Conlang
Mailing List – March 2010, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
A creation story in Angosey
About that collaborative conlang I recently announced
Allophones of /h/
(3 messages)
Arabic without Islam
(23 messages)
Book joy!
CONLANG Digest - 25 Mar 2010 to 26 Mar 2010 (#2010-86)
CONLANG film screening & Conlanging 101 talk @ Notacon, April 16, Cleveland
(2 messages)
conlanging partners
(2 messages)
Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(25 messages)
Farsi and Middle East
(2 messages)
Four Questions translation challenge
(5 messages)
Gleb 0.2, now with allophony
Internationalization in Elvish
Lexicon: an RPG
(14 messages)
Main Street; or, street names in general
(3 messages)
META: Conlang-L FAQ
Mostly-vowel language
(4 messages)
multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction)
Need 2-3 replacement players for EPYC
Nika Introduction
(18 messages)
OT: TV doldrums (and Swedish/Norwegian questions)
(4 messages)
Print on Demand Resource
Rigorousness of poetic form
(26 messages)
Round robin conlang:
(4 messages)
round robin grammar
Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction)
(8 messages)
SpecGram: Call for Papers
(2 messages)
TECH: domain names in native scripts coming
(9 messages)
TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(20 messages)
A creation story in Angosey
A creation story in Angosey
(140 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
About that collaborative conlang I recently announced
About that collaborative conlang I recently announced
(35 lines)
From:
M.S. Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Allophones of /h/
Re: Allophones of /h/
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Allophones of /h/
(52 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Allophones of /h/
(39 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Arabic without Islam
Arabic without Islam
(26 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(40 lines)
From:
Ben Scerri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(87 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(51 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(62 lines)
From:
Krista Casada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(82 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(40 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(43 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(37 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(54 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(46 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(53 lines)
From:
Chris Peters <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(83 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(45 lines)
From:
Adnan Majid <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(49 lines)
From:
Ronald Craig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(58 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(142 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(141 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(69 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(43 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(73 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic without Islam
(78 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Book joy!
Re: Book joy!
(91 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 25 Mar 2010 to 26 Mar 2010 (#2010-86)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 25 Mar 2010 to 26 Mar 2010 (#2010-86)
(45 lines)
From:
John H. Chalmers <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG film screening & Conlanging 101 talk @ Notacon, April 16, Cleveland
CONLANG film screening & Conlanging 101 talk @ Notacon, April 16, Cleveland
(47 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG film screening & Conlanging 101 talk @ Notacon, April 16, Cleveland
(56 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
conlanging partners
Re: conlanging partners
(69 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlanging partners
(37 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(81 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(70 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(95 lines)
From:
Krista Casada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(36 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(57 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(44 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(68 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(63 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(76 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(86 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(96 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(89 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(41 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(49 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(155 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(112 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(83 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(69 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(40 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(95 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(45 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(36 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
(52 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Farsi and Middle East
Farsi and Middle East
(40 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Farsi and Middle East
(36 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Four Questions translation challenge
Four Questions translation challenge
(49 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Four Questions translation challenge
(74 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Four Questions translation challenge
(82 lines)
From:
Sal Armoniac <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Four Questions translation challenge
(102 lines)
From:
Jen Runds <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Four Questions translation challenge
(49 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gleb 0.2, now with allophony
Gleb 0.2, now with allophony
(45 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Internationalization in Elvish
Re: Internationalization in Elvish
(48 lines)
From:
Krista Casada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lexicon: an RPG
Re: Lexicon: an RPG
(42 lines)
From:
Parker Glynn-Adey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexicon: an RPG
(53 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexicon: an RPG
(65 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexicon: an RPG
(62 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexicon: an RPG
(56 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexicon: an RPG
(36 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexicon: an RPG
(50 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexicon: an RPG
(67 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexicon: an RPG
(28 lines)
From:
Bruno Barcelos <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexicon: an RPG
(48 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexicon: an RPG
(33 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexicon: an RPG
(68 lines)
From:
Nat harrington <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexicon: an RPG
(39 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexicon: an RPG
(80 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Main Street; or, street names in general
Re: Main Street; or, street names in general
(48 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Main Street; or, street names in general
(41 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Main Street; or, street names in general
(32 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
META: Conlang-L FAQ
META: Conlang-L FAQ
(291 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mostly-vowel language
Re: Mostly-vowel language
(83 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mostly-vowel language
(91 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mostly-vowel language
(68 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mostly-vowel language
(114 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction)
multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction)
(72 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Need 2-3 replacement players for EPYC
Need 2-3 replacement players for EPYC
(30 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nika Introduction
Nika Introduction
(44 lines)
From:
Nika Mirovak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nika Introduction
(24 lines)
From:
Bruno Barcelos <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nika Introduction
(75 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nika Introduction
(33 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nika Introduction
(110 lines)
From:
Nika Mirovak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nika Introduction
(49 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nika Introduction
(30 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nika Introduction
(46 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nika Introduction
(38 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nika Introduction
(35 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nika Introduction
(65 lines)
From:
Nuno-Miguel Raposo <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nika Introduction
(87 lines)
From:
Nika Mirovak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nika Introduction
(41 lines)
From:
Parker Glynn-Adey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nika Introduction
(30 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nika Introduction
(53 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nika Introduction
(40 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nika Introduction
(65 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nika Introduction
(70 lines)
From:
Calculator Ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: TV doldrums (and Swedish/Norwegian questions)
Re: OT: TV doldrums (and Swedish/Norwegian questions)
(38 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: TV doldrums (and Swedish/Norwegian questions)
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: TV doldrums (and Swedish/Norwegian questions)
(55 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: TV doldrums (and Swedish/Norwegian questions)
(66 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Print on Demand Resource
Print on Demand Resource
(56 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rigorousness of poetic form
Rigorousness of poetic form
(25 lines)
From:
Charlie Brickner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(45 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(38 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(62 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(68 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(85 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(113 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(131 lines)
From:
Sal Armoniac <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(64 lines)
From:
eldin_raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(45 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(60 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(127 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(138 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(141 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(87 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(48 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(82 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(52 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(68 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(66 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(50 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(58 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(133 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(64 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(63 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rigorousness of poetic form
(71 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Round robin conlang:
Round robin conlang:
(35 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlang:
(54 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlang:
(44 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round robin conlang:
(49 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
round robin grammar
round robin grammar
(28 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction)
Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction)
(74 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction)
(84 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction)
(111 lines)
From:
Nika Mirovak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction)
(97 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction)
(39 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction)
(52 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction)
(142 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction)
(193 lines)
From:
Nika Mirovak <
[log in to unmask]
>
SpecGram: Call for Papers
SpecGram: Call for Papers
(78 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SpecGram: Call for Papers
(35 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: domain names in native scripts coming
TECH: domain names in native scripts coming
(30 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: domain names in native scripts coming
(34 lines)
From:
Calculator Ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: domain names in native scripts coming
(50 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: domain names in native scripts coming
(61 lines)
From:
Calculator Ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: domain names in native scripts coming
(48 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: domain names in native scripts coming
(85 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: domain names in native scripts coming
(24 lines)
From:
Ollock Ackeop <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: domain names in native scripts coming
(51 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: domain names in native scripts coming
(64 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(35 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(44 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(50 lines)
From:
Ryan Dobie-Watt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(53 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(65 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(32 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(45 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(38 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(49 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(66 lines)
From:
Ben Scerri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(39 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(32 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(53 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(50 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(72 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(101 lines)
From:
Nika Mirovak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(35 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(37 lines)
From:
Calculator Ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
(44 lines)
From:
Calculator Ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – March 2010, week 4
Conlang Mailing List – March 2010, week 4
