Conlang Mailing List – September 2009, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "pulchrous" and the sounds of words (7 messages)
• Barsoomian
• Book of idioms (2 messages)
• Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (25 messages)
• Borrowing Bogus Roots
• Conlang Flyer (5 messages)
• Conworlds and language families (2 messages)
• Cookie vs. Biscuit (was Universality of discreteness) (13 messages)
• Creating Adpositions (was Stative and Motive Cases) (6 messages)
• Etymology of names for God (6 messages)
• Evolution of syntax (3 messages)
• Food languages (was Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit) (3 messages)
• From "breakfast" to onomatopoeia (2 messages)
• Implicit corporeal posession (13 messages)
• Kalaba-X article going offline (6 messages)
• Latin Conscript (3 messages)
• LCS feedback survey
• Lhenazi Syllabary (4 messages)
• More Latin translation texts for your perusal (3 messages)
• Sign and Discreteness (was: Universality of discreteness)
• Sketch of New Conlang (9 messages)
• Split Ergativity Markers (2 messages)
• Stative and Motive Cases (was Re: USAGE: universal case patterns?) (13 messages)
• Stative Verbs & Adjectives: shine vs shiny (4 messages)
• Super Doomed Conlanging (3 messages)
• Teonaht font (was: Re: Writing systems) (2 messages)
• Three conlangs for the price of two
• Translation exercises (part 1 of 3: Grandfather and the dragon) (2 messages)
• UK Conlangers' Moot (25 messages)
• Universality of discreteness (10 messages)
• USAGE: universal case patterns? (11 messages)
• Vowel Harmony? (5 messages)
• Writing systems (33 messages)
• [TECH] MSKLC Trouble

1. "pulchrous" and the sounds of words
   • Re: "pulchrous" and the sounds of words (41 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "pulchrous" and the sounds of words (44 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "pulchrous" and the sounds of words (57 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "pulchrous" and the sounds of words (44 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "pulchrous" and the sounds of words (56 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "pulchrous" and the sounds of words (80 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "pulchrous" and the sounds of words (78 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>

2. Barsoomian
   • Barsoomian (63 lines)
     From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>

3. Book of idioms
   • Book of idioms (39 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Book of idioms (38 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

4. Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary
   • Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (94 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (82 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (120 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (51 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (57 lines)
     From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (44 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (39 lines)
     From: Muke Tever <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (125 lines)
     From: Thomas Alexander <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (85 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (54 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (47 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (85 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (56 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (48 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (34 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (51 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (127 lines)
     From: Thomas Alexander <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (63 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (68 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (78 lines)
     From: Maxime Papillon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (49 lines)
     From: Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (41 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (56 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (45 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstrapping a self-defining conlang dictionary (114 lines)
     From: Thomas Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

5. Borrowing Bogus Roots
   • Re: Borrowing Bogus Roots (33 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

6. Conlang Flyer
   • Conlang Flyer (26 lines)
     From: Israel Noletto <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Flyer (40 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Flyer (35 lines)
     From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Flyer (31 lines)
     From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Flyer (48 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

7. Conworlds and language families
   • Re: Conworlds and language families (48 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conworlds and language families (35 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>

8. Cookie vs. Biscuit (was Universality of discreteness)
   • Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit (was Universality of discreteness) (51 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit (was Universality of discreteness) (41 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit (was Universality of discreteness) (60 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit (was Universality of discreteness) (82 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit (was Universality of discreteness) (45 lines)
     From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit (was Universality of discreteness) (57 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit (was Universality of discreteness) (35 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit (was Universality of discreteness) (50 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit (was Universality of discreteness) (70 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit (was Universality of discreteness) (44 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit (was Universality of discreteness) (42 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit (was Universality of discreteness) (44 lines)
     From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit (was Universality of discreteness) (48 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

9. Creating Adpositions (was Stative and Motive Cases)
   • Creating Adpositions (was Stative and Motive Cases) (70 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creating Adpositions (was Stative and Motive Cases) (38 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creating Adpositions (was Stative and Motive Cases) (45 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creating Adpositions (was Stative and Motive Cases) (54 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creating Adpositions (was Stative and Motive Cases) (56 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creating Adpositions (was Stative and Motive Cases) (48 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

10. Etymology of names for God
    • Re: Etymology of names for God (66 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Etymology of names for God (43 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Etymology of names for God (37 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Etymology of names for God (56 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Etymology of names for God (82 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Etymology of names for God (43 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

11. Evolution of syntax
    • Evolution of syntax (35 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of syntax (82 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Evolution of syntax (95 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>

12. Food languages (was Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit)
    • Food languages (was Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit) (49 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Food languages (was Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit) (62 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Food languages (was Re: Cookie vs. Biscuit) (82 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

13. From "breakfast" to onomatopoeia
    • Re: From "breakfast" to onomatopoeia (50 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: From "breakfast" to onomatopoeia (87 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>

14. Implicit corporeal posession
    • Implicit corporeal posession (55 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Implicit corporeal posession (49 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Implicit corporeal posession (96 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Implicit corporeal posession (43 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Implicit corporeal posession (59 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Implicit corporeal posession (47 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Implicit corporeal posession (58 lines)
      From: Arnt Richard Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Implicit corporeal posession (32 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Implicit corporeal posession (28 lines)
      From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Implicit corporeal posession (42 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Implicit corporeal posession (46 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Implicit corporeal posession (63 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Implicit corporeal posession (83 lines)
      From: Maxime Papillon <[log in to unmask]>

15. Kalaba-X article going offline
    • Kalaba-X article going offline (35 lines)
      From: Rick Harrison <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kalaba-X article going offline (22 lines)
      From: Rick Harrison <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kalaba-X article going offline (43 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kalaba-X article going offline (28 lines)
      From: Rick Harrison <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kalaba-X article going offline (30 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kalaba-X article going offline (60 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

16. Latin Conscript
    • Latin Conscript (48 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin Conscript (34 lines)
      From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Latin Conscript (42 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>

17. LCS feedback survey
    • LCS feedback survey (33 lines)
      From: Language Creation Society <[log in to unmask]>

18. Lhenazi Syllabary
    • Lhenazi Syllabary (32 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Lhenazi Syllabary (35 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Lhenazi Syllabary (34 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Lhenazi Syllabary (44 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

19. More Latin translation texts for your perusal
    • More Latin translation texts for your perusal (90 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Latin translation texts for your perusal (33 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: More Latin translation texts for your perusal (51 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>

20. Sign and Discreteness (was: Universality of discreteness)
    • Sign and Discreteness (was: Universality of discreteness) (90 lines)
      From: Thomas Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

21. Sketch of New Conlang
    • Re: Sketch of New Conlang (35 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sketch of New Conlang (38 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sketch of New Conlang (67 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sketch of New Conlang (48 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sketch of New Conlang (39 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sketch of New Conlang (127 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sketch of New Conlang (46 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sketch of New Conlang (33 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sketch of New Conlang (35 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>

22. Split Ergativity Markers
    • Split Ergativity Markers (48 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Split Ergativity Markers (80 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

23. Stative and Motive Cases (was Re: USAGE: universal case patterns?)
    • Stative and Motive Cases (was Re: USAGE: universal case patterns?) (46 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stative and Motive Cases (was Re: USAGE: universal case patterns?) (45 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stative and Motive Cases (was Re: USAGE: universal case patterns?) (42 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stative and Motive Cases (was Re: USAGE: universal case patterns?) (59 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stative and Motive Cases (was Re: USAGE: universal case patterns?) (66 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Stative and Motive Cases (was Re: USAGE: universal case patterns?) (41 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stative and Motive Cases (was Re: USAGE: universal case patterns?) (72 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stative and Motive Cases (was Re: USAGE: universal case patterns?) (35 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stative and Motive Cases (was Re: USAGE: universal case patterns?) (41 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stative and Motive Cases (was Re: USAGE: universal case patterns?) (66 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stative and Motive Cases (was Re: USAGE: universal case patterns?) (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Stative and Motive Cases (was Re: USAGE: universal case patterns?) (61 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stative and Motive Cases (was Re: USAGE: universal case patterns?) (61 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

24. Stative Verbs & Adjectives: shine vs shiny
    • Stative Verbs & Adjectives: shine vs shiny (58 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stative Verbs & Adjectives: shine vs shiny (25 lines)
      From: Alex Bicksler <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stative Verbs & Adjectives: shine vs shiny (80 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stative Verbs & Adjectives: shine vs shiny (35 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>

25. Super Doomed Conlanging
    • Super Doomed Conlanging (28 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Super Doomed Conlanging (35 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Super Doomed Conlanging (57 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>

26. Teonaht font (was: Re: Writing systems)
    • Teonaht font (was: Re: Writing systems) (49 lines)
      From: Arnt Richard Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Teonaht font (was: Re: Writing systems) (66 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

27. Three conlangs for the price of two
    • Re: Three conlangs for the price of two (82 lines)
      From: Arnt Richard Johansen <[log in to unmask]>

28. Translation exercises (part 1 of 3: Grandfather and the dragon)
    • Re: Translation exercises (part 1 of 3: Grandfather and the dragon) (56 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Translation exercises (part 1 of 3: Grandfather and the dragon) (56 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

29. UK Conlangers' Moot
    • UK Conlangers' Moot (32 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (32 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (66 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (68 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (37 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (90 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (42 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (37 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (47 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (50 lines)
      From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (57 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (54 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (26 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (32 lines)
      From: Rik Roots <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (45 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (48 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (36 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (46 lines)
      From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (58 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (48 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (50 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (34 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: UK Conlangers' Moot (34 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

30. Universality of discreteness
    • Re: Universality of discreteness (41 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Universality of discreteness (99 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Universality of discreteness (64 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Universality of discreteness (58 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Universality of discreteness (53 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Universality of discreteness (48 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Universality of discreteness (106 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Universality of discreteness (67 lines)
      From: Basilius <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Universality of discreteness (71 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Universality of discreteness (73 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

31. USAGE: universal case patterns?
    • USAGE: universal case patterns? (29 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: universal case patterns? (37 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: universal case patterns? (41 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: universal case patterns? (57 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: universal case patterns? (46 lines)
      From: Basilius <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: universal case patterns? (39 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: universal case patterns? (61 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: universal case patterns? (53 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: universal case patterns? (46 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: universal case patterns? (63 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: universal case patterns? (67 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>

32. Vowel Harmony?
    • Re: Vowel Harmony? (61 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vowel Harmony? (57 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vowel Harmony? (80 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vowel Harmony? (49 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vowel Harmony? (56 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

33. Writing systems
    • Writing systems (63 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (82 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (49 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (33 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (146 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (151 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (96 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (40 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (83 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (68 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (63 lines)
      From: Paul Hartzer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (157 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (38 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (203 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (67 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (220 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (237 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (29 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (29 lines)
      From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (57 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (121 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (89 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (34 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (110 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (43 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (75 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (80 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (50 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (105 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (54 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (146 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Writing systems (113 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>

34. [TECH] MSKLC Trouble
    • [TECH] MSKLC Trouble (41 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>