Conlang
Mailing List August 2009, week 1
Sort by
Author |
Date
|
Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show contributor list |
Hide contributor list
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
List of contributors:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
(6 messages)
Alex Bicksler <
[log in to unmask]
>
(3 messages)
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
(7 messages)
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
(3 messages)
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
(2 messages)
anonymous <
[log in to unmask]
>
(3 messages)
Arnt Richard Johansen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
(19 messages)
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
(2 messages)
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Damatir Ando <
[log in to unmask]
>
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
(3 messages)
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
(2 messages)
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
(2 messages)
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
(5 messages)
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
(3 messages)
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
(5 messages)
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
(2 messages)
Glorious Waffle <
[log in to unmask]
>
(3 messages)
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
(3 messages)
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
(2 messages)
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
(5 messages)
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
(11 messages)
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
(3 messages)
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
(9 messages)
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
(19 messages)
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
(4 messages)
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
(2 messages)
Parker Glynn-Adey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
(14 messages)
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
(4 messages)
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
(9 messages)
Przemyslaw Ziobrowski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
(6 messages)
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
(2 messages)
Scott Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
(2 messages)
The Benevolent Dictator <
[log in to unmask]
>
Thomas Alexander <
[log in to unmask]
>
(9 messages)
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
(5 messages)
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
(40 lines)
Date:
Sun, 2 Aug 2009 18:00:02 -0400
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(46 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 21:37:26 -0400
Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated?
(95 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 21:58:49 -0400
Re: how often do you work on your conlangs?
(47 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 02:57:49 -0400
Re: omniglot.com down
(34 lines)
Date:
Sat, 1 Aug 2009 12:47:41 -0400
Re: Venetian Grammar online
(56 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:06:42 -0400
Alex Bicksler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated?
(72 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 00:26:30 -0700
Re: how often do you work on your conlangs?
(45 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:42:29 -0700
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(29 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:44:23 -0700
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
(36 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:07:17 -0400
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(65 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 00:27:19 -0400
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(64 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 22:00:21 -0400
Re: Language generation software
(109 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 23:10:26 -0400
Re: Language generation software
(42 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:16:33 -0400
Re: Language generation software
(47 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 22:41:42 -0400
Re: Language generation software
(30 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:37:21 -0400
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
(46 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 00:27:24 -0400
Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
(41 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:11:29 -0400
Re: how often do you work on your conlangs?
(46 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:56:45 -0400
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang)
(43 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:28:00 +0100
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(43 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 21:07:52 +0200
Re: Language generation software
(45 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:56:19 +0200
anonymous <
[log in to unmask]
>
Irrealis mood and subordinate clauses
(51 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 19:10:31 -0400
Re: Irrealis mood and subordinate clauses
(31 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:01:31 -0400
Re: Irrealis mood and subordinate clauses
(37 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 17:28:38 -0400
Arnt Richard Johansen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
(50 lines)
Date:
Sun, 2 Aug 2009 18:20:50 +0200
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
BXS (Benct's X-SAMPA) keymap for vim updated
(32 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:50:32 +0200
Re: Common Romansh spelling (was Re: Venetian Grammar online)
(194 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 23:10:15 +0200
Re: Common Romansh spelling (was Re: Venetian Grammar online)
(228 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:01:03 +0200
Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated?
(51 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 23:21:20 +0200
Re: how often do you work on your conlangs?
(77 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 20:31:33 +0200
Re: IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang)
(76 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:05:42 +0200
labial + /j/ in Romance (was: Re: [CONLANG] Language generation software)
(82 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:25:59 +0200
Re: Language generation software
(71 lines)
Date:
Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:47:17 +0200
Re: Language generation software
(54 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:53:59 +0200
Re: Language generation software
(72 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:50:03 +0200
Re: Latin Garlic
(87 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:54:03 +0200
Re: Latin Garlic
(96 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:22:46 +0200
omniglot.com down
(25 lines)
Date:
Sat, 1 Aug 2009 10:56:43 +0200
Re: Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang
(49 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:31:32 +0200
Re: Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang
(76 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:45:59 +0200
Re: Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang
(35 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:50:28 +0200
Re: Venetian Grammar online
(51 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:07:04 +0200
Re: Venetian Grammar online
(72 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:41:10 +0200
Re: Venetian Grammar online
(75 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:12:30 +0200
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin Garlic
(52 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:54:06 -0000
Re: Venetian Grammar online
(42 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:44:17 -0000
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how often do you work on your conlangs?
(37 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:17:35 +0200
Damatir Ando <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(32 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:31:45 -0700
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated?
(49 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:26:58 -0600
how often do you work on your conlangs?
(28 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 01:58:09 -0400
Re: Learning (was: Re: A spoken-only conlang)
(34 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:07:03 -0600
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language generation software
(43 lines)
Date:
Sun, 2 Aug 2009 18:07:26 -0400
Re: Latin Garlic
(37 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:49:08 -0400
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin Garlic
(111 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:03:48 +0200
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Let's finally ix the "reply-to" for Conlang. (< Optimizing Vocabulary)
(75 lines)
Date:
Sat, 1 Aug 2009 23:41:16 -0400
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(56 lines)
Date:
Sun, 2 Aug 2009 16:55:19 +0100
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
(48 lines)
Date:
Sun, 2 Aug 2009 22:00:26 -0700
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
(55 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:20:19 -0700
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Venetian Grammar online
(40 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:16:18 -0700
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(128 lines)
Date:
Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:00:36 -0700
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
(49 lines)
Date:
Sun, 2 Aug 2009 22:39:19 -0500
Re: Conlanging with Tiddly Wiki
(44 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:01:33 -0500
Re: Irrealis mood and subordinate clauses
(109 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 23:59:26 -0500
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(52 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:46:26 -0500
Re: YAEPT Uh? was: Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(75 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:56:36 -0500
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(101 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 00:58:20 +0800
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(43 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 01:00:30 +0800
Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle?
(98 lines)
Date:
Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:18:23 +0800
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(45 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:37:11 -0700
Re: Irrealis mood and subordinate clauses
(49 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:24:54 -0700
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(39 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:22:38 -0700
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(42 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:38:44 -0700
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(43 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:25:28 -0700
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Completely Different Way to Create a Conlang
(51 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:08:02 -0700
How is your Conlanging time allocated?
(47 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:09:13 -0700
Glorious Waffle <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(51 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:59:21 -0400
Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated?
(51 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:39:39 -0400
Re: how often do you work on your conlangs?
(37 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:07:45 -0400
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: gésir
(54 lines)
Date:
Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:36:14 +0200
Re: TECH: Let's finally ix the "reply-to" for Conlang. (< Optimizing Vocabulary)
(80 lines)
Date:
Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:27:05 +0200
Re: TECH: Let's finally ix the "reply-to" for Conlang. (< Optimizing Vocabulary)
(44 lines)
Date:
Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:43:38 +0200
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated?
(55 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:49:58 +0200
Re: how often do you work on your conlangs?
(52 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 22:56:49 +0200
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Whistling Language
(138 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 02:17:18 -0500
Re: Conlanging with Tiddly Wiki
(84 lines)
Date:
Sat, 1 Aug 2009 02:00:39 -0500
Re: Conlanging with Tiddly Wiki
(99 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:49:53 -0500
Re: Conlanging with Tiddly Wiki
(110 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:45:45 -0500
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(76 lines)
Date:
Sat, 1 Aug 2009 18:04:04 -0500
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
(38 lines)
Date:
Sun, 2 Aug 2009 12:01:14 -0400
Re: A Completely Different Way to Create a Conlang
(64 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 02:20:10 -0400
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(114 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 22:59:39 -0400
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(127 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:28:11 -0400
Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated?
(46 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:49:49 -0400
Re: how often do you work on your conlangs?
(34 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 02:26:11 -0400
Re: Language generation software
(50 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 06:24:44 -0400
Re: Learning (was: Re: A spoken-only conlang)
(49 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:47:12 -0400
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(165 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:25:10 -0400
Re: Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang
(130 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:43:56 -0400
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(49 lines)
Date:
Sun, 2 Aug 2009 03:19:50 -0400
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language generation software
(41 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:16:27 -0400
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
(48 lines)
Date:
Sun, 2 Aug 2009 19:28:18 -0400
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: how often do you work on your conlangs?
(39 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:46:04 -0400
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(44 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:40:07 -0400
Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated?
(65 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:19:49 -0400
Re: how often do you work on your conlangs?
(26 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:10:48 -0400
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(61 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:59:52 -0700
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(129 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:59:17 -0700
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(81 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:55:35 -0700
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(67 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:50:14 -0700
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(49 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:54:58 -0700
Re: how often do you work on your conlangs?
(45 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:52:55 -0700
Re: Learning (was: Re: A spoken-only conlang)
(39 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:40:07 -0700
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(140 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:34:23 -0700
Re: TECH: Entering Unicode
(64 lines)
Date:
Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:48:59 -0700
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(62 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:14:15 -0400
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(49 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:14:53 -0400
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(79 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 07:40:17 -0400
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(36 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:20:38 -0400
Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated?
(45 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:29:21 -0400
Re: Latin Garlic
(42 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:54:55 -0400
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(34 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:10:26 -0400
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(187 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:18:48 -0400
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(43 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:03:45 -0400
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(78 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:03:26 -0400
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(122 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:47:55 -0400
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(34 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:39:33 -0400
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(37 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:25:41 -0400
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(38 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:51:25 -0400
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(60 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:32:44 -0400
Re: Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang
(143 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:51:03 -0400
Re: Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang
(99 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 07:47:08 -0400
Re: YAEPT Uh? was: Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(35 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:06:46 -0400
Re: YAEPT Uh? was: Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(65 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:39:14 -0400
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(33 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:54:37 -0500
Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated?
(35 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 22:27:15 -0500
Re: IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang)
(64 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:51:18 -0500
Re: IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang)
(121 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:23:29 -0500
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(50 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:34:29 +0200
Re: how often do you work on your conlangs?
(52 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:51:10 +0200
Parker Glynn-Adey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(36 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:26:38 -0300
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(45 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:37:46 -0700
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(93 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:45:43 -0400
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(82 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:10:03 -0400
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(42 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:22:51 -0700
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(43 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:28:14 -0700
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(64 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:08:56 -0700
Re: IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang)
(64 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:11:39 -0700
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(68 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:18:54 -0700
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(104 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:42:52 -0700
Re: Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang
(47 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:53:11 -0700
Re: Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang
(89 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:01:28 -0700
YAEPT Uh? was: Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(87 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:01:16 -0700
Re: YAEPT Uh? was: Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(49 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:17:13 -0700
Re: YAEPT Uh? was: Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(51 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:26:22 -0700
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang)
(59 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 01:08:50 -0400
Re: IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang)
(75 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:29:06 -0400
Re: IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang)
(64 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:16:38 -0400
Re: IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang)
(74 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:28:08 -0400
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(44 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:03:35 +0200
Common Romansh spelling (was Re: Venetian Grammar online)
(111 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:24:03 +0200
Re: Common Romansh spelling (was Re: Venetian Grammar online)
(132 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:56:05 +0200
Re: Common Romansh spelling (was Re: Venetian Grammar online)
(69 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:39:06 +0200
Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated?
(33 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 22:03:30 +0200
Re: how often do you work on your conlangs?
(43 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:30:54 +0200
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(37 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:27:24 +0200
Re: Venetian Grammar online
(47 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:57:10 +0200
Re: Venetian Grammar online
(36 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 22:18:58 +0200
Przemyslaw Ziobrowski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA & Conlangs
(72 lines)
Date:
Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:53:58 +0200
Rik Roots <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated?
(45 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 22:44:00 +0100
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(37 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:29:51 -0700
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(81 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:27:45 -0700
Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated?
(42 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:29:26 -0700
Re: how often do you work on your conlangs?
(43 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:16:48 -0700
Re: Irrealis mood and subordinate clauses
(47 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 21:16:10 -0700
Re: Venetian Grammar online
(35 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:44:21 -0700
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Reminder: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
(48 lines)
Date:
Sun, 2 Aug 2009 09:35:43 -0700
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
(36 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 02:55:39 -0700
Re: TECH: Let's finally ix the "reply-to" for Conlang. (< Optimizing Vocabulary)
(34 lines)
Date:
Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:00:12 -0700
Scott Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin Garlic
(118 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:17:52 -0600
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(65 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:40:13 +0200
Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated?
(79 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:15:50 +0200
The Benevolent Dictator <
[log in to unmask]
>
Latin Garlic
(54 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:36:13 +0200
Thomas Alexander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(130 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:09:36 -0700
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(146 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:36:16 -0700
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(86 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:10:27 -0700
Re: A spoken-only conlang
(126 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 04:36:06 -0700
Learning (was: Re: A spoken-only conlang)
(52 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:42:20 -0700
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(123 lines)
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:05:33 -0700
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(160 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:06:37 -0700
Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples
(140 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:57:22 -0700
Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang
(126 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:43:50 -0700
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated?
(56 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 21:01:24 +0300
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
(68 lines)
Date:
Sun, 2 Aug 2009 19:40:50 -0400
Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
(56 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:31:55 -0400
Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
(51 lines)
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:03:19 -0400
Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated?
(53 lines)
Date:
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 06:56:49 -0400
Re: how often do you work on your conlangs?
(59 lines)
Date:
Wed, 5 Aug 2009 06:37:38 -0400
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST
(52 lines)
Date:
Sun, 2 Aug 2009 22:45:51 +0200
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU