'TEI' as group of scholars vs. guidelines vs. organization (was Re: New article on TEI)

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:06:30 +0000

15 lines

Re: 'TEI' as group of scholars vs. guidelines vs. organization (was Re: New article on TEI)

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:11:41 +0000

54 lines

Annoucement: LREC tutorial

Laurent Romary <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:57:29 +0100

412 lines

Re: application/tei+xml

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:14:47 +0100

67 lines

Re: application/tei+xml

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:58:46 +1300

40 lines

Re: application/tei+xml redux

David Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:26:32 -0500

77 lines

Best place to put <linkGrp>?

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:17:34 -0700

34 lines

Re: Best place to put <linkGrp>?

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:11:05 -0700

72 lines

Re: Best place to put <linkGrp>?

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:30:50 -0700

105 lines

Re: Best place to put <linkGrp>?

pboot <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:47:53 +0100

25 lines

Re: Best place to put <linkGrp>?

Laurent Romary <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:17:45 +0100

59 lines

Re: Best place to put <linkGrp>?

Croenen, Godfried <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:43:44 +0000

48 lines

Re: Best place to put <linkGrp>?

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:19:04 +0100

27 lines

Re: Best place to put <linkGrp>?

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:01:19 +0000

41 lines

Re: Best place to put <linkGrp>?

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:35:10 +0100

28 lines

Re: Best place to put <linkGrp>?

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:08:46 +0000

60 lines

Re: Best place to put <linkGrp>?

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:29:56 +0000

52 lines

Re: Best place to put <linkGrp>?

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:52:36 +0100

88 lines

Re: Best place to put <linkGrp>?

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Mar 2010 21:04:48 -0700

33 lines

Re: Best place to put <linkGrp>?

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 05:30:03 -0700

33 lines

Re: Best place to put <linkGrp>?

Dot Porter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:37:18 -0400

40 lines

Corpora of Tribunal documents?

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:11:46 +1300

35 lines

declare formula notation TeX ?

Steffen Wolfrum <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:26:08 +0100

25 lines

discussion about specific element inclusion in a TEI ODD

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:10:43 +0000

24 lines

DRHA 2010 reminder

Lou <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:41:28 +0000

18 lines

Empty space for initial in an MS

Gábor Tóth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:49:35 +0000

31 lines

Re: Empty space for initial in an MS

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:08:43 +0000

32 lines

Re: Empty space for initial in an MS

John Young <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:26:09 +0000

50 lines

Re: Empty space for initial in an MS

Notis Toufexis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:24:43 +0100

191 lines

Re: Empty space for initial in an MS

Notis Toufexis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:47:57 +0100

596 lines

Re: Empty space for initial in an MS

Dr. Herbert Wender <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:19:25 EDT

133 lines

Re: Empty space for initial in an MS

Dr. Herbert Wender <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:53:58 EDT

133 lines

Re: encoding annotations

Laurent Romary <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:59:28 +0100

59 lines

Re: encoding annotations

Lou <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:45:40 +0000

34 lines

FW: New W3C Working Draft: for Bidi in HTML

Deborah W. Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:53:06 -0800

52 lines

Re: http://www.tei-c.org.uk/ dead?

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:02:02 +0000

18 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Paul F. Schaffner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:55:49 -0400

217 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Lou <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:11:12 +0000

30 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Lou <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:19:36 +0000

47 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Croenen, Godfried <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:28:37 +0000

60 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Lou <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:10:21 +0000

42 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Croenen, Godfried <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:23:09 +0000

33 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

John Young <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:00:10 +0000

35 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Croenen, Godfried <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:06:54 +0000

66 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Croenen, Godfried <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:44:50 +0000

23 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Croenen, Godfried <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:04:59 +0000

78 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Paul F. Schaffner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:38:02 -0400

47 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Elena Pierazzo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:05:43 +0000

50 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals: Dutch rules

Croenen, Godfried <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:54:29 +0000

24 lines

Internet draft revised

Sigfrid Lundberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:46:04 +0200

17 lines

Re: Internet draft revised

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:17:07 +0100

41 lines

Re: Internet draft revised

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:27:39 +0100

65 lines

Re: Internet draft revised

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:47:28 +0100

30 lines

Re: Internet draft revised

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:31:46 +1300

40 lines

Re: Internet draft revised

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:16:58 +0100

22 lines

last call for participation, TEI institute on manuscript materials

Julia Flanders <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:26:05 -0500

55 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:35:43 +1300

71 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

Elizabeth McAulay <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:12:48 -0700

101 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:10:54 +0000

57 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:28:09 +0000

25 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:22:42 +1300

43 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

Christian-Emil Ore <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:19:42 +0100

120 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:28:58 +1300

69 lines

Re: lingGrp/@domains

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:40:31 +0100

91 lines

linguistically annotated corpora in TEI (was: project listings at tei-c)

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:01:43 +0100

79 lines

Re: linguistically annotated corpora in TEI (was: project listings at tei-c)

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:52:35 +0000

32 lines

Re: [log in to unmask]

David Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:03:37 -0500

43 lines

Re: More on Soft Hyphen U+00AD

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:59:15 +0000

29 lines

Re: New article on TEI

Dr. Herbert Wender <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 05:48:35 EST

70 lines

Re: ODD - Adding an attribute from a foreign namespace (and defined in an external XSD)

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:37:34 +0000

36 lines

Re: ODD - Adding an attribute from a foreign namespace (and defined in an external XSD)

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:01:19 +0000

65 lines

Re: ODD - Adding an attribute from a foreign namespace (and defined in an external XSD)

Maik Stührenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:04:36 +0100

108 lines

Re: ODD and combine attribute

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:12:10 +0000

37 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Ian Rons <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 08:24:32 -0500

22 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:36:16 +0000

47 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:55:22 +0000

82 lines

Re: Programmers and documentation

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:11:51 +0000

56 lines

Re: Programmers and documentation (was: TEI as format for teaching materials?)

Stuart Yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 20:29:39 +1300

31 lines

project listings at tei-c

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:52:39 +0100

71 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:12:26 -0700

109 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

O'Donnell, Dan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:46:37 -0600

137 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Ondine LeBlanc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:54:08 -0400

136 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:15:47 -0700

32 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:25:43 +0100

35 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Gabriel Bodard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:23:05 +0000

51 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:46:40 +0100

51 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Martin Mueller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:44:32 -0500

34 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Elizabeth McAulay <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:53:27 -0700

90 lines

Recognizing TEI, xmlns, P4 vs P5 and the injection of executable XML

Sigfrid Lundberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:43:35 +0200

44 lines

Re: Recognizing TEI, xmlns, P4 vs P5 and the injection of executable XML

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:35:05 +1300

39 lines

Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header

Jarom McDonald <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:47:49 -0700

63 lines

Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 07:47:40 +1300

49 lines

Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 08:08:19 +1300

53 lines

Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:06:23 +0000

83 lines

Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header

Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:56:07 +0000

18 lines

Roma error on attribute change

Christiane Fritze <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:40:06 +0100

29 lines

Roma on Ubuntu

Ian Rons <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:23:46 -0500

31 lines

Re: Roma problem

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:09:14 +0000

41 lines

Some dimensions of polygone discourse

Dr. Herbert Wender <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:27:54 EDT

384 lines

Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:55:16 +0100

39 lines

Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:22:57 +0100

29 lines

Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:59:41 +0000

44 lines

Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery

Brett Zamir <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:42:10 +0800

46 lines

Re: SV: <del> and <add> - word-for-word-approach?

Gabriel Viehhauser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:57:21 +0100

225 lines

SV: application/tei+xml

Sigfrid Lundberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:01:34 +0100

79 lines

SVN (was: What happened to dicteg?)

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:05:11 +0100

56 lines

Syntactica Open Source TEI Integrator

Ward Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 17:39:27 -0500

67 lines

TEI as format for teaching materials?

Iftikhar Zaman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:04:19 +0500

113 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Martin Mueller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:33:51 -0600

26 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:51:26 -0800

67 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Martin Mueller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:37:31 -0600

68 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Wendell Piez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:47:40 -0500

63 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 19:24:35 -0800

29 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Martin Mueller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:19:54 -0600

28 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Stuart Yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 21:43:06 +1300

39 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:44:49 +0000

36 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Thomas Crombez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:59:49 +0100

79 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Martin Mueller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:42:39 -0600

63 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:13:39 +0100

48 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Stuart Yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:16:05 +1300

23 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 10:45:57 +0000

45 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Thomas Crombez <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 21:16:43 +0100

180 lines

Re: TEI DTD problem

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:41:09 +0000

62 lines

Re: TEI DTD problem

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:20:00 +0000

39 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:24:41 +0000

32 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 22:32:52 +0000

28 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Barry Cornelius <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:05:58 +0000

30 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:34:50 +0000

29 lines

tei releases on Sourceforge

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:32:30 +0000

20 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply

Deborah W. Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:28:46 -0800

204 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:48:18 +0000

35 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply

John Young <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:58:11 +0000

335 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply

Martin Mueller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:39:14 -0600

269 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply

Martin Mueller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:21:11 -0600

62 lines

Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:13:35 -0800

64 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 21:27:26 -0800

77 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:38:09 +0000

53 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Elena Pierazzo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:17:26 +0000

50 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Lou <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:23:30 +0000

24 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:35:32 +0000

42 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:49:38 +0000

35 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Øyvind Eide <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:58:23 +0100

41 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:26:10 +0000

34 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Dot Porter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:37:42 -0500

55 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:46:15 -0800

32 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:48:47 +0000

35 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:57:22 -0800

29 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Dot Porter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:14:00 -0500

54 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:46:52 -0800

48 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Dot Porter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:58:10 -0500

49 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:56:47 -0800

44 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:17:22 +1300

34 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:29:50 +0000

36 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:30:51 +1300

35 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:11:29 +0000

49 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:29:48 +1300

40 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:42:13 +0000

36 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:56:31 +0000

57 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Hugh Cayless <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:19:59 -0500

59 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:45:13 -0800

134 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:03:55 -0800

67 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:12:57 +0000

26 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:51:41 +0000

39 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:13:40 +0000

58 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:39:21 +0000

50 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:06:27 -0700

41 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Wendell Piez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:25:03 -0400

66 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Wendell Piez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:58:16 -0400

112 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Wendell Piez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:37:51 -0400

68 lines

Re: Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Dr. Herbert Wender <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:47:10 EDT

50 lines

What happened to dicteg?

Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 12:28:13 -0800

38 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:56:45 +0100

46 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:01:17 +0000

88 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 12:03:30 +0000

42 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:40:24 +0000

39 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Julia Flanders <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:19:41 -0500

84 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Julia Flanders <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:38:14 -0500

33 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Julia Flanders <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:20:47 -0500

53 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Lou <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:13:42 +0000

53 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:19:47 +0000

35 lines

Re: White space handling in different contexts

James Cummings <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:49:26 +0000

71 lines

Re: White space handling in different contexts

Dr. Herbert Wender <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:42:26 EDT

55 lines

Re: White space handling in different contexts

Elena Pierazzo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:02:08 +0000

82 lines

Re: White space handling in different contexts

George Cristian Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:26:54 +0300

64 lines

Re: White space handling in different contexts

Lou <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:03:46 +0100

28 lines

Re: xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:33:57 +0100

36 lines

Re: xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:53:09 +0000

32 lines

Re: xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas

George Cristian Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:39:43 +0200

79 lines

xsl stylesheets and teitoepub

George Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:32:32 +0100

57 lines

Re: xsl stylesheets and teitoepub

Dr. George Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:55:37 +0100

90 lines

Re: xsl stylesheets and teitoepub

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:35:54 +0000

21 lines

Re: xsltdoc

Heiden Serge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:30:16 +0100

95 lines

Re: xsltdoc

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:24:21 +0100

58 lines

Re: xsltdoc

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:03:45 +0000

35 lines

Re: xsltdoc

Piotr Bański <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:00:13 +0100

51 lines

Re: xsltdoc

David Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:15:42 -0400

53 lines

Re: xsltdoc

Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:57:24 +0000

37 lines

Re: xsltdoc

Serge Heiden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:42:29 +0100

81 lines

You are Not a Gadget, by Jaron Lanier

Charles Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:34:03 +0900

88 lines

Re: You are Not a Gadget, by Jaron Lanier

Charles Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:22:09 +0900

52 lines

[ann] oXygen XML Editor 11.2

George Cristian Bina <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:29:57 +0200

52 lines