Conlang
Mailing List October 2009, week 2
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Anyone Recognize This?
(38 messages)
CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(59 messages)
CONLANG Digest - 8 Oct 2009 to 9 Oct 2009 (#2009-281)
(6 messages)
Fascinating Resource! "Ruby element" instruction for screen readers?
(2 messages)
Goodbye to Piashi and all that
(7 messages)
Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(20 messages)
IPA Zounds
(17 messages)
It's me etc - WARNING!!
It's me etc. (was: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions)
LCS membership survey results; financial status; JSTOR service?; help wanted
(2 messages)
Looking for Anishnaabe language resources
(10 messages)
Marking verbs for word order
(6 messages)
META: Merging conlang wikis
New (and hopfully final) home for Carrajina
(4 messages)
Numeric oddities
(11 messages)
Numeric oddities (was: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
(8 messages)
OT: Identifying a language (WAS: Anyone Recognize This?)
(3 messages)
OT: Library book sales (was Re: Whither Langmaker.com?)
(5 messages)
OT: Zombie simulator (with nukes!)
PIE glottalic theory (was Re: Pre-Greek (was ...))
(3 messages)
Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(13 messages)
PreBabel - another "universal language"
Roots and Phonotactics (Was: Interesting Morphophonological idea)
(3 messages)
Round robin conlanging
Round Robin Conlanging
(4 messages)
Round robin conlanging
Round Robin Conlanging
Secret languages
(8 messages)
Signs
(4 messages)
signs
Signs
Sorting out Rhodrese U-umlaut
TECH: Windows composed characters w/out alt kbd layouts
(2 messages)
The causative and intentional "and"
(5 messages)
The PIE root *dhes- (was: Pre-Greek (was: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"))
Using <x> as a vowel
(7 messages)
What features make a conlang good or bad?
(4 messages)
Whither Langmaker.com?
(9 messages)
YAEUT: Hopefully we can determine what kind of word "hopefully" is
(6 messages)
Youth Without Youth
(4 messages)
Anyone Recognize This?
Anyone Recognize This?
(47 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(73 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(73 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(74 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(54 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(84 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(35 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(38 lines)
From:
Alex Bicksler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(55 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(48 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(59 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(59 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(43 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(64 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(43 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(71 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(78 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(69 lines)
From:
Scott Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(62 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(28 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(43 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(39 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(39 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(39 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(47 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(53 lines)
From:
Krista Casada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(66 lines)
From:
Krista Casada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(36 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(41 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(54 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(66 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(48 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(55 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anyone Recognize This?
(41 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(55 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(75 lines)
From:
Krista Casada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(48 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(90 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(55 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(43 lines)
From:
Arnt Richard Johansen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(45 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(48 lines)
From:
Craig Daniel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(43 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(45 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(36 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(42 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(51 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(38 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(69 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(45 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(37 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(63 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(78 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(55 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(49 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(34 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(62 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(54 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(39 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(39 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(50 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(46 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(47 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(59 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(55 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(57 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(57 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(64 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(40 lines)
From:
G. van der Vegt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(50 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(37 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(93 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(42 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(60 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(62 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(43 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(60 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(46 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(45 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(54 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(39 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(41 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(41 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(47 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(51 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(48 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(77 lines)
From:
Krista Casada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(60 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions
(64 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 8 Oct 2009 to 9 Oct 2009 (#2009-281)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 8 Oct 2009 to 9 Oct 2009 (#2009-281)
(146 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
<
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 8 Oct 2009 to 9 Oct 2009 (#2009-281)
(56 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 8 Oct 2009 to 9 Oct 2009 (#2009-281)
(59 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 8 Oct 2009 to 9 Oct 2009 (#2009-281)
(104 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 8 Oct 2009 to 9 Oct 2009 (#2009-281)
(46 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 8 Oct 2009 to 9 Oct 2009 (#2009-281)
(82 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fascinating Resource! "Ruby element" instruction for screen readers?
Re: Fascinating Resource! "Ruby element" instruction for screen readers?
(93 lines)
From:
Claude Almansi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource! "Ruby element" instruction for screen readers?
(64 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Goodbye to Piashi and all that
Goodbye to Piashi and all that
(90 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Goodbye to Piashi and all that
(55 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Goodbye to Piashi and all that
(76 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Goodbye to Piashi and all that
(139 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Goodbye to Piashi and all that
(35 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Goodbye to Piashi and all that
(110 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Goodbye to Piashi and all that
(52 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Interesting Morphophonological Idea
Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(39 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(74 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(38 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(77 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(59 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(52 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(128 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(55 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(59 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(55 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(55 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(61 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(62 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(41 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(61 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(67 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(50 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(39 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting Morphophonological Idea
(42 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
IPA Zounds
IPA Zounds
(33 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA Zounds
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA Zounds
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA Zounds
(51 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA Zounds
(59 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA Zounds
(53 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA Zounds
(55 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA Zounds
(79 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA Zounds
(65 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA Zounds
(74 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA Zounds
(39 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA Zounds
(43 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA Zounds
(49 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA Zounds
(63 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA Zounds
(44 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA Zounds
(57 lines)
From:
Jamie Norrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA Zounds
(70 lines)
From:
J. Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
It's me etc - WARNING!!
It's me etc - WARNING!!
(33 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
It's me etc. (was: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions)
It's me etc. (was: CHAT: Linguistic misapprehensions)
(121 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
LCS membership survey results; financial status; JSTOR service?; help wanted
LCS membership survey results; financial status; JSTOR service?; help wanted
(128 lines)
From:
Language Creation Society <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LCS membership survey results; financial status; JSTOR service?; help wanted
(38 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Looking for Anishnaabe language resources
Looking for Anishnaabe language resources
(30 lines)
From:
Raenna Peiss <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for Anishnaabe language resources
(49 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for Anishnaabe language resources
(67 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for Anishnaabe language resources
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for Anishnaabe language resources
(65 lines)
From:
Alex Bicksler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for Anishnaabe language resources
(55 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for Anishnaabe language resources
(52 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for Anishnaabe language resources
(41 lines)
From:
Raenna Peiss <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for Anishnaabe language resources
(53 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Looking for Anishnaabe language resources
(48 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Marking verbs for word order
Marking verbs for word order
(69 lines)
From:
maikxlx <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Marking verbs for word order
(42 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Marking verbs for word order
(46 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Marking verbs for word order
(60 lines)
From:
maikxlx <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Marking verbs for word order
(44 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Marking verbs for word order
(34 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
META: Merging conlang wikis
META: Merging conlang wikis
(34 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
New (and hopfully final) home for Carrajina
New (and hopfully final) home for Carrajina
(40 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New (and hopfully final) home for Carrajina
(41 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New (and hopfully final) home for Carrajina
(51 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New (and hopfully final) home for Carrajina
(73 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Numeric oddities
Re: Numeric oddities
(96 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeric oddities
(105 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeric oddities
(119 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeric oddities
(40 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeric oddities
(60 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeric oddities
(61 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeric oddities
(112 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeric oddities
(66 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeric oddities
(40 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeric oddities
(181 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeric oddities
(65 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Numeric oddities (was: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
Numeric oddities (was: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
(123 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeric oddities (was: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
(156 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeric oddities (was: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
(65 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeric oddities (was: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
(162 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeric oddities (was: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
(41 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeric oddities (was: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeric oddities (was: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
(64 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numeric oddities (was: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
(51 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Identifying a language (WAS: Anyone Recognize This?)
OT: Identifying a language (WAS: Anyone Recognize This?)
(71 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Identifying a language (WAS: Anyone Recognize This?)
(41 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Identifying a language (WAS: Anyone Recognize This?)
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Library book sales (was Re: Whither Langmaker.com?)
OT: Library book sales (was Re: Whither Langmaker.com?)
(58 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Library book sales (was Re: Whither Langmaker.com?)
(64 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Library book sales (was Re: Whither Langmaker.com?)
(43 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Library book sales (was Re: Whither Langmaker.com?)
(50 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Library book sales (was Re: Whither Langmaker.com?)
(69 lines)
From:
Scott Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Zombie simulator (with nukes!)
Re: OT: Zombie simulator (with nukes!)
(58 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
PIE glottalic theory (was Re: Pre-Greek (was ...))
PIE glottalic theory (was Re: Pre-Greek (was ...))
(74 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PIE glottalic theory (was Re: Pre-Greek (was ...))
(27 lines)
From:
Harald S. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PIE glottalic theory (was Re: Pre-Greek (was ...))
(38 lines)
From:
Craig Daniel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
Re: Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(209 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(105 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(123 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(45 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(79 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(150 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(33 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(44 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(276 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(60 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(209 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(230 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
PreBabel - another "universal language"
PreBabel - another "universal language"
(32 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Roots and Phonotactics (Was: Interesting Morphophonological idea)
Roots and Phonotactics (Was: Interesting Morphophonological idea)
(40 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roots and Phonotactics (Was: Interesting Morphophonological idea)
(39 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roots and Phonotactics (Was: Interesting Morphophonological idea)
(92 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Round robin conlanging
Re: Round robin conlanging
(27 lines)
From:
Alex Bicksler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Round Robin Conlanging
Round Robin Conlanging
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Round Robin Conlanging
(35 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round Robin Conlanging
(54 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round Robin Conlanging
(40 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Round robin conlanging
Re: Round robin conlanging
(30 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Round Robin Conlanging
Re: Round Robin Conlanging
(44 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Secret languages
Secret languages
(31 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Secret languages
(44 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Secret languages
(35 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Secret languages
(52 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Secret languages
(80 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Secret languages
(54 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Secret languages
(50 lines)
From:
Craig Daniel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Secret languages
(59 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Signs
Signs
(27 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Signs
(28 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Signs
(58 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Signs
(63 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
signs
signs
(39 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Signs
Re: Signs
(51 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sorting out Rhodrese U-umlaut
Sorting out Rhodrese U-umlaut
(144 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Windows composed characters w/out alt kbd layouts
Re: TECH: Windows composed characters w/out alt kbd layouts
(41 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Windows composed characters w/out alt kbd layouts
(64 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
The causative and intentional "and"
The causative and intentional "and"
(101 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The causative and intentional "and"
(50 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The causative and intentional "and"
(58 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The causative and intentional "and"
(137 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The causative and intentional "and"
(37 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
The PIE root *dhes- (was: Pre-Greek (was: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"))
The PIE root *dhes- (was: Pre-Greek (was: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"))
(38 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Using <x> as a vowel
Using <x> as a vowel
(43 lines)
From:
maikxlx <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Using <x> as a vowel
(47 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Using <x> as a vowel
(35 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Using <x> as a vowel
(38 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Using <x> as a vowel
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Using <x> as a vowel
(98 lines)
From:
maikxlx <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Using <x> as a vowel
(57 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
What features make a conlang good or bad?
Re: What features make a conlang good or bad?
(138 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
<
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features make a conlang good or bad?
(103 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features make a conlang good or bad?
(68 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features make a conlang good or bad?
(67 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Whither Langmaker.com?
Whither Langmaker.com?
(59 lines)
From:
Richard Kennaway <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whither Langmaker.com?
(72 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whither Langmaker.com?
(63 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whither Langmaker.com?
(55 lines)
From:
Richard Kennaway <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whither Langmaker.com?
(88 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whither Langmaker.com?
(107 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whither Langmaker.com?
(32 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whither Langmaker.com?
(49 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whither Langmaker.com?
(51 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEUT: Hopefully we can determine what kind of word "hopefully" is
YAEUT: Hopefully we can determine what kind of word "hopefully" is
(41 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT: Hopefully we can determine what kind of word "hopefully" is
(54 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT: Hopefully we can determine what kind of word "hopefully" is
(63 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT: Hopefully we can determine what kind of word "hopefully" is
(68 lines)
From:
maikxlx <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT: Hopefully we can determine what kind of word "hopefully" is
(42 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT: Hopefully we can determine what kind of word "hopefully" is
(95 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Youth Without Youth
Youth Without Youth
(33 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Youth Without Youth
(40 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Youth Without Youth
(52 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Youth Without Youth
(30 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU