Conlang Mailing List – April 2010, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• CHAT: Introducing myself. (9 messages)
• CHAT: Re: susan day
• Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (14 messages)
• Concivil planning
• Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
• I'm back! (4 messages)
• Linguistic Obituary (4 messages)
• Morphosyntactic allignment oddity
• Most recognised contemporary conlangs (2 messages)
• Naturalism of protolangs (was: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?)
• OT: TEST - Has the list been held?
• OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (10 messages)
• POA question (3 messages)
• Status of inverse relay 2? (Beware: links to spoilers!)
• susan day (3 messages)
• Till Johan imorn? (2 messages)
• What would happen to an oligosynthetic language? (3 messages)

1. CHAT: Introducing myself.
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (33 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:15:54 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (32 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:07:48 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (20 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:06:28 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (38 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:33:55 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (60 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:18:53 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (84 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 19:53:05 +0100
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (26 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:00:56 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (106 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:34:18 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (162 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:46:38 +0100

2. CHAT: Re: susan day
   • CHAT: Re: susan day (50 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:52:28 -0400

3. Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (48 lines)
     Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 00:13:25 +0000
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (152 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:26:28 -0700
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (75 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:32:17 -0700
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (81 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 20:04:27 +0000
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (80 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 20:15:10 +0100
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (122 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:03:15 -0700
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (88 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 06:54:21 +0100
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (43 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:52:21 -0700
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (57 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:04:31 +0000
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (51 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:35:22 -0700
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (69 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:17:26 +0200
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (101 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:46:14 +0100
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (212 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:44:01 +0100
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (56 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:45:18 +0100

4. Concivil planning
   • Re: Concivil planning (43 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:52:59 -0400

5. Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (58 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:49:37 +0200

6. I'm back!
   • Re: I'm back! (40 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:10:19 -0500
   • Re: I'm back! (75 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:41:37 +0300
   • Re: I'm back! (55 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:45:38 -0700
   • I'm back! (26 lines)
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:13:33 -0400

7. Linguistic Obituary
   • Re: Linguistic Obituary (30 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 22:54:23 -0400
   • Re: Linguistic Obituary (48 lines)
     Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 12:46:58 +1000
   • Re: Linguistic Obituary (38 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 22:31:29 -0400
   • Linguistic Obituary (24 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 22:28:52 -0400

8. Morphosyntactic allignment oddity
   • Morphosyntactic allignment oddity (61 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:32:29 +0100

9. Most recognised contemporary conlangs
   • Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (32 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 19:44:00 -0700
   • Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (57 lines)
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:32:08 -0400

10. Naturalism of protolangs (was: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?)
    • Naturalism of protolangs (was: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?) (57 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:04:00 +0200

11. OT: TEST - Has the list been held?
    • OT: TEST - Has the list been held? (40 lines)
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:01:13 +0200

12. OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!!
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (61 lines)
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:14:11 -0700
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (55 lines)
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:02:30 -0700
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (53 lines)
      Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 01:00:03 +0200
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (59 lines)
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:59:26 -0700
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (68 lines)
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:49:53 -0500
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (56 lines)
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:38:09 -0400
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (50 lines)
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:17:06 -0500
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (41 lines)
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 20:06:13 +0000
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (53 lines)
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:00:02 -0700
    • OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (35 lines)
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:51:47 -0500

13. POA question
    • Re: POA question (46 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:56:52 -0500
    • Re: POA question (61 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:54:09 -0700
    • Re: POA question (53 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:12:48 -0400

14. Status of inverse relay 2? (Beware: links to spoilers!)
    • Status of inverse relay 2? (Beware: links to spoilers!) (40 lines)
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:25:16 +0200

15. susan day
    • Re: susan day (61 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:09:13 -0700
    • Re: susan day (46 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:56:41 -0700
    • Re: susan day (77 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:49:41 -0400

16. Till Johan imorn?
    • Re: Till Johan imorn? (52 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:15:02 +0200
    • Re: Till Johan imorn? (38 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:45:37 +0100

17. What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?
    • Re: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language? (48 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:18:00 -0400
    • Re: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language? (41 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:22:58 +0300
    • Re: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language? (38 lines)
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:05:31 -0400