone know if this is normal? (6 messages)
• Patent application for "Digital universal language" (5 messages)
• Phaistos Disk (8 messages)
• Phaistos Disk (was: XKCD - Voynich manuscript) (4 messages)
• Q and other orthografical oddities (< Qakwan) (5 messages)
• Qakwan (25 messages)
• Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (9 messages)
• Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (9 messages)
• TECH: Linewrapping (35 messages)
• The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea) (2 messages)
• Vowel length in Urianian. (4 messages)
• Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (31 messages)
• XKCD - Voynich manuscript (26 messages)
• Yengtilah or Yengdilah (2 messages)

1. <Q> (<: Qakwan)
   • <Q> (<: Qakwan) (66 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:52:30 -0400
   • Re: <Q> (<: Qakwan) (66 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:01:10 -0400
   • Re: <Q> (<: Qakwan) (58 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:05:02 -0700
   • Re: <Q> (<: Qakwan) (48 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:26:20 -0400
   • Re: <Q> (<: Qakwan) (61 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:39:11 -0700
   • Re: <Q> (<: Qakwan) (50 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:48:24 -0400
   • Re: <Q> (<: Qakwan) (92 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:49:19 +0100
   • Re: <Q> (<: Qakwan) (61 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:04:48 -0700
   • Re: <Q> (<: Qakwan) (55 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:12:50 -0400

2. Ascriptors vs evidentials and skepticism vs sheephood
   • Ascriptors vs evidentials and skepticism vs sheephood (95 lines)
     Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 23:52:09 -0700
   • Re: Ascriptors vs evidentials and skepticism vs sheephood (133 lines)
     Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 23:10:25 -0400

3. CONL: Urianian verbs.
   • Re: CONL: Urianian verbs. (78 lines)
     Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 20:44:18 -0400
   • Re: CONL: Urianian verbs. (69 lines)
     Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 12:02:36 +0200
   • Re: CONL: Urianian verbs. (46 lines)
     Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 23:16:12 -0400

4. crossed bilingual conversation
   • Re: crossed bilingual conversation (28 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:41:17 -0400
   • Re: crossed bilingual conversation (55 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:23:03 -0400
   • Re: crossed bilingual conversation (30 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:19:35 -0400

5. Fundamental syntactic features
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (108 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:40:17 +0200
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (127 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:06:33 -0600
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (51 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:12:47 +0100
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (76 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:48:42 -0700
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (47 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:11:52 -0400
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (70 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:17:36 -0700
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (48 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:20:33 -0400
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (78 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 13:16:47 -0700
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (46 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:09:27 +0200
   • Re: Fundamental syntactic features (58 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:20:52 +0100

6. Gothic oddities (was: Qakwan)
   • Gothic oddities (was: Qakwan) (96 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 20:06:31 +0100

7. Hildegard of Bingen's Private Language
   • Hildegard of Bingen's Private Language (50 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 03:21:38 -0400

8. Lang of the Lost?
   • Re: Lang of the Lost? (43 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 01:41:06 -0400
   • Re: Lang of the Lost? (37 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 07:32:25 -0700
   • Re: Lang of the Lost? (45 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 13:02:29 -0400
   • Re: Lang of the Lost? (34 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:17:08 +0200
   • Re: Lang of the Lost? (31 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 13:27:51 -0400
   • Re: Lang of the Lost? (47 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:17:03 -0400
   • Re: Lang of the Lost? (41 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:25:40 -0700
   • Re: Lang of the Lost? (40 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:13:51 -0700

9. Lingua Ignota
   • Lingua Ignota (35 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:16:06 -0400
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (49 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:55:35 -0400
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (60 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:16:16 -0400
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (37 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:28:45 -0400
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (87 lines)
     Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 20:00:11 -0400
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (65 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:44:13 -0400
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (53 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:04:28 +0100
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (115 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:20:07 -0400
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (32 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:42:38 -0700
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (40 lines)
     Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:01:39 -0400
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (75 lines)
     Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:51:31 +0100
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (92 lines)
     Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:09:16 -0500
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (59 lines)
     Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:07:00 +0100
   • Re: Lingua Ignota (90 lines)
     Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 09:58:28 -0500

10. Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects?
    • Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (31 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:39:19 -0700
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (58 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:53:31 -0700
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (59 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:40:10 +0100
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (40 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:43:26 +0200
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (44 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 07:02:34 -0700
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (68 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:32:12 -0700
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (56 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:37:06 -0700
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (75 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:22:49 -0400
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (52 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:30:01 -0700
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (59 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:33:04 -0700
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (36 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:06:07 -0400
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (44 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:05:48 -0700
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (59 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:01:17 -0700
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (46 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 20:56:03 +0200
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (88 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:58:14 +0100
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (45 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:14:43 +0200
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (48 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:28:12 -0400
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (55 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:34:15 -0400
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (60 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:02:30 -0700
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (36 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:48:55 +0200
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (235 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 03:31:48 -0700
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (53 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:37:55 -0400
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (43 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:08:24 +0200
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (47 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 09:30:08 -0400
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (39 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:54:45 -0400
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (52 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:06:44 -0700
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (62 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:09:47 -0700
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (45 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:13:36 +0200
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (63 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:17:34 +0200
    • Re: Masculine and feminine nouns affect how one perceives objects? (43 lines)
      Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 00:53:16 -0700

11. META: Missing messages
    • META: Missing messages (27 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:01:20 -0500
    • Re: META: Missing messages (39 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:13:01 -0700
    • Re: META: Missing messages (33 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:17:06 -0700
    • Re: META: Missing messages (31 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:04:39 -0700
    • Re: META: Missing messages (27 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 20:54:24 -0400
    • Re: META: Missing messages (34 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:01:12 -0700
    • Re: META: Missing messages (27 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 21:04:22 -0400
    • Re: META: Missing messages (36 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 22:37:35 -0400
    • Re: META: Missing messages (38 lines)
      Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 10:44:32 -0400
    • Re: META: Missing messages (45 lines)
      Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 17:11:19 +0200
    • Re: META: Missing messages (47 lines)
      Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 11:46:56 -0400

12. Noam Chomsky
    • Noam Chomsky (22 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 21:41:48 -0400
    • Re: Noam Chomsky (38 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:15:08 -0700
    • Re: Noam Chomsky (46 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 20:54:45 -0600
    • Re: Noam Chomsky (60 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 20:14:22 -0700
    • Re: Noam Chomsky (32 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:16:25 +0900
    • Re: Noam Chomsky (27 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:11:37 -0400
    • Re: Noam Chomsky (53 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:57:43 -0700
    • Re: Noam Chomsky (32 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 21:23:12 -0700

13. Nominal Aspect for Location Nouns
    • Re: Nominal Aspect for Location Nouns (59 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:06:10 +0100
    • Re: Nominal Aspect for Location Nouns (58 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:25:11 +0100
    • Re: Nominal Aspect for Location Nouns (58 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:39:46 +0100
    • Re: Nominal Aspect for Location Nouns (60 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 21:32:32 +0200
    • Re: Nominal Aspect for Location Nouns (47 lines)
      Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 17:14:35 -0400

14. OT: Anyone know if this is normal?
    • OT: Anyone know if this is normal? (27 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:09:05 -0700
    • Re: OT: Anyone know if this is normal? (38 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:21:18 -0600
    • Re: OT: Anyone know if this is normal? (32 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:39:57 -0700
    • Re: OT: Anyone know if this is normal? (39 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:07:16 -0400
    • Re: OT: Anyone know if this is normal? (34 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:08:03 -0400
    • Re: OT: Anyone know if this is normal? (68 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:15:37 -0700

15. Patent application for "Digital universal language"
    • Patent application for "Digital universal language" (32 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:07:05 -0700
    • Re: Patent application for "Digital universal language" (36 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:27:49 -0700
    • Re: Patent application for "Digital universal language" (35 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:11:32 -0700
    • Re: Patent application for "Digital universal language" (61 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 00:49:36 +1200
    • Re: Patent application for "Digital universal language" (45 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:12:01 -0700

16. Phaistos Disk
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (90 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 19:10:26 +0100
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (35 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:38:32 -0400
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (71 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 20:07:34 +0100
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (77 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:11:12 -0400
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (85 lines)
      Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 07:46:43 +0100
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (81 lines)
      Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 08:57:21 -0700
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (129 lines)
      Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 17:43:54 +0100
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (62 lines)
      Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 14:32:40 -0700

17. Phaistos Disk (was: XKCD - Voynich manuscript)
    • Phaistos Disk (was: XKCD - Voynich manuscript) (74 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:47:57 +0100
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (was: XKCD - Voynich manuscript) (48 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:08:29 -0400
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (was: XKCD - Voynich manuscript) (59 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:50:54 -0400
    • Re: Phaistos Disk (was: XKCD - Voynich manuscript) (71 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 19:30:38 -0400

18. Q and other orthografical oddities (< Qakwan)
    • Q and other orthografical oddities (< Qakwan) (74 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:45:48 -0400
    • Re: Q and other orthografical oddities (< Qakwan) (51 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:59:09 -0700
    • Re: Q and other orthografical oddities (< Qakwan) (54 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:57:50 +0100
    • Re: Q and other orthografical oddities (< Qakwan) (51 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:24:43 +0200
    • Re: Q and other orthografical oddities (< Qakwan) (66 lines)
      Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 14:37:58 +0200

19. Qakwan
    • Re: Qakwan (47 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:16:26 +0200
    • Re: Qakwan (64 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:14:50 -0400
    • Re: Qakwan (54 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:24:24 -0400
    • Re: Qakwan (43 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:31:06 +0200
    • Qakwan (70 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:02:22 +0200
    • Re: Qakwan (74 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:42:56 +0200
    • Re: Qakwan (81 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:56:25 +0200
    • Re: Qakwan (41 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:01:49 +0200
    • Re: Qakwan (70 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:02:45 -0400
    • Re: Qakwan (32 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:04:27 -0400
    • Re: Qakwan (60 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:15:56 +0200
    • Re: Qakwan (65 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:23:07 -0400
    • Re: Qakwan (75 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:56:59 +0200
    • Re: Qakwan (48 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:05:11 -0000
    • Re: Qakwan (47 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 13:18:23 -0400
    • Re: Qakwan (42 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 13:26:34 -0400
    • Re: Qakwan (61 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 13:55:28 -0400
    • Re: Qakwan (88 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 07:53:49 +0100
    • Re: Qakwan (54 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:33:14 +0200
    • Re: Qakwan (54 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 06:01:50 -0400
    • Re: Qakwan (101 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:56:38 +0200
    • Re: Qakwan (126 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:06:12 -0400
    • Re: Qakwan (62 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:28:20 +0200
    • Re: Qakwan (54 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:48:27 -0400
    • Re: Qakwan (65 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:09:16 -0400

20. Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book
    • Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (49 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 03:03:35 -0700
    • Re: Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (69 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:25:32 -0700
    • Re: Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (25 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:55:22 -0400
    • Re: Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (57 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:38:43 -0400
    • Re: Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (32 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:45:50 -0700
    • Re: Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (40 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:34:42 -0400
    • Re: Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (59 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:35:35 +0100
    • Re: Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (32 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:49:24 -0700
    • Re: Reviewers & editors requested for LCC proceedings book (38 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 21:12:02 -0400

21. Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages'
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (37 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 09:09:39 -0700
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (34 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 09:11:00 -0700
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (43 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 09:58:40 -0700
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (54 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 21:00:08 -0400
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (38 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 21:01:41 -0400
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (50 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:03:42 -0700
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (202 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:08:08 -0700
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (55 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:46:41 +0100
    • Re: Studio 360 interview w/ Arika Okrent re 'In the land of invented languages' (44 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:07:41 -0700

22. TECH: Linewrapping
    • TECH: Linewrapping (43 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:23:43 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (69 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 00:16:07 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (37 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:53:08 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (78 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:15:57 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (60 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:28:42 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (47 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:30:16 -0500
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (44 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:34:19 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (51 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:35:31 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (44 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:38:19 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (50 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:46:39 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (63 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:50:52 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (31 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:53:09 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (33 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 07:55:35 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (35 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:01:00 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (33 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:02:57 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (110 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:16:29 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (37 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:22:23 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (39 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:30:30 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (55 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:42:48 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (48 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:56:36 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (44 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:00:55 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (28 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:27:46 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (63 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:38:35 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (50 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 21:30:33 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (55 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 18:34:05 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (47 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:22:13 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (67 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:38:58 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (60 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 20:38:18 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (40 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 20:43:20 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (90 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:02:59 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (75 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 02:52:29 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (59 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:41:15 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (42 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 07:03:39 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (30 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:13:54 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Linewrapping (58 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:45:55 -0400

23. The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea)
    • Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea) (53 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:41:36 +0200
    • Re: The art of conlang critique (was Re: how to tell when you're conlang's complete-an idea) (52 lines)
      Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:00:04 -0600

24. Vowel length in Urianian.
    • Vowel length in Urianian. (45 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:38:29 +0200
    • Re: Vowel length in Urianian. (47 lines)
      Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:49:53 -0400
    • Re: Vowel length in Urianian. (54 lines)
      Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:08:17 +0200
    • Re: Vowel length in Urianian. (87 lines)
      Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 00:33:19 +0200

25. Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili?
    • Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (39 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 04:08:33 +0200
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (90 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 07:54:43 +0100
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (43 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 09:26:42 +0100
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (63 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 09:32:55 +0100
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (46 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:52:26 +0200
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (53 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:01:00 +0200
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (85 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:28:29 +0100
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (92 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 09:40:50 -0400
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (58 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 16:41:20 +0100
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (37 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 20:02:26 +0200
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (41 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 20:55:44 +0200
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (60 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 21:20:37 +0100
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (65 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:41:59 -0400
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (25 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 00:01:58 +0200
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (41 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 18:35:08 -0400
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (52 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 23:57:39 +0100
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (40 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 23:58:37 +0100
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (64 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:18:42 -0400
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (77 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:25:04 -0400
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (75 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 00:26:11 +0100
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (51 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:55:36 -0500
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (31 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:59:36 -0500
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (63 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 21:22:05 -0400
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (36 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 21:26:55 -0400
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (46 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 22:40:02 -0400
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (58 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 07:05:07 +0100
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (35 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:37:25 +0200
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (73 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:01:50 +0100
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (119 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:10:31 +0200
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (58 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:01:26 +0200
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (155 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 20:34:20 -0400

26. XKCD - Voynich manuscript
    • XKCD - Voynich manuscript (30 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:35:39 +0100
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (39 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:01:46 +0200
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (41 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:54:28 -0400
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (44 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:57:38 -0400
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (54 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:03:59 -0400
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (54 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:49:09 +0100
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (56 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:03:46 +0100
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (68 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:51:38 -0400
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (43 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:15:19 -0700
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (47 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:29:18 -0400
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (43 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:43:11 +0200
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (47 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:55:26 +0200
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (39 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:13:00 -0400
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (59 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:13:25 -0700
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (63 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:14:39 -0700
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (53 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:29:17 -0400
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (50 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 19:37:12 +0200
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (44 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:01:47 -0400
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (45 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:07:18 -0400
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (49 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:14:40 -0700
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (35 lines)
      Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:03:34 -0400
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (50 lines)
      Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 16:59:28 -0500
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (35 lines)
      Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 00:00:24 -0700
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (58 lines)
      Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 12:33:39 -0400
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (77 lines)
      Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 12:56:15 -0400
    • Re: XKCD - Voynich manuscript (55 lines)
      Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 22:23:28 -0400

27. Yengtilah or Yengdilah
    • Yengtilah or Yengdilah (38 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 21:42:50 +0000
    • Re: Yengtilah or Yengdilah (51 lines)
      Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 18:41:06 -0400