Conlang Mailing List – March 2010, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• A creation story in Angosey
• About that collaborative conlang I recently announced
• Allophones of /h/ (3 messages)
• Arabic without Islam (23 messages)
• Book joy!
• CONLANG Digest - 25 Mar 2010 to 26 Mar 2010 (#2010-86)
• CONLANG film screening & Conlanging 101 talk @ Notacon, April 16, Cleveland (2 messages)
• conlanging partners (2 messages)
• Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (25 messages)
• Farsi and Middle East (2 messages)
• Four Questions translation challenge (5 messages)
• Gleb 0.2, now with allophony
• Internationalization in Elvish
• Lexicon: an RPG (14 messages)
• Main Street; or, street names in general (3 messages)
• META: Conlang-L FAQ
• Mostly-vowel language (4 messages)
• multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction)
• Need 2-3 replacement players for EPYC
• Nika Introduction (18 messages)
• OT: TV doldrums (and Swedish/Norwegian questions) (4 messages)
• Print on Demand Resource
• Rigorousness of poetic form (26 messages)
• Round robin conlang: (4 messages)
• round robin grammar
• Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction) (8 messages)
• SpecGram: Call for Papers (2 messages)
• TECH: domain names in native scripts coming (9 messages)
• TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (20 messages)

1. A creation story in Angosey
   • A creation story in Angosey (140 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:40:12 -0400

2. About that collaborative conlang I recently announced
   • About that collaborative conlang I recently announced (35 lines)
     From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:34:30 -0400

3. Allophones of /h/
   • Re: Allophones of /h/ (41 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:27:22 +0100
   • Re: Allophones of /h/ (52 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:01:11 +0000
   • Re: Allophones of /h/ (39 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:06:26 -0400

4. Arabic without Islam
   • Arabic without Islam (26 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:12:03 -0400
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (40 lines)
     From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:23:20 +1100
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (87 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:17:40 +0000
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (51 lines)
     From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:53:53 +0100
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (62 lines)
     From: Krista Casada <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:53:01 -0500
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (82 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:16:30 +0100
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (40 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:42:14 -0700
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (43 lines)
     From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:57:40 -0700
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (37 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:22:32 -0400
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (54 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:34:52 +0000
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (46 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:40:00 -0400
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (53 lines)
     From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:14:52 -0500
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (83 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:36:53 +0100
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (45 lines)
     From: Adnan Majid <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:36:05 -0700
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (49 lines)
     From: Ronald Craig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:50:20 +0900
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (47 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:39:29 -0700
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (58 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:43:50 -0400
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (142 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:19:06 +0000
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (141 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:22:43 +0100
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (69 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:15:02 -0400
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (43 lines)
     From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 03:37:29 -0000
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (73 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:05:21 +0000
   • Re: Arabic without Islam (78 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:44:32 +0100

5. Book joy!
   • Re: Book joy! (91 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:46:54 -0500

6. CONLANG Digest - 25 Mar 2010 to 26 Mar 2010 (#2010-86)
   • Re: CONLANG Digest - 25 Mar 2010 to 26 Mar 2010 (#2010-86) (45 lines)
     From: John H. Chalmers <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:36:56 -0700

7. CONLANG film screening & Conlanging 101 talk @ Notacon, April 16, Cleveland
   • CONLANG film screening & Conlanging 101 talk @ Notacon, April 16, Cleveland (47 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:30:15 -0700
   • Re: CONLANG film screening & Conlanging 101 talk @ Notacon, April 16, Cleveland (56 lines)
     From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:04:01 -0400

8. conlanging partners
   • Re: conlanging partners (69 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 03:24:05 -0400
   • Re: conlanging partners (37 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 06:03:08 -0700

9. Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (81 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:41:10 +0000
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (70 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:59:40 -0500
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (95 lines)
     From: Krista Casada <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:50:47 -0500
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (36 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:03:20 -0700
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (57 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:30:20 +0000
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (44 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:44:52 -0700
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (68 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:35:57 -0500
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (63 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:00:32 +0100
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (76 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:31:57 +0100
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (86 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:01:50 +0100
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (41 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:10:48 +0100
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (96 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:31:27 +0100
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (89 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:55:00 +0000
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (41 lines)
     From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:57:52 -0000
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (49 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:22:35 -0400
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (155 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:17:33 +0000
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (112 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:41:24 +0100
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (83 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:11:36 +0100
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (69 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:53:41 -0400
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (40 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:33:15 -0400
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (95 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:14:11 -0500
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (45 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:10:15 +0100
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (46 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:13:31 -0400
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (36 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:23:14 -0400
   • Re: Conworld: Reconstructing a "lost" language (52 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:23:21 -0500

10. Farsi and Middle East
    • Farsi and Middle East (40 lines)
      From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:59:17 -0700
    • Re: Farsi and Middle East (36 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:09:40 -0400

11. Four Questions translation challenge
    • Four Questions translation challenge (49 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:23:25 -0700
    • Re: Four Questions translation challenge (74 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:33:10 -0700
    • Re: Four Questions translation challenge (82 lines)
      From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:27:04 -0400
    • Re: Four Questions translation challenge (102 lines)
      From: Jen Runds <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:38:49 +1100
    • Re: Four Questions translation challenge (49 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 03:43:35 +0000

12. Gleb 0.2, now with allophony
    • Gleb 0.2, now with allophony (45 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:45:19 -0400

13. Internationalization in Elvish
    • Re: Internationalization in Elvish (48 lines)
      From: Krista Casada <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:13:30 -0500

14. Lexicon: an RPG
    • Re: Lexicon: an RPG (42 lines)
      From: Parker Glynn-Adey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:20:22 +0300
    • Re: Lexicon: an RPG (53 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:37:58 +0000
    • Re: Lexicon: an RPG (65 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:59:41 -0400
    • Re: Lexicon: an RPG (62 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:29:40 -0400
    • Re: Lexicon: an RPG (56 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:25:19 +0100
    • Re: Lexicon: an RPG (36 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:43:23 -0400
    • Re: Lexicon: an RPG (50 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:22:43 -0500
    • Re: Lexicon: an RPG (67 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:32:15 -0500
    • Re: Lexicon: an RPG (28 lines)
      From: Bruno Barcelos <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:07:22 -0300
    • Re: Lexicon: an RPG (48 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:25:38 -0700
    • Re: Lexicon: an RPG (33 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:42:20 -0700
    • Re: Lexicon: an RPG (68 lines)
      From: Nat harrington <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:14:35 -0700
    • Re: Lexicon: an RPG (39 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:05:48 -0400
    • Re: Lexicon: an RPG (80 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:09:41 +0100

15. Main Street; or, street names in general
    • Re: Main Street; or, street names in general (48 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:52:51 -0000
    • Re: Main Street; or, street names in general (41 lines)
      From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:32:59 -0400
    • Re: Main Street; or, street names in general (32 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:14:49 -0500

16. META: Conlang-L FAQ
    • META: Conlang-L FAQ (291 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:54:47 -0700

17. Mostly-vowel language
    • Re: Mostly-vowel language (83 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:34:08 -0400
    • Re: Mostly-vowel language (91 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:58:03 -0400
    • Re: Mostly-vowel language (68 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:36:10 -0400
    • Re: Mostly-vowel language (114 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:49:51 -0500

18. multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction)
    • multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction) (72 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:20:31 +0100

19. Need 2-3 replacement players for EPYC
    • Need 2-3 replacement players for EPYC (30 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:52:09 -0700

20. Nika Introduction
    • Nika Introduction (44 lines)
      From: Nika Mirovak <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:18:20 -0400
    • Re: Nika Introduction (24 lines)
      From: Bruno Barcelos <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:10:08 -0300
    • Re: Nika Introduction (75 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:10:26 +0100
    • Re: Nika Introduction (33 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:48:29 +0100
    • Re: Nika Introduction (110 lines)
      From: Nika Mirovak <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:49:39 -0400
    • Re: Nika Introduction (49 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:22:25 -0400
    • Re: Nika Introduction (30 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:25:46 -0700
    • Re: Nika Introduction (46 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:41:26 -0400
    • Re: Nika Introduction (38 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:47:03 -0400
    • Re: Nika Introduction (35 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:13:51 -0700
    • Re: Nika Introduction (65 lines)
      From: Nuno-Miguel Raposo <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:46:14 -0700
    • Re: Nika Introduction (87 lines)
      From: Nika Mirovak <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:34:06 -0400
    • Re: Nika Introduction (41 lines)
      From: Parker Glynn-Adey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 11:27:15 +0400
    • Re: Nika Introduction (30 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 06:04:05 -0700
    • Re: Nika Introduction (53 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 10:49:57 -0400
    • Re: Nika Introduction (40 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:32:19 -0400
    • Re: Nika Introduction (65 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:16:38 -0700
    • Re: Nika Introduction (70 lines)
      From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:10:26 -0400

21. OT: TV doldrums (and Swedish/Norwegian questions)
    • Re: OT: TV doldrums (and Swedish/Norwegian questions) (38 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:00:10 -0500
    • Re: OT: TV doldrums (and Swedish/Norwegian questions) (53 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:45:12 +0100
    • Re: OT: TV doldrums (and Swedish/Norwegian questions) (55 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:01:32 +0000
    • Re: OT: TV doldrums (and Swedish/Norwegian questions) (66 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:38:07 +0100

22. Print on Demand Resource
    • Print on Demand Resource (56 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:52:15 -0700

23. Rigorousness of poetic form
    • Rigorousness of poetic form (25 lines)
      From: Charlie Brickner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:40:10 -0400
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (45 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:58:53 +0000
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (38 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:04:55 -0400
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (62 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:23:32 +0000
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (68 lines)
      From: John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:08:04 +0200
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (85 lines)
      From: John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:09:39 +0200
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (113 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:06:44 -0500
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (131 lines)
      From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:44:38 -0400
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (64 lines)
      From: eldin_raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:56:57 -0000
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (45 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:30:11 -0400
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (60 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:27:50 -0700
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (127 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:50:05 +0000
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (138 lines)
      From: John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:57:20 +0200
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (141 lines)
      From: John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:59:39 +0200
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (87 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:45:25 +0000
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (48 lines)
      From: Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:28:36 +0100
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (82 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:41:12 +0100
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (52 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:44:31 +0100
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (68 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:50:13 -0700
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (66 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:21:13 +0000
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (50 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:48:06 -0700
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (58 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:44:43 +0100
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (133 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:36:51 -0400
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (64 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:45:49 +0100
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (63 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:52:59 -0700
    • Re: Rigorousness of poetic form (71 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:39:07 +0100

24. Round robin conlang:
    • Round robin conlang: (35 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:48:39 -0400
    • Re: Round robin conlang: (54 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:54:29 -0500
    • Re: Round robin conlang: (44 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:05:01 -0500
    • Re: Round robin conlang: (49 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:46:07 -0400

25. round robin grammar
    • round robin grammar (28 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:43:09 -0500

26. Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction)
    • Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction) (74 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:14:49 +0100
    • Re: Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction) (84 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:23:11 -0500
    • Re: Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction) (111 lines)
      From: Nika Mirovak <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:02:56 -0400
    • Re: Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction) (97 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:23:03 +0100
    • Re: Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction) (39 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:09:35 -0400
    • Re: Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction) (52 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:56:32 +0100
    • Re: Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction) (142 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:42:30 +0100
    • Re: Soundless phonemes (was Re: [CONLANG] Nika Introduction) (193 lines)
      From: Nika Mirovak <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:20:12 -0400

27. SpecGram: Call for Papers
    • SpecGram: Call for Papers (78 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:25:49 -0700
    • Re: SpecGram: Call for Papers (35 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:18:09 -0500

28. TECH: domain names in native scripts coming
    • TECH: domain names in native scripts coming (30 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:17:25 -0700
    • Re: TECH: domain names in native scripts coming (34 lines)
      From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:27:16 -0400
    • Re: TECH: domain names in native scripts coming (50 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:23:20 -0300
    • Re: TECH: domain names in native scripts coming (61 lines)
      From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:35:39 -0400
    • Re: TECH: domain names in native scripts coming (48 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:47:03 -0300
    • Re: TECH: domain names in native scripts coming (85 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:40:39 +0100
    • Re: TECH: domain names in native scripts coming (24 lines)
      From: Ollock Ackeop <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:16:33 -0400
    • Re: TECH: domain names in native scripts coming (51 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:21:26 -0400
    • Re: TECH: domain names in native scripts coming (64 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:33:49 -0700

29. TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard
    • TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (35 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:46:20 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (44 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:53:10 +0100
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (50 lines)
      From: Ryan Dobie-Watt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:20:49 -0600
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (53 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:21:19 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (65 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:23:20 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (43 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:36:15 +0100
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (32 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:47:13 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (45 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:09:26 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (38 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:16:52 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (49 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:37:47 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (66 lines)
      From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 10:24:14 +1100
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (39 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:10:27 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (32 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:03:34 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (53 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 06:13:07 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (50 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 10:26:44 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (72 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 10:35:24 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (101 lines)
      From: Nika Mirovak <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:38:51 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (35 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:27:53 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (37 lines)
      From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:31:47 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Ultimate conlanger's keyboard (44 lines)
      From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:32:28 -0400