Conlang Mailing List – June 2009, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• a quick question about opposites (30 messages)
• Asha'ille Word Generator (6 messages)
• Changing standard word order (36 messages)
• Conlang "Twibe" (Twitter Group) (9 messages)
• Conlang Dialog
• Conlang NaNoWriMo (26 messages)
• Conlanging as performance art? (4 messages)
• Corpus and lexicon analysis service, and auction thereof (4 messages)
• criteria for IE (4 messages)
• dr. Sigmund (cartoon) in Latin
• How to interlinear (2 messages)
• John Carter of Mars (3 messages)
• LCS hosting: now unlimited space/BW
• LIVE in <1 hour: lightning presentation on conlangs
• looking for an image describing relative positions (12 messages)
• More about the Phaistos Disc (2 messages)
• OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (18 messages)
• OT: Henrik: your mail's broken
• OT: Integration Re: [CONLANG] Changing standard word order (2 messages)
• OT: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?
• Phone numbers (was Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?)
• Pinging SF Bay Area Conlangers (3 messages)
• Pritani, Britanni etc (was: Changing standard word order)
• Public Domain relative positioning image for you (6 messages)
• Quotations and Speech (21 messages)
• Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (18 messages)
• Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC (4 messages)
• Slightly OT (was Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo) (5 messages)
• Some speculations on prehistoric European languages (4 messages)
• Surrealist Conlanging (6 messages)
• Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (58 messages)
• Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (24 messages)
• Universal Grammar (4 messages)
• Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (4 messages)
• YAEPT: "Drowned" (a quicky YAEPT.) (10 messages)
• Yingdilah Phrases
• [conlang_learners] criteria for IE (2 messages)
• [conlang_learners] The three deaths (13 messages)
• [lostlangs] Some speculations on prehistoric European languages

1. a quick question about opposites
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (39 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:24:41 -0400
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (62 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:20:51 -0400
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (49 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:17:38 -0400
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (74 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:03:19 -0400
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (30 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:27:16 -0700
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (73 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:21:51 -0400
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (50 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:20:30 -0700
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (61 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:17:18 -0700
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (45 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:07:52 -0400
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (51 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:53:45 -0400
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (54 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:48:04 -0700
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (88 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:40:55 -0400
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (45 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:33:11 -0400
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (47 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:26:51 -0700
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (64 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:08:15 -0700
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (42 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:38:22 -0400
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (36 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:58:50 -0400
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (58 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:57:31 -0400
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (47 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:57:24 +0200
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (44 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:39:54 +0200
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (56 lines)
     From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:48:25 +0200
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (39 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:02:29 -0000
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (66 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:28:31 -0400
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (62 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:56:22 -0400
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (65 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:30:40 +0200
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (31 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:51:07 -0700
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (38 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:11:20 -0400
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (50 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:55:33 -0400
   • Re: a quick question about opposites (53 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:48:37 -0400
   • a quick question about opposites (38 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:26:25 -0400

2. Asha'ille Word Generator
   • Re: Asha'ille Word Generator (41 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:38:32 +0200
   • Re: Asha'ille Word Generator (40 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:18:07 -0400
   • Re: Asha'ille Word Generator (76 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:44:12 -0700
   • Re: Asha'ille Word Generator (38 lines)
     From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:25:03 -0700
   • Re: Asha'ille Word Generator (57 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:07:16 -0700
   • Asha'ille Word Generator (36 lines)
     From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:43:47 -0700

3. Changing standard word order
   • Re: Changing standard word order (46 lines)
     From: TOms Deimonds Barvidis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:55:52 +0300
   • Re: Changing standard word order (68 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:49:54 +0200
   • Re: Changing standard word order (44 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:27:18 -0400
   • Re: Changing standard word order (46 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:51:49 -0400
   • Re: Changing standard word order (54 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:35:52 -0700
   • Re: Changing standard word order (68 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:25:10 -0700
   • Re: Changing standard word order (52 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:40:01 -0400
   • Re: Changing standard word order (58 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:36:40 -0400
   • Re: Changing standard word order (50 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:29:05 -0700
   • Re: Changing standard word order (57 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:18:58 -0700
   • Re: Changing standard word order (81 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:59:28 -0400
   • Re: Changing standard word order (67 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:48:06 -0400
   • Re: Changing standard word order (53 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:40:52 -0400
   • Re: Changing standard word order (57 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:29:38 +0200
   • Re: Changing standard word order (56 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:29:37 +0200
   • Re: Changing standard word order (41 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:17:19 +0200
   • Re: Changing standard word order (72 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:58:13 +0200
   • Re: Changing standard word order (104 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:04:49 -0500
   • Re: Changing standard word order (85 lines)
     From: TOms Deimonds Barvidis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:14:34 +0300
   • Re: Changing standard word order (42 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:17:26 -0400
   • Re: Changing standard word order (56 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:27:24 -0700
   • Re: Changing standard word order (89 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:23:35 -0400
   • Re: Changing standard word order (82 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:14:42 -0400
   • Re: Changing standard word order (46 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:54:57 -0400
   • Re: Changing standard word order (68 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:04:34 -0700
   • Re: Changing standard word order (69 lines)
     From: R. Dan Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:54:04 -0700
   • Re: Changing standard word order (123 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:26:13 -0400
   • Re: Changing standard word order (129 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:20:58 -0700
   • Re: Changing standard word order (73 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:51:33 -0400
   • Re: Changing standard word order (48 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:49:49 -0400
   • Re: Changing standard word order (49 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:00:24 -0700
   • Re: Changing standard word order (46 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:08:01 -0400
   • Re: Changing standard word order (41 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:00:53 -0400
   • Re: Changing standard word order (44 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:38:59 -0700
   • Re: Changing standard word order (55 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:55:34 -0400
   • Changing standard word order (49 lines)
     From: Israel Noletto <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:14:06 -0400

4. Conlang "Twibe" (Twitter Group)
   • Re: Conlang "Twibe" (Twitter Group) (55 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:13:08 -0400
   • Re: Conlang "Twibe" (Twitter Group) (44 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:36:51 -0700
   • Re: Conlang "Twibe" (Twitter Group) (45 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:16:49 -0400
   • Re: Conlang "Twibe" (Twitter Group) (47 lines)
     From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:14:43 -0400
   • Re: Conlang "Twibe" (Twitter Group) (57 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:02:38 -0400
   • Re: Conlang "Twibe" (Twitter Group) (43 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:56:17 +0100
   • Re: Conlang "Twibe" (Twitter Group) (48 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:44:42 -0400
   • Re: Conlang "Twibe" (Twitter Group) (33 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:43:00 +0200
   • Conlang "Twibe" (Twitter Group) (34 lines)
     From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:00:15 -0400

5. Conlang Dialog
   • Re: Conlang Dialog (59 lines)
     From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:55:53 +0200

6. Conlang NaNoWriMo
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (65 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:20:51 -0400
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (42 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:43:32 -0400
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (100 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:14:27 -0400
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (68 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:48:16 -0400
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (81 lines)
     From: R. Dan Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:34:24 -0700
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (44 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:59:43 -0400
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (33 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:43:09 -0700
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (59 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:51:36 -0400
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (50 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:55:10 -0400
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (67 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:05:09 -0400
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (70 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:34:13 -0400
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (102 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:00:59 -0400
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (41 lines)
     From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:24:45 -0500
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (130 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:22:44 -0400
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (79 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:55:21 -0400
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (51 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:00:42 -0400
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (79 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:16:16 -0400
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (117 lines)
     From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:02:40 -0700
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (44 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:00:11 +0200
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (37 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:50:54 -0700
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (43 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:43:52 -0700
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (54 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:56:18 -0400
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (101 lines)
     From: R. Dan Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:41:37 -0700
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (74 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:03:24 -0400
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (39 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:38:37 -0400
   • Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo (61 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:55:47 -0400

7. Conlanging as performance art?
   • Re: Conlanging as performance art? (52 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:42:28 -0400
   • Re: Conlanging as performance art? (43 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:30:24 -0700
   • Re: Conlanging as performance art? (61 lines)
     From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:44:48 -0400
   • Conlanging as performance art? (43 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:25:52 -0400

8. Corpus and lexicon analysis service, and auction thereof
   • Re: Corpus and lexicon analysis service, and auction thereof (43 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:06:02 -0700
   • Re: Corpus and lexicon analysis service, and auction thereof (46 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:03:31 -0400
   • Re: Corpus and lexicon analysis service, and auction thereof (37 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:28:10 -0700
   • Corpus and lexicon analysis service, and auction thereof (61 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:33:34 -0400

9. criteria for IE
   • Re: criteria for IE (48 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:33:38 -0400
   • Re: criteria for IE (57 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:57:07 +0100
   • Re: criteria for IE (47 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:03:44 -0700
   • Re: criteria for IE (99 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:28:31 +0200

10. dr. Sigmund (cartoon) in Latin
    • dr. Sigmund (cartoon) in Latin (31 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:55:43 +0200

11. How to interlinear
    • Re: How to interlinear (43 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:24:30 -0400
    • How to interlinear (52 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:32:27 -0400

12. John Carter of Mars
    • Re: John Carter of Mars (94 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:34:37 -0500
    • Re: John Carter of Mars (75 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:29:37 -0400
    • Re: John Carter of Mars (63 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:36:17 -0700

13. LCS hosting: now unlimited space/BW
    • LCS hosting: now unlimited space/BW (38 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:08:34 -0700

14. LIVE in <1 hour: lightning presentation on conlangs
    • LIVE in <1 hour: lightning presentation on conlangs (38 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:43:21 -0700

15. looking for an image describing relative positions
    • Re: looking for an image describing relative positions (42 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:30:21 -0400
    • Re: looking for an image describing relative positions (51 lines)
      From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:30:53 +0100
    • Re: looking for an image describing relative positions (63 lines)
      From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:02:32 -0400
    • Re: looking for an image describing relative positions (57 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:10:20 +0200
    • Re: looking for an image describing relative positions (37 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:37:00 +0200
    • Re: looking for an image describing relative positions (69 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:16:47 +0200
    • Re: looking for an image describing relative positions (34 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:53:19 -0700
    • Re: looking for an image describing relative positions (44 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:22:43 -0400
    • Re: looking for an image describing relative positions (50 lines)
      From: Parker Glynn-Adey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:47:07 -0400
    • Re: looking for an image describing relative positions (42 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:10:53 -0700
    • Re: looking for an image describing relative positions (42 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:49:22 -0400
    • looking for an image describing relative positions (34 lines)
      From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:29:38 -0400

16. More about the Phaistos Disc
    • Re: More about the Phaistos Disc (59 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:20:09 +0100
    • More about the Phaistos Disc (32 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:23:47 +0100

17. OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?)
    • Re: OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (45 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:34:55 +0200
    • Re: OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (53 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:40:53 -0400
    • Re: OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (56 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:27:27 -0400
    • Re: OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (59 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:22:15 -0700
    • Re: OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (34 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:35:02 -0400
    • Re: OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (68 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:32:54 -0400
    • Re: OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (41 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:15:29 -0000
    • Re: OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (40 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:43 -0400
    • Re: OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (47 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:38:14 -0700
    • Re: OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (82 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:50:39 -0400
    • Re: OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (59 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:00:11 -0400
    • Re: OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (47 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:31:42 -0700
    • Re: OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (54 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:46:42 -0700
    • Re: OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (123 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:52:49 -0400
    • Re: OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (107 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:43:05 -0400
    • Re: OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (98 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:36:38 -0400
    • Re: OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (64 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:41:25 -0400
    • OT: area and postal codes (<Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (55 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:24:56 -0400

18. OT: Henrik: your mail's broken
    • OT: Henrik: your mail's broken (30 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:25:26 -0700

19. OT: Integration Re: [CONLANG] Changing standard word order
    • Re: OT: Integration Re: [CONLANG] Changing standard word order (49 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:39:50 -0700
    • OT: Integration Re: [CONLANG] Changing standard word order (66 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:14:15 +0200

20. OT: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?
    • Re: OT: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (114 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:59:05 -0400

21. Phone numbers (was Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?)
    • Phone numbers (was Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?) (56 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:22:13 -0700

22. Pinging SF Bay Area Conlangers
    • Re: Pinging SF Bay Area Conlangers (41 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:10:52 -0700
    • Re: Pinging SF Bay Area Conlangers (39 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:55:56 -0400
    • Pinging SF Bay Area Conlangers (33 lines)
      From: Leland Kusmer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:46:14 -0700

23. Pritani, Britanni etc (was: Changing standard word order)
    • Pritani, Britanni etc (was: Changing standard word order) (124 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:10:11 +0100

24. Public Domain relative positioning image for you
    • Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you (33 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:11:55 +0000
    • Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you (46 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:53:14 +0100
    • Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you (61 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:42:52 -0600
    • Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you (46 lines)
      From: Alex DelPriore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:16:02 -0400
    • Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you (34 lines)
      From: Parker Glynn-Adey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:08:53 -0400
    • Public Domain relative positioning image for you (35 lines)
      From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:29:55 -0400

25. Quotations and Speech
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (87 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:41:12 +0100
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (62 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:57:52 -0400
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (51 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:43:53 +0200
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (80 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:35:16 -0400
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (32 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:59:01 -0400
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (75 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:06:03 -0400
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (55 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:46:45 -0400
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (73 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:37:02 +0200
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (53 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:15:30 +0200
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (71 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:42:30 +0100
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (34 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:38:50 +0200
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (38 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:04:34 -0400
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (59 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:38:21 -0600
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (43 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:35:42 -0400
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (71 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:08:04 -0600
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (44 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:39:21 -0700
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (87 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:40:11 -0600
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (49 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:26:04 -0700
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (39 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:57:53 -0700
    • Re: Quotations and Speech (48 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:42:39 +0200
    • Quotations and Speech (80 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:20:03 -0700

26. Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (38 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:14:33 +0000
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (35 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:11:31 +0000
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (33 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:07:42 -0700
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (56 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 02:49:53 -0400
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (33 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 02:41:26 -0400
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (68 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 23:21:41 -0700
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (213 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 01:58:53 -0400
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (55 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:42:41 -0700
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (65 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:26:45 -0700
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (47 lines)
      From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:51:21 -0400
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (49 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:42:50 -0700
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (37 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:36:24 -0700
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (42 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:17:57 -0700
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (104 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:43:46 -0700
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (57 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:55:04 -0500
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (45 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:08:37 -0400
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (47 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:38:48 -0000
    • Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (27 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:45:13 -0400

27. Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
    • Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC (57 lines)
      From: Parker Glynn-Adey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:54:58 -0400
    • Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC (48 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:30:33 -0700
    • Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC (67 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:17:16 -0700
    • Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC (47 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:32:43 -0700

28. Slightly OT (was Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo)
    • Re: Slightly OT (was Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo) (51 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:27:27 -0400
    • Re: Slightly OT (was Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo) (54 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:05:31 +0200
    • Re: Slightly OT (was Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo) (56 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:08:14 -0400
    • Re: Slightly OT (was Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo) (57 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:31:54 -0700
    • Slightly OT (was Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo) (33 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:27:14 -0400

29. Some speculations on prehistoric European languages
    • Re: Some speculations on prehistoric European languages (133 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:17:42 +0200
    • Re: Some speculations on prehistoric European languages (72 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:44:13 +0200
    • Re: Some speculations on prehistoric European languages (25 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:05:22 -0600
    • Some speculations on prehistoric European languages (216 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:29:53 +0200

30. Surrealist Conlanging
    • Re: Surrealist Conlanging (59 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:49:22 -0400
    • Re: Surrealist Conlanging (63 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:04:52 -0400
    • Re: Surrealist Conlanging (51 lines)
      From: R. Dan Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:51:27 -0700
    • Re: Surrealist Conlanging (43 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:43:31 -0400
    • Re: Surrealist Conlanging (66 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:32:33 -0400
    • Surrealist Conlanging (40 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:47:59 +0100

31. Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang?
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (51 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:20:12 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (36 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:12:56 -0700
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (61 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:20:20 -0700
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (55 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:37:07 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (92 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:09:58 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (64 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:57:48 -0700
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (54 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:51:54 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (43 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:33:43 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (53 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:33:25 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (41 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:26:32 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (60 lines)
      From: R. Dan Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:23:40 -0700
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (42 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:12:04 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (48 lines)
      From: R. Dan Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:08:15 -0700
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (45 lines)
      From: R. Dan Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:03:05 -0700
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (49 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:30:13 +0200
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (59 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:20:11 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (49 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:44:58 -0700
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (62 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:43:32 +0100
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (78 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:32:52 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (69 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:13:16 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (43 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:06:31 +0200
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:01:43 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (64 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:13:19 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (47 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:11:20 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (53 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:55:04 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (61 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:44:52 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (48 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:34:58 +0200
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (67 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:27:00 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:57:56 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (94 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:49:56 +0200
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (57 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:22:00 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (60 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:15:52 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (46 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:12:29 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (45 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:35:25 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (48 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:46:50 -0700
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (42 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:28:18 -0700
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (58 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:36:39 +0200
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (58 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:21:56 -0700
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (40 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:38:55 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (46 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:33:17 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (79 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:19:33 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (49 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:06:51 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (77 lines)
      From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:55:03 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (56 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:00:46 -0700
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (53 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:53:06 -0700
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (52 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:28:09 +0200
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (71 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:21:54 -0700
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (53 lines)
      From: R. Dan Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:14:07 -0700
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (102 lines)
      From: R. Dan Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:07:26 -0700
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (96 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:07:07 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (142 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:52:23 +0100
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (66 lines)
      From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:49:02 +0200
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (46 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:40:56 +0200
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (49 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:31:11 +0200
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (105 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:50:16 -0400
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (50 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:34:14 +0200
    • Re: Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (58 lines)
      From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:05:55 -0400
    • Systematic naming of political units in engelang or auxlang? (64 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:36:57 -0400

32. Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (38 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:15:14 -0500
    • Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (48 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:35:43 -0400
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (60 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:35:45 -0400
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (66 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:19:22 -0400
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (112 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:29:10 -0700
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (70 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:06:11 -0400
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (58 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:03:15 -0400
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (36 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:10:05 -0700
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (41 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:47:59 -0500
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (82 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:45:42 -0400
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (42 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:10:43 -0400
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (102 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:06:13 -0400
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (91 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:54:37 -0700
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (65 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:19:26 -0400
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (38 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:48:49 -0400
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (46 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:44:31 -0400
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (39 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:17:45 -0700
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (64 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:30:19 -0400
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (142 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:55:14 -0400
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (41 lines)
      From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:29:38 -0400
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (56 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:10:47 -0700
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (194 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:10:12 -0400
    • Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (116 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:42:12 -0400
    • Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating (107 lines)
      From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:59:13 -0400

33. Universal Grammar
    • Re: Universal Grammar (46 lines)
      From: Tim Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:14:40 -0400
    • Re: Universal Grammar (31 lines)
      From: Kate <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:31:43 -0500
    • Re: Universal Grammar (44 lines)
      From: Paul Huff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:34:11 +0200
    • Re: Universal Grammar (52 lines)
      From: Claude Almansi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:57:52 +0200

34. Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili?
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (53 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:29:39 +0200
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (105 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:21:50 +0200
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (39 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:46:14 -0400
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (198 lines)
      From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:02:14 -0400

35. YAEPT: "Drowned" (a quicky YAEPT.)
    • Re: YAEPT: "Drowned" (a quicky YAEPT.) (39 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:23:25 +0100
    • Re: YAEPT: "Drowned" (a quicky YAEPT.) (78 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 05:27:47 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: "Drowned" (a quicky YAEPT.) (50 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:28:57 -0400
    • Re: YAEPT: "Drowned" (a quicky YAEPT.) (56 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:34:09 +0100
    • Re: YAEPT: "Drowned" (a quicky YAEPT.) (26 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:57:10 -0400
    • Re: YAEPT: "Drowned" (a quicky YAEPT.) (74 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:50:35 -0700
    • Re: YAEPT: "Drowned" (a quicky YAEPT.) (35 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:40:00 -0700
    • Re: YAEPT: "Drowned" (a quicky YAEPT.) (33 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:39:56 -0400
    • Re: YAEPT: "Drowned" (a quicky YAEPT.) (65 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:32:20 -0400
    • YAEPT: "Drowned" (a quicky YAEPT.) (50 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:26:55 -0400

36. Yingdilah Phrases
    • Yingdilah Phrases (36 lines)
      From: Martin Di Maggio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:46:20 +0000

37. [conlang_learners] criteria for IE
    • Re: [conlang_learners] criteria for IE (54 lines)
      From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:14:15 -0300
    • Re: [conlang_learners] criteria for IE (67 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:30:26 -0400

38. [conlang_learners] The three deaths
    • Re: [conlang_learners] The three deaths (40 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:57:24 -0400
    • Re: [conlang_learners] The three deaths (46 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:58:36 -0400
    • Re: [conlang_learners] The three deaths (64 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:01:46 +0200
    • Re: [conlang_learners] The three deaths (52 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:36:11 -0500
    • Re: [conlang_learners] The three deaths (62 lines)
      From: GV Pieterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:53:00 -0400
    • Re: [conlang_learners] The three deaths (43 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:27:49 +0200
    • Re: [conlang_learners] The three deaths (52 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:43:27 -0700
    • Re: [conlang_learners] The three deaths (54 lines)
      From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:33:32 -0400
    • Re: [conlang_learners] The three deaths (41 lines)
      From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:29:11 -0400
    • Re: [conlang_learners] The three deaths (59 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:17:35 -0400
    • Re: [conlang_learners] The three deaths (63 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:11:01 -0700
    • Re: [conlang_learners] The three deaths (41 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:01:40 -0400
    • Re: [conlang_learners] The three deaths (63 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:54:38 -0400

39. [lostlangs] Some speculations on prehistoric European languages
    • Re: [lostlangs] Some speculations on prehistoric European languages (92 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:36:54 -0400