Conlang
Mailing List December 2009, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"Bogolang" (was Re: Theadisch, a German-flavored romlang)
(8 messages)
"Bogolang" vs. "Altlang" (was Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang)
(2 messages)
Anoé; and, did this new user account work ?
(5 messages)
Clicks in Zulu
(3 messages)
Concuisine
Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange
(7 messages)
CONLANG Digest - 13 Dec 2009 to 14 Dec 2009 (#2009-347)
Conlang mock-ups
(2 messages)
Conlang...Possible Word of the Year??!
Contact info / status for David E Bell aka The Gray Wizard?
darwinian dragons
(3 messages)
Demonstrative Pronouns and Third Person Inanimate Pronouns
(4 messages)
Diachronic conlanging and diachronic linguistics (was Origin of PIE ablaut (was ...)
Fwd: Anoé; and, did this new user account work ?
(2 messages)
Is half as big twice as small?
(42 messages)
LoCoWriMo website admin?
(5 messages)
More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR)
(9 messages)
New Academia.edu feature for ConLang
new member and creating a new conlang
Oh, noes! Endangered languages! WAS: Re: The official word on Na'vi
(8 messages)
Origin of PIE ablaut (was How do you give reality to an a priori conlang?)
(6 messages)
OT: English phonetic conversion rules
(15 messages)
OT: RE: USAGE: French
(3 messages)
Passive participles
(12 messages)
Proto-Uralic (was: Diachronic conlanging and diachronic linguistic (was ...)
(4 messages)
Question about demonstratives
(12 messages)
Random lang gen: forms for the morphology
(2 messages)
Recording Dialogs (Was: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR))
(8 messages)
Resumptive pronoun question
(2 messages)
Round Robin Conlang Round 3
(6 messages)
Sapuno Deveru
Semi-away for 2 weeks
SHE post on BBC interview regarding constructed languages
The official word on Na'vi
(14 messages)
Theadisch, a German-flavored romlang
(2 messages)
Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(18 messages)
USAGE: French
(32 messages)
Vocab Building Tricks
(2 messages)
Window blinds
(8 messages)
WYSIWYG conlang?
(27 messages)
"Bogolang" (was Re: Theadisch, a German-flavored romlang)
"Bogolang" (was Re: Theadisch, a German-flavored romlang)
(47 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Bogolang" (was Re: Theadisch, a German-flavored romlang)
(58 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Bogolang" (was Re: Theadisch, a German-flavored romlang)
(97 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Bogolang" (was Re: Theadisch, a German-flavored romlang)
(56 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Bogolang" (was Re: Theadisch, a German-flavored romlang)
(97 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Bogolang" (was Re: Theadisch, a German-flavored romlang)
(59 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Bogolang" (was Re: Theadisch, a German-flavored romlang)
(68 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Bogolang" (was Re: Theadisch, a German-flavored romlang)
(103 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
"Bogolang" vs. "Altlang" (was Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang)
"Bogolang" vs. "Altlang" (was Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang)
(50 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Bogolang" vs. "Altlang" (was Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang)
(59 lines)
From:
Kenner Gordon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Anoé; and, did this new user account work ?
Re: Anoé; and, did this new user account work ?
(51 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anoé; and, did this new user account work ?
(93 lines)
From:
calculator ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anoé; and, did this new user account work ?
(34 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anoé; and, did this new user account work ?
(49 lines)
From:
calculator ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anoé; and, did this new user account work ?
(52 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Clicks in Zulu
Clicks in Zulu
(36 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Clicks in Zulu
(63 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Clicks in Zulu
(71 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Concuisine
Concuisine
(53 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange
Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange
(48 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange
(57 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange
(58 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange
(29 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange
(32 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange
(65 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange
(65 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 13 Dec 2009 to 14 Dec 2009 (#2009-347)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 13 Dec 2009 to 14 Dec 2009 (#2009-347)
(49 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang mock-ups
Conlang mock-ups
(38 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang mock-ups
(87 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang...Possible Word of the Year??!
Conlang...Possible Word of the Year??!
(34 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Contact info / status for David E Bell aka The Gray Wizard?
Contact info / status for David E Bell aka The Gray Wizard?
(29 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
darwinian dragons
darwinian dragons
(44 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: darwinian dragons
(38 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: darwinian dragons
(74 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Demonstrative Pronouns and Third Person Inanimate Pronouns
Demonstrative Pronouns and Third Person Inanimate Pronouns
(35 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Demonstrative Pronouns and Third Person Inanimate Pronouns
(50 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Demonstrative Pronouns and Third Person Inanimate Pronouns
(53 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Demonstrative Pronouns and Third Person Inanimate Pronouns
(41 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Diachronic conlanging and diachronic linguistics (was Origin of PIE ablaut (was ...)
Diachronic conlanging and diachronic linguistics (was Origin of PIE ablaut (was ...)
(237 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: Anoé; and, did this new user account work ?
Fwd: Anoé; and, did this new user account work ?
(38 lines)
From:
calculator ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: Anoé; and, did this new user account work ?
(48 lines)
From:
calculator ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is half as big twice as small?
Is half as big twice as small?
(34 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(54 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(74 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(82 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(85 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(52 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(55 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(71 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(35 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(44 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(63 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(59 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(62 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(49 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(67 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(43 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(64 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(82 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(99 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(107 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(58 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(73 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(45 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(127 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(123 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(35 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(46 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(44 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(89 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(34 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(65 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(29 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(108 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(60 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(72 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(55 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(38 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is half as big twice as small?
(54 lines)
From:
Steven Lytle <
[log in to unmask]
>
LoCoWriMo website admin?
Re: LoCoWriMo website admin?
(48 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LoCoWriMo website admin?
(45 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LoCoWriMo website admin?
(38 lines)
From:
Parker Glynn-Adey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LoCoWriMo website admin?
(43 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LoCoWriMo website admin?
(55 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR)
More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR)
(35 lines)
From:
M.S. Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR)
(39 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR)
(29 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR)
(48 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR)
(40 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR)
(34 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR)
(66 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR)
(31 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR)
(44 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Academia.edu feature for ConLang
Re: New Academia.edu feature for ConLang
(109 lines)
From:
Richard Price <
[log in to unmask]
>
new member and creating a new conlang
Re: new member and creating a new conlang
(47 lines)
From:
Tom Sparks <
[log in to unmask]
>
Oh, noes! Endangered languages! WAS: Re: The official word on Na'vi
Oh, noes! Endangered languages! WAS: Re: The official word on Na'vi
(62 lines)
From:
M.S. Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Oh, noes! Endangered languages! WAS: Re: The official word on Na'vi
(71 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Oh, noes! Endangered languages! WAS: Re: The official word on Na'vi
(48 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Oh, noes! Endangered languages! WAS: Re: The official word on Na'vi
(93 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Oh, noes! Endangered languages! WAS: Re: The official word on Na'vi
(37 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Oh, noes! Endangered languages! WAS: Re: The official word on Na'vi
(35 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Oh, noes! Endangered languages! WAS: Re: The official word on Na'vi
(44 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Oh, noes! Endangered languages! WAS: Re: The official word on Na'vi
(49 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Origin of PIE ablaut (was How do you give reality to an a priori conlang?)
Re: Origin of PIE ablaut (was How do you give reality to an a priori conlang?)
(126 lines)
From:
Basilius <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of PIE ablaut (was How do you give reality to an a priori conlang?)
(142 lines)
From:
Vasiliy Chernov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of PIE ablaut (was How do you give reality to an a priori conlang?)
(42 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of PIE ablaut (was How do you give reality to an a priori conlang?)
(48 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of PIE ablaut (was How do you give reality to an a priori conlang?)
(78 lines)
From:
Basilius <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of PIE ablaut (was How do you give reality to an a priori conlang?)
(81 lines)
From:
Basilius <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: English phonetic conversion rules
OT: English phonetic conversion rules
(49 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: English phonetic conversion rules
(43 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: English phonetic conversion rules
(59 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: English phonetic conversion rules
(50 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: English phonetic conversion rules
(92 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: English phonetic conversion rules
(86 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: English phonetic conversion rules
(44 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: English phonetic conversion rules
(45 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: English phonetic conversion rules
(35 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: English phonetic conversion rules
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: English phonetic conversion rules
(39 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: English phonetic conversion rules
(48 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: English phonetic conversion rules
(49 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: English phonetic conversion rules
(66 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: English phonetic conversion rules
(40 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: RE: USAGE: French
OT: RE: USAGE: French
(158 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: RE: USAGE: French
(186 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: RE: USAGE: French
(64 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Passive participles
Re: Passive participles
(97 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive participles
(63 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive participles
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive participles
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive participles
(74 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive participles
(86 lines)
From:
Steven Lytle <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive participles
(105 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive participles
(108 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive participles
(134 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive participles
(46 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive participles
(50 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Passive participles
(46 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Proto-Uralic (was: Diachronic conlanging and diachronic linguistic (was ...)
Proto-Uralic (was: Diachronic conlanging and diachronic linguistic (was ...)
(37 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proto-Uralic (was: Diachronic conlanging and diachronic linguistic (was ...)
(59 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proto-Uralic (was: Diachronic conlanging and diachronic linguistic (was ...)
(43 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Proto-Uralic (was: Diachronic conlanging and diachronic linguistic (was ...)
(56 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Question about demonstratives
Re: Question about demonstratives
(36 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about demonstratives
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about demonstratives
(39 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about demonstratives
(33 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about demonstratives
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about demonstratives
(40 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about demonstratives
(63 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about demonstratives
(53 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about demonstratives
(44 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about demonstratives
(36 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about demonstratives
(59 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about demonstratives
(67 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Random lang gen: forms for the morphology
Random lang gen: forms for the morphology
(100 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Random lang gen: forms for the morphology
(32 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Recording Dialogs (Was: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR))
Recording Dialogs (Was: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR))
(38 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Recording Dialogs (Was: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR))
(48 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Recording Dialogs (Was: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR))
(37 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Recording Dialogs (Was: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR))
(37 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Recording Dialogs (Was: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR))
(62 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Recording Dialogs (Was: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR))
(48 lines)
From:
Jayelinda <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Recording Dialogs (Was: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR))
(27 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Recording Dialogs (Was: More Na'vi (Frommer interview on NPR))
(45 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Resumptive pronoun question
Resumptive pronoun question
(25 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Resumptive pronoun question
(42 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Round Robin Conlang Round 3
Round Robin Conlang Round 3
(34 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round Robin Conlang Round 3
(39 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round Robin Conlang Round 3
(59 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round Robin Conlang Round 3
(53 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round Robin Conlang Round 3
(39 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round Robin Conlang Round 3
(35 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sapuno Deveru
Sapuno Deveru
(30 lines)
From:
Steven Lytle <
[log in to unmask]
>
Semi-away for 2 weeks
Semi-away for 2 weeks
(38 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
SHE post on BBC interview regarding constructed languages
SHE post on BBC interview regarding constructed languages
(43 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
The official word on Na'vi
The official word on Na'vi
(34 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The official word on Na'vi
(29 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The official word on Na'vi
(36 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The official word on Na'vi
(50 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The official word on Na'vi
(41 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The official word on Na'vi
(49 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The official word on Na'vi
(53 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The official word on Na'vi
(65 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The official word on Na'vi
(51 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The official word on Na'vi
(43 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The official word on Na'vi
(77 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The official word on Na'vi
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The official word on Na'vi
(87 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The official word on Na'vi
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Theadisch, a German-flavored romlang
Re: Theadisch, a German-flavored romlang
(91 lines)
From:
Kenner Gordon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a German-flavored romlang
(35 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(156 lines)
From:
Kenner Gordon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(60 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(174 lines)
From:
Steven Lytle <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(193 lines)
From:
Kenner Gordon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(47 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(48 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(61 lines)
From:
Kenner Gordon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(75 lines)
From:
Kenner Gordon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(85 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(37 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(51 lines)
From:
Kenner Gordon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(56 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(70 lines)
From:
Kenner Gordon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(77 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(43 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(42 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theadisch, a Latin-as-German bogolang
(52 lines)
From:
Steven Lytle <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: French
USAGE: French
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(62 lines)
From:
Etienne Nadji <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(85 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(54 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(41 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(55 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(36 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(52 lines)
From:
Claude Almansi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(72 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(56 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(113 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(117 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(35 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(53 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(68 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(40 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(76 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(62 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(118 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(167 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(123 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(118 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(68 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(67 lines)
From:
Andrew Jarrette <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(43 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(46 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French
(176 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vocab Building Tricks
Re: Vocab Building Tricks
(50 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vocab Building Tricks
(74 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Window blinds
Window blinds
(25 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Window blinds
(40 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Window blinds
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Window blinds
(47 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Window blinds
(36 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Window blinds
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Window blinds
(44 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Window blinds
(38 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
WYSIWYG conlang?
WYSIWYG conlang?
(37 lines)
From:
calculator ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(46 lines)
From:
John Osborne <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(64 lines)
From:
calculator ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(31 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(47 lines)
From:
calculator ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(54 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(89 lines)
From:
calculator ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(100 lines)
From:
Steven Lytle <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(111 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(71 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(132 lines)
From:
calculator ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(86 lines)
From:
calculator ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(30 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(49 lines)
From:
calculator ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(46 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(36 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(51 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(56 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(44 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(75 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(82 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(43 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(43 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(64 lines)
From:
Edward Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(101 lines)
From:
Kenner Gordon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(128 lines)
From:
calculator ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: WYSIWYG conlang?
(82 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU