Cockney [WAS: letter-sound correspondences}

Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Dec 2009 14:54:46 +0000

69 lines

Re: Elites [WAS Nova listo: Malrauxmismo.]

Kjell Rehnstršöm <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 05:38:37 +0100

66 lines

Re: Esperanto revisited

Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 18:25:53 +0000

46 lines

Re: Esperanto revisited

Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 18:35:13 +0000

40 lines

Re: Esperanto revisited

Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 18:53:36 +0000

42 lines

Re: Esperanto revisited

Kjell Rehnstršöm <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Dec 2009 05:24:35 +0100

42 lines

FW: Frazo #13 (tradukuri)

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Dec 2009 03:31:28 -0800

102 lines

Re: FW: Omnez (lingua inter Ido et Latino sine flexione)

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:12:09 -0800

42 lines

Idiom Neutral group and blog

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Dec 2009 07:04:41 -0800

36 lines

Re: Idiom Neutral group and blog

Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Dec 2009 21:29:20 -0500

51 lines

Integrolang (< Re: Worldlang)

lingwadeplaneta <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:07:51 -0000

55 lines

Re: Integrolang (< Re: Worldlang)

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 08:25:42 -0500

34 lines

Re: Integrolang (< Re: Worldlang)

Matthew Barnett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 16:48:04 +0000

46 lines

Kn [was: letter-sound correspondences]

Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Dec 2009 16:16:38 +0000

65 lines

Re: Kn [was: letter-sound correspondences]

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Dec 2009 12:14:00 -0500

65 lines

Re: Kn [was: letter-sound correspondences]

Kjell Rehnstršöm <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:13:55 +0100

51 lines

Re: Kn [was: letter-sound correspondences]

Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 13:59:52 -0500

119 lines

Re: Kn [was: letter-sound correspondences]

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:33:01 -0800

34 lines

Re: Kn [was: letter-sound correspondences]

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:04:34 -0500

40 lines

Re: Kn [was: letter-sound correspondences]

Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 17:12:12 -0500

47 lines

Re: Kn [was: letter-sound correspondences]

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 19:05:53 -0500

57 lines

Re: Kn [was: letter-sound correspondences]

Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 19:53:20 -0500

115 lines

Re: Kn [was: letter-sound correspondences]

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 17:11:56 -0800

45 lines

Re: Kn [was: letter-sound correspondences]

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 20:53:51 -0800

44 lines

Old English [WAS: letter-sound correspondences]

Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Dec 2009 16:06:36 +0000

51 lines

Re: OT was: Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 08:20:53 -0500

31 lines

Re: OT [WAS Nova listo: Malrauxmismo.]

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:27:41 -0500

41 lines

Portland, Oregon [WAS Nova listo: Malrauxmismo.]

Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:25:01 +0000

52 lines

Possible relations between the launching of Esperanto and Modern Hebrew

Kjell Rehnstršöm <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 06:01:01 +0100

46 lines

Re: Review my 26c3 paper please

Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:59:04 -0800

31 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:41:36 -0500

73 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:44:55 -0800

36 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

Risto Kupsala <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 22:57:50 +0200

51 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

Risto Kupsala <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 23:51:51 +0200

51 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Dec 2009 10:51:19 +0900

53 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

Kjell Rehnstršöm <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 07:05:44 +0100

64 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

Matthew Barnett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 15:24:57 +0000

64 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:57:52 -0500

48 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

Matthew Barnett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 16:48:53 +0000

52 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 20:51:52 -0800

128 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

Kjell Rehnstršöm <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:37:34 +0100

72 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

Kjell Rehnstršöm <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:49:57 +0100

50 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

Matthew Barnett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Dec 2009 16:07:38 +0000

71 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:48:12 -0500

63 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

Risto Kupsala <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Dec 2009 23:44:33 +0200

64 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Dec 2009 21:13:14 -0500

43 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

lingwadeplaneta <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Dec 2009 06:56:14 -0000

50 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Dec 2009 16:37:39 +0900

69 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Dec 2009 23:02:56 +0900

60 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Dec 2009 09:36:35 -0500

43 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:00:04 +0900

80 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Dec 2009 10:50:57 -0500

97 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 01:07:13 +0900

48 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Dec 2009 16:50:42 -0800

247 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Dec 2009 21:34:18 -0800

369 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary

Risto Kupsala <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 12:51:19 +0200

69 lines

Re: Scientific vocabulary (was Re: What non-Esperanto-like auxlang should I use as an example?)

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 01:02:26 -0500

62 lines

Sorry it's the hats again [WAS: Esperanto revisited]

Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 18:33:01 +0000

67 lines

Re: The Sambahsa thread

lingwadeplaneta <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Dec 2009 09:24:05 -0000

44 lines

Re: The Sambahsa thread

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 13:42:25 +0900

39 lines

Re: The Sambahsa thread

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 04:51:54 -0500

31 lines

Re: The Sambahsa thread

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 07:48:43 -0500

48 lines

Re: The Sambahsa thread

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:15:25 -0500

41 lines

Re: Try to Find the Source of an Esperanto Document

Matthew Barnett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Dec 2009 01:03:55 +0000

61 lines

Re: Try to Find the Source of an Esperanto Document

Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Dec 2009 21:04:07 -0500

49 lines

Re: What non-Esperanto-like auxlang should I use as an example?

Kjell Rehnstršöm <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 06:00:37 +0100

80 lines

Re: What non-Esperanto-like auxlang should I use as an example?

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 00:55:36 -0500

39 lines

Re: What non-Esperanto-like auxlang should I use as an example?

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:06:13 +0900

51 lines

Re: What non-Esperanto-like auxlang should I use as an example?

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:28:47 +0900

52 lines

Re: What non-Esperanto-like auxlang should I use as an example?

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 18:47:28 +0900

40 lines

Re: What non-Esperanto-like auxlang should I use as an example?

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:09:02 -0500

51 lines

Re: What non-Esperanto-like auxlang should I use as an example?

Kjell Rehnstršöm <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 05:16:08 +0100

61 lines

Re: What non-Esperanto-like auxlang should I use as an example?

Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:43:15 -0800

32 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 01:20:48 -0500

71 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 19:24:48 +0900

58 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

Risto Kupsala <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:40:08 +0200

48 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:20:42 -0500

52 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:47:05 -0500

49 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:16:16 -0500

64 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 19:14:45 -0500

40 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 22:11:22 -0500

203 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:24:32 +0900

42 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 03:34:25 -0500

79 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 18:03:11 +0900

66 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 18:04:43 +0900

49 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

Valdi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:31:24 +0100

59 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:42:02 -0500

55 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:51:20 -0500

71 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

Kjell Rehnstršöm <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 19:25:47 +0100

57 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 18:21:16 -0500

60 lines

Re: Which IAL would you teach to your children?

Kjell Rehnstr?öm <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:04:51 +0100

61 lines

Worldlang

Kjell Rehnstršöm <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:56:20 +0100

46 lines

Re: Worldlang

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 03:52:46 -0500

59 lines

Re: Worldlang

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 18:13:33 +0900

53 lines

Re: Worldlang

Kjell Rehnstršöm <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 19:32:52 +0100

62 lines

Re: Worldlang

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:26:06 -0500

77 lines

Re: Worldlang

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:11:35 +0900

45 lines

Re: Worldlang

Risto Kupsala <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Dec 2009 09:52:27 +0200

62 lines

Re: Worldlang

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:09:15 +0900

93 lines

Re: Worldlang

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:00:20 +0900

49 lines

Re: Worldlang

Kjell Rehnstršöm <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 07:09:46 +0100

56 lines

Re: Worldlang

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Dec 2009 22:25:17 -0800

85 lines

Re: Worldlang

Kjell Rehnstršöm <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:49:54 +0100

44 lines

Worldlang hypothesis

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 05:37:48 -0800

39 lines

Re: Worldlang hypothesis

lingwadeplaneta <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:58:09 -0000

39 lines

Re: Worldlang hypothesis

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Dec 2009 03:54:05 -0800

33 lines

Re: Worldlang hypothesis

Kjell Rehnstršöm <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:31:32 +0100

37 lines

Re: Worldlang hypothesis

Kjell Rehnstršöm <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Dec 2009 16:06:31 +0100

47 lines

Re: [CONLANG] Review my 26c3 paper please

Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:31:40 -0800

45 lines

[Fwd: Idiom Neutral Yahoo Group founded!]

<deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Dec 2009 18:39:30 -0500

187 lines