Conlang
Mailing List – February 2010, week 1
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(10 messages)
Adverbial verbs(like stative verbs)?
(10 messages)
An intersting 23-page document in a self-teaching conlang.
(10 messages)
An orthographic monster
(6 messages)
Anyone have an issue of Wired UK 3/10?
Binary features of diphthongs
(6 messages)
CALS currently down
Comparisons, adverbs and exceed was: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(9 messages)
Conscripts: Neo-Cuneiform
(10 messages)
Essential non-noun, non-verb, non-adjective words.
Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(19 messages)
Exolangs with extra chagrinnage
First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(9 messages)
Gleb, a phonology generator
(2 messages)
Going NOMAIL
(2 messages)
Happy Birthday to PhD
(2 messages)
Khangaþyagon Court
Mixed marking strategies.
(12 messages)
More sentences for Conlang testing
(3 messages)
muta cum liquida (was: Syllabification)
(10 messages)
My easiest conlang yet
(4 messages)
OT Problems with email
(5 messages)
OT TECH: HTML/CSS embedded fonts problem
(12 messages)
OT: RPM Challenge (Conlang Music?)
(2 messages)
Polish Notation was: Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
(5 messages)
Really conjugated pre/postpostions?
(2 messages)
Right-branching vs. Left-branching
(3 messages)
Romance stressed vowels (was: muta cum liquida)
(3 messages)
Round Robin Heads Up again
(2 messages)
Sanskrit loans in Indonesian (was: Re: Does English have unusually many quantifiers?)
Shigudo Adverb-only language (WAS: Adverbial verbs?)
(3 messages)
Speech to IPA?
(11 messages)
Swedish students conlanging for their senior project
(3 messages)
Syllabification
(18 messages)
The Hesychian Construct Form
(3 messages)
The Syntax of Monkey Language
Think of conlanging from languages backwards?
(5 messages)
Word Order and Conjunctions
(12 messages)
World Loanword Database
(9 messages)
Zegments.ttf - a multi-purpose font
[i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
(16 messages)
Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(552 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(356 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(425 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(168 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(68 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(134 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(50 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(86 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(80 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(64 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Adverbial verbs(like stative verbs)?
Re: Adverbial verbs(like stative verbs)?
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Adverbial verbs(like stative verbs)?
(56 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Adverbial verbs(like stative verbs)?
(46 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Adverbial verbs(like stative verbs)?
(42 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Adverbial verbs(like stative verbs)?
(87 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Adverbial verbs(like stative verbs)?
(54 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Adverbial verbs(like stative verbs)?
(72 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Adverbial verbs(like stative verbs)?
(106 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Adverbial verbs(like stative verbs)?
(62 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Adverbial verbs(like stative verbs)?
(72 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
An intersting 23-page document in a self-teaching conlang.
An intersting 23-page document in a self-teaching conlang.
(28 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An intersting 23-page document in a self-teaching conlang.
(38 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An intersting 23-page document in a self-teaching conlang.
(55 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An intersting 23-page document in a self-teaching conlang.
(32 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An intersting 23-page document in a self-teaching conlang.
(27 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An intersting 23-page document in a self-teaching conlang.
(42 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An intersting 23-page document in a self-teaching conlang.
(45 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An intersting 23-page document in a self-teaching conlang.
(60 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An intersting 23-page document in a self-teaching conlang.
(39 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An intersting 23-page document in a self-teaching conlang.
(60 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
An orthographic monster
An orthographic monster
(159 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An orthographic monster
(42 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An orthographic monster
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An orthographic monster
(137 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An orthographic monster
(48 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An orthographic monster
(46 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Anyone have an issue of Wired UK 3/10?
Anyone have an issue of Wired UK 3/10?
(32 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Binary features of diphthongs
Binary features of diphthongs
(56 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features of diphthongs
(44 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features of diphthongs
(51 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features of diphthongs
(40 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features of diphthongs
(75 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Binary features of diphthongs
(60 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
CALS currently down
CALS currently down
(41 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Comparisons, adverbs and exceed was: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
Comparisons, adverbs and exceed was: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(62 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparisons, adverbs and exceed was: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(74 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparisons, adverbs and exceed was: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(68 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparisons, adverbs and exceed was: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(49 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparisons, adverbs and exceed was: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(57 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparisons, adverbs and exceed was: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(49 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparisons, adverbs and exceed was: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(50 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparisons, adverbs and exceed was: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(81 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparisons, adverbs and exceed was: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(101 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conscripts: Neo-Cuneiform
Conscripts: Neo-Cuneiform
(29 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conscripts: Neo-Cuneiform
(36 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conscripts: Neo-Cuneiform
(55 lines)
From:
Bruno Barcelos <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conscripts: Neo-Cuneiform
(31 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conscripts: Neo-Cuneiform
(70 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conscripts: Neo-Cuneiform
(23 lines)
From:
Bruno Barcelos <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conscripts: Neo-Cuneiform
(69 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conscripts: Neo-Cuneiform
(31 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conscripts: Neo-Cuneiform
(42 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conscripts: Neo-Cuneiform
(38 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Essential non-noun, non-verb, non-adjective words.
Re: Essential non-noun, non-verb, non-adjective words.
(125 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(65 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(83 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(103 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(85 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(88 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(49 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(51 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(58 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(50 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(92 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(86 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(74 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(57 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(120 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(42 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(126 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Exolangs was: Re: Aaalis Phonology, Orthography and Nominal Morphology
(60 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Exolangs with extra chagrinnage
Exolangs with extra chagrinnage
(108 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
Re: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(40 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(39 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(49 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(45 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(62 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(39 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(47 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: First Draft: Sentences to test a conlang with
(41 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gleb, a phonology generator
Gleb, a phonology generator
(49 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gleb, a phonology generator
(65 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going NOMAIL
Going NOMAIL
(36 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Going NOMAIL
(43 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Happy Birthday to PhD
Re: Happy Birthday to PhD
(128 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Happy Birthday to PhD
(46 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Khangaþyagon Court
Khangaþyagon Court
(38 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mixed marking strategies.
Mixed marking strategies.
(46 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed marking strategies.
(69 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed marking strategies.
(40 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed marking strategies.
(46 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed marking strategies.
(47 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed marking strategies.
(45 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed marking strategies.
(113 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed marking strategies.
(64 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed marking strategies.
(70 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed marking strategies.
(36 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed marking strategies.
(65 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixed marking strategies.
(117 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
More sentences for Conlang testing
Re: More sentences for Conlang testing
(58 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More sentences for Conlang testing
(47 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More sentences for Conlang testing
(58 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
muta cum liquida (was: Syllabification)
muta cum liquida (was: Syllabification)
(139 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: muta cum liquida (was: Syllabification)
(122 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: muta cum liquida (was: Syllabification)
(60 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: muta cum liquida (was: Syllabification)
(53 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: muta cum liquida (was: Syllabification)
(48 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: muta cum liquida (was: Syllabification)
(40 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: muta cum liquida (was: Syllabification)
(22 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: muta cum liquida (was: Syllabification)
(52 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: muta cum liquida (was: Syllabification)
(56 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: muta cum liquida (was: Syllabification)
(43 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
My easiest conlang yet
My easiest conlang yet
(55 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My easiest conlang yet
(66 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My easiest conlang yet
(45 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My easiest conlang yet
(56 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Problems with email
OT Problems with email
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Problems with email
(45 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Problems with email
(28 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Problems with email
(22 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Problems with email
(43 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT TECH: HTML/CSS embedded fonts problem
OT TECH: HTML/CSS embedded fonts problem
(35 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH: HTML/CSS embedded fonts problem
(64 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH: HTML/CSS embedded fonts problem
(52 lines)
From:
Rebecca Bettencourt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH: HTML/CSS embedded fonts problem
(46 lines)
From:
Rebecca Bettencourt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH: HTML/CSS embedded fonts problem
(52 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH: HTML/CSS embedded fonts problem
(63 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH: HTML/CSS embedded fonts problem
(61 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH: HTML/CSS embedded fonts problem
(76 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH: HTML/CSS embedded fonts problem
(44 lines)
From:
Rebecca Bettencourt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH: HTML/CSS embedded fonts problem
(30 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH: HTML/CSS embedded fonts problem
(39 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH: HTML/CSS embedded fonts problem
(56 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: RPM Challenge (Conlang Music?)
OT: RPM Challenge (Conlang Music?)
(58 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: RPM Challenge (Conlang Music?)
(71 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Polish Notation was: Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
Polish Notation was: Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
(77 lines)
From:
Jacob X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Polish Notation was: Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
(73 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Polish Notation was: Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
(77 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Polish Notation was: Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
(89 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Polish Notation was: Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
(101 lines)
From:
Jacob X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Really conjugated pre/postpostions?
Really conjugated pre/postpostions?
(105 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Really conjugated pre/postpostions?
(114 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Right-branching vs. Left-branching
Right-branching vs. Left-branching
(98 lines)
From:
Linvi Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Right-branching vs. Left-branching
(121 lines)
From:
Jacob X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Right-branching vs. Left-branching
(72 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Romance stressed vowels (was: muta cum liquida)
Romance stressed vowels (was: muta cum liquida)
(155 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Romance stressed vowels (was: muta cum liquida)
(71 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Romance stressed vowels (was: muta cum liquida)
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Round Robin Heads Up again
Round Robin Heads Up again
(31 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round Robin Heads Up again
(49 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sanskrit loans in Indonesian (was: Re: Does English have unusually many quantifiers?)
Re: Sanskrit loans in Indonesian (was: Re: Does English have unusually many quantifiers?)
(63 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Shigudo Adverb-only language (WAS: Adverbial verbs?)
Shigudo Adverb-only language (WAS: Adverbial verbs?)
(80 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shigudo Adverb-only language (WAS: Adverbial verbs?)
(33 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shigudo Adverb-only language (WAS: Adverbial verbs?)
(61 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Speech to IPA?
Speech to IPA?
(28 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Speech to IPA?
(33 lines)
From:
Thomas Thurman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Speech to IPA?
(40 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Speech to IPA?
(49 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Speech to IPA?
(41 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Speech to IPA?
(38 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Speech to IPA?
(75 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Speech to IPA?
(94 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Speech to IPA?
(60 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Speech to IPA?
(39 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Speech to IPA?
(59 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Swedish students conlanging for their senior project
Swedish students conlanging for their senior project
(30 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Swedish students conlanging for their senior project
(38 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Swedish students conlanging for their senior project
(30 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Syllabification
Syllabification
(34 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabification
(43 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabification
(55 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabification
(65 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabification
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabification
(32 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabification
(54 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabification
(103 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabification
(42 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabification
(40 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabification
(47 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabification
(50 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabification
(78 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabification
(84 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabification
(47 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabification
(127 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabification
(70 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabification
(95 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Hesychian Construct Form
The Hesychian Construct Form
(104 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Hesychian Construct Form
(43 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Hesychian Construct Form
(50 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Syntax of Monkey Language
The Syntax of Monkey Language
(43 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Think of conlanging from languages backwards?
Think of conlanging from languages backwards?
(25 lines)
From:
SUBSCRIBE CONLANG Anonymous <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Think of conlanging from languages backwards?
(39 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Think of conlanging from languages backwards?
(43 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Think of conlanging from languages backwards?
(71 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Think of conlanging from languages backwards?
(45 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Word Order and Conjunctions
Word Order and Conjunctions
(30 lines)
From:
Linvi Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
(44 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
(38 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
(61 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
(77 lines)
From:
Jacob X <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
(53 lines)
From:
Rick <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
(49 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
(63 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
(81 lines)
From:
Linvi Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
(44 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
(107 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word Order and Conjunctions
(55 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
World Loanword Database
World Loanword Database
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: World Loanword Database
(70 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: World Loanword Database
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: World Loanword Database
(57 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: World Loanword Database
(58 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: World Loanword Database
(54 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: World Loanword Database
(40 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: World Loanword Database
(68 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: World Loanword Database
(68 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Zegments.ttf - a multi-purpose font
Zegments.ttf - a multi-purpose font
(39 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
[i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
[i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
(45 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
(52 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
(72 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
(63 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
(52 lines)
From:
Toms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
(60 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
(44 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
(55 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
(63 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
(84 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
(70 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
(65 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
(56 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [i:], [ji], [ij] ; [u:], [wu], [uw]
(61 lines)
From:
Toms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – February 2010, week 1
Conlang Mailing List – February 2010, week 1
