Conlang
Mailing List April 2010, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(3 messages)
<No subject>
(4 messages)
Backspace or silencer character for writing system?
(2 messages)
Conlang film showing live online & in person during Notacon, April 16-18
(3 messages)
Conlang film: Opening party at the NYC Downtown Short Film Festival
Conlang Seminar: Help!
(14 messages)
deini nuyɉ | Deini news
Distinctive features - labial stops & fricatives
(4 messages)
Does ASL have OSV word-order? Does it have classifiers? (was: Singing in parts in non-vocal/aural languages?)
(5 messages)
Dritok as work-for-hire (Was: Most recognised contemporary conlangs)
Dritok update
(8 messages)
Ergativity and incorporation
Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(20 messages)
Flashcards (Was: Lang-8.com)
(2 messages)
inability to produce alveolar trill
(10 messages)
Introducing alveolar consonants into a phonology
Latin -que clitic
(11 messages)
Melete: yet another sound change applier
Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(10 messages)
Okrand-Okrent
Okrand-Okrent?
(2 messages)
OT Nasty human food product?
(7 messages)
OT Nasty human food product? (was: LCS hired to make Dothraki for HBO series Game of Thrones)
(13 messages)
Paul Frommer
(3 messages)
Singing in parts in non-vocal/aural languages?
(2 messages)
spam
(2 messages)
Syntax question
(5 messages)
toolbox and circumfixes
Uvular coarticulation
(2 messages)
What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?
[256etudes: 333]
"Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
"Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(46 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(35 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(42 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
<No subject>
(28 lines)
From:
Ilya Pavlenkov <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
(36 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
(46 lines)
From:
Ilya Pavlenkov <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
(31 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Backspace or silencer character for writing system?
Re: Backspace or silencer character for writing system?
(37 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Backspace or silencer character for writing system?
(69 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang film showing live online & in person during Notacon, April 16-18
Re: Conlang film showing live online & in person during Notacon, April 16-18
(43 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang film showing live online & in person during Notacon, April 16-18
(47 lines)
From:
Eleanor Good <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang film showing live online & in person during Notacon, April 16-18
(38 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang film: Opening party at the NYC Downtown Short Film Festival
Conlang film: Opening party at the NYC Downtown Short Film Festival
(62 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Seminar: Help!
Conlang Seminar: Help!
(56 lines)
From:
David Edwards <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Seminar: Help!
(75 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Seminar: Help!
(83 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Seminar: Help!
(29 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Seminar: Help!
(59 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Seminar: Help!
(72 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Seminar: Help!
(66 lines)
From:
David E <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Seminar: Help!
(79 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Seminar: Help!
(40 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Seminar: Help!
(79 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Seminar: Help!
(76 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Seminar: Help!
(35 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Seminar: Help!
(20 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Seminar: Help!
(40 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
deini nuyɉ | Deini news
deini nuyɉ | Deini news
(54 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Distinctive features - labial stops & fricatives
Distinctive features - labial stops & fricatives
(34 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Distinctive features - labial stops & fricatives
(41 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Distinctive features - labial stops & fricatives
(37 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Distinctive features - labial stops & fricatives
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Does ASL have OSV word-order? Does it have classifiers? (was: Singing in parts in non-vocal/aural languages?)
Does ASL have OSV word-order? Does it have classifiers? (was: Singing in parts in non-vocal/aural languages?)
(20 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Does ASL have OSV word-order? Does it have classifiers? (was: Singing in parts in non-vocal/aural languages?)
(33 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Does ASL have OSV word-order? Does it have classifiers? (was: Singing in parts in non-vocal/aural languages?)
(46 lines)
From:
Nika Mirovak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Does ASL have OSV word-order? Does it have classifiers? (was: Singing in parts in non-vocal/aural languages?)
(72 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Does ASL have OSV word-order? Does it have classifiers? (was: Singing in parts in non-vocal/aural languages?)
(39 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dritok as work-for-hire (Was: Most recognised contemporary conlangs)
Dritok as work-for-hire (Was: Most recognised contemporary conlangs)
(68 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dritok update
Dritok update
(39 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dritok update
(27 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dritok update
(26 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dritok update
(39 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dritok update
(46 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dritok update
(24 lines)
From:
Parker Glynn-Adey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dritok update
(27 lines)
From:
Parker Glynn-Adey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dritok update
(81 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ergativity and incorporation
Ergativity and incorporation
(38 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(142 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(169 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(96 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(57 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(147 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(67 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(194 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(233 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(133 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(61 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(157 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(62 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(247 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(287 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(35 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(76 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(46 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(56 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(43 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Evolution of language (was: multi-modal language (was: Nika Introduction))
(128 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Flashcards (Was: Lang-8.com)
Re: Flashcards (Was: Lang-8.com)
(60 lines)
From:
Parker Glynn-Adey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Flashcards (Was: Lang-8.com)
(73 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
inability to produce alveolar trill
Re: inability to produce alveolar trill
(45 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inability to produce alveolar trill
(54 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inability to produce alveolar trill
(68 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inability to produce alveolar trill
(38 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inability to produce alveolar trill
(56 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inability to produce alveolar trill
(34 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inability to produce alveolar trill
(45 lines)
From:
Ben Scerri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inability to produce alveolar trill
(32 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inability to produce alveolar trill
(47 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inability to produce alveolar trill
(45 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Introducing alveolar consonants into a phonology
Re: Introducing alveolar consonants into a phonology
(63 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Latin -que clitic
Latin -que clitic
(38 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(44 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(40 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(51 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(50 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(134 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(45 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(52 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(53 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(42 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(57 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Melete: yet another sound change applier
Melete: yet another sound change applier
(56 lines)
From:
Adam Mesha (Raizen) <
[log in to unmask]
>
Most recognised contemporary conlangs
Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(39 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(40 lines)
From:
Ben Scerri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(41 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(25 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(38 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(45 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(45 lines)
From:
Ben Scerri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(61 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(63 lines)
From:
Ben Scerri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(53 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Okrand-Okrent
Re: Okrand-Okrent
(39 lines)
From:
John H. Chalmers <
[log in to unmask]
>
Okrand-Okrent?
Okrand-Okrent?
(40 lines)
From:
John Chalmers <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Okrand-Okrent?
(49 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Nasty human food product?
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(49 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(53 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(47 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(45 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(101 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(67 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Nasty human food product? (was: LCS hired to make Dothraki for HBO series Game of Thrones)
Re: OT Nasty human food product? (was: LCS hired to make Dothraki for HBO series Game of Thrones)
(95 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product? (was: LCS hired to make Dothraki for HBO series Game of Thrones)
(44 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product? (was: LCS hired to make Dothraki for HBO series Game of Thrones)
(59 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product? (was: LCS hired to make Dothraki for HBO series Game of Thrones)
(70 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product? (was: LCS hired to make Dothraki for HBO series Game of Thrones)
(30 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product? (was: LCS hired to make Dothraki for HBO series Game of Thrones)
(46 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product? (was: LCS hired to make Dothraki for HBO series Game of Thrones)
(61 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product? (was: LCS hired to make Dothraki for HBO series Game of Thrones)
(53 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product? (was: LCS hired to make Dothraki for HBO series Game of Thrones)
(59 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product? (was: LCS hired to make Dothraki for HBO series Game of Thrones)
(60 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product? (was: LCS hired to make Dothraki for HBO series Game of Thrones)
(41 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product? (was: LCS hired to make Dothraki for HBO series Game of Thrones)
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product? (was: LCS hired to make Dothraki for HBO series Game of Thrones)
(39 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Paul Frommer
Paul Frommer
(35 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(49 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(39 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Singing in parts in non-vocal/aural languages?
Re: Singing in parts in non-vocal/aural languages?
(45 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Singing in parts in non-vocal/aural languages?
(36 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
spam
spam
(31 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: spam
(45 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Syntax question
Syntax question
(62 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syntax question
(34 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syntax question
(81 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syntax question
(102 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syntax question
(75 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
toolbox and circumfixes
Re: toolbox and circumfixes
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Uvular coarticulation
Uvular coarticulation
(32 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Uvular coarticulation
(53 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?
What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?
(42 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
[256etudes: 333]
Re: [256etudes: 333]
(34 lines)
From:
Ilya Pavlenkov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU