Conlang Mailing List – April 2010, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

1. "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
   • Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects (73 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects (57 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects (54 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects (37 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects (74 lines)
     From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects (41 lines)
     From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects (46 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects (49 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects (46 lines)
     From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects (57 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects (67 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects (82 lines)
     From: David E <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects (34 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects (68 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects (29 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects (36 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects (39 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>

2. Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer))
   • Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)) (69 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)) (39 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)) (57 lines)
     From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)) (53 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)) (62 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)) (78 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)) (39 lines)
     From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)) (44 lines)
     From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)) (45 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>

3. CHAT: Introducing myself.
   • CHAT: Introducing myself. (50 lines)
     From: Lensman <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (91 lines)
     From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (50 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (22 lines)
     From: Michael Wormley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (25 lines)
     From: Michael Wormley <[log in to unmask]>

4. Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
   • Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (103 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (84 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (44 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (121 lines)
     From: Basilius <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (33 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (63 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (47 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (88 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (123 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (77 lines)
     From: Basilius <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (54 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (52 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (36 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (54 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (49 lines)
     From: Jeffrey S. Jones <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (47 lines)
     From: Jeffrey S. Jones <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (151 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (65 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (109 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (102 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

5. Con-laws?
   • Con-laws? (29 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-laws? (52 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-laws? (38 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-laws? (84 lines)
     From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-laws? (62 lines)
     From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-laws? (89 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-laws? (42 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-laws? (29 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Con-laws? (88 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

6. Concivil planning
   • Concivil planning (31 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Concivil planning (38 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Concivil planning (38 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Concivil planning (39 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Concivil planning (48 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Concivil planning (39 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Concivil planning (63 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Concivil planning (36 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Concivil planning (53 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

7. Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
   • Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (128 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (60 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (75 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (63 lines)
     From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (44 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (52 lines)
     From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (62 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (62 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (69 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (61 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (78 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (37 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (47 lines)
     From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (43 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (31 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (45 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (54 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (65 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (42 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (53 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (45 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (82 lines)
     From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (55 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (45 lines)
     From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (56 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (67 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (46 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (55 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (79 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (52 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (58 lines)
     From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (23 lines)
     From: Charlie Brickner <[log in to unmask]>

8. Dothraki: Tor.com interview with David and Sai
   • Dothraki: Tor.com interview with David and Sai (24 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

9. Ergative-marked agreement markers?
   • Ergative-marked agreement markers? (40 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

10. Ergativity and incorporation
    • Re: Ergativity and incorporation (182 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ergativity and incorporation (20 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>

11. inability to produce alveolar trill
    • Re: inability to produce alveolar trill (37 lines)
      From: Rag Tag Bunch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inability to produce alveolar trill (75 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inability to produce alveolar trill (61 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inability to produce alveolar trill (47 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inability to produce alveolar trill (60 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inability to produce alveolar trill (84 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>

12. licence/ license
    • Re: licence/ license (71 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: licence/ license (44 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: licence/ license (70 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

13. licence/ license (was: Paul Frommer)
    • licence/ license (was: Paul Frommer) (71 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: licence/ license (was: Paul Frommer) (53 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

14. lyrics in invented words
    • lyrics in invented words (28 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: lyrics in invented words (36 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: lyrics in invented words (45 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: lyrics in invented words (68 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>

15. Melete: yet another sound change applier
    • Re: Melete: yet another sound change applier (58 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Melete: yet another sound change applier (49 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

16. META: Conlang-L FAQ
    • META: Conlang-L FAQ (275 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

17. Most recognised contemporary conlangs
    • Most recognised contemporary conlangs (54 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (58 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (63 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (65 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (54 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (34 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (49 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (58 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (41 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (44 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (44 lines)
      From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>

18. Nevashi recordings
    • Nevashi recordings (51 lines)
      From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nevashi recordings (33 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nevashi recordings (43 lines)
      From: James W. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nevashi recordings (45 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nevashi recordings (53 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nevashi recordings (44 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nevashi recordings (28 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nevashi recordings (62 lines)
      From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nevashi recordings (45 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>

19. OT Nasty human food product?
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (58 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (53 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (93 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (42 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (56 lines)
      From: Maxime Papillon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (80 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (39 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (47 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (41 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (51 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (48 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (55 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (84 lines)
      From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (33 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (45 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (56 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (40 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (51 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (72 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (23 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (93 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (58 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (41 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (54 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (45 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (50 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (174 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (133 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (78 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (47 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (166 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (69 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (152 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT Nasty human food product? (47 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

20. Paul Frommer
    • Re: Paul Frommer (72 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (55 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (57 lines)
      From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (74 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (72 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (84 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (62 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (65 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (94 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (67 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (92 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (102 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (70 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (51 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (58 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (68 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (41 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (47 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (90 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (50 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (80 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (36 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (65 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (70 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (26 lines)
      From: Jeffrey S. Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (73 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (36 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (91 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (56 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (141 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Paul Frommer (38 lines)
      From: Jeffrey S. Jones <[log in to unmask]>

21. POA question
    • POA question (30 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: POA question (43 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: POA question (54 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: POA question (55 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: POA question (39 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>

22. Round Robin Romlang
    • Round Robin Romlang (30 lines)
      From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (39 lines)
      From: Nevisand Chowdhury <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Round Robin Romlang (48 lines)
      From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>

23. susan day
    • susan day (25 lines)
      From: Alex Bicksler <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: susan day (36 lines)
      From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: susan day (53 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: susan day (48 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: susan day (52 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: susan day (30 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: susan day (61 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: susan day (31 lines)
      From: Alex Bicksler <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: susan day (64 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

24. Till Johan imorn?
    • Till Johan imorn? (30 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

25. Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer)
    • Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer) (72 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer) (82 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer) (29 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer) (61 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer) (59 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer) (59 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer) (52 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer) (71 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>

26. Translation: The four candles
    • Re: Translation: The four candles (44 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

27. What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?
    • Re: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language? (42 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language? (75 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language? (79 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language? (21 lines)
      From: Michael Wormley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language? (47 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

28. Where Are Your Keys? Language Learning Game
    • Where Are Your Keys? Language Learning Game (44 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Where Are Your Keys? Language Learning Game (55 lines)
      From: Andrew Quïnn <[log in to unmask]>

29. Who moderates comments on the LCS blog?
    • Who moderates comments on the LCS blog? (33 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who moderates comments on the LCS blog? (52 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who moderates comments on the LCS blog? (34 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who moderates comments on the LCS blog? (42 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who moderates comments on the LCS blog? (32 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who moderates comments on the LCS blog? (60 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Who moderates comments on the LCS blog? (51 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>