Conlang
Mailing List – April 2010, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(17 messages)
Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer))
(9 messages)
CHAT: Introducing myself.
(5 messages)
Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(20 messages)
Con-laws?
(9 messages)
Concivil planning
(9 messages)
Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(32 messages)
Dothraki: Tor.com interview with David and Sai
Ergative-marked agreement markers?
Ergativity and incorporation
(2 messages)
inability to produce alveolar trill
(6 messages)
licence/ license
(3 messages)
licence/ license (was: Paul Frommer)
(2 messages)
lyrics in invented words
(4 messages)
Melete: yet another sound change applier
(2 messages)
META: Conlang-L FAQ
Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(11 messages)
Nevashi recordings
(9 messages)
OT Nasty human food product?
(34 messages)
Paul Frommer
(31 messages)
POA question
(5 messages)
Round Robin Romlang
(3 messages)
susan day
(9 messages)
Till Johan imorn?
Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer)
(8 messages)
Translation: The four candles
What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?
(5 messages)
Where Are Your Keys? Language Learning Game
(2 messages)
Who moderates comments on the LCS blog?
(7 messages)
"Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(73 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(57 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(54 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(74 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(41 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(49 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(46 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(57 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(67 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(82 lines)
From:
David E <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(34 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(68 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(29 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(36 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Maximum semantic density" theory of customer service idiolects
(39 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer))
Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer))
(69 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer))
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer))
(57 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer))
(53 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer))
(62 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer))
(78 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer))
(39 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer))
(44 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Abacus vs. computer (was: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer))
(45 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Introducing myself.
CHAT: Introducing myself.
(50 lines)
From:
Lensman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Introducing myself.
(91 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Introducing myself.
(50 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Introducing myself.
(22 lines)
From:
Michael Wormley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Introducing myself.
(25 lines)
From:
Michael Wormley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(103 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(84 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(44 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(121 lines)
From:
Basilius <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(33 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(63 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(88 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(123 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(77 lines)
From:
Basilius <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(54 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(52 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(36 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(54 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(49 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(47 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(151 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(65 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(109 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
(102 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Con-laws?
Con-laws?
(29 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-laws?
(52 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-laws?
(38 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-laws?
(84 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-laws?
(62 lines)
From:
M.S. Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-laws?
(89 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-laws?
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-laws?
(29 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-laws?
(88 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Concivil planning
Concivil planning
(31 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concivil planning
(38 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concivil planning
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concivil planning
(39 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concivil planning
(48 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concivil planning
(39 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concivil planning
(63 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concivil planning
(36 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concivil planning
(53 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(128 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(60 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(75 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(63 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(44 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(52 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(62 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(62 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(69 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(61 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(78 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(37 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(47 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(43 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(31 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(54 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(65 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(42 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(53 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(45 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(82 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(55 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(45 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(56 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(67 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(46 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(79 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(52 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(58 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
(23 lines)
From:
Charlie Brickner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dothraki: Tor.com interview with David and Sai
Dothraki: Tor.com interview with David and Sai
(24 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ergative-marked agreement markers?
Ergative-marked agreement markers?
(40 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ergativity and incorporation
Re: Ergativity and incorporation
(182 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergativity and incorporation
(20 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
inability to produce alveolar trill
Re: inability to produce alveolar trill
(37 lines)
From:
Rag Tag Bunch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inability to produce alveolar trill
(75 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inability to produce alveolar trill
(61 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inability to produce alveolar trill
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inability to produce alveolar trill
(60 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inability to produce alveolar trill
(84 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
licence/ license
Re: licence/ license
(71 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: licence/ license
(44 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: licence/ license
(70 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
licence/ license (was: Paul Frommer)
licence/ license (was: Paul Frommer)
(71 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: licence/ license (was: Paul Frommer)
(53 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
lyrics in invented words
lyrics in invented words
(28 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: lyrics in invented words
(36 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: lyrics in invented words
(45 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: lyrics in invented words
(68 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Melete: yet another sound change applier
Re: Melete: yet another sound change applier
(58 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Melete: yet another sound change applier
(49 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
META: Conlang-L FAQ
META: Conlang-L FAQ
(275 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Most recognised contemporary conlangs
Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(54 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(58 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(63 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(65 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(54 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(34 lines)
From:
J. Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(49 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(58 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(41 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs
(44 lines)
From:
Ben Scerri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nevashi recordings
Nevashi recordings
(51 lines)
From:
M.S. Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nevashi recordings
(33 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nevashi recordings
(43 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nevashi recordings
(45 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nevashi recordings
(53 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nevashi recordings
(44 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nevashi recordings
(28 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nevashi recordings
(62 lines)
From:
M.S. Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nevashi recordings
(45 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Nasty human food product?
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(58 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(53 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(93 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(42 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(56 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(80 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(39 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(47 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(41 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(51 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(48 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(55 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(84 lines)
From:
Ben Scerri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(33 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(45 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(56 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(40 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(51 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(72 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(23 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(93 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(58 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(41 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(54 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(45 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(50 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(174 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(133 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(78 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(47 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(166 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(69 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(152 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Nasty human food product?
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Paul Frommer
Re: Paul Frommer
(72 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(55 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(57 lines)
From:
Chris Peters <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(74 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(72 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(84 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(62 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(65 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(94 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(67 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(92 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(102 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(70 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(51 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(58 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(68 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(41 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(47 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(90 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(50 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(80 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(65 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(70 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(26 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(73 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(36 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(91 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(56 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(141 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Paul Frommer
(38 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
POA question
POA question
(30 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POA question
(43 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POA question
(54 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POA question
(55 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: POA question
(39 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Round Robin Romlang
Round Robin Romlang
(30 lines)
From:
Calculator Ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round Robin Romlang
(39 lines)
From:
Nevisand Chowdhury <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Round Robin Romlang
(48 lines)
From:
Calculator Ftvb <
[log in to unmask]
>
susan day
susan day
(25 lines)
From:
Alex Bicksler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: susan day
(36 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: susan day
(53 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: susan day
(48 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: susan day
(52 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: susan day
(30 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: susan day
(61 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: susan day
(31 lines)
From:
Alex Bicksler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: susan day
(64 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Till Johan imorn?
Till Johan imorn?
(30 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer)
Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer)
(72 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer)
(82 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer)
(29 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer)
(61 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer)
(59 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer)
(59 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer)
(52 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Toki Pona's Evil Stepbrother. (WAS: Paul Frommer)
(71 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation: The four candles
Re: Translation: The four candles
(44 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?
Re: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?
(42 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?
(75 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?
(79 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?
(21 lines)
From:
Michael Wormley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?
(47 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Where Are Your Keys? Language Learning Game
Where Are Your Keys? Language Learning Game
(44 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Where Are Your Keys? Language Learning Game
(55 lines)
From:
Andrew Quïnn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Who moderates comments on the LCS blog?
Who moderates comments on the LCS blog?
(33 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Who moderates comments on the LCS blog?
(52 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Who moderates comments on the LCS blog?
(34 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Who moderates comments on the LCS blog?
(42 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Who moderates comments on the LCS blog?
(32 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Who moderates comments on the LCS blog?
(60 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Who moderates comments on the LCS blog?
(51 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – April 2010, week 4
Conlang Mailing List – April 2010, week 4
