Conlang
Mailing List – June 2009, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
a quick question about opposites
(2 messages)
An interesting format for a grammar
(3 messages)
Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar)
(4 messages)
Conlang NaNoWriMo
(10 messages)
Conlang-L FAQ
(3 messages)
Contractions
(12 messages)
Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar)
Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(16 messages)
Flighty [YAEPT] (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(7 messages)
Holly Lisle's Create A Language Clinic
(5 messages)
Ignite Toorcamp - lightning presentation on conlangs
Ithikorian (WAS: Re: tell me about your @!#$)
(4 messages)
List of languages by entropy
LoCoWriMo: Cory Doctorow's writing advice, and adapting it to writing in conlangs
Most interesting conlang words
(54 messages)
Need a quick and dirty font editor?
Okaikiar
(5 messages)
Palatalization (help needed)
(11 messages)
PIE on Bartleby (was Re: Flighty [YAEPT] (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar)))
(5 messages)
Practice sentences
(14 messages)
Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(19 messages)
Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology
Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(16 messages)
Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating
tell me about your @!#$
(38 messages)
Verbal Agreement
(3 messages)
Verbs that agree with more than the subject
(5 messages)
Yingdilah
[AUXLANG] Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
[TECH] Bitmap fonts under Windows
(9 messages)
1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
(47 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
a quick question about opposites
Re: a quick question about opposites
(55 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a quick question about opposites
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
An interesting format for a grammar
An interesting format for a grammar
(37 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An interesting format for a grammar
(53 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An interesting format for a grammar
(44 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar)
Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar)
(37 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar)
(40 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar)
(43 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar)
(45 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang NaNoWriMo
Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo
(35 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo
(66 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo
(105 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo
(41 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo
(40 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo
(75 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang NaNoWriMo
(65 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang-L FAQ
Conlang-L FAQ
(245 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang-L FAQ
(47 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang-L FAQ
(46 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Contractions
Contractions
(28 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Contractions
(37 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Contractions
(57 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Contractions
(65 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Contractions
(60 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Contractions
(43 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Contractions
(45 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Contractions
(96 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Contractions
(59 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Contractions
(61 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Contractions
(37 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Contractions
(58 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar)
Re: Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar)
(32 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(41 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(59 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(70 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(37 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(84 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(61 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(81 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(90 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(39 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(63 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(74 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(91 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(38 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(63 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Flighty [YAEPT] (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
Re: Flighty [YAEPT] (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(53 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty [YAEPT] (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(63 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Flighty [YAEPT] (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(45 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty [YAEPT] (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(105 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty [YAEPT] (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(92 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty [YAEPT] (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(43 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flighty [YAEPT] (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar))
(56 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Holly Lisle's Create A Language Clinic
Holly Lisle's Create A Language Clinic
(38 lines)
From:
John H. Chalmers <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Holly Lisle's Create A Language Clinic
(35 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Holly Lisle's Create A Language Clinic
(57 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Holly Lisle's Create A Language Clinic
(28 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Holly Lisle's Create A Language Clinic
(37 lines)
From:
J. Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ignite Toorcamp - lightning presentation on conlangs
Ignite Toorcamp - lightning presentation on conlangs
(49 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ithikorian (WAS: Re: tell me about your @!#$)
Ithikorian (WAS: Re: tell me about your @!#$)
(49 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Ithikorian (WAS: Re: tell me about your @!#$)
(46 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ithikorian (WAS: Re: tell me about your @!#$)
(46 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ithikorian (WAS: Re: tell me about your @!#$)
(57 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
List of languages by entropy
List of languages by entropy
(57 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
LoCoWriMo: Cory Doctorow's writing advice, and adapting it to writing in conlangs
LoCoWriMo: Cory Doctorow's writing advice, and adapting it to writing in conlangs
(64 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Most interesting conlang words
Most interesting conlang words
(32 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(37 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(32 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(46 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(38 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(32 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(40 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(49 lines)
From:
Arnt Richard Johansen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(52 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(48 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(39 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(61 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(57 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(49 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(78 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(103 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(41 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(40 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(39 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(51 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(89 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(39 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(39 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(56 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(40 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(40 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(53 lines)
From:
Ronald Craig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(52 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(33 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(55 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(86 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(50 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(54 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(54 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(44 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(43 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(55 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(45 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(38 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(43 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(44 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(45 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(61 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(66 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(59 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most interesting conlang words
(78 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Need a quick and dirty font editor?
Need a quick and dirty font editor?
(29 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Okaikiar
Okaikiar
(33 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Okaikiar
(38 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Okaikiar
(49 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Okaikiar
(71 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Okaikiar
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Palatalization (help needed)
Palatalization (help needed)
(51 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Palatalization (help needed)
(66 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Palatalization (help needed)
(54 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Palatalization (help needed)
(47 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Palatalization (help needed)
(51 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Palatalization (help needed)
(76 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Palatalization (help needed)
(50 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Palatalization (help needed)
(45 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Palatalization (help needed)
(50 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Palatalization (help needed)
(39 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Palatalization (help needed)
(43 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
PIE on Bartleby (was Re: Flighty [YAEPT] (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar)))
PIE on Bartleby (was Re: Flighty [YAEPT] (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar)))
(44 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PIE on Bartleby (was Re: Flighty [YAEPT] (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar)))
(48 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PIE on Bartleby (was Re: Flighty [YAEPT] (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar)))
(52 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PIE on Bartleby (was Re: Flighty [YAEPT] (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar)))
(31 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PIE on Bartleby (was Re: Flighty [YAEPT] (Was Re: Berlitz: (was An interesting format for a grammar)))
(43 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Practice sentences
Practice sentences
(76 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Practice sentences
(50 lines)
From:
Martin Di Maggio <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Practice sentences
(63 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Practice sentences
(58 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Practice sentences
(57 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Practice sentences
(42 lines)
From:
Bruno Barcelos <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Practice sentences
(70 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Practice sentences
(98 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Practice sentences
(48 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Practice sentences
(67 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Practice sentences
(73 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Practice sentences
(75 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Practice sentences
(35 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Practice sentences
(74 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Public Domain relative positioning image for you
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(35 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(58 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(49 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(48 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(51 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(63 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(47 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(63 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(64 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(45 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(35 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(40 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(29 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(40 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(37 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(42 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Public Domain relative positioning image for you
(79 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology
Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology
(37 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(68 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(41 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(66 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(91 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(40 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(31 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(42 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(34 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(67 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(37 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(40 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(57 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(52 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(79 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(53 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(39 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating
Re: Teaching/Learning Methods; Collaborating
(51 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
tell me about your @!#$
tell me about your @!#$
(31 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(42 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(56 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(54 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(88 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(46 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(51 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(48 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(56 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(68 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(50 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(39 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(61 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(32 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(70 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(36 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(52 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(32 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(31 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(38 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(60 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(42 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(64 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(73 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(51 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(44 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(56 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(66 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(44 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(65 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(45 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(57 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(31 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(56 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(55 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: tell me about your @!#$
(45 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Verbal Agreement
Verbal Agreement
(37 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Agreement
(61 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Agreement
(105 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Verbs that agree with more than the subject
Verbs that agree with more than the subject
(56 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbs that agree with more than the subject
(42 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbs that agree with more than the subject
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbs that agree with more than the subject
(74 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbs that agree with more than the subject
(45 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yingdilah
Yingdilah
(72 lines)
From:
Martin Di Maggio <
[log in to unmask]
>
[AUXLANG] Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
Re: [AUXLANG] Regularly scheduled topical group chat on IRC
(65 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
[TECH] Bitmap fonts under Windows
[TECH] Bitmap fonts under Windows
(55 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [TECH] Bitmap fonts under Windows
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [TECH] Bitmap fonts under Windows
(52 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [TECH] Bitmap fonts under Windows
(43 lines)
From:
Rebecca Bettencourt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [TECH] Bitmap fonts under Windows
(42 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [TECH] Bitmap fonts under Windows
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [TECH] Bitmap fonts under Windows
(52 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [TECH] Bitmap fonts under Windows
(41 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [TECH] Bitmap fonts under Windows
(53 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – June 2009, week 4
Conlang Mailing List – June 2009, week 4
