Conlang
Mailing List – July 2009, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"One Another"
'wh-agreement'
(6 messages)
<No subject>
(3 messages)
A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(33 messages)
Articles
(41 messages)
Citation forms
(9 messages)
Citation forms (was: Articles)
(4 messages)
Conflating source and recipient?
Conworld History (was: Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?)
(2 messages)
DEAD CONLANG(S)?
(14 messages)
Deini pronouns (revisited)
(2 messages)
Esperanto as a relex (was: Pakuni not a relex (was "Pakuni" and/or <No subject given>)
Foundations of Language (was Re: [CONLANG] "Women, > Fire, and Dangerous Things")
(2 messages)
Foundations of Language (was Re: [CONLANG] "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things")
Gripping language documentation
(7 messages)
H. S. Teoh?
HEH GOAL
(30 messages)
Help with Hebrew script
(3 messages)
I can't unsubscribe...
(2 messages)
Irish sound changes
(2 messages)
Labiovelar pronunciation (was: Re: Articles)
(5 messages)
Labiovelars and assimilation
(2 messages)
Mandalorian
(12 messages)
META: No topic line (was: )
META: Start new topics (was Re: META: No topic line (was: ))
(4 messages)
Origin of lateral fricatives?
(18 messages)
OT: Legal advice needed
Pakuni
Pakuni Language (Land of the Lost)
(2 messages)
Pakuni not a relex
(2 messages)
Pakuni not a relex (was "Pakuni" and/or <No subject given>)
(8 messages)
phonology, critique pls
Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise. (was Re: Articles)
(13 messages)
Porcellain Elephants translation exercise
(2 messages)
Pronouncable Ciphers (was:Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?)
(7 messages)
Reverse-Polish Notation in Grammar
(14 messages)
Reviving old languages
Scripts: (<: Why are you constructing your language(s)?)
Shorthand-like writing systems
(8 messages)
TECH: Duplicated words in in messages
(4 messages)
Typological sins
(2 messages)
Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(27 messages)
Vixzrinddyig orthography and numbers
Why are you constructing your language(s)?
(11 messages)
YAEPT: Flapped /l/
Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(24 messages)
"One Another"
Re: "One Another"
(58 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
'wh-agreement'
'wh-agreement'
(73 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'wh-agreement'
(41 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'wh-agreement'
(45 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'wh-agreement'
(107 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'wh-agreement'
(107 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'wh-agreement'
(100 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
<No subject>
(175 lines)
From:
Thomas Alexander <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
(193 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(77 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(84 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(113 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(70 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(54 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(97 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(83 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(62 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(37 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(62 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(33 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(56 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(59 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(55 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(219 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(155 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(39 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(50 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(48 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(81 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(39 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(32 lines)
From:
Seo Sanghyeon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(44 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(74 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(59 lines)
From:
Piermaria Maraziti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(74 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(93 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(73 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(38 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(100 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(54 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(32 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang for Witchcraft and Wizardry
(51 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Articles
Articles
(54 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(54 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(46 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(35 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(57 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(33 lines)
From:
Stephen Barnes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(45 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(72 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(75 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(92 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(53 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(26 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(55 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(45 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(54 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(47 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(99 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(58 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(30 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(110 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(34 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(58 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(51 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(93 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(45 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(34 lines)
From:
burtonlang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(115 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(75 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(63 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(60 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(54 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(48 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(190 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(65 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(102 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(119 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(49 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(58 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Articles
(68 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Citation forms
Re: Citation forms
(171 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citation forms
(45 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citation forms
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citation forms
(56 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citation forms
(67 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citation forms
(135 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citation forms
(91 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citation forms
(54 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citation forms
(66 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Citation forms (was: Articles)
Citation forms (was: Articles)
(141 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citation forms (was: Articles)
(227 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citation forms (was: Articles)
(71 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Citation forms (was: Articles)
(122 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conflating source and recipient?
Conflating source and recipient?
(43 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conworld History (was: Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?)
Conworld History (was: Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?)
(40 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld History (was: Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?)
(38 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
DEAD CONLANG(S)?
Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?
(44 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?
(52 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?
(69 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?
(41 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?
(54 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?
(80 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?
(125 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?
(97 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?
(61 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?
(61 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?
(119 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?
(132 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DEAD CONLANG(S)?
(50 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Deini pronouns (revisited)
Re: Deini pronouns (revisited)
(84 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Deini pronouns (revisited)
(44 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Esperanto as a relex (was: Pakuni not a relex (was "Pakuni" and/or <No subject given>)
Re: Esperanto as a relex (was: Pakuni not a relex (was "Pakuni" and/or <No subject given>)
(35 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Foundations of Language (was Re: [CONLANG] "Women, > Fire, and Dangerous Things")
Re: Foundations of Language (was Re: [CONLANG] "Women, > Fire, and Dangerous Things")
(51 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Foundations of Language (was Re: [CONLANG] "Women, > Fire, and Dangerous Things")
(57 lines)
From:
Linvi Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Foundations of Language (was Re: [CONLANG] "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things")
Foundations of Language (was Re: [CONLANG] "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things")
(56 lines)
From:
Jim Rosenberg <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gripping language documentation
Gripping language documentation
(28 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gripping language documentation
(50 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gripping language documentation
(58 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gripping language documentation
(71 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gripping language documentation
(67 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gripping language documentation
(51 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gripping language documentation
(47 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
H. S. Teoh?
H. S. Teoh?
(37 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
HEH GOAL
HEH GOAL
(37 lines)
From:
The Benevolent Dictator <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(47 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(48 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(62 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(33 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(60 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(93 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(111 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(61 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(34 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(81 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(54 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(54 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(90 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(87 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(52 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(99 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(64 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(79 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(61 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(81 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(66 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(68 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(33 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(53 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(98 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(57 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(53 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: HEH GOAL
(44 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Help with Hebrew script
Help with Hebrew script
(33 lines)
From:
The Benevolent Dictator <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help with Hebrew script
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help with Hebrew script
(52 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
I can't unsubscribe...
I can't unsubscribe...
(26 lines)
From:
Campbell Nilsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I can't unsubscribe...
(39 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Irish sound changes
Irish sound changes
(36 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Irish sound changes
(48 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Labiovelar pronunciation (was: Re: Articles)
Labiovelar pronunciation (was: Re: Articles)
(60 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Labiovelar pronunciation (was: Re: Articles)
(37 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Labiovelar pronunciation (was: Re: Articles)
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Labiovelar pronunciation (was: Re: Articles)
(41 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Labiovelar pronunciation (was: Re: Articles)
(63 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Labiovelars and assimilation
Re: Labiovelars and assimilation
(39 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Labiovelars and assimilation
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mandalorian
Mandalorian
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandalorian
(44 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandalorian
(50 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandalorian
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandalorian
(52 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandalorian
(47 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandalorian
(51 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandalorian
(59 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandalorian
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandalorian
(39 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandalorian
(52 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mandalorian
(48 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
META: No topic line (was: )
META: No topic line (was: )
(35 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
META: Start new topics (was Re: META: No topic line (was: ))
META: Start new topics (was Re: META: No topic line (was: ))
(44 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Start new topics (was Re: META: No topic line (was: ))
(52 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Start new topics (was Re: META: No topic line (was: ))
(27 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: META: Start new topics (was Re: META: No topic line (was: ))
(40 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Origin of lateral fricatives?
Origin of lateral fricatives?
(30 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of lateral fricatives?
(43 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of lateral fricatives?
(81 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of lateral fricatives?
(88 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of lateral fricatives?
(41 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of lateral fricatives?
(26 lines)
From:
J. Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of lateral fricatives?
(32 lines)
From:
J. Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of lateral fricatives?
(38 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of lateral fricatives?
(59 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of lateral fricatives?
(71 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of lateral fricatives?
(71 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of lateral fricatives?
(72 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of lateral fricatives?
(92 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of lateral fricatives?
(43 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of lateral fricatives?
(48 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of lateral fricatives?
(50 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of lateral fricatives?
(42 lines)
From:
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of lateral fricatives?
(80 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Legal advice needed
OT: Legal advice needed
(40 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pakuni
Re: Pakuni
(70 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pakuni Language (Land of the Lost)
Pakuni Language (Land of the Lost)
(134 lines)
From:
Thomas Alexander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pakuni Language (Land of the Lost)
(80 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pakuni not a relex
Re: Pakuni not a relex
(94 lines)
From:
Thomas Alexander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pakuni not a relex
(69 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pakuni not a relex (was "Pakuni" and/or <No subject given>)
Pakuni not a relex (was "Pakuni" and/or <No subject given>)
(211 lines)
From:
Thomas Alexander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pakuni not a relex (was "Pakuni" and/or <No subject given>)
(79 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pakuni not a relex (was "Pakuni" and/or <No subject given>)
(129 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pakuni not a relex (was "Pakuni" and/or <No subject given>)
(45 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pakuni not a relex (was "Pakuni" and/or <No subject given>)
(51 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pakuni not a relex (was "Pakuni" and/or <No subject given>)
(52 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pakuni not a relex (was "Pakuni" and/or <No subject given>)
(62 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pakuni not a relex (was "Pakuni" and/or <No subject given>)
(77 lines)
From:
Thomas Alexander <
[log in to unmask]
>
phonology, critique pls
Re: phonology, critique pls
(98 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise. (was Re: Articles)
Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise. (was Re: Articles)
(120 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise. (was Re: Articles)
(143 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise. (was Re: Articles)
(164 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise. (was Re: Articles)
(42 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise. (was Re: Articles)
(32 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise. (was Re: Articles)
(51 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise. (was Re: Articles)
(45 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise. (was Re: Articles)
(34 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise. (was Re: Articles)
(70 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise. (was Re: Articles)
(45 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise. (was Re: Articles)
(39 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise. (was Re: Articles)
(70 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise. (was Re: Articles)
(46 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Porcellain Elephants translation exercise
Re: Porcellain Elephants translation exercise
(68 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Porcellain Elephants translation exercise
(75 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pronouncable Ciphers (was:Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?)
Pronouncable Ciphers (was:Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?)
(50 lines)
From:
Thomas Alexander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncable Ciphers (was:Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?)
(67 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncable Ciphers (was:Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?)
(85 lines)
From:
Thomas Alexander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncable Ciphers (was:Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?)
(49 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncable Ciphers (was:Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?)
(59 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncable Ciphers (was:Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?)
(37 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouncable Ciphers (was:Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?)
(61 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Reverse-Polish Notation in Grammar
Reverse-Polish Notation in Grammar
(89 lines)
From:
Stephen Barnes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse-Polish Notation in Grammar
(68 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse-Polish Notation in Grammar
(116 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse-Polish Notation in Grammar
(54 lines)
From:
Piermaria Maraziti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse-Polish Notation in Grammar
(39 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse-Polish Notation in Grammar
(110 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse-Polish Notation in Grammar
(83 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse-Polish Notation in Grammar
(75 lines)
From:
Stephen Barnes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse-Polish Notation in Grammar
(59 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse-Polish Notation in Grammar
(80 lines)
From:
Stephen Barnes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Reverse-Polish Notation in Grammar
(65 lines)
From:
Thomas Alexander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse-Polish Notation in Grammar
(72 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse-Polish Notation in Grammar
(91 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse-Polish Notation in Grammar
(41 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Reviving old languages
Reviving old languages
(68 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Scripts: (<: Why are you constructing your language(s)?)
Scripts: (<: Why are you constructing your language(s)?)
(39 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Shorthand-like writing systems
Shorthand-like writing systems
(35 lines)
From:
Stephen Barnes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shorthand-like writing systems
(37 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shorthand-like writing systems
(102 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shorthand-like writing systems
(99 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shorthand-like writing systems
(27 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shorthand-like writing systems
(107 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shorthand-like writing systems
(79 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shorthand-like writing systems
(57 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Duplicated words in in messages
TECH: Duplicated words in in messages
(36 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Duplicated words in in messages
(59 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Duplicated words in in messages
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Duplicated words in in messages
(59 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Typological sins
Re: Typological sins
(84 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins
(50 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(43 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(49 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(67 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(35 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(38 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(32 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(52 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(58 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(54 lines)
From:
M.S. Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(60 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(41 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(116 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(38 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(53 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(51 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(67 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(52 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(44 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(43 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(48 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(47 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typological sins (WAS: Re: [CONLANG] phonology, critique pls)
(70 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vixzrinddyig orthography and numbers
Vixzrinddyig orthography and numbers
(40 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Why are you constructing your language(s)?
Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?
(59 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?
(96 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?
(97 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?
(34 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?
(38 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?
(48 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?
(34 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why are you constructing your language(s)?
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEPT: Flapped /l/
Re: YAEPT: Flapped /l/
(45 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(58 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(50 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(66 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(82 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(26 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(31 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(46 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(67 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(45 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(54 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(72 lines)
From:
Scott Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(67 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(49 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(130 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(53 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(75 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(64 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(63 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(53 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(81 lines)
From:
Thomas Alexander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(42 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(54 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(100 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – July 2009, week 3
Conlang Mailing List – July 2009, week 3
