Conlang Mailing List – August 2009, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show contributor list | Hide contributor list

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

List of contributors:

• <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Alex Bicksler <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]> (7 messages)
• Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
• Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• anonymous <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Arnt Richard Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
• Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]> (19 messages)
• caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
• Damatir Ando <[log in to unmask]>
• Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
• David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>
• David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
• David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
• Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>
• Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Glorious Waffle <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]> (11 messages)
• John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
• kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
• Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
• Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Lee <[log in to unmask]> (9 messages)
• Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]> (19 messages)
• Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Parker Glynn-Adey <[log in to unmask]>
• Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]> (14 messages)
• Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]> (9 messages)
• Przemyslaw Ziobrowski <[log in to unmask]>
• Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
• Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
• Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Scott Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
• taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• The Benevolent Dictator <[log in to unmask]>
• Thomas Alexander <[log in to unmask]> (9 messages)
• TOms Deimonds Barvidis <[log in to unmask]>
• Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• Veoler <[log in to unmask]>

1. <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST (40 lines)
     Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 18:00:02 -0400
   • Re: A spoken-only conlang (46 lines)
     Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 21:37:26 -0400
   • Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated? (95 lines)
     Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 21:58:49 -0400
   • Re: how often do you work on your conlangs? (47 lines)
     Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 02:57:49 -0400
   • Re: omniglot.com down (34 lines)
     Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 12:47:41 -0400
   • Re: Venetian Grammar online (56 lines)
     Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:06:42 -0400

2. Alex Bicksler <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated? (72 lines)
     Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 00:26:30 -0700
   • Re: how often do you work on your conlangs? (45 lines)
     Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:42:29 -0700
   • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (29 lines)
     Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:44:23 -0700

3. Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST (36 lines)
     Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:07:17 -0400
   • Re: A spoken-only conlang (65 lines)
     Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 00:27:19 -0400
   • Re: A spoken-only conlang (64 lines)
     Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 22:00:21 -0400
   • Re: Language generation software (109 lines)
     Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 23:10:26 -0400
   • Re: Language generation software (42 lines)
     Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:16:33 -0400
   • Re: Language generation software (47 lines)
     Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 22:41:42 -0400
   • Re: Language generation software (30 lines)
     Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:37:21 -0400

4. Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST (46 lines)
     Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 00:27:24 -0400
   • Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST (41 lines)
     Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:11:29 -0400
   • Re: how often do you work on your conlangs? (46 lines)
     Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:56:45 -0400

5. And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang) (43 lines)
     Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:28:00 +0100

6. Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A spoken-only conlang (43 lines)
     Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 21:07:52 +0200
   • Re: Language generation software (45 lines)
     Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:56:19 +0200

7. anonymous <[log in to unmask]>
   • Irrealis mood and subordinate clauses (51 lines)
     Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 19:10:31 -0400
   • Re: Irrealis mood and subordinate clauses (31 lines)
     Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:01:31 -0400
   • Re: Irrealis mood and subordinate clauses (37 lines)
     Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 17:28:38 -0400

8. Arnt Richard Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST (50 lines)
     Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 18:20:50 +0200

9. Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • BXS (Benct's X-SAMPA) keymap for vim updated (32 lines)
     Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:50:32 +0200
   • Re: Common Romansh spelling (was Re: Venetian Grammar online) (194 lines)
     Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 23:10:15 +0200
   • Re: Common Romansh spelling (was Re: Venetian Grammar online) (228 lines)
     Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:01:03 +0200
   • Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated? (51 lines)
     Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 23:21:20 +0200
   • Re: how often do you work on your conlangs? (77 lines)
     Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 20:31:33 +0200
   • Re: IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang) (76 lines)
     Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:05:42 +0200
   • labial + /j/ in Romance (was: Re: [CONLANG] Language generation software) (82 lines)
     Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:25:59 +0200
   • Re: Language generation software (71 lines)
     Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:47:17 +0200
   • Re: Language generation software (54 lines)
     Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:53:59 +0200
   • Re: Language generation software (72 lines)
     Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:50:03 +0200
   • Re: Latin Garlic (87 lines)
     Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:54:03 +0200
   • Re: Latin Garlic (96 lines)
     Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:22:46 +0200
   • omniglot.com down (25 lines)
     Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 10:56:43 +0200
   • Re: Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang (49 lines)
     Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:31:32 +0200
   • Re: Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang (76 lines)
     Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:45:59 +0200
   • Re: Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang (35 lines)
     Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:50:28 +0200
   • Re: Venetian Grammar online (51 lines)
     Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:07:04 +0200
   • Re: Venetian Grammar online (72 lines)
     Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:41:10 +0200
   • Re: Venetian Grammar online (75 lines)
     Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:12:30 +0200

10. caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin Garlic (52 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:54:06 -0000
    • Re: Venetian Grammar online (42 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:44:17 -0000

11. Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: how often do you work on your conlangs? (37 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:17:35 +0200

12. Damatir Ando <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (32 lines)
      Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:31:45 -0700

13. Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated? (49 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:26:58 -0600
    • how often do you work on your conlangs? (28 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 01:58:09 -0400
    • Re: Learning (was: Re: A spoken-only conlang) (34 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:07:03 -0600

14. Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language generation software (43 lines)
      Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 18:07:26 -0400
    • Re: Latin Garlic (37 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:49:08 -0400

15. Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin Garlic (111 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:03:48 +0200

16. David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Let's finally ix the "reply-to" for Conlang. (< Optimizing Vocabulary) (75 lines)
      Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 23:41:16 -0400

17. David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (56 lines)
      Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 16:55:19 +0100

18. David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST (48 lines)
      Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 22:00:26 -0700

19. Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST (55 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:20:19 -0700

20. Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
    • Venetian Grammar online (40 lines)
      Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:16:18 -0700
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (128 lines)
      Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:00:36 -0700

21. Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST (49 lines)
      Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 22:39:19 -0500
    • Re: Conlanging with Tiddly Wiki (44 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:01:33 -0500
    • Re: Irrealis mood and subordinate clauses (109 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 23:59:26 -0500
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (52 lines)
      Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:46:26 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT Uh? was: Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (75 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:56:36 -0500

22. Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (101 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 00:58:20 +0800
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (43 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 01:00:30 +0800
    • Re: What's the difference between an affix and a particle? (98 lines)
      Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:18:23 +0800

23. Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (45 lines)
      Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:37:11 -0700
    • Re: Irrealis mood and subordinate clauses (49 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:24:54 -0700
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (39 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:22:38 -0700
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (42 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:38:44 -0700
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (43 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:25:28 -0700

24. Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • A Completely Different Way to Create a Conlang (51 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:08:02 -0700
    • How is your Conlanging time allocated? (47 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:09:13 -0700

25. Glorious Waffle <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (51 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:59:21 -0400
    • Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated? (51 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:39:39 -0400
    • Re: how often do you work on your conlangs? (37 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:07:45 -0400

26. Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: gésir (54 lines)
      Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:36:14 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Let's finally ix the "reply-to" for Conlang. (< Optimizing Vocabulary) (80 lines)
      Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:27:05 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Let's finally ix the "reply-to" for Conlang. (< Optimizing Vocabulary) (44 lines)
      Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:43:38 +0200

27. Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated? (55 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:49:58 +0200
    • Re: how often do you work on your conlangs? (52 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 22:56:49 +0200

28. Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
    • A Whistling Language (138 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 02:17:18 -0500
    • Re: Conlanging with Tiddly Wiki (84 lines)
      Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 02:00:39 -0500
    • Re: Conlanging with Tiddly Wiki (99 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:49:53 -0500
    • Re: Conlanging with Tiddly Wiki (110 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:45:45 -0500
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (76 lines)
      Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 18:04:04 -0500

29. Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST (38 lines)
      Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 12:01:14 -0400
    • Re: A Completely Different Way to Create a Conlang (64 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 02:20:10 -0400
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (114 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 22:59:39 -0400
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (127 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:28:11 -0400
    • Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated? (46 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:49:49 -0400
    • Re: how often do you work on your conlangs? (34 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 02:26:11 -0400
    • Re: Language generation software (50 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 06:24:44 -0400
    • Re: Learning (was: Re: A spoken-only conlang) (49 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:47:12 -0400
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (165 lines)
      Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:25:10 -0400
    • Re: Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang (130 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:43:56 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (49 lines)
      Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 03:19:50 -0400

30. John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language generation software (41 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:16:27 -0400

31. kate rhodes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST (48 lines)
      Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 19:28:18 -0400

32. Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: how often do you work on your conlangs? (39 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:46:04 -0400

33. Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (44 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:40:07 -0400
    • Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated? (65 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:19:49 -0400
    • Re: how often do you work on your conlangs? (26 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:10:48 -0400

34. Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (61 lines)
      Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:59:52 -0700
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (129 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:59:17 -0700
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (81 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:55:35 -0700
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (67 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:50:14 -0700
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (49 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:54:58 -0700
    • Re: how often do you work on your conlangs? (45 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:52:55 -0700
    • Re: Learning (was: Re: A spoken-only conlang) (39 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:40:07 -0700
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (140 lines)
      Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:34:23 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Entering Unicode (64 lines)
      Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:48:59 -0700

35. Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (62 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:14:15 -0400
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (49 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:14:53 -0400
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (79 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 07:40:17 -0400
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (36 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:20:38 -0400
    • Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated? (45 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:29:21 -0400
    • Re: Latin Garlic (42 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:54:55 -0400
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (34 lines)
      Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:10:26 -0400
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (187 lines)
      Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:18:48 -0400
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (43 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:03:45 -0400
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (78 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:03:26 -0400
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (122 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:47:55 -0400
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (34 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:39:33 -0400
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (37 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:25:41 -0400
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (38 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:51:25 -0400
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (60 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:32:44 -0400
    • Re: Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang (143 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:51:03 -0400
    • Re: Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang (99 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 07:47:08 -0400
    • Re: YAEPT Uh? was: Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (35 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:06:46 -0400
    • Re: YAEPT Uh? was: Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (65 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:39:14 -0400

36. Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (33 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:54:37 -0500
    • Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated? (35 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 22:27:15 -0500
    • Re: IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang) (64 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:51:18 -0500
    • Re: IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang) (121 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:23:29 -0500

37. Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (50 lines)
      Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:34:29 +0200
    • Re: how often do you work on your conlangs? (52 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:51:10 +0200

38. Parker Glynn-Adey <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (36 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:26:38 -0300

39. Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (45 lines)
      Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:37:46 -0700
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (93 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:45:43 -0400
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (82 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:10:03 -0400
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (42 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:22:51 -0700
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (43 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:28:14 -0700
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (64 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:08:56 -0700
    • Re: IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang) (64 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:11:39 -0700
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (68 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:18:54 -0700
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (104 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:42:52 -0700
    • Re: Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang (47 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:53:11 -0700
    • Re: Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang (89 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:01:28 -0700
    • YAEPT Uh? was: Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (87 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:01:16 -0700
    • Re: YAEPT Uh? was: Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (49 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:17:13 -0700
    • Re: YAEPT Uh? was: Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (51 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:26:22 -0700

40. Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
    • IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang) (59 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 01:08:50 -0400
    • Re: IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang) (75 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:29:06 -0400
    • Re: IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang) (64 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:16:38 -0400
    • Re: IPA & Conlangs (Was Re: A spoken-only conlang) (74 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:28:08 -0400

41. Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (44 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:03:35 +0200
    • Common Romansh spelling (was Re: Venetian Grammar online) (111 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:24:03 +0200
    • Re: Common Romansh spelling (was Re: Venetian Grammar online) (132 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:56:05 +0200
    • Re: Common Romansh spelling (was Re: Venetian Grammar online) (69 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:39:06 +0200
    • Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated? (33 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 22:03:30 +0200
    • Re: how often do you work on your conlangs? (43 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:30:54 +0200
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (37 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:27:24 +0200
    • Re: Venetian Grammar online (47 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:57:10 +0200
    • Re: Venetian Grammar online (36 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 22:18:58 +0200

42. Przemyslaw Ziobrowski <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: IPA & Conlangs (72 lines)
      Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:53:58 +0200

43. Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated? (45 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 22:44:00 +0100

44. Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (37 lines)
      Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:29:51 -0700
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (81 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:27:45 -0700
    • Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated? (42 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:29:26 -0700
    • Re: how often do you work on your conlangs? (43 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:16:48 -0700
    • Re: Irrealis mood and subordinate clauses (47 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 21:16:10 -0700
    • Re: Venetian Grammar online (35 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:44:21 -0700

45. Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Reminder: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST (48 lines)
      Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 09:35:43 -0700

46. Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST (36 lines)
      Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 02:55:39 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Let's finally ix the "reply-to" for Conlang. (< Optimizing Vocabulary) (34 lines)
      Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:00:12 -0700

47. Scott Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin Garlic (118 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:17:52 -0600

48. taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (65 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:40:13 +0200
    • Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated? (79 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:15:50 +0200

49. The Benevolent Dictator <[log in to unmask]>
    • Latin Garlic (54 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:36:13 +0200

50. Thomas Alexander <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (130 lines)
      Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:09:36 -0700
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (146 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:36:16 -0700
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (86 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:10:27 -0700
    • Re: A spoken-only conlang (126 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 04:36:06 -0700
    • Learning (was: Re: A spoken-only conlang) (52 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:42:20 -0700
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (123 lines)
      Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:05:33 -0700
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (160 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:06:37 -0700
    • Re: Recreating Pakuni language from on-screen examples (140 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:57:22 -0700
    • Standards - was: A spoken-only conlang (126 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:43:50 -0700

51. TOms Deimonds Barvidis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated? (56 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 21:01:24 +0300

52. Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST (68 lines)
      Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 19:40:50 -0400
    • Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST (56 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:31:55 -0400
    • Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST (51 lines)
      Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:03:19 -0400
    • Re: How is your Conlanging time allocated? (53 lines)
      Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 06:56:49 -0400
    • Re: how often do you work on your conlangs? (59 lines)
      Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 06:37:38 -0400

53. Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: 1st Conlang IRC meet - Sun. Aug 2 @ 11a-1p PST (52 lines)
      Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 22:45:51 +0200