Conlang Mailing List – May 2010, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (15 messages)
• A bit of nostalgia... (17 messages)
• Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (8 messages)
• Choose your own career in linguistics! (2 messages)
• Concivil planning
• Conlang list archive (2 messages)
• diachronic honorifics (11 messages)
• Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages (2 messages)
• Ergative-marked agreement markers? (3 messages)
• gjâ-zym-byn site update and captioned pictures
• Golden line in conlangs
• Grammar Nazis (5 messages)
• I'm back!
• Linguistic Obituary (15 messages)
• Ludmila (4 messages)
• Morphosyntactic allignment oddity
• Most recognised contemporary conlangs (2 messages)
• Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology (6 messages)
• OT & YAEPT : Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!!
• OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (14 messages)
• Relaxing noun classes (15 messages)
• Rick Harrison book giveaway
• Round Robins (4 messages)
• susan day
• The golden line in conlangs (28 messages)
• The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (11 messages)

1. "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages"
   • "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (27 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (73 lines)
     From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (38 lines)
     From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (58 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (71 lines)
     From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (66 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (100 lines)
     From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (35 lines)
     From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (57 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (72 lines)
     From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (49 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (48 lines)
     From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (76 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (81 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (31 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

2. A bit of nostalgia...
   • A bit of nostalgia... (61 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A bit of nostalgia... (42 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A bit of nostalgia... (43 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A bit of nostalgia... (55 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A bit of nostalgia... (40 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A bit of nostalgia... (65 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A bit of nostalgia... (47 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A bit of nostalgia... (87 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A bit of nostalgia... (93 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A bit of nostalgia... (48 lines)
     From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A bit of nostalgia... (60 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A bit of nostalgia... (75 lines)
     From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A bit of nostalgia... (43 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A bit of nostalgia... (61 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A bit of nostalgia... (32 lines)
     From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A bit of nostalgia... (40 lines)
     From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A bit of nostalgia... (61 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>

3. Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (178 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (68 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (93 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (66 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (69 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (64 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (132 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (408 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

4. Choose your own career in linguistics!
   • Choose your own career in linguistics! (23 lines)
     From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Choose your own career in linguistics! (38 lines)
     From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>

5. Concivil planning
   • Re: Concivil planning (25 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

6. Conlang list archive
   • Conlang list archive (31 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang list archive (37 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

7. diachronic honorifics
   • diachronic honorifics (39 lines)
     From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: diachronic honorifics (60 lines)
     From: Andrew Quïnn <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: diachronic honorifics (84 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: diachronic honorifics (85 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: diachronic honorifics (84 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: diachronic honorifics (57 lines)
     From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: diachronic honorifics (51 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: diachronic honorifics (50 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: diachronic honorifics (48 lines)
     From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: diachronic honorifics (42 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: diachronic honorifics (29 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

8. Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages
   • Re: Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages (42 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages (42 lines)
     From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>

9. Ergative-marked agreement markers?
   • Re: Ergative-marked agreement markers? (77 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ergative-marked agreement markers? (46 lines)
     From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ergative-marked agreement markers? (124 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

10. gjâ-zym-byn site update and captioned pictures
    • gjâ-zym-byn site update and captioned pictures (43 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

11. Golden line in conlangs
    • Golden line in conlangs (31 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

12. Grammar Nazis
    • Grammar Nazis (23 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammar Nazis (30 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammar Nazis (38 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammar Nazis (34 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammar Nazis (34 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

13. I'm back!
    • Re: I'm back! (42 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>

14. Linguistic Obituary
    • Re: Linguistic Obituary (40 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic Obituary (39 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic Obituary (45 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic Obituary (59 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic Obituary (32 lines)
      From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic Obituary (43 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic Obituary (51 lines)
      From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic Obituary (54 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic Obituary (51 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic Obituary (62 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic Obituary (38 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic Obituary (60 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic Obituary (55 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic Obituary (42 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic Obituary (41 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>

15. Ludmila
    • Ludmila (23 lines)
      From: Charlie Brickner <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ludmila (42 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ludmila (70 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ludmila (52 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>

16. Morphosyntactic allignment oddity
    • Re: Morphosyntactic allignment oddity (120 lines)
      From: Maxime Papillon <[log in to unmask]>

17. Most recognised contemporary conlangs
    • Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (42 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (39 lines)
      From: John Q <[log in to unmask]>

18. Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology
    • Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology (152 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology (231 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology (74 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology (89 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology (252 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology (62 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

19. OT & YAEPT : Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!!
    • OT & YAEPT : Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (50 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

20. OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!!
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (59 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (42 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (75 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (59 lines)
      From: Arnt Richard Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (57 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (50 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (52 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (53 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (60 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (97 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (43 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (56 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (49 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (61 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

21. Relaxing noun classes
    • Relaxing noun classes (46 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relaxing noun classes (101 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relaxing noun classes (39 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relaxing noun classes (46 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relaxing noun classes (53 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relaxing noun classes (54 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relaxing noun classes (68 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relaxing noun classes (46 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relaxing noun classes (59 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relaxing noun classes (67 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relaxing noun classes (54 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relaxing noun classes (46 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relaxing noun classes (24 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relaxing noun classes (56 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relaxing noun classes (49 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>

22. Rick Harrison book giveaway
    • Rick Harrison book giveaway (23 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

23. Round Robins
    • Round Robins (38 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Round Robins (39 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Round Robins (69 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Round Robins (44 lines)
      From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>

24. susan day
    • Re: susan day (49 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>

25. The golden line in conlangs
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (55 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (250 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (45 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (93 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (106 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (78 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (30 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (180 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (56 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (76 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (84 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (99 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (59 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (104 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (52 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (78 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (86 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (78 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (92 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (135 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (106 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (50 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (153 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (106 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (75 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (92 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (37 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (48 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>

26. The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? )
    • The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (93 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (92 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (83 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (56 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (102 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (61 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (64 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (59 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (68 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (56 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (67 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>