Conlang Mailing List – March 2010, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "Colony" (4 messages)
• 3rd-grade female canine classification (17 messages)
• A Collaborative Conlang (YACC) (3 messages)
• a sound change question
• Arabic Resource and Question
• Besiodo: If Spanish was Germanic (5 messages)
• Conlang translation word for today: terremoto (3 messages)
• conlanging partners (2 messages)
• Etymology of "lens" (7 messages)
• FANBOYS (11 messages)
• How does the meaning these sentences differ? (32 messages)
• How to make a mess of an ATL (was: Representing /v/ in Greek script) (4 messages)
• My conlanging progress (9 messages)
• Negation: merge with tense or aspect? (7 messages)
• Odd use of the conjunction "and"
• OT: Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ?
• OT: Re: [CONLANG] FANBOYS
• Pi day (12 messages)
• POP = Soaloa revisited (5 messages)
• Q&A by Arika Okrent and Paul Frommer in Ben Schott's NY Times weblog (6 messages)
• Q&A with Frommer and Okrent (2 messages)
• Representing /v/ in Greek script (20 messages)
• Round Robin Conlang News (2 messages)
• Round Robin Romlang (26 messages)
• Sal Ammoniac (3 messages)
• Sal Armoniac is Sally Caves (10 messages)
• Second Life Conlangers? (12 messages)
• Sentences to test conlang features (6 messages)
• Spelling pronunciation (5 messages)
• Spelling pronunciation (was: 3rd-grade female canine classification) (3 messages)
• Text-only EPYC: Signup
• Tone: Statistical(?) Implicational Universals(?) (9 messages)
• Trent Reznor Prize for Tricky Embedding. (15 messages)
• Two noun morphology questions (6 messages)
• WHATL / TAKE question (14 messages)
• Who is interested in writing a conlangy intro linguistics textbook? (7 messages)

1. "Colony"
   • "Colony" (30 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:09:19 +0000
   • Re: "Colony" (38 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:56:51 +0100
   • Re: "Colony" (46 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:24:26 +0000
   • Re: "Colony" (93 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:38:16 +0000

2. 3rd-grade female canine classification
   • 3rd-grade female canine classification (30 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 22:27:11 +0000
   • Re: 3rd-grade female canine classification (49 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:21:47 -0600
   • Re: 3rd-grade female canine classification (46 lines)
     From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 19:17:21 -0500
   • Re: 3rd-grade female canine classification (25 lines)
     From: Ollock Ackeop <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:20:57 -0500
   • Re: 3rd-grade female canine classification (67 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:33:35 +0100
   • Re: 3rd-grade female canine classification (41 lines)
     From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:02:02 -0600
   • Re: 3rd-grade female canine classification (39 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:23:10 +0100
   • Re: 3rd-grade female canine classification (54 lines)
     From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:05:25 -0500
   • Re: 3rd-grade female canine classification (51 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:19:50 +0100
   • Re: 3rd-grade female canine classification (41 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:14:13 -0500
   • Re: 3rd-grade female canine classification (56 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:36:01 +0100
   • Re: 3rd-grade female canine classification (42 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:59:06 -0500
   • Re: 3rd-grade female canine classification (73 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:44:37 +0100
   • Re: 3rd-grade female canine classification (50 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:45:36 -0500
   • Re: 3rd-grade female canine classification (63 lines)
     From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:22:01 -0500
   • Re: 3rd-grade female canine classification (37 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:20:09 +0100
   • Re: 3rd-grade female canine classification (47 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:58:11 +0000

3. A Collaborative Conlang (YACC)
   • A Collaborative Conlang (YACC) (34 lines)
     From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:43:18 -0500
   • Re: A Collaborative Conlang (YACC) (41 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:40:35 -0500
   • Re: A Collaborative Conlang (YACC) (45 lines)
     From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:59:33 +1100

4. a sound change question
   • Re: a sound change question (102 lines)
     From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 11:57:19 -0500

5. Arabic Resource and Question
   • Arabic Resource and Question (46 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:38:10 -0700

6. Besiodo: If Spanish was Germanic
   • Besiodo: If Spanish was Germanic (74 lines)
     From: Kenner Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:38:44 -0700
   • Re: Besiodo: If Spanish was Germanic (44 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:51:41 +0000
   • Re: Besiodo: If Spanish was Germanic (41 lines)
     From: Kenner Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:55:41 -0700
   • Re: Besiodo: If Spanish was Germanic (48 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:01:30 +0100
   • Re: Besiodo: If Spanish was Germanic (38 lines)
     From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:51:27 -0500

7. Conlang translation word for today: terremoto
   • Re: Conlang translation word for today: terremoto (50 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 16:39:57 +0000
   • Re: Conlang translation word for today: terremoto (59 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:53:48 +0000
   • Re: Conlang translation word for today: terremoto (51 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 22:11:55 +0100

8. conlanging partners
   • Re: conlanging partners (59 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:02:02 -0800
   • Re: conlanging partners (76 lines)
     From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:55:06 -0400

9. Etymology of "lens"
   • Etymology of "lens" (22 lines)
     From: Bruno Barcelos <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:23:22 -0300
   • Re: Etymology of "lens" (39 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:32:39 -0500
   • Re: Etymology of "lens" (30 lines)
     From: Thomas Thurman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:32:51 +0000
   • Re: Etymology of "lens" (32 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:26:16 -0400
   • Re: Etymology of "lens" (53 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:39:08 -0700
   • Re: Etymology of "lens" (50 lines)
     From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:00:22 -0400
   • Re: Etymology of "lens" (52 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:48:02 -0500

10. FANBOYS
    • FANBOYS (29 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:13:16 -0500
    • Re: FANBOYS (22 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:15:18 -0500
    • Re: FANBOYS (38 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:25:43 -0500
    • Re: FANBOYS (37 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:28:10 -0500
    • Re: FANBOYS (42 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:32:28 -0500
    • Re: FANBOYS (35 lines)
      From: John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:28:40 +0200
    • Re: FANBOYS (32 lines)
      From: Kurt Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:01:01 -0600
    • Re: FANBOYS (46 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:03:21 +0000
    • Re: FANBOYS (41 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:24:12 -0500
    • Re: FANBOYS (61 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:18:54 -0800
    • Re: FANBOYS (57 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:03:35 +0000

11. How does the meaning these sentences differ?
    • How does the meaning these sentences differ? (42 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:00:50 -0800
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (56 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:06:53 -0800
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (62 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:11:26 -0800
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (42 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:19:27 -0800
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (81 lines)
      From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:22:07 +1100
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (40 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:32:55 -0500
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (60 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:52:18 +0000
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (37 lines)
      From: Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:17:08 +0100
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (42 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:24:16 +0000
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (156 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:06:11 -0800
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (35 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:29:02 -0500
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (59 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:19:47 +0000
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (67 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:00:05 -0800
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (85 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:05:56 -0800
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (101 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:13:56 -0800
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (62 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:14:29 -0800
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (55 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:38:43 -0500
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (45 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:30:22 -0500
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (38 lines)
      From: Nokta Kanto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:40:28 -0500
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (60 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:32:39 -0500
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (56 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:51:41 +0000
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (184 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:18:20 +0100
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (54 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:30:25 +0100
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (67 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:49:55 +0000
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (70 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:46:13 -0800
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (51 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:54:34 +0100
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (41 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:58:26 -0800
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (58 lines)
      From: masukomi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:54:25 -0500
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (35 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:17:56 -0500
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (49 lines)
      From: masukomi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:30:28 -0500
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (54 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:53:13 -0800
    • Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (93 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:45:33 -0800

12. How to make a mess of an ATL (was: Representing /v/ in Greek script)
    • How to make a mess of an ATL (was: Representing /v/ in Greek script) (96 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:01:54 +0100
    • Re: How to make a mess of an ATL (was: Representing /v/ in Greek script) (128 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:52:38 +0000
    • Re: How to make a mess of an ATL (was: Representing /v/ in Greek script) (225 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:49:39 +0100
    • Re: How to make a mess of an ATL (was: Representing /v/ in Greek script) (94 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:02:25 -0500

13. My conlanging progress
    • My conlanging progress (101 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:19:47 -0500
    • Re: My conlanging progress (112 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:50:30 -0500
    • Re: My conlanging progress (38 lines)
      From: Parker Glynn-Adey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:07:51 +0300
    • Re: My conlanging progress (49 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:38:26 -0000
    • Re: My conlanging progress (49 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:12:41 -0500
    • Re: My conlanging progress (62 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:08:24 -0700
    • Re: My conlanging progress (80 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:44:08 -0400
    • Re: My conlanging progress (54 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:41:10 +0100
    • Re: My conlanging progress (54 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:36:48 -0600

14. Negation: merge with tense or aspect?
    • Re: Negation: merge with tense or aspect? (58 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:17:53 +0000
    • Re: Negation: merge with tense or aspect? (85 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:05:46 -0500
    • Re: Negation: merge with tense or aspect? (80 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:27:02 -0500
    • Re: Negation: merge with tense or aspect? (34 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:09:09 -0500
    • Re: Negation: merge with tense or aspect? (68 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 23:37:39 +0000
    • Re: Negation: merge with tense or aspect? (48 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:30:09 +0000
    • Re: Negation: merge with tense or aspect? (62 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:49:12 -0800

15. Odd use of the conjunction "and"
    • Re: Odd use of the conjunction "and" (83 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:58:01 +0000

16. OT: Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ?
    • OT: Re: How does the meaning these sentences differ? (43 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:01:35 +0100

17. OT: Re: [CONLANG] FANBOYS
    • OT: Re: [CONLANG] FANBOYS (43 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:45:55 +0000

18. Pi day
    • Pi day (30 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:37:06 -0400
    • Re: Pi day (41 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:48:47 -0400
    • Re: Pi day (64 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:11:51 +0100
    • Re: Pi day (29 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:12:46 -0400
    • Re: Pi day (27 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:19:39 -0400
    • Re: Pi day (89 lines)
      From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:28:08 -0400
    • Re: Pi day (33 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:49:28 -0500
    • Re: Pi day (112 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:51:41 -0400
    • Re: Pi day (42 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:55:20 -0400
    • Re: Pi day (33 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:10:16 -0400
    • Re: Pi day (49 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:09:29 +0000
    • Re: Pi day (42 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:56:18 -0400

19. POP = Soaloa revisited
    • POP = Soaloa revisited (152 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:39:06 -0800
    • Re: POP = Soaloa revisited (163 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:30:48 -0500
    • Re: POP = Soaloa revisited (180 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:05:37 -0500
    • Re: POP = Soaloa revisited (193 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:17:52 -0400
    • Re: POP = Soaloa revisited (192 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:52:31 -0400

20. Q&A by Arika Okrent and Paul Frommer in Ben Schott's NY Times weblog
    • Q&A by Arika Okrent and Paul Frommer in Ben Schott's NY Times weblog (29 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:04:23 -0500
    • Re: Q&A by Arika Okrent and Paul Frommer in Ben Schott's NY Times weblog (34 lines)
      From: Ronald Craig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:31:40 +0900
    • Re: Q&A by Arika Okrent and Paul Frommer in Ben Schott's NY Times weblog (41 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:19:41 -0500
    • Re: Q&A by Arika Okrent and Paul Frommer in Ben Schott's NY Times weblog (57 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:17:41 -0800
    • Re: Q&A by Arika Okrent and Paul Frommer in Ben Schott's NY Times weblog (72 lines)
      From: John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:01:11 +0200
    • Re: Q&A by Arika Okrent and Paul Frommer in Ben Schott's NY Times weblog (55 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:43:30 +0000

21. Q&A with Frommer and Okrent
    • Re: Q&A with Frommer and Okrent (33 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:08:46 -0600
    • Re: Q&A with Frommer and Okrent (56 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:31:24 -0800

22. Representing /v/ in Greek script
    • Representing /v/ in Greek script (68 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:57:32 +0100
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (66 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:05:20 +0000
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (42 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:09:10 +0100
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (107 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:01:14 +0000
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (89 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:03:07 +0100
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (40 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:10:36 +0100
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (91 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:15:14 +0100
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (47 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:43:35 +0100
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (51 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:22:06 +0000
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (117 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:16:33 +0100
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (51 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:41:23 +0100
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (129 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:32:52 +0000
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (72 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:35:05 +0000
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (111 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:36:22 +0100
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (54 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:54:05 +0100
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (49 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:59:41 +0000
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (175 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:43:30 +0100
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (112 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:00:36 +0000
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (58 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:21:16 +0100
    • Re: Representing /v/ in Greek script (80 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:17:04 -0500

23. Round Robin Conlang News
    • Round Robin Conlang News (36 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:24:32 +0000
    • Re: Round Robin Conlang News (35 lines)
      From: Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:18:12 -0500

24. Round Robin Romlang
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (81 lines)
      From: Kenner Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 18:22:28 -0700
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (90 lines)
      From: Shair Ahmed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 09:17:47 -0600
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (105 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:38:28 -0500
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (43 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:54:42 +0000
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (43 lines)
      From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 12:26:30 -0500
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (53 lines)
      From: Kenner Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 16:32:56 -0700
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (59 lines)
      From: Shair Ahmed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:45:50 -0600
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (73 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 19:27:39 -0500
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (45 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:59:27 +0000
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (43 lines)
      From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:33:19 -0500
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (41 lines)
      From: Kenner Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:12:16 -0700
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (48 lines)
      From: Shair Ahmed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:09:39 -0600
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (57 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:44:14 +0000
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (65 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:46:50 -0800
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (44 lines)
      From: Kenner Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:04:10 -0700
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (57 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:20:08 -0500
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (45 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:40:14 +0000
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (43 lines)
      From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:34:07 -0500
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (42 lines)
      From: Kenner Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:48:16 -0700
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (50 lines)
      From: Shair Ahmed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:32:15 -0600
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (62 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:39:13 -0500
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (48 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:41:16 +0000
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (47 lines)
      From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:33:52 -0500
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (40 lines)
      From: Kenner Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:40:46 -0700
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (51 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:11:23 -0500
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (53 lines)
      From: Shair Ahmed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:01:12 -0600

25. Sal Ammoniac
    • Sal Ammoniac (37 lines)
      From: John H. Chalmers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:45:33 -0800
    • Re: Sal Ammoniac (42 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:56:53 -0800
    • Re: Sal Ammoniac (34 lines)
      From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:21:30 -0500

26. Sal Armoniac is Sally Caves
    • Sal Armoniac is Sally Caves (23 lines)
      From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:48:48 -0500
    • Re: Sal Armoniac is Sally Caves (40 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 21:03:29 -0500
    • Re: Sal Armoniac is Sally Caves (41 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:16:38 +0100
    • Re: Sal Armoniac is Sally Caves (38 lines)
      From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:09:16 -0500
    • Re: Sal Armoniac is Sally Caves (46 lines)
      From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:11:25 -0500
    • Re: Sal Armoniac is Sally Caves (53 lines)
      From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:13:47 -0500
    • Re: Sal Armoniac is Sally Caves (55 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:25:22 -0800
    • Re: Sal Armoniac is Sally Caves (39 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:21:10 +0000
    • Re: Sal Armoniac is Sally Caves (32 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:07:59 -0600
    • Re: Sal Armoniac is Sally Caves (42 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:52:24 +0100

27. Second Life Conlangers?
    • Second Life Conlangers? (44 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:33:44 -0800
    • Re: Second Life Conlangers? (65 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:56:09 +0100
    • Re: Second Life Conlangers? (96 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 16:08:41 -0800
    • Re: Second Life Conlangers? (57 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:38:14 -0500
    • Re: Second Life Conlangers? (67 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:42:15 -0800
    • Re: Second Life Conlangers? (83 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 19:47:53 -0600
    • Re: Second Life Conlangers? (98 lines)
      From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:51:34 -0500
    • Re: Second Life Conlangers? (119 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:01:10 -0600
    • Re: Second Life Conlangers? (33 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:37:04 +0100
    • Re: Second Life Conlangers? (62 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:42:36 -0800
    • Re: Second Life Conlangers? (135 lines)
      From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:05:51 -0500
    • Re: Second Life Conlangers? (86 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:04:30 -0500

28. Sentences to test conlang features
    • Re: Sentences to test conlang features (32 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 00:18:39 -0500
    • Re: Sentences to test conlang features (52 lines)
      From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:30:05 +1100
    • Re: Sentences to test conlang features (50 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 07:01:03 +0100
    • Re: Sentences to test conlang features (61 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:23:00 -0800
    • Re: Sentences to test conlang features (71 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:51:40 -0500
    • Re: Sentences to test conlang features (38 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:27:37 -0800

29. Spelling pronunciation
    • Re: Spelling pronunciation (55 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:59:40 +0000
    • Re: Spelling pronunciation (74 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:47:24 +0000
    • Re: Spelling pronunciation (58 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:52:10 -0800
    • Re: Spelling pronunciation (123 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:34:20 +0100
    • Re: Spelling pronunciation (85 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:21:59 -0500

30. Spelling pronunciation (was: 3rd-grade female canine classification)
    • Spelling pronunciation (was: 3rd-grade female canine classification) (61 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:02:02 +0000
    • Re: Spelling pronunciation (was: 3rd-grade female canine classification) (42 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:25:45 -0500
    • Re: Spelling pronunciation (was: 3rd-grade female canine classification) (51 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:20:28 +0100

31. Text-only EPYC: Signup
    • Re: Text-only EPYC: Signup (55 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:01:42 -0800

32. Tone: Statistical(?) Implicational Universals(?)
    • Tone: Statistical(?) Implicational Universals(?) (65 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 18:10:18 -0500
    • Re: Tone: Statistical(?) Implicational Universals(?) (89 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 18:52:42 -0600
    • Re: Tone: Statistical(?) Implicational Universals(?) (104 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 20:00:00 -0500
    • Re: Tone: Statistical(?) Implicational Universals(?) (121 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 00:23:26 -0600
    • Re: Tone: Statistical(?) Implicational Universals(?) (139 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 01:32:45 -0500
    • Re: Tone: Statistical(?) Implicational Universals(?) (125 lines)
      From: Maxime Papillon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 01:37:26 -0500
    • Re: Tone: Statistical(?) Implicational Universals(?) (49 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 02:11:19 -0500
    • Re: Tone: Statistical(?) Implicational Universals(?) (78 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:40:30 +0000
    • Re: Tone: Statistical(?) Implicational Universals(?) (37 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:43:35 -0500

33. Trent Reznor Prize for Tricky Embedding.
    • Re: Trent Reznor Prize for Tricky Embedding. (29 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 00:46:47 -0500
    • Re: Trent Reznor Prize for Tricky Embedding. (38 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 22:00:56 -0800
    • Re: Trent Reznor Prize for Tricky Embedding. (74 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:11:14 +0000
    • Re: Trent Reznor Prize for Tricky Embedding. (85 lines)
      From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:24:56 +1100
    • Re: Trent Reznor Prize for Tricky Embedding. (41 lines)
      From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 11:07:46 +0100
    • Re: Trent Reznor Prize for Tricky Embedding. (52 lines)
      From: masukomi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:15:01 -0500
    • Re: Trent Reznor Prize for Tricky Embedding. (62 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:41:47 -0500
    • Re: Trent Reznor Prize for Tricky Embedding. (44 lines)
      From: masukomi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:45:20 -0500
    • Re: Trent Reznor Prize for Tricky Embedding. (67 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:43:45 -0500
    • Re: Trent Reznor Prize for Tricky Embedding. (76 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:21:36 +0000
    • Re: Trent Reznor Prize for Tricky Embedding. (77 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:40:52 +0000
    • Re: Trent Reznor Prize for Tricky Embedding. (38 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 07:50:39 -0500
    • Re: Trent Reznor Prize for Tricky Embedding. (97 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:58:02 +0000
    • Re: Trent Reznor Prize for Tricky Embedding. (40 lines)
      From: G. van der Vegt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:08:14 +0100
    • Re: Trent Reznor Prize for Tricky Embedding. (62 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:46:33 +0000

34. Two noun morphology questions
    • Two noun morphology questions (56 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:30:31 +0000
    • Re: Two noun morphology questions (74 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:08:29 +0100
    • Re: Two noun morphology questions (34 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:35:00 -0800
    • Re: Two noun morphology questions (42 lines)
      From: Shair Ahmed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:04:06 -0600
    • Re: Two noun morphology questions (41 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:47:48 -0600
    • Re: Two noun morphology questions (36 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:34:57 -0400

35. WHATL / TAKE question
    • WHATL / TAKE question (38 lines)
      From: John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:53:04 +0200
    • Re: WHATL / TAKE question (41 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:59:44 -0500
    • Re: WHATL / TAKE question (38 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:43:51 +0100
    • Re: WHATL / TAKE question (41 lines)
      From: John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:20:07 +0200
    • Re: WHATL / TAKE question (39 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:46:39 +0100
    • Re: WHATL / TAKE question (40 lines)
      From: John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:07:17 +0200
    • Re: WHATL / TAKE question (36 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:38:03 +0100
    • Re: WHATL / TAKE question (132 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:39:52 +0000
    • Re: WHATL / TAKE question (60 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:06:55 +0100
    • Re: WHATL / TAKE question (97 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:49:44 +0000
    • Re: WHATL / TAKE question (55 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:11:09 +0100
    • Re: WHATL / TAKE question (107 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:09:35 +0100
    • Re: WHATL / TAKE question (48 lines)
      From: Aidan Aannestad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:48:30 -0500
    • Re: WHATL / TAKE question (146 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:01:43 -0400

36. Who is interested in writing a conlangy intro linguistics textbook?
    • Who is interested in writing a conlangy intro linguistics textbook? (49 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:37:52 -0800
    • Re: Who is interested in writing a conlangy intro linguistics textbook? (61 lines)
      From: Leland Kusmer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:36:48 -0500
    • Re: Who is interested in writing a conlangy intro linguistics textbook? (73 lines)
      From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:46:26 +1100
    • Re: Who is interested in writing a conlangy intro linguistics textbook? (27 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:45:55 -0500
    • Re: Who is interested in writing a conlangy intro linguistics textbook? (26 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:50:01 -0600
    • Re: Who is interested in writing a conlangy intro linguistics textbook? (34 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:30:10 -0500
    • Re: Who is interested in writing a conlangy intro linguistics textbook? (40 lines)
      From: Israel Noletto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:42:08 -0500