Conlang Mailing List – December 2009, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show contributor list | Hide contributor list

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

List of contributors:

• <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> (8 messages)
• Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
• Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• And Rosta <[log in to unmask]> (9 messages)
• anonymous <[log in to unmask]>
• Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Charlie <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Claude Almansi <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Craig Daniel <[log in to unmask]>
• David McCann <[log in to unmask]> (7 messages)
• David Peterson <[log in to unmask]> (7 messages)
• Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>
• Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]> (9 messages)
• Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]> (9 messages)
• Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• Jen Runds <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
• John Vertical <[log in to unmask]> (10 messages)
• Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
• Krista Casada <[log in to unmask]>
• Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Lee <[log in to unmask]> (7 messages)
• Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]> (14 messages)
• Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Maxime Papillon <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
• Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
• Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]> (9 messages)
• R A Brown <[log in to unmask]> (7 messages)
• René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
• Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]> (15 messages)
• Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> (10 messages)
• Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
• Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
• Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
• Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
• Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
• Sapthan <[log in to unmask]>
• Shair Ahmed <[log in to unmask]>
• taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Tom Sparks <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Veoler <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)

1. <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Modern Greek question (38 lines)
     Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:48:15 -0500
   • Re: new member and creating a new conlang (44 lines)
     Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:36:45 -0500
   • Re: Revisiting conlangs as ciphers disguised as languages (34 lines)
     Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:16:10 -0500
   • Re: Spelling pronunciations in English place names. (41 lines)
     Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:07:45 -0500
   • Re: USAGE: "buenísimo"? (36 lines)
     Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:44:02 -0500
   • Re: USAGE: "buenísimo"? (42 lines)
     Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:31:41 -0500
   • Re: USAGE: "buenísimo"? (47 lines)
     Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:35:50 -0500
   • Re: USAGE: "buenísimo"? (50 lines)
     Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:47:01 -0500

2. Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange (51 lines)
     Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 18:45:03 -0800

3. Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Conlang written with silence (79 lines)
     Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:18:29 -0500
   • Re: A vowel system in need of rewinding (35 lines)
     Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:12:19 -0500
   • Re: growing a phonology (44 lines)
     Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:27:30 -0500
   • Re: Language Universals Website (32 lines)
     Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:54:47 -0500
   • Re: Origin of PIE ablaut (was How do you give reality to an a priori conlang?) (43 lines)
     Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:17:08 -0500
   • Re: Pirahã based conlang (63 lines)
     Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:05:14 -0500

4. And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (48 lines)
     Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:17:24 +0000
   • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (76 lines)
     Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:00:44 +0000
   • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (52 lines)
     Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:45:40 +0000
   • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (72 lines)
     Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:00:49 +0000
   • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (99 lines)
     Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:51:31 +0000
   • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (64 lines)
     Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 00:12:18 +0000
   • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (103 lines)
     Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:30:38 +0000
   • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (61 lines)
     Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:53:57 +0000
   • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (86 lines)
     Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:37:08 +0000

5. anonymous <[log in to unmask]>
   • Passive participles (35 lines)
     Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:24:11 -0500

6. Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Conlang written with silence (52 lines)
     Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:34:00 -0800
   • Re: A Conlang written with silence (42 lines)
     Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:27:40 -0800
   • Language Universals Website (30 lines)
     Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:11:36 -0800
   • Re: Language Universals Website (41 lines)
     Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:57:18 -0800
   • Re: Modern Greek question (39 lines)
     Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:31:55 -0800
   • Re: Which natlangs to choose for CALS? (34 lines)
     Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:24:15 -0800

7. Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Modern Greek question (46 lines)
     Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:54:54 +0100
   • Re: Modern Greek question (69 lines)
     Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:57:08 +0100
   • Re: Spelling pronunciations in English place names. (48 lines)
     Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:33:51 +0100
   • Re: Which natlangs to choose for CALS? (44 lines)
     Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:40:17 +0100

8. Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
   • growing a phonology (37 lines)
     Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:02:48 -0500
   • Re: growing a phonology (97 lines)
     Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:31:35 -0500
   • Re: growing a phonology (85 lines)
     Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:29:58 -0500
   • Re: growing a phonology (82 lines)
     Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:06:11 -0500
   • Re: growing a phonology (73 lines)
     Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:01:54 -0500

9. Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange (50 lines)
     Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:41:09 +0100
   • Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange (47 lines)
     Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:30:35 +0100
   • Re: going no-mail (31 lines)
     Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:48:31 +0100

10. Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísim o"? (40 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:59:37 -0000
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísimo"? (39 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:57:40 -0000

11. Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: *nix keyboards again (< Review my 26c3 paper please) (55 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:59:19 +0100
    • Re: growing a phonology (55 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:35:43 +0100
    • Re: Modern Greek question (159 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:24:14 +0100
    • Re: Modern Greek question (136 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:35:34 +0100
    • Re: Modern Greek question (58 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:03:09 +0100
    • Re: Modern Greek question (50 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:08:37 +0100

12. Claude Almansi <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Modern Greek question (54 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:18:19 +0100
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (100 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:13:34 +0100

13. Craig Daniel <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: growing a phonology (60 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:29:40 -0500

14. David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Modern Greek question (43 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:20:26 +0000
    • Re: Origin of PIE ablaut (40 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:52:18 +0000
    • Re: Origin of PIE ablaut (was How do you give reality to an a priori conlang?) (45 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 18:12:54 +0000
    • Re: Origin of PIE ablaut (was How do you give reality to an a priori conlang?) (58 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 18:42:20 +0000
    • Re: Origin of PIE ablaut (was How do you give reality to an a priori conlang?) (64 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:43:54 +0000
    • Re: Origin of PIE ablaut (was How do you give reality to an a priori conlang?) (53 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:23:21 +0000
    • Re: Passive participles (56 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:50:29 +0000

15. David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A Conlang written with silence (54 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:07:05 -0800
    • Re: A Conlang written with silence (66 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:20:01 -0800
    • Re: SIL IPA keyings chart (52 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 22:09:59 -0800
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (69 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:21:03 -0800
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (92 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:51:50 -0800
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (62 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:42:39 -0800
    • Re: Which natlangs to choose for CALS? (51 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:07:19 -0800

16. Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Article: "Syntax in our primate cousins" (43 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 06:39:00 -0800

17. Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How do you give reality to an a priori conlang? (77 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:55:58 -0200
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísimo"? (84 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:06:56 -0200

18. Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive participles (78 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:56:37 -0800
    • Re: USAGE: "buenís i m o"? (54 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 02:25:43 -0800

19. Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A vowel system in need of rewinding (42 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600
    • Re: Glottal Stops Becoming K (53 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 23:43:33 -0600
    • Re: Glottal Stops Becoming K (46 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 00:50:40 -0600
    • Re: Glottal Stops Becoming K (47 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:32:22 -0600
    • Re: Origin of PIE ablaut (was How do you give reality to an a priori conlang?) (38 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:25:26 -0600
    • Re: Pirahã based con lang (59 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:08:56 -0600
    • Re: Pirahã based conlang (57 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:20:11 -0600
    • Re: USAGE: "buenís i m o"? (86 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:14:53 -0600
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísim o"? (54 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:44:43 -0600

20. Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Conlang/Concultural Card Exchange (44 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:38:19 +0000
    • Re: Modern Greek question (51 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:44:10 +0000
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations in English place names. (60 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:22:31 +0000

21. Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: *nix keyboards again (< Review my 26c3 paper please) (68 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 12:54:49 -0800
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (46 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:53:45 -0800
    • Re: USAGE: "buenís i m o"? (45 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:50:43 -0800

22. Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • A Conlang written with silence (93 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:07:00 -0800
    • Re: A Conlang written with silence (75 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:27:28 -0800
    • Re: A Conlang written with silence (45 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:31:09 -0800
    • Re: A Conlang written with silence (46 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:32:02 -0800
    • Re: A Conlang written with silence (58 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:43:29 -0800
    • Re: A Conlang written with silence (51 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:38:40 -0800
    • Re: growing a phonology (37 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:12:19 -0800
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (50 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:32:25 -0800
    • Re: Vocab Building Tricks (42 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:52:10 -0800

23. Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange (43 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:22:40 +0100
    • Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange (50 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:35:21 +0100

24. Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: growing a phonology (49 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:22:19 +0100
    • Re: growing a phonology (50 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 02:10:45 +0100
    • Re: Origin of PIE ablaut (was How do you give reality to an a priori conlang?) (245 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 23:25:48 +0100
    • Re: Origin of PIE ablaut (was How do you give reality to an a priori conlang?) (83 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 21:53:08 +0100
    • Re: Vocab Building Tricks (89 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:06:40 +0100

25. Jen Runds <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (42 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:46:51 +1100
    • Re: Which natlangs to choose for CALS? (56 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:26:55 +1100

26. Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive participles (54 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:57:19 -0800
    • Vocab Building Tricks (62 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:52:41 -0800
    • Re: Vocab Building Tricks (42 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:05:46 -0800

27. Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A Conlang written with silence (47 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:18:47 -0500
    • Re: growing a phonology (66 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:04:33 -0500
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (43 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:14:43 -0500
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (53 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:22:05 -0500
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (69 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:39:23 -0500
    • Re: Which natlangs to choose for CALS? (44 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:27:17 -0500

28. John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Which natlangs to choose for CALS? (87 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 20:58:58 +0200

29. John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A Conlang written with silence (32 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:26:35 -0500
    • Re: A Conlang written with silence (72 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:05:12 -0500
    • A vowel system in need of rewinding (74 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 07:39:12 -0500
    • Re: A vowel system in need of rewinding (55 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 13:10:36 -0500
    • Re: A vowel system in need of rewinding (88 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:16:42 -0500
    • Re: Glottal Stops Becoming K (40 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 16:58:45 -0500
    • Re: growing a phonology (61 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:47:47 -0500
    • Re: How do you give reality to an a priori conlang? (78 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 06:19:07 -0500
    • Re: Vocab Building Tricks (33 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:58:44 -0500
    • Re: Which natlangs to choose for CALS? (73 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:33:17 -0500

30. Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (60 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:04:55 -0500

31. Krista Casada <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísimo"? (66 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:55:51 -0600

32. Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: growing a phonology (26 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:52:50 -0500
    • OT: endangered languages (26 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:53:44 -0500

33. Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Language Universals Website (52 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:56:25 -0800
    • Re: LoCoWriMo website admin? (46 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:54:43 -0800
    • Re: new member and creating a new conlang (43 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:06:26 -0800
    • Re: Vocab Building Tricks (61 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:17:45 -0800
    • Re: Which natlangs to choose for CALS? (96 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:24:42 -0800
    • Re: Which natlangs to choose for CALS? (59 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:32:29 -0800
    • Re: Which natlangs to choose for CALS? (52 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:59:54 -0800

34. Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: *nix keyboards again (< Review my 26c3 paper please) (55 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 06:39:44 -0500
    • Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange (61 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:20:24 -0500
    • Re: Glottal Stops Becoming K (41 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:49:28 -0500
    • Re: Modern Greek question (41 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:48:04 -0500
    • Re: Passive participles (47 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:39:08 -0500
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations in English place names. (45 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:04:43 -0500
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (54 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:03:54 -0500
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (115 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:07:47 -0500
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (64 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:25:04 -0500
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (89 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:38:24 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: "buenís i m o"? (46 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 06:52:45 -0500
    • USAGE: "buenísimo"? (29 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:57:49 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísimo"? (44 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:23:32 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísimo"? (66 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:43:14 -0500

35. Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A Conlang written with silence (56 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:44:32 -0600
    • Re: A vowel system in need of rewinding (76 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:58:52 -0600
    • Re: A vowel system in need of rewinding (68 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:41:00 -0600

36. Maxime Papillon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pirahã based con lang (91 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:31:55 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: "buenís i m o"? (55 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:28:30 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísi m o"? (104 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:21:56 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísim o"? (104 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:57:42 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísim o"? (45 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:08:45 -0500

37. Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Round Robin heads up (49 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:58:50 +0100
    • Re: Vocab Building Tricks (70 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:31:45 +0100
    • Re: Which natlangs to choose for CALS? (73 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:29:42 +0100

38. Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Glottal Stops Becoming K (83 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 01:51:17 -0000
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations in English place names. (47 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:17:05 -0000
    • Re: Which natlangs to choose for CALS? (45 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:55:02 -0000

39. Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Na'vi Sample Audio now online (36 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 20:57:53 -0500

40. Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: growing a phonology (50 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:06:11 +0000
    • Re: Na'vi Sample Audio now online (40 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:38:05 +0000
    • Re: pronoun systems (41 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:23:14 +0000
    • Round Robin heads up (31 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:13:18 +0000
    • Spelling pronunciations in English place names. (39 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:43:42 +0000

41. Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (42 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:06:22 -0500

42. Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A Conlang written with silence (35 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:09:45 +0100
    • Re: growing a phonology (51 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:15:14 +0100
    • Re: growing a phonology (38 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:36:52 +0100
    • Re: Modern Greek question (41 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:30:55 +0100
    • Re: Modern Greek question (72 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:51:11 +0100
    • Re: Modern Greek question (54 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:16:05 +0100
    • Re: Modern Greek question (46 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:09:01 +0100
    • Re: Modern Greek question (49 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:40:04 +0100
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísimo"? (35 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:20:16 +0100

43. R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A Conlang written with silence (53 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:26:53 +0000
    • Re: Modern Greek question (84 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:58:38 +0000
    • OT Puerto Rico (was: USAGE: "buenísi m o"?) (74 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:32:07 +0000
    • Re: Spelling pronunciations in English place names. (99 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:03:01 +0000
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (49 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:00:26 +0000
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (75 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:01:33 +0000
    • Re: Which natlangs to choose for CALS? (55 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:17:49 +0000

44. René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísimo"? (59 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:56:52 +0100

45. Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A vowel system in need of rewinding (51 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:13:21 -0800
    • Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange (34 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:21:53 -0800
    • Conlang/Concultural Card Exchange (32 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:25:12 -0800
    • Re: Conlang/Concultural Card Exchange (55 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:44:28 -0800
    • Re: diglossia/colloquialisms (was: Modern Greek question) (69 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:09:23 -0800
    • going no-mail (27 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:57:31 -0800
    • Re: How do you give reality to an a priori conlang? (77 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:21:42 -0800
    • Re: Language Universals Website (36 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:10:33 -0800
    • Modern Greek question (28 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:35:21 -0800
    • Re: Modern Greek question (59 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:31:39 -0800
    • Re: Modern Greek question (40 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:39:28 -0800
    • Re: USAGE: "buenís i m o"? (66 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:55:49 -0800
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísim o"? (59 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:17:32 -0800
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísimo"? (57 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:00:03 -0800
    • Re: Vocab Building Tricks (40 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:00:06 -0800

46. Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Conlang-L FAQ (279 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:38:27 -0800
    • SIL IPA keyings chart (46 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 19:44:02 -0800

47. Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • 26C3 talk preview in ~30 minutes (30 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:27:24 -0800
    • LoCoWriMo website admin? (28 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:31:20 -0800
    • Syntactitians: is this weird? (33 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:08:18 -0800

48. Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange (30 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 13:03:57 -0800
    • Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange (39 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:29:35 -0800
    • Re: LoCoWriMo website admin? (29 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:27:28 -0800
    • Re: new member and creating a new conlang (32 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:34:37 -0800
    • Re: SIL IPA keyings chart (29 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 22:16:18 -0800
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (53 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:00:15 -0800
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (83 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:31:51 -0800
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (47 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:21:05 -0800
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (67 lines)
      Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:39:11 -0800
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (97 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:52:48 -0800

49. Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange (46 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:27:46 +0000
    • Glottal Stops Becoming K (60 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:41:24 +0000

50. Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: new member and creating a new conlang (60 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:03:14 +0000

51. Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: new member and creating a new conlang (81 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:04:33 +0000

52. Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Syntactitians: is this weird? (66 lines)
      Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:32:14 +0000

53. Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísimo"? (62 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:21:04 +0000

54. Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísimo"? (50 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:28:02 +0000

55. Sapthan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísimo"? (49 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:39:28 -0800

56. Shair Ahmed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Question about demonstratives (28 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:19:54 -0600

57. taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Another database/overview of language features... (26 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:40:51 +0100
    • Which natlangs to choose for CALS? (47 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:33:01 +0100
    • Re: Which natlangs to choose for CALS? (36 lines)
      Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:06:35 +0100

58. Tom Sparks <[log in to unmask]>
    • new member and creating a new conlang (42 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 23:57:51 -0800
    • Re: new member and creating a new conlang (80 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:47:58 -0800
    • Re: new member and creating a new conlang (65 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:09:04 -0800
    • Re: new member and creating a new conlang (37 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:34:31 -0800

59. Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange (56 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:42:43 -0500
    • Re: Concultural (or just conlang) Card Exchange (87 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:08:36 -0500
    • Re: Idiom Neutral Yahoo Group founded! (84 lines)
      Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:12:42 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: "buenísimo"? (74 lines)
      Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:56:50 -0500

60. Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: growing a phonology (48 lines)
      Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:21:59 +0100
    • Re: growing a phonology (52 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:45:35 +0100
    • Re: growing a phonology (35 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:56:09 +0100
    • Re: new member and creating a new conlang (30 lines)
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:00:23 +0100