Conlang
Mailing List – October 2009, week 1
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"
(14 messages)
a LOGLANG mailing list
(2 messages)
Ach-Laut (was Re: Fascinating Resource!)
(2 messages)
CC licenses for conlangs (was: Conlang copyright)
(4 messages)
CHAT pavement (was: Irregular spelling)
(7 messages)
CHAT: Re: [CONLANG] Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(2 messages)
conlang based on speaking in tongues
(2 messages)
Conlang copyright
(33 messages)
Conlang flag favicon
(8 messages)
Fascinating Resource!
(21 messages)
Indonesian (WAS: Round robin conlanging)
Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(25 messages)
Natlang numerical bases (was: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
NCNC
(9 messages)
NCNC (was: Conlang copyright)
(4 messages)
Numbering systems (< What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
(4 messages)
OT: Zombie simulator (with nukes!)
(10 messages)
Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(5 messages)
Round robin conlanging
(21 messages)
Subgraphemic analysis (was: Writing systems)
(6 messages)
Subjunctive nouns
(2 messages)
T from [?] ?
(11 messages)
TECH: Numbering systems - base 7 - pakuni
(8 messages)
TECH: Windows composed characters w/out alt kbd layouts
(4 messages)
What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(84 messages)
What happens when we're gone? (was: [BoD] CC licenses... )
Whorf and physical jargon
Words for Blue [was: Round robin conlanging]
(2 messages)
YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(19 messages)
YAGPT: Ach-Laut (was: Re: Fascinating Resource!)
(6 messages)
[BoD] CC licenses for conlangs (was: Conlang copyright)
(3 messages)
"Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"
"Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"
(42 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"
(55 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"
(70 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"
(64 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"
(78 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"
(46 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"
(106 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"
(49 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"
(87 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"
(92 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"
(105 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"
(90 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial"
(97 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
a LOGLANG mailing list
Re: a LOGLANG mailing list
(63 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a LOGLANG mailing list
(63 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ach-Laut (was Re: Fascinating Resource!)
Ach-Laut (was Re: Fascinating Resource!)
(106 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ach-Laut (was Re: Fascinating Resource!)
(79 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
CC licenses for conlangs (was: Conlang copyright)
CC licenses for conlangs (was: Conlang copyright)
(37 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CC licenses for conlangs (was: Conlang copyright)
(67 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CC licenses for conlangs (was: Conlang copyright)
(66 lines)
From:
M.S. Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CC licenses for conlangs (was: Conlang copyright)
(79 lines)
From:
Basilius <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT pavement (was: Irregular spelling)
CHAT pavement (was: Irregular spelling)
(69 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT pavement (was: Irregular spelling)
(56 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT pavement (was: Irregular spelling)
(54 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT pavement (was: Irregular spelling)
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT pavement (was: Irregular spelling)
(57 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT pavement (was: Irregular spelling)
(70 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT pavement (was: Irregular spelling)
(62 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Re: [CONLANG] Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
CHAT: Re: [CONLANG] Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(42 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: [CONLANG] Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(52 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
conlang based on speaking in tongues
Re: conlang based on speaking in tongues
(52 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang based on speaking in tongues
(54 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang copyright
Re: Conlang copyright
(91 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(55 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(101 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(45 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(54 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(59 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(75 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(47 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(82 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(54 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(162 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(45 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(58 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(52 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(57 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(71 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(75 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(130 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(88 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(48 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(62 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(55 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Conlang copyright
(71 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(48 lines)
From:
Alex Bicksler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(41 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(369 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(50 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(34 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(49 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(97 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(136 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang copyright
(70 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang flag favicon
Conlang flag favicon
(31 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang flag favicon
(61 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang flag favicon
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang flag favicon
(47 lines)
From:
Rebecca Bettencourt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang flag favicon
(33 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang flag favicon
(51 lines)
From:
Rebecca Bettencourt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang flag favicon
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang flag favicon
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fascinating Resource!
Fascinating Resource!
(46 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(53 lines)
From:
Basilius <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(87 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(43 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(54 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(45 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(58 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(49 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(67 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(101 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(74 lines)
From:
Claude Almansi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(58 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(64 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(100 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(55 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(44 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(57 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(50 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fascinating Resource!
(74 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Indonesian (WAS: Round robin conlanging)
Indonesian (WAS: Round robin conlanging)
(52 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(115 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(38 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(83 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(146 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(95 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(56 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(104 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(98 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(49 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(107 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(41 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(61 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(86 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(43 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(46 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(50 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(87 lines)
From:
Craig Daniel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(39 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(88 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(42 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(85 lines)
From:
Craig Daniel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(42 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(115 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irregular spelling; was: Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(47 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Natlang numerical bases (was: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
Re: Natlang numerical bases (was: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
(63 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
NCNC
Re: NCNC
(39 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NCNC
(52 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NCNC
(29 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NCNC
(32 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NCNC
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NCNC
(37 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NCNC
(45 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NCNC
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NCNC
(39 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
NCNC (was: Conlang copyright)
NCNC (was: Conlang copyright)
(63 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NCNC (was: Conlang copyright)
(67 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NCNC (was: Conlang copyright)
(41 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NCNC (was: Conlang copyright)
(92 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Numbering systems (< What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
Numbering systems (< What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
(42 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numbering systems (< What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
(61 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numbering systems (< What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
(60 lines)
From:
Jeff Daniel Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numbering systems (< What features in a Conlang are good or bad?)
(76 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Zombie simulator (with nukes!)
Re: OT: Zombie simulator (with nukes!)
(44 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Zombie simulator (with nukes!)
(58 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Zombie simulator (with nukes!)
(77 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Zombie simulator (with nukes!)
(27 lines)
From:
Alex Bicksler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Zombie simulator (with nukes!)
(34 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Zombie simulator (with nukes!)
(62 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Zombie simulator (with nukes!)
(30 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Zombie simulator (with nukes!)
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Zombie simulator (with nukes!)
(59 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Zombie simulator (with nukes!)
(380 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(126 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(44 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(136 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(171 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pre-Greek (was Re: "Cybernetics" and "Gubernatorial")
(40 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Round robin conlanging
Round robin conlanging
(40 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(40 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(45 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(64 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(44 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(53 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(95 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(68 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(72 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(86 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(43 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(42 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(23 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(35 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(39 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(42 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(43 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(40 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(31 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlanging
(42 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Subgraphemic analysis (was: Writing systems)
Re: Subgraphemic analysis (was: Writing systems)
(38 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subgraphemic analysis (was: Writing systems)
(78 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subgraphemic analysis (was: Writing systems)
(86 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subgraphemic analysis (was: Writing systems)
(118 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subgraphemic analysis (was: Writing systems)
(75 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subgraphemic analysis (was: Writing systems)
(150 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Subjunctive nouns
Re: Subjunctive nouns
(87 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subjunctive nouns
(86 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
T from [?] ?
T from [?] ?
(52 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: T from [?] ?
(83 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: T from [?] ?
(55 lines)
From:
TOms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: T from [?] ?
(30 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: T from [?] ?
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: T from [?] ?
(214 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: T from [?] ?
(80 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: T from [?] ?
(81 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: T from [?] ?
(114 lines)
From:
Basilius <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: T from [?] ?
(59 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: T from [?] ?
(71 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Numbering systems - base 7 - pakuni
TECH: Numbering systems - base 7 - pakuni
(60 lines)
From:
Thomas Alexander <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Numbering systems - base 7 - pakuni
(68 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Numbering systems - base 7 - pakuni
(47 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Numbering systems - base 7 - pakuni
(77 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Numbering systems - base 7 - pakuni
(46 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Numbering systems - base 7 - pakuni
(43 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Numbering systems - base 7 - pakuni
(37 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Numbering systems - base 7 - pakuni
(71 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Windows composed characters w/out alt kbd layouts
Re: TECH: Windows composed characters w/out alt kbd layouts
(50 lines)
From:
Muke Tever <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Windows composed characters w/out alt kbd layouts
(58 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Windows composed characters w/out alt kbd layouts
(73 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Windows composed characters w/out alt kbd layouts
(49 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(69 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
<
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(62 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(76 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(60 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(106 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(45 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(104 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(58 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(48 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(39 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(99 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(245 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
<
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(72 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(37 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(190 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(109 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(51 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(45 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(162 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
<
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(157 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(60 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(99 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(258 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(55 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(180 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(40 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(93 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(49 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(49 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(88 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(51 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(81 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(198 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
<
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(65 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(49 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(74 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(61 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(45 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(56 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(107 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(37 lines)
From:
Alex Bicksler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(45 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(136 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(48 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(39 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(95 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(157 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(101 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(119 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(57 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(48 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(36 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(61 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(43 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(89 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(54 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(235 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(42 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(73 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(51 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(61 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(101 lines)
From:
M.S. Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(39 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(46 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(89 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(83 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(61 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(73 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(38 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(255 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
<
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(66 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(85 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(57 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(65 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(66 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(36 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(134 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(47 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(61 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(65 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What features in a Conlang are good or bad?
(73 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
What happens when we're gone? (was: [BoD] CC licenses... )
Re: What happens when we're gone? (was: [BoD] CC licenses... )
(43 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Whorf and physical jargon
Whorf and physical jargon
(31 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Words for Blue [was: Round robin conlanging]
Words for Blue [was: Round robin conlanging]
(113 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for Blue [was: Round robin conlanging]
(138 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAGPT: Ach-Laut
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(54 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(47 lines)
From:
Cedh Audmanh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(72 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(66 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(116 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(103 lines)
From:
Cedh Audmanh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(51 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(124 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(81 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(88 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(71 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(83 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(55 lines)
From:
Paul Hartzer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(62 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(90 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(50 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(61 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut
(113 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAGPT: Ach-Laut (was: Re: Fascinating Resource!)
YAGPT: Ach-Laut (was: Re: Fascinating Resource!)
(72 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut (was: Re: Fascinating Resource!)
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut (was: Re: Fascinating Resource!)
(68 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut (was: Re: Fascinating Resource!)
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut (was: Re: Fascinating Resource!)
(49 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAGPT: Ach-Laut (was: Re: Fascinating Resource!)
(81 lines)
From:
Julia "Schnecki" Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
[BoD] CC licenses for conlangs (was: Conlang copyright)
Re: [BoD] CC licenses for conlangs (was: Conlang copyright)
(85 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [BoD] CC licenses for conlangs (was: Conlang copyright)
(83 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [BoD] CC licenses for conlangs (was: Conlang copyright)
(64 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – October 2009, week 1
Conlang Mailing List – October 2009, week 1
