Conlang Mailing List – June 2009, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• An interesting format for a grammar
• Heavy Syllables Attract Stress?
• Hi (8 messages)
• Most interesting conlang words
• Okaikiar
• Practice sentences (15 messages)
• Searching the archives/recovering meanings (3 messages)
• tell me about your @!#$
• Verbs that agree with more than the subject (13 messages)
• Verdurian on Wikipedia (7 messages)
• Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (2 messages)
• [TECH] Bitmap fonts under Windows

1. An interesting format for a grammar
   • Re: An interesting format for a grammar (225 lines)
     From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:54:42 -0400

2. Heavy Syllables Attract Stress?
   • Heavy Syllables Attract Stress? (84 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:19:55 -0400

3. Hi
   • Hi (35 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:26:06 -0700
   • Re: Hi (55 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:00:50 -0400
   • Re: Hi (85 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:14:44 +0100
   • Re: Hi (91 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:32:11 -0400
   • Re: Hi (119 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:38:53 +0100
   • Re: Hi (87 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:05:12 -0700
   • Re: Hi (106 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:06:38 -0700
   • Re: Hi (137 lines)
     From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:39:43 -0400

4. Most interesting conlang words
   • Re: Most interesting conlang words (38 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:59:32 +0200

5. Okaikiar
   • Re: Okaikiar (67 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:04:20 +0200

6. Practice sentences
   • Re: Practice sentences (76 lines)
     From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:05:21 +0200
   • Re: Practice sentences (70 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:43:56 -0400
   • Re: Practice sentences (51 lines)
     From: Michael Potter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:07:38 -0400
   • Re: Practice sentences (33 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:37:57 -0400
   • Re: Practice sentences (76 lines)
     From: TOms Deimonds Barvidis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:08:15 +0300
   • Re: Practice sentences (113 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:03:27 +0200
   • Re: Practice sentences (35 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:55:08 -0400
   • Re: Practice sentences (45 lines)
     From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:58:34 -0700
   • Re: Practice sentences (53 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:22:15 -0400
   • Re: Practice sentences (38 lines)
     From: Michael Potter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:30:27 -0400
   • Re: Practice sentences (44 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:46:57 -0400
   • Re: Practice sentences (50 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:46:36 +0100
   • Re: Practice sentences (70 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:02:04 +0200
   • Re: Practice sentences (102 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:39:16 -0400
   • Re: Practice sentences (39 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:18:59 +0200

7. Searching the archives/recovering meanings
   • Searching the archives/recovering meanings (35 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:03:11 -0700
   • Re: Searching the archives/recovering meanings (30 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:55:58 -0700
   • Re: Searching the archives/recovering meanings (54 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:13:03 -0700

8. tell me about your @!#$
   • Re: tell me about your @!#$ (43 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:51:43 -0400

9. Verbs that agree with more than the subject
   • Re: Verbs that agree with more than the subject (41 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 06:40:55 -0400
   • Re: Verbs that agree with more than the subject (52 lines)
     From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 06:43:03 -0400
   • Re: Verbs that agree with more than the subject (37 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:07:11 -0400
   • Re: Verbs that agree with more than the subject (48 lines)
     From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:23:59 -0700
   • Re: Verbs that agree with more than the subject (43 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:33:35 -0600
   • Re: Verbs that agree with more than the subject (47 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:44:57 +0200
   • Re: Verbs that agree with more than the subject (46 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:10:55 -0400
   • Re: Verbs that agree with more than the subject (53 lines)
     From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:33:15 -0700
   • Re: Verbs that agree with more than the subject (62 lines)
     From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:48:30 -0700
   • Re: Verbs that agree with more than the subject (89 lines)
     From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:02:58 -0700
   • Re: Verbs that agree with more than the subject (64 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:36:34 -0400
   • Re: Verbs that agree with more than the subject (66 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:21:10 -0700
   • Re: Verbs that agree with more than the subject (106 lines)
     From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:17:53 -0700

10. Verdurian on Wikipedia
    • Verdurian on Wikipedia (35 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:11:21 +0100
    • Re: Verdurian on Wikipedia (36 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:07:20 -0700
    • Re: Verdurian on Wikipedia (53 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:18:07 +0100
    • Re: Verdurian on Wikipedia (31 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:48:14 -0700
    • Re: Verdurian on Wikipedia (48 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:55:42 +0100
    • Re: Verdurian on Wikipedia (47 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:12:26 +0100
    • Re: Verdurian on Wikipedia (46 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:41:01 +0200

11. Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili?
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (91 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:07:31 +0200
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (58 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:49:54 +0200

12. [TECH] Bitmap fonts under Windows
    • Re: [TECH] Bitmap fonts under Windows (45 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:18:38 +0200