Conlang Mailing List – July 2009, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• 57 cases (23 messages)
• 57 cases (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote) (4 messages)
• A spoken-only conlang (9 messages)
• Bye for now.
• CHAT: introduction (3 messages)
• Citation forms
• example sentences for grammar testing purposes (12 messages)
• gésir
• Language generation software (15 messages)
• Maximally divergent relay design
• NATLANG: THEORY: Ways of classifying cases. (was: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote)
• NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (19 messages)
• nipha (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote)
• OT TECH: hosting. Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes (4 messages)
• OT TECH: listserv problems? (2 messages)
• OT: Cute linguistic joke (3 messages)
• Peer Reviewed Journal of Conlangs (6 messages)
• Polyptoton? Bi’smi-llahi’r-Rahmani’r-Rahim
• Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise
• Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (6 messages)
• Roman abjad.
• Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!) (7 messages)
• TECH: Entering Unicode (37 messages)
• What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (25 messages)
• Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex) (2 messages)
• [offlist] Re: [CONLANG] example sentences for grammar testing purposes (5 messages)

1. 57 cases
   • Re: 57 cases (53 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:08:14 +0100
   • Re: 57 cases (47 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:58:17 +0100
   • Re: 57 cases (45 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:28:52 -0400
   • Re: 57 cases (56 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:29:14 +0200
   • Re: 57 cases (88 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:39:17 -0700
   • Re: 57 cases (54 lines)
     From: Przemyslaw Ziobrowski <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:27:15 +0200
   • Re: 57 cases (69 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:22:05 -0700
   • Re: 57 cases (38 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:44:02 -0400
   • Re: 57 cases (43 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:26:19 -0400
   • Re: 57 cases (44 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:24:19 -0400
   • Re: 57 cases (46 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:09:34 +0200
   • Re: 57 cases (40 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:05:10 +0200
   • Re: 57 cases (63 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:04:27 +0100
   • Re: 57 cases (73 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:51:18 +0100
   • Re: 57 cases (54 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:36:00 -0400
   • Re: 57 cases (52 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:06:22 +0100
   • Re: 57 cases (74 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:36:44 -0400
   • Re: 57 cases (67 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:17:08 +0100
   • Re: 57 cases (65 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:11:05 +0200
   • Re: 57 cases (57 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:08:16 +0100
   • Re: 57 cases (68 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:58:08 +0100
   • Re: 57 cases (52 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:55:45 +0200
   • Re: 57 cases (47 lines)
     From: Przemyslaw Ziobrowski <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:54:22 +0200

2. 57 cases (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote)
   • Re: 57 cases (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote) (38 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:45:33 -0400
   • Re: 57 cases (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote) (50 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:54:59 -0700
   • Re: 57 cases (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote) (36 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:37:22 -0700
   • 57 cases (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote) (101 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:28:22 +0100

3. A spoken-only conlang
   • Re: A spoken-only conlang (58 lines)
     From: Parker Glynn-Adey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:56:56 -0300
   • Re: A spoken-only conlang (103 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:14:41 -0400
   • Re: A spoken-only conlang (46 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:36:37 -0700
   • Re: A spoken-only conlang (41 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:41:52 -0400
   • Re: A spoken-only conlang (47 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:05:57 +0200
   • Re: A spoken-only conlang (32 lines)
     From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:26:20 -0400
   • Re: A spoken-only conlang (44 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:21:39 -0400
   • Re: A spoken-only conlang (39 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:09:59 -0400
   • A spoken-only conlang (82 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:13:43 -0700

4. Bye for now.
   • Bye for now. (41 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:27:12 +0100

5. CHAT: introduction
   • Re: CHAT: introduction (72 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:35:33 -0700
   • Re: CHAT: introduction (54 lines)
     From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:06:22 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: introduction (46 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:22:55 +0200

6. Citation forms
   • Re: Citation forms (39 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:22:32 +0100

7. example sentences for grammar testing purposes
   • Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes (41 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:40:32 -0700
   • Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes (48 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:38:46 -0400
   • Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes (45 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:27:51 -0400
   • Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes (34 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:21:53 -0700
   • Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes (28 lines)
     From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:53:22 -0400
   • Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes (51 lines)
     From: Jorge Cristino <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:13:33 +0100
   • Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes (41 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:01:42 -0700
   • Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes (62 lines)
     From: Michael Potter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 02:33:03 -0400
   • Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes (60 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:49:59 -0700
   • Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes (49 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:43:10 -0700
   • Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes (37 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:28:28 +0200
   • example sentences for grammar testing purposes (31 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:38:53 -0400

8. gésir
   • Re: gésir (54 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:36:10 +0100

9. Language generation software
   • Re: Language generation software (120 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:19:15 -0400
   • Re: Language generation software (86 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:27:25 -0400
   • Re: Language generation software (47 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:51:38 -0400
   • Re: Language generation software (52 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:57:25 +0200
   • Re: Language generation software (45 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:10:28 -0400
   • Re: Language generation software (43 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:18:20 -0400
   • Re: Language generation software (84 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:30:36 -0400
   • Re: Language generation software (44 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:40:01 -0400
   • Re: Language generation software (96 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:13:35 -0700
   • Re: Language generation software (38 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:19:17 -0400
   • Re: Language generation software (129 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:51:19 -0400
   • Re: Language generation software (70 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:48:15 -0400
   • Re: Language generation software (54 lines)
     From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:35:10 -0400
   • Re: Language generation software (30 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:18:46 -0400
   • Re: Language generation software (41 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:01:03 +0100

10. Maximally divergent relay design
    • Re: Maximally divergent relay design (60 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:54:18 +0100

11. NATLANG: THEORY: Ways of classifying cases. (was: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote)
    • NATLANG: THEORY: Ways of classifying cases. (was: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote) (169 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:09:20 -0400

12. NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (53 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:10:21 -0700
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (85 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:01:50 +0100
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (235 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:12:50 -0400
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (44 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:17:58 +0200
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (315 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:58:03 +0100
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (48 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:06:34 -0400
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (75 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:46:40 -0400
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (329 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:34:42 -0400
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (43 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:15:52 -0700
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (55 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:46:23 +0200
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (195 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:19:54 -0400
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (314 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:39:22 -0400
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (40 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:40:50 -0400
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (44 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:07:32 +0200
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (50 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:48:16 +0100
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (52 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:54:11 -0400
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (68 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:40:08 +0100
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (98 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:14:08 +0200
    • Re: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote (162 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:00:53 +0100

13. nipha (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote)
    • nipha (was: NATLANG: THEORY?: Aptote, monoptote, diptote, triptote, tetraptote, pentaptote) (75 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:41:14 +0100

14. OT TECH: hosting. Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes
    • Re: OT TECH: hosting. Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes (36 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:23:34 -0700
    • Re: OT TECH: hosting. Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes (55 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:03:47 +0200
    • Re: OT TECH: hosting. Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes (42 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:07:54 -0400
    • OT TECH: hosting. Re: example sentences for grammar testing purposes (47 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:18:57 -0400

15. OT TECH: listserv problems?
    • Re: OT TECH: listserv problems? (50 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:56:33 -0700
    • OT TECH: listserv problems? (32 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:42:58 -0700

16. OT: Cute linguistic joke
    • Re: OT: Cute linguistic joke (31 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:37:07 -0500
    • Re: OT: Cute linguistic joke (39 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:38:22 -0700
    • OT: Cute linguistic joke (24 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:21:42 -0700

17. Peer Reviewed Journal of Conlangs
    • Re: Peer Reviewed Journal of Conlangs (79 lines)
      From: Samuel R Boylan Jr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:49:16 -0400
    • Re: Peer Reviewed Journal of Conlangs (72 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:45:40 -0700
    • Re: Peer Reviewed Journal of Conlangs (46 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:41:37 -0700
    • Re: Peer Reviewed Journal of Conlangs (53 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:01:56 +0100
    • Re: Peer Reviewed Journal of Conlangs (38 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:49:43 -0700
    • Peer Reviewed Journal of Conlangs (33 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:51:06 +0100

18. Polyptoton? Bi’smi-llahi’r-Rahmani’r-Rahim
    • Polyptoton? Bi’smi-llahi’r-Rahmani’r-Rahim (76 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:57:23 -0400

19. Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise
    • Re: Porcelain Elephants Translation Exercise (53 lines)
      From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:41:55 -0400

20. Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (38 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:31:23 +0200
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (70 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:17:48 -0400
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (56 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 01:36:16 +0800
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (43 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:06:52 +0200
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (69 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:47:21 -0400
    • Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (90 lines)
      From: Thomas Alexander <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 04:42:08 -0700

21. Roman abjad.
    • Re: Roman abjad. (45 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:54:44 -0400

22. Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!)
    • Re: Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!) (78 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:35:47 -0700
    • Re: Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!) (58 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:12:12 -0700
    • Re: Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!) (39 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:49:49 -0400
    • Re: Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!) (192 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:41:35 -0700
    • Re: Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!) (51 lines)
      From: Arnt Richard Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:45:45 +0200
    • Re: Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!) (145 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:23:41 -0500
    • Snake and mouse in the gripping language (with video!) (126 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:43:53 -0700

23. TECH: Entering Unicode
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (52 lines)
      From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:30:57 -0600
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (55 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:29:16 -0500
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (46 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:00:38 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (37 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:26:06 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (34 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:15:07 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (54 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:45:58 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (46 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:45:32 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (59 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:42:38 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (53 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:22:07 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (49 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:56:41 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (45 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:01:17 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (40 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:26:43 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (54 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:00:10 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (44 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:31:48 +0100
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (50 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:44:29 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (52 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:42:34 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (45 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:50:01 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (45 lines)
      From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:38:41 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (60 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:34:35 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (58 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:21:37 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (47 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:17:40 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (56 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:15:21 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (39 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:31:24 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (81 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:10:47 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (73 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:07:32 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (43 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:36:31 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (72 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:37:25 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (58 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:58:30 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (85 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:31:15 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (52 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:34:39 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (52 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:37:35 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (57 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:00:14 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (37 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:58:11 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (39 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:55:08 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (69 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:51:11 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (52 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:07:07 +0200
    • TECH: Entering Unicode (35 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:11:45 +0100

24. What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (68 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:33:31 -0400
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (53 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:29:49 -0400
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (41 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:26:07 +0200
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (66 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:20:15 +0200
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (62 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:16:45 +0200
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (52 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:10:29 -0700
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (51 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:30:04 +0200
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (81 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 02:03:21 +0800
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (47 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:37:44 -0700
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (48 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:09:06 +0100
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:02:36 -0400
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (59 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:32:24 -0500
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (34 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:20:36 -0600
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (31 lines)
      From: Parker Glynn-Adey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:42:08 -0300
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (41 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:06:20 -0000
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (59 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:13:28 -0400
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (44 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:12:25 +0200
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (34 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:29:31 -0400
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (58 lines)
      From: R. Dan Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:30:36 -0700
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (70 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:28:25 -0400
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (54 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:04:44 -0700
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (86 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:48:12 -0400
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (55 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:57:35 -0400
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (37 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:52:34 -0500
    • What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (71 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:24:38 -0700

25. Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex)
    • Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex) (32 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:17:00 -0400
    • Re: Yes/no interrogative (< Esperanto as a relex) (98 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:22:25 -0700

26. [offlist] Re: [CONLANG] example sentences for grammar testing purposes
    • Re: [offlist] Re: [CONLANG] example sentences for grammar testing purposes (42 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:13:00 -0400
    • Re: [offlist] Re: [CONLANG] example sentences for grammar testing purposes (43 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:05:15 -0500
    • Re: [offlist] Re: [CONLANG] example sentences for grammar testing purposes (37 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:10:58 +0200
    • Re: [offlist] Re: [CONLANG] example sentences for grammar testing purposes (26 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:25:47 -0600
    • [offlist] Re: [CONLANG] example sentences for grammar testing purposes (25 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:28:39 -0400