Conlang Mailing List – July 2009, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "One Another" (33 messages)
• "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things" (3 messages)
• Another patent application re. numerical language (10 messages)
• Arithmographic languages (was Re: Another patent application re. numerical language) (3 messages)
• Brown Corpus (2 messages)
• Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts) (16 messages)
• Choosing between Greek "past tense" forms (4 messages)
• Conlanging on an iPod touch (5 messages)
• Conlangs to be discussed on WHYY this morning (5 messages)
• CONPROGLANG [WAS: OT: Programming languages] (6 messages)
• DEAD CONLANG(S)?
• Deini pronouns
• Holly Lisle's Create A Language Clinic (7 messages)
• How I'm writing my journal in Lates
• Labiovelars and assimilation (7 messages)
• Language generation software (14 messages)
• Moods (14 messages)
• NUMBERS FROM YOUR CONLANG(S)?
• On the subject of conscripts... (54 messages)
• OT: Internet oddities.. (5 messages)
• OT: Programming languages (was Re: Language generation software) (5 messages)
• OT: Song of Ice and Fire
• phonology, critique pls (14 messages)
• Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (10 messages)
• TECH: Conlanging on an iPod touch (5 messages)
• TECH: Threshold reached!
• Thryomanes 1.4 font available (2 messages)
• Tokana (5 messages)
• Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (31 messages)
• USAGE: dumb ASL question (9 messages)
• Why are you constructing your language(s)? (33 messages)
• Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (2 messages)
• YAEPT: (< On the subject of conscripts...)
• YAEPT: Flapped /l/ (2 messages)

1. "One Another"
   • "One Another" (23 lines)
     From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (63 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (31 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (83 lines)
     From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (62 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (38 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (106 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (40 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (37 lines)
     From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (50 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (103 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (58 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (122 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (59 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (46 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (81 lines)
     From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (47 lines)
     From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (89 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (47 lines)
     From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (53 lines)
     From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (38 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (43 lines)
     From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (57 lines)
     From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (64 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (65 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (56 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (32 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (56 lines)
     From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (50 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (54 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (37 lines)
     From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (57 lines)
     From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "One Another" (71 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>

2. "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things"
   • "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things" (31 lines)
     From: Linvi Charles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things" (41 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things" (45 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

3. Another patent application re. numerical language
   • Re: Another patent application re. numerical language (109 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another patent application re. numerical language (32 lines)
     From: kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another patent application re. numerical language (46 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another patent application re. numerical language (48 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another patent application re. numerical language (39 lines)
     From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another patent application re. numerical language (135 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another patent application re. numerical language (50 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another patent application re. numerical language (48 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another patent application re. numerical language (38 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another patent application re. numerical language (33 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

4. Arithmographic languages (was Re: Another patent application re. numerical language)
   • Arithmographic languages (was Re: Another patent application re. numerical language) (60 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Arithmographic languages (was Re: Another patent application re. numerical language) (55 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Arithmographic languages (was Re: Another patent application re. numerical language) (94 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

5. Brown Corpus
   • Re: Brown Corpus (44 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brown Corpus (31 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>

6. Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts)
   • Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts) (49 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts) (80 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts) (37 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts) (91 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts) (30 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts) (31 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts) (40 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts) (53 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts) (44 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts) (47 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts) (79 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts) (33 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts) (59 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts) (51 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts) (111 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Brown Corpus (was: On the subject of conscripts) (124 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

7. Choosing between Greek "past tense" forms
   • Re: Choosing between Greek "past tense" forms (42 lines)
     From: Adnan Majid <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Choosing between Greek "past tense" forms (55 lines)
     From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Choosing between Greek "past tense" forms (47 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Choosing between Greek "past tense" forms (68 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

8. Conlanging on an iPod touch
   • Conlanging on an iPod touch (45 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlanging on an iPod touch (56 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlanging on an iPod touch (44 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlanging on an iPod touch (46 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlanging on an iPod touch (52 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>

9. Conlangs to be discussed on WHYY this morning
   • Conlangs to be discussed on WHYY this morning (34 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs to be discussed on WHYY this morning (50 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs to be discussed on WHYY this morning (50 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs to be discussed on WHYY this morning (35 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs to be discussed on WHYY this morning (28 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

10. CONPROGLANG [WAS: OT: Programming languages]
    • Re: CONPROGLANG [WAS: OT: Programming languages] (44 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CONPROGLANG [WAS: OT: Programming languages] (47 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: CONPROGLANG [WAS: OT: Programming languages] (34 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CONPROGLANG [WAS: OT: Programming languages] (39 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CONPROGLANG [WAS: OT: Programming languages] (59 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CONPROGLANG [WAS: OT: Programming languages] (74 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

11. DEAD CONLANG(S)?
    • DEAD CONLANG(S)? (34 lines)
      From: janko gorenc <[log in to unmask]>

12. Deini pronouns
    • Deini pronouns (71 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

13. Holly Lisle's Create A Language Clinic
    • Re: Holly Lisle's Create A Language Clinic (581 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Holly Lisle's Create A Language Clinic (80 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Holly Lisle's Create A Language Clinic (71 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Holly Lisle's Create A Language Clinic (110 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Holly Lisle's Create A Language Clinic (52 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Holly Lisle's Create A Language Clinic (58 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Holly Lisle's Create A Language Clinic (36 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

14. How I'm writing my journal in Lates
    • How I'm writing my journal in Lates (56 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>

15. Labiovelars and assimilation
    • Labiovelars and assimilation (46 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Labiovelars and assimilation (58 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Labiovelars and assimilation (40 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Labiovelars and assimilation (42 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Labiovelars and assimilation (52 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Labiovelars and assimilation (55 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Labiovelars and assimilation (63 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

16. Language generation software
    • Language generation software (84 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language generation software (27 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language generation software (42 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language generation software (66 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language generation software (85 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language generation software (45 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language generation software (89 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language generation software (72 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language generation software (82 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language generation software (56 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language generation software (48 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language generation software (64 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language generation software (231 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language generation software (51 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

17. Moods
    • Re: Moods (62 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Moods (71 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Moods (44 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Moods (60 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Moods (60 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Moods (50 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Moods (41 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Moods (35 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Moods (45 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Moods (25 lines)
      From: Thomas Lawrie <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Moods (66 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Moods (38 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Moods (65 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Moods (61 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

18. NUMBERS FROM YOUR CONLANG(S)?
    • NUMBERS FROM YOUR CONLANG(S)? (37 lines)
      From: janko gorenc <[log in to unmask]>

19. On the subject of conscripts...
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (39 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (54 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (44 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (41 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (57 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (36 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (67 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (45 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (45 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (48 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (58 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (46 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (51 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (43 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (75 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (57 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (52 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (42 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (62 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (33 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (53 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (52 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (56 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (47 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (54 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (137 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (31 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (64 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (52 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (45 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (93 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (47 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (41 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (69 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (35 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (45 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (69 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (58 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (44 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (38 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (39 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (47 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (43 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (49 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (34 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (45 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (59 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (38 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (57 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (69 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (77 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: On the subject of conscripts... (94 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

20. OT: Internet oddities..
    • OT: Internet oddities.. (28 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Internet oddities.. (54 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Internet oddities.. (59 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Internet oddities.. (57 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Internet oddities.. (46 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]

21. OT: Programming languages (was Re: Language generation software)
    • OT: Programming languages (was Re: Language generation software) (59 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Programming languages (was Re: Language generation software) (51 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Programming languages (was Re: Language generation software) (56 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Programming languages (was Re: Language generation software) (50 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Programming languages (was Re: Language generation software) (81 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>

22. OT: Song of Ice and Fire
    • OT: Song of Ice and Fire (27 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

23. phonology, critique pls
    • phonology, critique pls (71 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, critique pls (70 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, critique pls (107 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, critique pls (123 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, critique pls (148 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, critique pls (97 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, critique pls (42 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, critique pls (109 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, critique pls (113 lines)
      From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, critique pls (45 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, critique pls (50 lines)
      From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, critique pls (95 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, critique pls (86 lines)
      From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: phonology, critique pls (84 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

24. Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (74 lines)
      From: Nuno Raposo <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (89 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (110 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (91 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (65 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (87 lines)
      From: Nuno Raposo <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (67 lines)
      From: Nuno Raposo <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (99 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (60 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Recoding ASL with a spoken phonology (89 lines)
      From: Nuno Raposo <[log in to unmask]>

25. TECH: Conlanging on an iPod touch
    • TECH: Conlanging on an iPod touch (57 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Conlanging on an iPod touch (85 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Conlanging on an iPod touch (45 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Conlanging on an iPod touch (36 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Conlanging on an iPod touch (41 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

26. TECH: Threshold reached!
    • TECH: Threshold reached! (37 lines)
      From: The Benevolent Dictator <[log in to unmask]>

27. Thryomanes 1.4 font available
    • Thryomanes 1.4 font available (34 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Thryomanes 1.4 font available (42 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

28. Tokana
    • Re: Tokana (41 lines)
      From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tokana (53 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tokana (62 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tokana (46 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tokana (65 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

29. Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
    • Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (38 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (43 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (59 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (72 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (46 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (87 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (52 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (41 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (35 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (53 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (53 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (38 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (51 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (52 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (49 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (82 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (55 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (76 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (101 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (43 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (144 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (47 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (51 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (98 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (87 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (26 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (35 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (44 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls) (35 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

30. USAGE: dumb ASL question
    • USAGE: dumb ASL question (29 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: dumb ASL question (48 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: dumb ASL question (49 lines)
      From: Claude Almansi <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: dumb ASL question (62 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: dumb ASL question (40 lines)
      From: Claude Almansi <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: dumb ASL question (88 lines)
      From: Leland Kusmer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: dumb ASL question (101 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: dumb ASL question (98 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: dumb ASL question (70 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>

31. Why are you constructing your language(s)?
    • Why are you constructing your language(s)? (27 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (45 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (50 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (50 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (62 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (38 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (51 lines)
      From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (41 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (59 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (42 lines)
      From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (28 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (41 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (41 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (46 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (47 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (64 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (73 lines)
      From: Lee B. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (49 lines)
      From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (41 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (41 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (54 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (36 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (44 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (59 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (66 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (50 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (87 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (39 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (58 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (50 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (63 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (46 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)? (70 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>

32. Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili?
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (58 lines)
      From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why no Greek capital upsilon with psili? (51 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

33. YAEPT: (< On the subject of conscripts...)
    • YAEPT: (< On the subject of conscripts...) (73 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

34. YAEPT: Flapped /l/
    • YAEPT: Flapped /l/ (35 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: Flapped /l/ (42 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>