Conlang
Mailing List – July 2009, week 5
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
57 cases
(23 messages)
57 cases (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote)
(4 messages)
A spoken-only conlang
(9 messages)
Bye for now.
CHAT: introduction
(3 messages)
Citation forms
example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(12 messages)
gésir
Language generation software
(15 messages)
Maximally divergent relay design
NATLANG: THEORY: Ways of classifying cases. (was: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote)
NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(19 messages)
nipha (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote)
OT TECH: hosting. Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(4 messages)
OT TECH: listserv problems?
(2 messages)
OT: Cute linguistic joke
(3 messages)
Peer Reviewed Journal of Conlangs
(6 messages)
Polyptoton? Bi’smi-llahi’r-Rahmani’r-Rahim
Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise
Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(6 messages)
Roman abjad.
Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!)
(7 messages)
TECH: Entering Unicode
(37 messages)
What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(25 messages)
Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(2 messages)
[offlist] Re: [CONLANG] example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(5 messages)
57 cases
Re: 57 cases
(47 lines)
From:
Przemyslaw Ziobrowski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(68 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(57 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(65 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(67 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(74 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(52 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(54 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(73 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(63 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(40 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(44 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(43 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(69 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(54 lines)
From:
Przemyslaw Ziobrowski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(88 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(56 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(45 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(47 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases
(53 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
57 cases (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote)
57 cases (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote)
(101 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote)
(36 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote)
(50 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 57 cases (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote)
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
A spoken-only conlang
A spoken-only conlang
(82 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(39 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(44 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(32 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(47 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(41 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(103 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(58 lines)
From:
Parker Glynn-Adey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Bye for now.
Bye for now.
(41 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: introduction
Re: CHAT: introduction
(46 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: introduction
(54 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: introduction
(72 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Citation forms
Re: Citation forms
(39 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
example sentences for grammar testing purposes
example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(31 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(37 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(49 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(60 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(62 lines)
From:
Michael Potter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(41 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(51 lines)
From:
Jorge Cristino <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(28 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(34 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(45 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(41 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
gésir
Re: gésir
(54 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language generation software
Re: Language generation software
(41 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language generation software
(30 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language generation software
(54 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language generation software
(70 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language generation software
(129 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language generation software
(38 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language generation software
(96 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language generation software
(44 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language generation software
(84 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language generation software
(43 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language generation software
(45 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language generation software
(52 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language generation software
(47 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language generation software
(86 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language generation software
(120 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Maximally divergent relay design
Re: Maximally divergent relay design
(60 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG: THEORY: Ways of classifying cases. (was: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote)
NATLANG: THEORY: Ways of classifying cases. (was: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote)
(169 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(162 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(98 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(68 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(52 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(50 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(40 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(314 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(195 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(43 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(329 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(75 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(48 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(315 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(235 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(85 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
(53 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
nipha (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote)
nipha (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote)
(75 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT TECH: hosting. Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
OT TECH: hosting. Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(47 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH: hosting. Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(42 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH: hosting. Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(55 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH: hosting. Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT TECH: listserv problems?
OT TECH: listserv problems?
(32 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH: listserv problems?
(50 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Cute linguistic joke
OT: Cute linguistic joke
(24 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Cute linguistic joke
(39 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Cute linguistic joke
(31 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Peer Reviewed Journal of Conlangs
Peer Reviewed Journal of Conlangs
(33 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Peer Reviewed Journal of Conlangs
(38 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Peer Reviewed Journal of Conlangs
(53 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Peer Reviewed Journal of Conlangs
(46 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Peer Reviewed Journal of Conlangs
(72 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Peer Reviewed Journal of Conlangs
(79 lines)
From:
Samuel R Boylan Jr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Polyptoton? Bi’smi-llahi’r-Rahmani’r-Rahim
Polyptoton? Bi’smi-llahi’r-Rahmani’r-Rahim
(76 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise
Re: Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise
(53 lines)
From:
Puey McCleary <
[log in to unmask]
>
Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(90 lines)
From:
Thomas Alexander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(69 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(56 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(70 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(38 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Roman abjad.
Re: Roman abjad.
(45 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!)
Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!)
(126 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!)
(145 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!)
(51 lines)
From:
Arnt Richard Johansen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!)
(192 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!)
(39 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!)
(58 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!)
(78 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Entering Unicode
TECH: Entering Unicode
(35 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(52 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(69 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(39 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(37 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(57 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(52 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(52 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(85 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(58 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(72 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(43 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(73 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(81 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(39 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(56 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(47 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(60 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(45 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(45 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(52 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(50 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(44 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(54 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(40 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(45 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(49 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(53 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(59 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(54 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(34 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(37 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(46 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(55 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(52 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(71 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(37 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(55 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(86 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(54 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(70 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(58 lines)
From:
R. Dan Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(34 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(59 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(41 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(31 lines)
From:
Parker Glynn-Adey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(34 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(59 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(48 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(47 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(81 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(51 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(52 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(62 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(66 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(68 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(98 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
(32 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
[offlist] Re: [CONLANG] example sentences for grammar testing purposes
[offlist] Re: [CONLANG] example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(25 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [offlist] Re: [CONLANG] example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(26 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [offlist] Re: [CONLANG] example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [offlist] Re: [CONLANG] example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(43 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [offlist] Re: [CONLANG] example sentences for grammar testing purposes
(42 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – July 2009, week 5
Conlang Mailing List – July 2009, week 5
