LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TEI-L Archives


TEI-L Archives

TEI-L Archives


February 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Ph.d. Diss" in <biblStruct> (4 messages)
2 Digital Humanities Jobs (1 message)
2010 DHO Summer School - Registration Now Open (1 message)
a choice problem (15 messages)
bibls examples and mappings (2 messages)
Brown University Center for Digital Scholarship (1 message)
bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?") (8 messages)
Call for Teaching and Learning Resources (2 messages)
Ducange schema (6 messages)
editor for large xml files? (20 messages)
First folio of Shakespeare (2 messages)
FW: Call for Participation: XML for the Long Haul, 2 August 2010 Montreal (2 messages)
Fwd: Zotero output 2 TEI (1 message)
Index levels, P4 to P5 (3 messages)
Indicating the presence or absence of a feature (21 messages)
job offer: research assistant at the German Text Archive in Berlin, Germany (1 message)
Join Us to Plan a Service for Publishing TEI Documents (1 message)
lingGrp/@domains (6 messages)
linking between critical edition and witnesses (9 messages)
location of interpGrp (was Re: Quick question) (1 message)
Markup benefits [was: Subscriber benefits] (1 message)
maxOccurs, upper bound? (10 messages)
name vs. persName class memberships (3 messages)
on ODD def of enumerated attr vals (6 messages)
PDF of guidelines damaged (12 messages)
Position Opening: DHO IT Manager (1 message)
Postdoc Positions Available (1 message)
Quick question (1 message)
Roma using outdated tei-odds schema? (6 messages)
SV: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature (2 messages)
TEI Extension for Literary Analysis (1 message)
TEI members meeting 2010: call for proposals (1 message)
TEI members meeting 2010: call for workshop proposals (1 message)
TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release (14 messages)
use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) (5 messages)
Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode? (15 messages)
Zotero output 2 TEI (10 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TEI-L Home

TEI-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Ph.d. Diss" in <biblStruct>

"Ph.d. Diss" in <biblStruct>

Charles Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:32:53 +0900

46 lines

Re: "Ph.d. Diss" in <biblStruct>

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:48:57 -0800

76 lines

Re: "Ph.d. Diss" in <biblStruct>

Laurent Romary <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:56:03 +0100

102 lines

Re: "Ph.d. Diss" in <biblStruct>

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:51:01 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

2 Digital Humanities Jobs

2 Digital Humanities Jobs

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:14:36 +0000

77 lines

New Thread

2010 DHO Summer School - Registration Now Open

2010 DHO Summer School - Registration Now Open

Susan Schreibman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:10:02 +0000

179 lines

New Thread

a choice problem

a choice problem

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:02:51 +0000

91 lines

Re: a choice problem

Gabriel Bodard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:59:56 +0000

121 lines

Re: a choice problem

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:18:49 +0000

118 lines

Re: a choice problem

Syd Bauman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:51:28 -0500

48 lines

Re: a choice problem

Lou <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:59:26 +0000

64 lines

Re: a choice problem

O'Donnell, Dan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:49:18 -0700

127 lines

Re: a choice problem

Martin Mueller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:35:54 -0600

106 lines

Re: a choice problem

Lou <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:19:24 +0000

46 lines

Re: a choice problem

Lou <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:21:32 +0000

17 lines

Re: a choice problem

O'Donnell, Dan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:42:02 -0700

43 lines

Re: a choice problem

Werner Wegstein <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:36:17 +0100

171 lines

Re: a choice problem

Martin Mueller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:42:22 -0600

73 lines

Re: a choice problem

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:49:42 +0000

66 lines

Re: a choice problem

John Young <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:08:23 +0000

88 lines

Re: a choice problem

Brett Barney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:12:02 -0600

186 lines

New Thread

bibls examples and mappings

bibls examples and mappings

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:54:25 +1300

29 lines

Re: bibls examples and mappings

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:40:03 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

Brown University Center for Digital Scholarship

Brown University Center for Digital Scholarship

Julia Flanders <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:29:37 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

Syd Bauman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:39:23 -0500

73 lines

Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:29:40 +0000

42 lines

Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

John A. Walsh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:15:33 -0500

50 lines

Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:16:20 +0000

30 lines

Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

John A. Walsh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:11:23 -0500

55 lines

Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

Syd Bauman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:07:32 -0500

32 lines

Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

Syd Bauman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:35:35 -0500

87 lines

Re: bugs? (was "Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?")

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:09:07 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

Call for Teaching and Learning Resources

Re: Call for Teaching and Learning Resources

Florence Clavaud (Ecole nationale des Chartes) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:32:00 +0100

84 lines

Call for Teaching and Learning Resources

Marcus Bingenheimer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:02:12 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Ducange schema

Ducange schema

Lou <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:58:15 +0000

15 lines

Re: Ducange schema

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:20:39 -0800

31 lines

Re: Ducange schema

Croenen, Godfried <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:23:39 +0000

61 lines

Re: Ducange schema

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:27:07 -0800

27 lines

Re: Ducange schema

Paul Caton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:38:10 -0800

52 lines

Re: Ducange schema

"Frédéric Glorieux (École nationale des chartes)" <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:52:34 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

editor for large xml files?

editor for large xml files?

Birnbaum, David J <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:33:01 -0500

19 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

George Cristian Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:33:23 +0200

41 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Stuart Yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:18:18 +1300

24 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:51:00 +0000

28 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Stuart Yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:07:07 +1300

19 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Richard MAHONEY <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:54:12 +1300

47 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:24:12 +0000

27 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Peter Baker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:39:06 -0500

28 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Richard MAHONEY <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:58:47 +1300

54 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Andreas Roehler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:01:45 +0100

50 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

George Cristian Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:02:33 +0200

63 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Andreas Roehler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:03:22 +0100

38 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Stuart Yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:08:42 +1300

22 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Andreas Roehler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:47:20 +0100

58 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:15:03 +0000

43 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Timothy Lepczyk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:36:02 -0600

34 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Stuart Yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:28:48 +1300

23 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Charles Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:16:34 +0900

49 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Andreas Roehler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:27:51 +0100

67 lines

Re: editor for large xml files?

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:25:28 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

First folio of Shakespeare

First folio of Shakespeare

Gary Hoffman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:56:18 -0600

18 lines

Re: First folio of Shakespeare

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:53:18 +0000

55 lines

New Thread

FW: Call for Participation: XML for the Long Haul, 2 August 2010 Montreal

FW: Call for Participation: XML for the Long Haul, 2 August 2010 Montreal

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:59:57 +0000

126 lines

Re: FW: Call for Participation: XML for the Long Haul, 2 August 2010 Montreal

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:01:11 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Zotero output 2 TEI

Fwd: Zotero output 2 TEI

Greg Schofield <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:19:04 +0000

165 lines

New Thread

Index levels, P4 to P5

Index levels, P4 to P5

Charles Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 16:48:47 +0900

28 lines

Re: Index levels, P4 to P5

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 11:47:41 +0000

38 lines

Re: Index levels, P4 to P5

Charles Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:05:10 +0900

54 lines

New Thread

Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Matthew James Driscoll <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:06:39 +0100

288 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:32:16 +0000

30 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Birnbaum, David J <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:06:24 -0500

706 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:03:17 -0800

90 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:08:57 +0000

52 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:33:47 +1300

47 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:56:32 +0000

34 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

John Young <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:11:10 +0000

28 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:53:32 +1300

48 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Athanasios Velios <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:21:08 +0000

94 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Christian-Emil Ore <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:41:45 +0100

113 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:52:01 +0000

26 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Heiden Serge <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:19:55 +0100

87 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 07:07:49 -0800

28 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Matthew James Driscoll <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:39:03 +0100

327 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Stuart Yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:34:48 +1300

25 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:03:33 -0800

26 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Laurent Romary <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 06:58:30 +0100

35 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Matthew James Driscoll <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:43:44 +0100

124 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Charles Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:07:31 +0900

43 lines

Re: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Laurent Romary <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:56:42 +0100

103 lines

New Thread

job offer: research assistant at the German Text Archive in Berlin, Germany

job offer: research assistant at the German Text Archive in Berlin, Germany

Oliver Duntze <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:11:11 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

Join Us to Plan a Service for Publishing TEI Documents

Re: Join Us to Plan a Service for Publishing TEI Documents

Thomas Crombez <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:00:05 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

lingGrp/@domains

lingGrp/@domains

Tomaz Erjavec <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:33:50 +0100

44 lines

Re: lingGrp/@domains

Lou <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:36:37 +0000

46 lines

Re: lingGrp/@domains

Lou <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:52:29 +0000

58 lines

Re: lingGrp/@domains

Tomaz Erjavec <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:01:03 +0100

76 lines

Re: lingGrp/@domains

Syd Bauman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:45:49 -0500

37 lines

Re: lingGrp/@domains

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:30:24 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

linking between critical edition and witnesses

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:54:23 +0000

111 lines

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:20:22 +0000

45 lines

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Christian Wittern <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:24:06 +0900

35 lines

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:36:37 +0000

87 lines

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:42:05 +0100

113 lines

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:09:09 +0000

57 lines

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Laurent Romary <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:31:26 +0100

68 lines

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:45:34 +0000

89 lines

Re: linking between critical edition and witnesses

Christian-Emil Ore <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:40:17 +0100

116 lines

New Thread

location of interpGrp (was Re: Quick question)

location of interpGrp (was Re: Quick question)

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:19:18 +0000

78 lines

New Thread

Markup benefits [was: Subscriber benefits]

Re: Markup benefits [was: Subscriber benefits]

Wendell Piez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:37:13 -0500

77 lines

New Thread

maxOccurs, upper bound?

maxOccurs, upper bound?

Julia Flanders <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:49:06 -0500

19 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

Syd Bauman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:04:18 -0500

108 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:39:45 +0000

28 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:48:04 +0000

29 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:05:55 +0000

37 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

Julia Flanders <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:17:00 -0500

37 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:06:13 +0000

53 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:48:49 +0000

70 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:04:04 +0000

41 lines

Re: maxOccurs, upper bound?

Syd Bauman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:56:04 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

name vs. persName class memberships

name vs. persName class memberships

Markus Flatscher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:09:07 -0500

67 lines

Re: name vs. persName class memberships

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:31:21 -0800

108 lines

Re: name vs. persName class memberships

Markus Flatscher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:14:01 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Syd Bauman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:12:52 -0500

249 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:34:22 +0000

37 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:19:22 +1300

45 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Syd Bauman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:21:29 -0500

31 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Syd Bauman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:36:39 -0500

61 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:39:40 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

PDF of guidelines damaged

PDF of guidelines damaged

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:47:29 +0000

14 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:01:08 +0000

27 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:28:12 +0000

31 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Pablo Rodríguez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:55:37 +0100

62 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:50:05 +0000

37 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Pablo Rodríguez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:52:28 +0100

51 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:00:18 +0100

32 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:13:07 +0000

36 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:17:54 +0000

45 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Pablo Rodríguez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:15:19 +0100

39 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Karl Eichwalder <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:47:16 +0100

34 lines

Re: PDF of guidelines damaged

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:24:46 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

Position Opening: DHO IT Manager

Position Opening: DHO IT Manager

Susan Schreibman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:16:39 +0000

154 lines

New Thread

Postdoc Positions Available

Postdoc Positions Available

Susan Schreibman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:08:41 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

Quick question

Re: Quick question

Espen S. Ore <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:28:25 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?

Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?

Julia Flanders <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:14:48 -0500

20 lines

Re: Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:59:49 +0000

34 lines

Re: Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?

Julia Flanders <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:21:27 -0500

39 lines

Re: Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:37:57 +0000

25 lines

Re: Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?

O'Donnell, Dan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:13:27 -0700

50 lines

Re: Roma using outdated tei-odds schema?

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:03:59 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

SV: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

SV: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Matthew James Driscoll <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:59:48 +0100

43 lines

Re: SV: Indicating the presence or absence of a feature

Christian-Emil Ore <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:15:34 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

TEI Extension for Literary Analysis

TEI Extension for Literary Analysis

Mandell, Laura C. Dr. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:31:15 -0500

189 lines

New Thread

TEI members meeting 2010: call for proposals

TEI members meeting 2010: call for proposals

Christian Wittern <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:28:25 +0900

129 lines

New Thread

TEI members meeting 2010: call for workshop proposals

TEI members meeting 2010: call for workshop proposals

Christian Wittern <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:33:16 +0900

82 lines

New Thread

TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:16:01 +0000

92 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Stuart Yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:15:53 +1300

26 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:58:30 +0000

37 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:28:07 +1300

36 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:35:07 +0000

28 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Ian Rons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:33:38 -0500

15 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Pablo Rodríguez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:27:06 +0100

31 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:20:13 +0000

28 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Ian Rons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:31:48 -0500

22 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Ian Rons <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:49:39 -0500

14 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Dr. Herbert Wender <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 10:31:35 EST

71 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:43:13 +0000

30 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Pablo Rodríguez <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:09:14 +0100

39 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:15:36 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem)

use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem)

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:13:16 +0000

107 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem)

Lou <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:53:49 +0000

151 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem)

Martin Mueller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:35:19 -0600

113 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem)

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:35:48 +0000

87 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem)

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:15:54 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

Joe Wicentowski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:48:59 -0500

34 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:40:15 +0000

71 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

Gabriel Bodard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:42:36 +0000

37 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

Syd Bauman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:01:52 -0500

30 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

Espen S. Ore <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:09:37 +0100

32 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

George Cristian Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:27:13 +0200

89 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

Martin Mueller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:37:28 -0600

94 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:41:06 +0000

41 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

O'Donnell, Dan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:14:06 -0700

79 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

John Young <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:49:37 +0000

107 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

George Cristian Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:32:24 +0200

137 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

Wendell Piez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:43:51 -0500

71 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

John Young <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:03:57 +0000

84 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

O'Donnell, Dan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:34:16 -0700

109 lines

Re: Wondering why oXygen XML Editor 11 defaults to Author mode?

George Cristian Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:19:42 +0200

35 lines

New Thread

Zotero output 2 TEI

Zotero output 2 TEI

Paul Caton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:18:24 -0800

32 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:56:54 -0800

45 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:01:30 +1300

30 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:45:42 +0000

30 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

Stuart Yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:41:38 +1300

49 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

Paul Caton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:12:28 -0800

138 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

Stuart Yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:37:19 +1300

31 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

Peter Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:25:06 +0000

31 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:22:56 +0000

77 lines

Re: Zotero output 2 TEI

Stuart Yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:03:23 +1300

27 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
June 1994
May 1994
April 1994
March 1994
February 1994
January 1994
December 1993
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
July 1993
June 1993
May 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993
January 1993
December 1992
November 1992
October 1992
September 1992
August 1992
July 1992
June 1992
May 1992
April 1992
March 1992
February 1992
January 1992
December 1991
November 1991
October 1991
September 1991
August 1991
July 1991
June 1991
May 1991
April 1991
March 1991
February 1991
January 1991
December 1990
November 1990
October 1990
September 1990
August 1990
July 1990
June 1990
April 1990
March 1990
February 1990
January 1990

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager