Conlang Mailing List – April 2010, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• CHAT: Introducing myself. (9 messages)
• CHAT: Re: susan day
• Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (14 messages)
• Concivil planning
• Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
• I'm back! (4 messages)
• Linguistic Obituary (4 messages)
• Morphosyntactic allignment oddity
• Most recognised contemporary conlangs (2 messages)
• Naturalism of protolangs (was: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?)
• OT: TEST - Has the list been held?
• OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (10 messages)
• POA question (3 messages)
• Status of inverse relay 2? (Beware: links to spoilers!)
• susan day (3 messages)
• Till Johan imorn? (2 messages)
• What would happen to an oligosynthetic language? (3 messages)

1. CHAT: Introducing myself.
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (162 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (106 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (26 lines)
     From: Michael Wormley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (84 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (60 lines)
     From: Michael Wormley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (38 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (20 lines)
     From: Michael Wormley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (32 lines)
     From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Introducing myself. (33 lines)
     From: Michael Wormley <[log in to unmask]>

2. CHAT: Re: susan day
   • CHAT: Re: susan day (50 lines)
     From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>

3. Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (56 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (212 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (101 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (69 lines)
     From: Claude Almansi <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (51 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (57 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (43 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (88 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (122 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (80 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (81 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (75 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (152 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (48 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>

4. Concivil planning
   • Re: Concivil planning (43 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>

5. Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer)
   • Re: Conlang canons (was: Paul Frommer) (58 lines)
     From: John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>

6. I'm back!
   • I'm back! (26 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: I'm back! (55 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: I'm back! (75 lines)
     From: Isaac Penziev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: I'm back! (40 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>

7. Linguistic Obituary
   • Linguistic Obituary (24 lines)
     From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Linguistic Obituary (38 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Linguistic Obituary (48 lines)
     From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Linguistic Obituary (30 lines)
     From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>

8. Morphosyntactic allignment oddity
   • Morphosyntactic allignment oddity (61 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

9. Most recognised contemporary conlangs
   • Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (57 lines)
     From: John Q <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (32 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

10. Naturalism of protolangs (was: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?)
    • Naturalism of protolangs (was: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?) (57 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

11. OT: TEST - Has the list been held?
    • OT: TEST - Has the list been held? (40 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

12. OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!!
    • OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (35 lines)
      From: Lensman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (53 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (41 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (50 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (56 lines)
      From: Harry Aspinwall <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (68 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (59 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (53 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (55 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (61 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

13. POA question
    • Re: POA question (53 lines)
      From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: POA question (61 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: POA question (46 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

14. Status of inverse relay 2? (Beware: links to spoilers!)
    • Status of inverse relay 2? (Beware: links to spoilers!) (40 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>

15. susan day
    • Re: susan day (77 lines)
      From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: susan day (46 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: susan day (61 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

16. Till Johan imorn?
    • Re: Till Johan imorn? (38 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Till Johan imorn? (52 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

17. What would happen to an oligosynthetic language?
    • Re: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language? (38 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language? (41 lines)
      From: Isaac Penziev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What would happen to an oligosynthetic language? (48 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>