Conlang
Mailing List – January 2010, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
(was: Alternative "no"'s)
A few things I find underused in conlangs
(2 messages)
Additional English Words for Colors, Shapes
(4 messages)
Alphabetizing SIAL
(3 messages)
Alternative "no"'s
(3 messages)
Amlin, conscript for Nimyad
Binary features and low vowels
(20 messages)
Binary Keyboard
(15 messages)
Breeding languages
(2 messages)
CHAT: PIE-mærian
Code density versus orthogonality
(13 messages)
Conlang translation
(8 messages)
Deini verbs and unmarked infinitive.
(3 messages)
examples for documenting your lang
(6 messages)
Help with noun classes and incorporation?
(7 messages)
human speakable programming language
(5 messages)
Introduction to software localisation for conlangers
(2 messages)
ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(20 messages)
Krig, my current conlang project...
(8 messages)
Latin binomials
(3 messages)
Negative by Default (was: Alternative "no"'s)
Nimyad: Retcons and names
(8 messages)
OT inquiry
(11 messages)
OT: English culturally specific denominalization - "do"
(2 messages)
OT: Trying to reach Sai Emrys
(2 messages)
Question about perfective, was Re: [CONLANG] Deini verbs and unmarked infinitive.
(9 messages)
Round Robin Reminder
Round Robin Round 5
Ruby annotations coming to Safari (and Chrome)
(2 messages)
Suffixaufnahme, Präfixaufnahme, and Tone-Aufnahme or Tonaufnahme (was: Case stacking)
TECH: getting my computer to use my conlang
(9 messages)
the same concept invented twice
(16 messages)
Translation Exercise
(6 messages)
Translation Exercise: The Strange Ecstasy of Creation
(13 messages)
USAGE: YAEGT: "Away" as a verb?
(10 messages)
[LCS] [CONLANG] OT: Trying to reach Sai Emrys
(2 messages)
(was: Alternative "no"'s)
(was: Alternative "no"'s)
(94 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
A few things I find underused in conlangs
Re: A few things I find underused in conlangs
(68 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A few things I find underused in conlangs
(100 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Additional English Words for Colors, Shapes
Additional English Words for Colors, Shapes
(27 lines)
From:
Douglas Treadwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Additional English Words for Colors, Shapes
(98 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Additional English Words for Colors, Shapes
(37 lines)
From:
Douglas Treadwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Additional English Words for Colors, Shapes
(114 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Alphabetizing SIAL
Re: Alphabetizing SIAL
(96 lines)
From:
Steven Lytle <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Alphabetizing SIAL
(65 lines)
From:
Steven Lytle <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Alphabetizing SIAL
(57 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Alternative "no"'s
Re: Alternative "no"'s
(42 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Alternative "no"'s
(86 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Alternative "no"'s
(39 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Amlin, conscript for Nimyad
Re: Amlin, conscript for Nimyad
(52 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Binary features and low vowels
Binary features and low vowels
(31 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(38 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(38 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(33 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(42 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(47 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(58 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(37 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(32 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(70 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(68 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(48 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(124 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(53 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(45 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features and low vowels
(45 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Binary Keyboard
Binary Keyboard
(105 lines)
From:
Andrii Zvorygin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary Keyboard
(48 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary Keyboard
(62 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary Keyboard
(37 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary Keyboard
(104 lines)
From:
Andrii Zvorygin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary Keyboard
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary Keyboard
(54 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary Keyboard
(51 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary Keyboard
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary Keyboard
(35 lines)
From:
Andrii Zvorygin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary Keyboard
(41 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary Keyboard
(42 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary Keyboard
(34 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary Keyboard
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary Keyboard
(56 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Breeding languages
Re: Breeding languages
(61 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Breeding languages
(52 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: PIE-mærian
CHAT: PIE-mærian
(49 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Code density versus orthogonality
Code density versus orthogonality
(50 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code density versus orthogonality
(62 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code density versus orthogonality
(46 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code density versus orthogonality
(81 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code density versus orthogonality
(68 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code density versus orthogonality
(104 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code density versus orthogonality
(96 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code density versus orthogonality
(55 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code density versus orthogonality
(76 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code density versus orthogonality
(65 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code density versus orthogonality
(63 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code density versus orthogonality
(43 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Code density versus orthogonality
(40 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang translation
Conlang translation
(59 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang translation
(90 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang translation
(63 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang translation
(50 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang translation
(54 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang translation
(68 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang translation
(81 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang translation
(78 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Deini verbs and unmarked infinitive.
Re: Deini verbs and unmarked infinitive.
(87 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Deini verbs and unmarked infinitive.
(69 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Deini verbs and unmarked infinitive.
(125 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
examples for documenting your lang
examples for documenting your lang
(29 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: examples for documenting your lang
(35 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: examples for documenting your lang
(38 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: examples for documenting your lang
(47 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: examples for documenting your lang
(55 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: examples for documenting your lang
(29 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Help with noun classes and incorporation?
Re: Help with noun classes and incorporation?
(108 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help with noun classes and incorporation?
(183 lines)
From:
David E <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help with noun classes and incorporation?
(155 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help with noun classes and incorporation?
(137 lines)
From:
David E <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help with noun classes and incorporation?
(108 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help with noun classes and incorporation?
(106 lines)
From:
David E <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help with noun classes and incorporation?
(40 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
human speakable programming language
Re: human speakable programming language
(60 lines)
From:
Andrii Zvorygin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: human speakable programming language
(48 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: human speakable programming language
(55 lines)
From:
Andrii Zvorygin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: human speakable programming language
(82 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: human speakable programming language
(32 lines)
From:
Nokta Kanto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Introduction to software localisation for conlangers
Introduction to software localisation for conlangers
(31 lines)
From:
Thomas Thurman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers
(35 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(36 lines)
From:
Thomas Thurman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(50 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(29 lines)
From:
Bruno Barcelos <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(38 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(55 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(43 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(27 lines)
From:
Bruno Barcelos <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(36 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(57 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(34 lines)
From:
Thomas Thurman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(35 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(68 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(50 lines)
From:
Thomas Thurman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(53 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(71 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(47 lines)
From:
Rebecca Bettencourt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(53 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(116 lines)
From:
Rebecca Bettencourt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ISO 639 (was Re: Introduction to software localisation for conlangers)
(63 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Krig, my current conlang project...
Krig, my current conlang project...
(71 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Krig, my current conlang project...
(40 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Krig, my current conlang project...
(43 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Krig, my current conlang project...
(55 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Krig, my current conlang project...
(55 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Krig, my current conlang project...
(51 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Krig, my current conlang project...
(62 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Krig, my current conlang project...
(70 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Latin binomials
Re: Latin binomials
(63 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin binomials
(49 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin binomials
(62 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Negative by Default (was: Alternative "no"'s)
Negative by Default (was: Alternative "no"'s)
(99 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nimyad: Retcons and names
Nimyad: Retcons and names
(78 lines)
From:
Thomas Thurman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nimyad: Retcons and names
(57 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nimyad: Retcons and names
(69 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nimyad: Retcons and names
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nimyad: Retcons and names
(54 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nimyad: Retcons and names
(49 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nimyad: Retcons and names
(98 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nimyad: Retcons and names
(52 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT inquiry
OT inquiry
(61 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT inquiry
(95 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT inquiry
(32 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT inquiry
(106 lines)
From:
Jen Runds <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT inquiry
(39 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT inquiry
(70 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT inquiry
(27 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT inquiry
(30 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT inquiry
(48 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT inquiry
(32 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT inquiry
(43 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: English culturally specific denominalization - "do"
OT: English culturally specific denominalization - "do"
(35 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: English culturally specific denominalization - "do"
(61 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Trying to reach Sai Emrys
OT: Trying to reach Sai Emrys
(34 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Trying to reach Sai Emrys
(38 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Question about perfective, was Re: [CONLANG] Deini verbs and unmarked infinitive.
Question about perfective, was Re: [CONLANG] Deini verbs and unmarked infinitive.
(52 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about perfective, was Re: [CONLANG] Deini verbs and unmarked infinitive.
(51 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about perfective, was Re: [CONLANG] Deini verbs and unmarked infinitive.
(52 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about perfective, was Re: [CONLANG] Deini verbs and unmarked infinitive.
(61 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about perfective, was Re: [CONLANG] Deini verbs and unmarked infinitive.
(55 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about perfective, was Re: [CONLANG] Deini verbs and unmarked infinitive.
(98 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about perfective, was Re: [CONLANG] Deini verbs and unmarked infinitive.
(94 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about perfective, was Re: [CONLANG] Deini verbs and unmarked infinitive.
(107 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about perfective, was Re: [CONLANG] Deini verbs and unmarked infinitive.
(74 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Round Robin Reminder
Round Robin Reminder
(33 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Round Robin Round 5
Round Robin Round 5
(31 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ruby annotations coming to Safari (and Chrome)
Ruby annotations coming to Safari (and Chrome)
(49 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ruby annotations coming to Safari (and Chrome)
(69 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Suffixaufnahme, Präfixaufnahme, and Tone-Aufnahme or Tonaufnahme (was: Case stacking)
Suffixaufnahme, Präfixaufnahme, and Tone-Aufnahme or Tonaufnahme (was: Case stacking)
(36 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: getting my computer to use my conlang
TECH: getting my computer to use my conlang
(30 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: getting my computer to use my conlang
(49 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: getting my computer to use my conlang
(59 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: getting my computer to use my conlang
(31 lines)
From:
Bruno Barcelos <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: getting my computer to use my conlang
(35 lines)
From:
Thomas Thurman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: getting my computer to use my conlang
(55 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: getting my computer to use my conlang
(32 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: getting my computer to use my conlang
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: getting my computer to use my conlang
(46 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
the same concept invented twice
the same concept invented twice
(31 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the same concept invented twice
(50 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the same concept invented twice
(25 lines)
From:
Bruno Barcelos <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the same concept invented twice
(48 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the same concept invented twice
(30 lines)
From:
Bruno Barcelos <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the same concept invented twice
(40 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the same concept invented twice
(31 lines)
From:
Bruno Barcelos <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the same concept invented twice
(53 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the same concept invented twice
(61 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the same concept invented twice
(46 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the same concept invented twice
(52 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the same concept invented twice
(46 lines)
From:
Chris Peters <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the same concept invented twice
(47 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the same concept invented twice
(71 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the same concept invented twice
(94 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the same concept invented twice
(78 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation Exercise
Translation Exercise
(32 lines)
From:
Bruno Barcelos <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(77 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(48 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(24 lines)
From:
Bruno Barcelos <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(44 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise
(57 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation Exercise: The Strange Ecstasy of Creation
Translation Exercise: The Strange Ecstasy of Creation
(48 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise: The Strange Ecstasy of Creation
(63 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise: The Strange Ecstasy of Creation
(63 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise: The Strange Ecstasy of Creation
(50 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise: The Strange Ecstasy of Creation
(88 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise: The Strange Ecstasy of Creation
(83 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise: The Strange Ecstasy of Creation
(58 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise: The Strange Ecstasy of Creation
(93 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise: The Strange Ecstasy of Creation
(65 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise: The Strange Ecstasy of Creation
(88 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise: The Strange Ecstasy of Creation
(83 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise: The Strange Ecstasy of Creation
(42 lines)
From:
kate rhodes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Exercise: The Strange Ecstasy of Creation
(55 lines)
From:
Thomas Thurman <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: YAEGT: "Away" as a verb?
USAGE: YAEGT: "Away" as a verb?
(33 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: YAEGT: "Away" as a verb?
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: YAEGT: "Away" as a verb?
(44 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: YAEGT: "Away" as a verb?
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: YAEGT: "Away" as a verb?
(36 lines)
From:
Harry Aspinwall <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: YAEGT: "Away" as a verb?
(44 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: YAEGT: "Away" as a verb?
(57 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: YAEGT: "Away" as a verb?
(44 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: YAEGT: "Away" as a verb?
(59 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: YAEGT: "Away" as a verb?
(49 lines)
From:
David Jardine <
[log in to unmask]
>
[LCS] [CONLANG] OT: Trying to reach Sai Emrys
Re: [LCS] [CONLANG] OT: Trying to reach Sai Emrys
(59 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [LCS] [CONLANG] OT: Trying to reach Sai Emrys
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – January 2010, week 3
Conlang Mailing List – January 2010, week 3
